Low molecular weight heparin treatment for malignant melanoma: a pilot clinical trial

Preparation of chitosan nanoparticles for simultaneous drug delivery of dacarbazine and enoxaparin in melanoma

The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-melanoma and anti-angiogenic effects of enoxaparin surface-coated dacarbazine-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (Enox-Dac-Chi NPs). The prepared Enox-Dac-Chi NPs had a particle size of 367.95 ± 1.84 nm, zeta potential of -7.12 ± 0.25 mV, efficiency of drug loading (DL%) of 73.90 ± 3.84 %, and attached enoxaparin percentage of 98.53 ± 0.96 %. Both drugs had extended-release profiles and approximately 96 % of enoxaparin and 67 % dacarbazine were released within 8 h. The Enox-Dac-Chi NPs with IC₅₀ of 59.60 ± 1.25 μg/ml were the most cytotoxic against melanoma cancer cells compared with chitosan nanoparticles containing only dacarbazine (Dac-Chi NPs) and free dacarbazine. There was no significant difference between the cellular uptake of Chi NPs and enoxaparin coated Chi NPs (Enox-Chi NPs) in B16F10 cells. Enox-Chi NPs with an average anti-angiogenic score of 1.75 ± 0.125 had more anti-angiogenic effect than enoxaparin. The results showed that simultaneous delivery of dacarbazine and enoxaparin by chitosan nanoparticles can enhance the anti-melanoma effect of dacarbazine. Additionally, enoxaparin can prevent the melanoma metastasis by its anti-angiogenic activity. Thus, the designed nanoparticles can be introduced as effective drug delivery vehicles for the treatment and prevention of metastatic melanoma.

Parenteral anticoagulation in ambulatory patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation may improve survival in patients with cancer through a speculated anti-tumour effect, in addition to the antithrombotic effect, although may increase the risk of bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of parenteral anticoagulants in ambulatory patients with cancer who, typically, are undergoing chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy, but otherwise have no standard therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.

SEARCH METHODS

A comprehensive search included (1) a major electronic search (February 2016) of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2016, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1946 to February 2016; accessed via OVID) and Embase (1980 to February 2016; accessed via OVID); (2) handsearching of conference proceedings; (3) checking of references of included studies; (4) use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed and (5) a search for ongoing studies in trial registries. As part of the living systematic review approach, we are running searches continually and we will incorporate new evidence rapidly after it is identified. This update of the systematic review is based on the findings of a literature search conducted on 14 August, 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of parenteral anticoagulation in ambulatory patients with cancer. Typically, these patients are undergoing chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy, but otherwise have no standard therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Using a standardized form we extracted data in duplicate on study design, participants, interventions outcomes of interest, and risk of bias. Outcomes of interested included all-cause mortality, symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding, minor bleeding, and quality of life. We assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach (GRADE handbook).

MAIN RESULTS

Of 6947 identified citations, 18 RCTs fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These trials enrolled 9575 participants. Trial registries' searches identified nine registered but unpublished trials, two of which were labeled as 'ongoing trials'. In all included RCTs, the intervention consisted of heparin (either unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin). Overall, heparin appears to have no effect on mortality at 12 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.03; risk difference (RD) 10 fewer per 1000; 95% CI 35 fewer to 15 more; moderate certainty of evidence) and mortality at 24 months (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01; RD 8 fewer per 1000; 95% CI 31 fewer to 8 more; moderate certainty of evidence). Heparin therapy reduces the risk of symptomatic VTE (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.68; RD 30 fewer per 1000; 95% CI 36 fewer to 22 fewer; high certainty of evidence), while it increases in the risks of major bleeding (RR 1.30; 95% 0.94 to 1.79; RD 4 more per 1000; 95% CI 1 fewer to 11 more; moderate certainty of evidence) and minor bleeding (RR 1.70; 95% 1.13 to 2.55; RD 17 more per 1000; 95% CI 3 more to 37 more; high certainty of evidence). Results failed to confirm or to exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of heparin on thrombocytopenia (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.27; RD 33 fewer per 1000; 95% CI 66 fewer to 28 more; moderate certainty of evidence); quality of life (moderate certainty of evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Heparin appears to have no effect on mortality at 12 months and 24 months. It reduces symptomatic VTE and likely increases major and minor bleeding. Future research should further investigate the survival benefit of different types of anticoagulants in patients with different types and stages of cancer. The decision for a patient with cancer to start heparin therapy should balance the benefits and downsides, and should integrate the patient's values and preferences.Editorial note:This is a living systematic review. Living systematic reviews offer a new approach to review updating in which the review is continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence, as it becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.

D-dimers in malignant melanoma: Association with prognosis and dynamic variation in disease progress

Malignant cells elicit a chronic hemostatic activation in disease progress. This procoagulant activity does not only bear a risk for thromboembolism but also facilitates tumor growth and dissemination. An elevated plasma D-dimer level indicates an activated coagulation and fibrinolysis. In this study, the association of D-dimer levels with clinicopathological parameters and patients outcome in melanoma was investigated analyzing in total 533 melanoma patients retrospectively. Using the cut-off point of 0.6 mg/L D-dimer 145 of the total 533 patients (27.2%) were identified with elevated plasma D-dimer levels. This increased D-dimer level positively correlated with tumor thickness (p = 0.0003), lymph node invasion (p = 0.0004) and metastatic state (p <0.0001). To assess the association of D-dimer levels with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), long-rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model was performed. Univariate analyses revealed that elevated D-dimer levels were significantly associated with decreased PFS (HR:2.89, 95% CI (2.07-7.56), p < 0.0001) and OS (HR:2.22, 95% CI (1.06-4.57), p = 0.035). Moreover, multivariate analyses identified elevated D-dimer levels being associated with poor disease outcome (PFS:HR:2.47, 95% CI (1.23-4.98), p = 0.012; OS:HR:2.01, 95% CI (0.09-4.45), p = 0.087). Additionally, D-dimer levels were significantly increased in terminal stage patients when comparing plasma levels 0-8 versus 24-48 weeks before death (p = 0.0003). In summary, this study presents multiple evidence that elevated D-dimer levels in melanoma patients associate with poor prognosis and therefore plasma levels of D-dimers could reveal a more aggressive phenotype of melanoma and may guide the management of anti-melanoma treatment including the concept of an anti-coagulatory therapy in tumor patients.

Parenteral anticoagulation in ambulatory patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation may improve survival in patients with cancer through an antitumor effect in addition to the perceived antithrombotic effect.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of parenteral anticoagulants in ambulatory patients with cancer who, typically, are undergoing chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or radiotherapy, but otherwise have no standard therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.

SEARCH METHODS

A comprehensive search included (1) an electronic search (February 2013) of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2013; accessed via OVID) and EMBASE(1980 to February 2013; accessed via OVID); (2) handsearching of conference proceedings; (3) checking of references of included studies; (4) use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed and (5) a search for ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of parenteral anticoagulation in ambulatory patients with cancer. Typically, these patients are undergoing chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or radiotherapy, but otherwise have no standard therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Using a standardized form we extracted data in duplicate on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest including all-cause mortality, symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), arterial thrombosis (e.g. stroke, myocardial infarction), major bleeding, minor bleeding and quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 9559 identified citations, 15 RCTs fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These trials enrolled 7622 participants for whom follow-up data were available. In all included RCTs the intervention consisted of heparin (either unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin). Overall, heparin may have a small effect on mortality at 12 months and 24 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 1.01 and RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.00, respectively). Heparin therapy was associated with a statistically and clinically important reduction in venous thromboembolism (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.74) and a clinically important increase in the risk of minor bleeding (RR 1.32; 95% 1.02 to 1.71). Results failed to show or to exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of heparin on major bleeding (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.85) or quality of life. Our confidence in the effect estimates (i.e. quality of evidence) was high for symptomatic venous thromboembolism, moderate for mortality, major bleeding and minor bleeding, and low for quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Heparin may have a small effect on mortality at 12 months and 24 months. It is associated with a reduction in venous thromboembolism and a likely increase in minor bleeding. Future research should further investigate the survival benefit of different types of anticoagulants in patients with different types and stages of cancer. The decision for a patient with cancer to start heparin therapy for survival benefit should balance the benefits and downsides, and should integrate the patient's values and preferences.

Parenteral anticoagulation in patients with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation may improve survival in patients with cancer through an antitumor effect in addition to the perceived antithrombotic effect.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of parenteral anticoagulants in patients with cancer with no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A comprehensive search included (1) an electronic search (February 2010) of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 1, 2010, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI the Web of Science; (2) handsearch of conference proceedings; (3) checking of references of included studies; and (4) use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of parenteral anticoagulation in patients with cancer but no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Using a standardized form we extracted in duplicate data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest including all-cause mortality, symptomatic thromboembolism, major bleeding, minor bleeding and quality of life (QoL).

MAIN RESULTS

Of 8187 identified citations, nine RCTs enrolling 2857 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In all included RCTs the intervention consisted of heparin (either unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin). Overall, the effect of heparin therapy on mortality was not statistically significant at 12 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.93; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.02) but it was statistically significant at 24 months (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97). Heparin therapy was associated with a statistically and clinically important reduction in venous thromboembolism (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.82). There were no statistically significant effects on major bleeding (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.59 to 2.88), minor bleeding (RR 1.05; 95% 0.75 to 1.46) or QoL. The quality of evidence was high for symptomatic venous thromboembolism, moderate for mortality, major bleeding and minor bleeding, and low for QoL.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Heparin was associated with a significant reduction of death at 24 months but not 12 months. It was also associated with a reduction in venous thromboembolism but based on the RCTs in this review it had no significant effect on major bleeding, minor bleeding or QoL. Future research should further investigate the survival benefit of different types of anticoagulants in patients with different types and stages of cancer. The decision for a patient with cancer to start heparin therapy for survival benefit should balance the benefits and downsides and integrate the patient's values and preferences.

Simultaneous tissue factor expression and phosphatidylserine exposure account for the highly procoagulant pattern of melanoma cell lines

A correlation between cancer and hypercoagulability has been described for more than a century. Patients with cancer are at increased risk for thrombotic complications, and the clotting initiator protein, tissue factor (TF), is possibly involved in this process. In addition to TF, the presence of negatively charged phospholipids, particularly phosphatidylserine (PS), is necessary to support some of the blood-clotting reactions. There are few reports describing PS exposure by tumor cells. In this study, we characterized the procoagulant properties of the murine B16F10 and the human WM-266-4 melanoma cell lines. Flow cytometry analyses showed constitutive TF expression by both cell lines, in contrast to negative staining observed for the nontumorigenic melanocyte lineage, melan-A. In addition, tumor cells accelerate plasma clotting in a number-dependent manner. For WM-266-4, this ability was partially reversed by an anti-TF antibody but not by aprotinin, a nonspecific serine-protease inhibitor. Furthermore, flow-cytometric analyses showed the presence of PS at the outer leaflet of both cell lines. This phenomenon was determinant for the assembly of the intrinsic tenase (FIXa/FVIIIa) and prothrombinase (FXa/FVa) complexes, resulting in the activation of FX to FXa and prothrombin to thrombin, respectively. As a result, incubation of WM-266-4 with human plasma produces robust thrombin generation. In conclusion, simultaneous TF expression and PS exposure are responsible for the highly procoagulant pattern of the aggressive melanoma cell lines B16F10 and WM-266-4. Therefore, these cell lines might be regarded as useful models for studying the role of blood coagulation proteins in tumor biology.

Rationale and design of PROSPECT-CONKO 004: a prospective, randomized trial of simultaneous pancreatic cancer treatment with enoxaparin and chemotherapy)

Background

Advanced pancreatic cancer, in addition to its high mortality, is characterized by one of the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) as compared to other types of cancer. Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), has proven to be effective for the prevention and treatment of VTE in surgical and general medical patients. Results of some small studies suggest that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer, however, enoxaparin is not currently indicated for this use. This phase IIb study was designed to analyze the efficacy of enoxaparin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer undergoing systemic chemotherapy.

Methods

The aim of this prospective multicenter trial is to compare concomitant treatment with enoxaparin to no anticoagulation in 540 patients. Primary endpoint is the incidence of clinically relevant VTE (symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the leg and/or pelvic and/or pulmonary embolism (PE)) within the first 3 months. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE after 6, 9 and 12 months as well as remission at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, overall survival and bleeding. Trial registration: isrctn.org identifier CCT-NAPN-16752, controlled-trials.com identifier: ISRCTN02140505.

Results

An interim analysis for safety performed after inclusion of 152 patients revealed no increased risk of bleeding (5 pts vs. 6 pts, Chi²: 0.763).

Conclusion

PROSPECT is a pivotal study in elucidating the role of low molecular weight heparins in advanced pancreatic cancer. Its results will lead to a new understanding of the role of heparins in the prevention of venous thromboembolism and of their effect on survival, remission rates and toxicity of chemotherapeutic regimens.

Parenteral anticoagulation for prolonging survival in patients with cancer who have no other indication for anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Basic research and clinical studies have generated the hypothesis that anticoagulation may improve survival in patients with cancer through an antitumour effect in addition to the antithrombotic effect.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of heparin (including unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)) and fondaparinux to improve survival of patients with cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients including (1) A January 2007 electronic search of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI the Web of Science; (2) Hand search of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and of the American Society of Hematology; (3) Checking of references of included studies; and (4) Use of "related article" feature in PubMed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients without clinical evidence of venous thromboembolism comparing UFH, LMWH or fondaparinux to no intervention or placebo and RCTs comparing two of the three agents of interest.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Using a standardized form we extracted in duplicate data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest including all cause mortality, venous thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, major bleeding and minor bleeding.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 3986 identified citations five RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In all included RCTs the intervention consisted of heparin ( either UFH or LMWH). The overall methodological quality of the included studies was acceptable. Overall, heparin therapy was associated with a statistically and clinically significant survival benefit (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.91). In subgroup analyses, patients with limited small cell lung cancer experienced a clear survival benefit (HR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.83). The survival benefit was not statistically significant for either patients with extensive small cell lung cancer (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.06) or patients with advanced cancer (HR = 0.84; 95%: 0.68 to 1.03). The increased risk of bleeding with heparin was not statistically significant (RR = 1.78; 95% CI: 0.73 to 4.38).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Heparin has a survival benefit in cancer patients in general, and in patients with limited small cell lung cancer in particular. Heparin might be particularly beneficial in cancer patients with limited cancer or a longer life expectancy. Future research should investigate the survival benefit of different types of anticoagulants (in different dosing, schedules and duration of therapy) in patients with different types and stages of cancers.

Efficacy of anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors in cancer-induced thrombosis

The efficacy of anticoagulants, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), the antiplatelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, or combinations on cancer-activated thrombosis was determined using thromboelastography. The LMWHs tinzaparin and enoxaparin (0.179, 1.79, 17.9 microg) were incubated in human citrated whole blood (n = 4) and then activated by calcium chloride (11 mmol/l) or Colo205 (cell count 10). Concentrations of 9.9, 17.9 and 179 microg glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, XV454, and combinations with each LMWH were carried out and activated under the same conditions. The experiment was repeated with tissue factor substituting for the Colo205 to induce platelet/fibrin clot formation. Parameters tested in the thrombelastography analysis included clotting time, rate of clot formation due to fibrin formation, clot kinetics, and clot strength related to platelet count (maximum amplitude). Tinzaparin (1.79 microg), enoxaparin (1.79 microg), and XV454 (17.9 microg) significantly reduced the angle by 64, 26 and 27%, respectively, in cancer-induced clotting. Significant reductions in the maximum amplitude occurred in tinzaparin 1.79 microg (31%), enoxaparin 1.79 microg (11%), and XV454 17.9 microg (59%). An overall antithrombotic additive effect occurred when each LMWH (1.79 microg) was combined with XV454 (17.9 microg). The results between cancer-activated and tissue factor-activated blood were similar. The study concludes that an additive effect is present between LMWHs and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist in reducing cancer-mediated thrombosis.

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) increases the efficacy of cisplatinum plus gemcitabine combination in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

In this non-randomized study we aimed to assess the efficacy of the addition of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatinum (CDDP) combination chemotherapy on survival by prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 1999 and February 2004, 69 consecutive patients with APC were treated with GEM (800 mg/m2, day 1, day 8) plus CDDP (35 mg/m2, day 1, day 8) every 21 days +/-LMWH (nadroparine calcium, 2,850 IU/day until disease progression). Ten out of 35 patients in LMWH group and 10 out of 34 patients in chemotherapy alone group had primary inoperable locally advanced disease and the rest of the patients had metastatic disease.

RESULTS

Total response rate was 58.8% (11.7% CR) for the patients treated with LMWH and 12.1% for those treated without LMWH (P = 0.0001). LMWH group had a better median time to progression (TTP) and survival when compared to control group (7.3 vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.0001; 13.0 vs. 5.5 months, P = 0.0001). The toxicity was similar and acceptable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Addition of LMWH to GEM plus CDDP combination significantly improved the response and survival in patients with APC and the current schedule deserves to be tested in phase III trials.

The prophylaxis of venous thrombosis in patients with cancer undergoing major abdominal surgery: emerging options

Cancer is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This risk is amplified by treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. Thus, patients with cancer undergoing major surgery should receive appropriate prophylaxis. Available agents include low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and Factor Xa inhibitors. Recent data suggest that Factor Xa inhibitors are safe and effective for VTE prevention in patients with cancer undergoing abdominal surgery. Further study in this patient population is warranted.

Venous thromboembolism syndrome in gynecological cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) could be presented as an initial clinical feature in some cancer patients or a complication followed by various cancer treatments, which all indicates a poor outcome. This review focuses on elucidating the relationship of VTE and the main gynecological cancers including ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. First, the general VTE information about gynecological cancer are introduced; second, the risk factors of VTE developing in gynecological cancer were discussed; third, we do a retrospective analysis on a novel treatment targeting coagulation cascade; and last, we analyze VTE as a remarkable complication followed by recombinant human erythropoietin and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in gynecological cancer patients. In summary, the interaction between the coagulation system and cancer progression is a novel promising area to be explored in the study of VTE in patients with gynecological cancer.

Effect of anticoagulant drugs in cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to perform a critical analysis of all completed studies evaluating the role of anticoagulant agents in improving survival in patients with cancer. Furthermore, the rationale for testing anticoagulant drugs in this setting, and the recent basic research studies providing new evidence for a link between tissue malignant transformation of tissues and hemostatic proteins, are also briefly reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four prospective randomized clinical studies to test the impact of low-molecular-weight heparin on mortality in cancer patients have been published. The results suggest a benefit from treatment, particularly in patients with nonadvanced disease. Inhibition of specific clotting pathways by anticoagulants may be hypothesized, particularly those involved in the malignant behavior of tissues. In the same vein, a direct action of anticoagulants on mechanisms of tumor growth and progression can be considered.

SUMMARY

An antineoplastic effect of anticoagulant agents has often been suggested. Heparin and vitamin K antagonists have both been tested in this context. Heparin has been more extensively studied. Data from clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients have suggested that heparin may have beneficial effects on survival in these patients, with a major role for low-molecular-weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin. Recently, the results of new prospective randomized clinical trials to evaluate the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on cancer survival have become available. The published data look promising and provide an important step forward in the research knowledge in this field.

Platelet-Mimicry of Cancer Cells: Epiphenomenon with Clinical Significance

Stem cell mimicry of cancer cells has been known for a long time and is considered to be responsible for ectopic gene expressions. The stem cell characteristics of tumor cells are shown to be involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and in the phenomenon of vascular mimicry. Certain cancer types acquire a geno-phenotype closely resembling the platelets and express several megakaryocytic genes (adhesion receptors alpha IIb beta 3, thrombin receptor and PECAM/CD 31 and/or platelet-type 12-LOX) able to activate the coagulation cascade or the platelets themselves. Here we define these potentials as platelet mimicry of cancer cells typical of pancreatic, breast, prostate, colorectal and urogenital cancers and melanoma. Data all support that platelet mimicry of certain cancer types is an important factor in their hematogenous dissemination and provides an attractive therapeutic target. Besides the long-available preclinical data, clinical trials have only recently provided evidence that targeting platelet mimicry of cancers is an efficient way to prevent tumor progression. The systematic discovery of the markers of platelet mimicry in various cancer types and their molecular targeting may provide new supportive therapeutic modalities for the management of the progressing disease.

Ovarian cancer, the coagulation pathway, and inflammation

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) represents the most frequent cause of death in the United States from a cancer involving the female genital tract. Contributing to the overall poor outcome in EOC patients, are the metastases to the peritoneum and stroma that are common in this cancer. In one study, cDNA microarray analysis was performed on fresh tissue to profile gene expression in patients with EOC. This study showed a number of genes with significantly altered expression in the pelvic peritoneum and stroma, and in the vicinity of EOC implants. These genes included those encoding coagulation factors and regulatory proteins in the coagulation cascade and genes encoding proteins associated with inflammatory responses. In addition to promoting the formation of blood clots, coagulation factors exhibit many other biologic functions as well as tumorigenic functions, the later including tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Coagulation pathway proteins involved in tumorigenesis consist of factor II (thrombin), thrombin receptor (protease-activated receptors), factor III (tissue factor), factor VII, factor X and factor I (fibrinogen), and fibrin and factor XIII. In a recent study we conducted, we found that factor XII, factor XI, and several coagulation regulatory proteins, including heparin cofactor-II and epithelial protein C receptor (EPCR), were also upregulated in the peritoneum of EOC. In this review, we summarize evidence in support of a role for these factors in promoting tumor cell progression and the formation of ascites. We also discuss the different roles of coagulation factor pathways in the tumor and peritumoral microenvironments as they relate to angiogenesis, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Since inflammatory responses are another characteristic of the peritoneum in EOC, we also discuss the linkage between the coagulation cascade and the cytokines/chemokines involved in inflammation. Interleukin-8, which is considered an important chemokine associated with tumor progression, appears to be a linkage point for coagulation and inflammation in malignancy. Lastly, we review findings regarding the inflammatory process yielded by certain clinical trials of agents that target members of the coagulation cascade in the treatment of cancer. Current data suggest that disrupting certain elements of the coagulation and inflammation processes in the tumor microenvironment could be a new biologic approach to cancer therapeutics.

Antitumor and antimetastatic effect of warfarin and heparins

Experimental and clinical studies have shown an anticancer effect of anticoagulant drugs. The aim of this study is to review the mechanisms by which the common types of anticoagulants influence the primary tumor and metastatic processes of solid tumors. The review evaluates the interference of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin on the growth of primary tumors and on the development of metastases. The first part of the review evaluates the effect on the growth and development of primary tumors. Attention is paid to the interference with proliferation of cancer cells, tumor angiogenesis and to the interference with the immune system. The second part of the review describes the metastatic process and the effect of anticoagulants on the cell motility and cancer cell adhesion. The third part refers to the outcomes of clinical studies with anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer. The problem of thromboembolic disease in patients with advanced cancer is also mentioned. The anticoagulants are more effective in inhibition of stages of the metastatic cascade than in the influence on primary tumors. They can interfere with tumor angiogenesis, immunity system, cancer cell motility and adhesion. The first clinical trials showed an effect on the development of primary tumors and survival of patients namely with lung cancer.

Low-molecular-weight heparins in thrombosis and cancer: emerging links

Heparin as well as low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have polypharmacological actions at various levels. Earlier studies focused on the plasma anti-Xa and anti-IIa pharmacodynamics (PD) for the different LMWHs. Other important PD parameters for heparin and LMWHs might explain the diverse clinical impacts of this class of agents in thrombosis and beyond: the release of the vascular tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), inhibition of key matrix-degrading enzymes, and other mechanisms. There is much evidence for the key role of LMWHs in hypercoagulation in thrombosis and cancer, angiogenesis, and inflammatory disorders. Many cancer patients reportedly have a hypercoaguable state, with recurrent thrombosis due to the impact of cancer cells and chemotherapy or radiotherapy on the coagulation cascade. Studies have demonstrated that unfractionated heparin (UFH) or its low molecular weight fractions interfere with various processes involved in tumor growth and metastasis. Clinical trials have suggested a clinically relevant and improved efficacy of LMWHs, as compared to UFH, on the survival of cancer patients with deep vein thrombosis. Our laboratory has demonstrated a significant role for LMWHs and for LMWH-releasable TFPI on the regulation of angiogenesis, tumor growth, and tumor metastasis; we have also seen potent inhibition of matrix-degrading enzymes by LMWHs but not by TFPI. The antiangiogenesis effect of LMWHs or non-anticoagulant LMWH derivatives was shown to be reversed by anti-TFPI. Thus, modulation of tissue factor/VIIa noncoagulant activities by LMWH-releasable TFPI and the inhibitory effects on matrix-degrading enzymes beside the anticoagulant efficacy have provided an expanded clinical utility for LMWHs in angiogenesis-associated disorders, including human tumor growth and metastasis.

Antithrombotic therapy and cancer

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To assess the current evidence from recent clinical trials investigating antithrombotic agents for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients and for the effects of these agents on cancer progression.

RECENT FINDINGS

A growing body of evidence supports the preventive use of antithrombotic strategies in subgroups of cancer patients. Moreover, in the long-term management of deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients, low-molecular-weight heparin seems to represent a valid alternative to vitamin K antagonists. Finally, several studies have claimed a direct anticancer activity and a positive impact on prognosis of some antithrombotic agents, eg, aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin.

SUMMARY

Although recent evidence suggests low-molecular-weight heparin as a possible option in the management and prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, more evidence from large randomized, prospective, controlled trials is needed to determine the exact the magnitude of the risk-benefit ratio associated with its use. The promising results on the effects of antithrombotic agents in the prognosis of cancer patients deserve further evaluation to estimate the potential and the feasibility of this approach.