Locally Advanced Disease and Pelvic Exenterations

Local Recurrences in Rectal Cancer: MRI vs. CT

Rectal cancers are often considered a distinct disease from colon cancers as their survival and management are different. Particularly, the risk for local recurrence (LR) is greater than in colon cancer. There are many factors predisposing to LR such as postoperative histopathological features or the mesorectal plane of surgical resection. In addition, the pattern of LR in rectal cancer has a prognostic significance and an important role in the choice of operative approach and. Therefore, an optimal follow up based on imaging is critical in rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to analyse the risk and the pattern of local recurrences in rectal cancer and to provide an overview of the role of imaging in early detection of LRs. We performed a literature review of studies published on Web of Science and MEDLINE up to January 2023. We also reviewed the current guidelines of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Although the timing and the modality of follow-up is not yet established, the guidelines usually recommend a time frame of 5 years post surgical resection of the rectum. Computed Tomography (CT) scans and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are the main imaging techniques recommended in the follow-up of these patients. PET-CT is not recommended by guidelines during post-operative surveillance and it is generally used for problem solving.

Establishing a state-wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team meeting in South Australia

BACKGROUND

Pelvic exenteration surgery is complex, necessitating co-ordinated multidisciplinary input and improved referral pathways. A state-wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting was established in SA and the outcomes of this were audited and compared with historical data.

METHODS

All patients referred for discussion between August 2021 and July 2022 to the SA State-wide Pelvic Exenteration MDT were included in this study. MDT discussion centred around disease resectability, risk versus benefit of surgery, and need for local or interstate referral. Prospective data collection included patient demographics and MDT recommendations of surgery, palliation, or referral. Patients referred for surgery locally or interstate were compared with a retrospective patient cohort treated previously between January and December 2020.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, 91 patients were discussed (including nine multiple times), by a mean of 18 meeting participants each month. Forty-eight patients (58.5%) had primary malignancy, 25 (30.5%) recurrent malignancy, and 9 (11.0%) had non-malignant disease. Colorectal cancer was the most common presentation (56.1%), followed by gynaecological (30.5%) and urological (6.1%) malignancy. Pelvic exenteration surgery was recommended to be performed locally in 53.7% of patients and the remainder for non-surgical treatment, palliation, or re-discussion. During this time, 44 patients underwent surgery locally (versus 34 in 2020) and only 4 referred interstate (versus 8 in 2020).

CONCLUSION

The establishment of a dedicated state-wide pelvic exenteration MDT has resulted in better coordination of care for patients with locally advanced pelvic malignancy in SA, and significantly reduced the need for interstate referral.

Minimum standards of pelvic exenterative practice: PelvEx Collaborative guideline

This document outlines the important aspects of caring for patients who have been diagnosed with advanced pelvic cancer. It is primarily aimed at those who are establishing a service that adequately caters to this patient group. The relevant literature has been summarized and an attempt made to simplify the approach to management of these complex cases.

Practical Application of Augmented/Mixed Reality Technologies in Surgery of Abdominal Cancer Patients

The technology of augmented and mixed reality (AR/MR) is useful in various areas of modern surgery. We considered the use of augmented and mixed reality technologies as a method of preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation in abdominal cancer patients. Practical use of AM/MR raises a range questions, which demand suitable solutions. The difficulties and obstacles we encountered in the practical use of AR/MR are presented, along with the ways we chose to overcome them. The most demonstrative case is covered in detail. The three-dimensional anatomical model obtained from the CT scan needed to be rigidly attached to the patient’s body, and therefore an invasive approach was developed, using an orthopedic pin fixed to the pelvic bones. The pin is used both similarly to an X-ray contrast marker and as a marker for augmented reality. This solution made it possible, not only to visualize the anatomical structures of the patient and the border zone of the tumor, but also to change the position of the patient during the operation. In addition, a noninvasive (skin-based) marking method was developed that allows the application of mixed and augmented reality during operation. Both techniques were used (8 clinical cases) for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation, which allowed surgeons to verify the radicality of the operation, to have visual control of all anatomical structures near the zone of interest, and to reduce the time of surgical intervention, thereby reducing the complication rate and improving the rehabilitation period.

[Perioperative augmented reality technology in surgical treatment of locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer]

Rectal cancer occupies the leading position among cancers, and incidence of locally advanced recurrences is still high despite comprehensive treatment. Combined resections are usually associated with high perioperative risks. These procedures are technically complex interventions requiring further improvement. Virtual reality technology in surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer recurrence has not been widely discussed. The authors present multidisciplinary construction of the matched topographic-anatomical virtual model and virtual planning of the combined surgical intervention. Intraoperative use of augmented reality allowed specifying topographic and anatomical features of surgical area, level of vascular ligation, localization of tumor fixation points and resection borders. These data ensured safety and quality of resection. Further research of augmented reality technology and improvement of its technical aspects will improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with locally advanced pelvic tumors and recurrences.

Early enteral feeding is beneficial for patients after pelvic exenteration surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative feeding practices vary after pelvic exenteration surgery because of the lack of nutrition research in this specific surgical area. Postoperative ileus (POI) is common after pelvic exenteration surgery, and early enteral feeding is often avoided because of the lack of evidence and the belief that this may induce POI in this patient cohort. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of early enteral feeding after pelvic exenteration surgery on return of bowel movement and POI.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with patients undergoing pelvic exenteration surgery from November 2018 to June 2020. Forty participants received standard nutrition care (parenteral nutrition) and 47 participants received trophic enteral feeding (20 ml/h) via a nasogastric tube, in addition to standard care, until participants were upgraded to free fluids. Time to first bowel movement and rates of POI were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between arms for time to first bowel movement; however, POI rates were significantly less in participants who were enterally fed (P = .036) in the per-protocol analysis. Regressions showed that the longer patients were restricted from an oral diet after surgery, the greater the time was to first bowel movement and the greater the postoperative complication rates (P < .0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Early enteral feeding can be commenced safely to improve gastrointestinal function after pelvic exenteration surgery.

Locally recurrent rectal cancer: what the radiologist should know

Despite advances in surgical techniques and chemoradiation therapy, recurrent rectal cancer remains a cause of morbidity and mortality. After successful treatment of rectal cancer, patients are typically enrolled in a surveillance strategy that includes imaging as studies have shown improved prognosis when recurrent rectal cancer is detected during imaging surveillance versus based on development of symptoms. Additionally, patients who experience a complete clinical response with chemoradiation therapy may elect to enroll in a "watch-and-wait" strategy that includes imaging surveillance rather than surgical resection. Factors that increase the likelihood of recurrence, patterns of recurrence, and the imaging appearances of recurrent rectal cancer are reviewed with a focus on CT, PET CT, and MR imaging.