Pharmacodynamics and Tolerance of Two Nadroparin Formulations (10,250 and 20,500 Anti Xa IU·ml-1) Delivered for 10 Days at Therapeutic Dose

How I treat venous thromboembolism in pregnancy

One to 2 pregnant women in 1000 will experience venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy or postpartum. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of maternal mortality, and deep vein thrombosis leads to maternal morbidity, with postthrombotic syndrome potentially diminishing quality of life for a woman's lifetime. However, the evidence base for pregnancy-related VTE management remains weak. Evidence-based guideline recommendations are often extrapolated from nonpregnant women and thus weak or conditional, resulting in wide variation of practice. In women with suspected PE, the pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm is safe and efficient, rendering computed tomographic pulmonary angiography to rule out PE unnecessary in 39%. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in therapeutic doses is the treatment of choice during pregnancy, and anticoagulation (LMWH or vitamin K antagonists [VKAs]) should be continued until 6 weeks after delivery, with a 3-month minimum total duration. LMWH or VKA use does not preclude breastfeeding. Postpartum, direct oral anticoagulants are an option if a woman does not breastfeed and long-term use is intended. Management of delivery, including type of analgesia, requires a multidisciplinary approach and depends on local preferences and patient-specific conditions. Several options are possible, including waiting for spontaneous delivery with temporary LMWH interruption. Prophylaxis for recurrent VTE prevention in subsequent pregnancies is indicated in most women with a history of VTE.

High-dose Intravenous Dalteparin Can be Monitored Effectively Using Standard Coagulation Times

The objective of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of intravenous dalteparin (Fragmin, Pharmacia-Upjohn, Peapack, NJ) and to assess the accuracy of standard coagulation-based monitoring techniques as an estimate of drug concentration with which to guide dosing. Knowledge of the kinetic behavior of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and the possible utility of coagulation times for monitoring may aid in the development of safe and effective dosing algorithms for percutaneous coronary interventions. Twenty normal volunteers were treated at 2-week intervals with each of three intravenous dalteparin doses. Measurement of anti-IIa, anti-Xa, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), activated clotting time (ACT), and low-range ACT was performed at baseline and at seven additional time points over 8 hours. The half-life of intravenous dalteparin is 77 minutes with slight dose-related variation. The aPTT, LR-ACT, and standard ACT are prolonged after dalteparin administration with the increase closely correlated to anti-Xa activity (aPTT, r = 0.85; LR-ACT, r = 0.79). Classification of anticoagulation intensity range using aPTT or LR-ACT in comparison to anti-Xa activity (0.5-0.99, 1.0-1.49, 1.5-2, >2) displays a level of agreement (kappa: aPTT = 0.69, LR-ACT = 0.59) that is comparable to values reported for coagulation time guidance of unfractionated heparin administration. Standard coagulation times are sensitive to the anticoagulant effect of dalteparin with a degree of correlation that suggests their utility for estimating drug concentration during high dose therapy. Trials establishing a relationship between monitoring and clinical efficacy, and the risk/reward of different treatment ranges alone or in combination with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel, are necessary.

Once versus twice daily low molecular weight heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

In the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is administered once or twice daily. A once daily treatment regimen is more convenient for the patient and may optimise home treatment. However, it is not clear whether a once daily treatment regimen is as safe and effective as a twice daily treatment regimen. This is the second update of a review first published in 2003.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of once daily versus twice daily administration of LMWH.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched May 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 4).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials in which LMWH given once daily is compared with LMWH given twice daily for the initial treatment of VTE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies were included with a total of 1508 participants. The pooled data showed no statistically significant difference in recurrent VTE between the two treatment regimens (OR 0.82, 0.49 to 1.39; P = 0.47). A comparison of major haemorrhagic events (OR 0.77, 0.40 to 1.45; P = 0.41), improvement of thrombus size (OR 1.41, 0.66 to 3.01; P = 0.38) and mortality (OR 1.14, 0.62 to 2.08; P = 0.68) also showed no statistically significant differences between the two treatment regimens. None of the five included studies reported data on post-thrombotic syndrome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Once daily treatment with LMWH is as effective and safe as twice daily treatment with LMWH.

Anti-Xa Levels 4 h After Subcutaneous Administration of 5,700 IU Nadroparin Strongly Correlate with Lean Body Weight in Morbidly Obese Patients

BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients (BMI > 40 kg/m(2)) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism, especially after surgery. Despite limited evidence, morbidly obese patients are often administered a double dose of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis compared to non-obese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different body size descriptors on anti-Xa levels after a double dose of nadroparin (5,700 IU) in morbidly obese patients. METHODS: In 27 morbidly obese patients with a mean total body weight of 148 kg (range 107-260 kg), anti-Xa levels were determined peri-operatively until 24 h after administration of a subcutaneous dose of 5,700 IU of nadroparin. RESULTS: Anti-Xa level 4 h after administration (A(4h), mean 0.22 ± 0.07 IU/ml) negatively correlated strongly with lean body weight (r = -0.66 (p < 0.001)) and moderately with total body weight (r = -0.56 (p = 0.003)) and did not correlate with body mass index (r = -0.26 (p = 0.187)). The area under the anti-Xa level-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUA(0-24h), mean 2.80 ± 0.97 h IU/ml) correlated with lean body weight (r = -0.63 (p = 0.007)), but did not correlate with total body weight (r = -0.44 (p = 0.075)) or body mass index (r = -0.10 (p = 0.709)). CONCLUCIONS: Following a subcutaneous dose of nadroparin 5,700 IU, A(4h) and AUA(0-24h) were found to negatively correlate strongly with lean body weight. From these results, individualized dosing of nadroparin based on lean body weight should be considered in morbidly obese patients.

How I treat pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates ∼ 1 to 2 of 1000 pregnancies, with pulmonary embolism being a leading cause of maternal mortality and deep vein thrombosis an important cause of maternal morbidity, also on the long term. However, a strong evidence base for the management of pregnancy-related VTE is missing. Management is not standardized between physicians, centers, and countries. The management of pregnancy-related VTE is based on extrapolation from the nonpregnant population, and clinical trial data for the optimal treatment are not available. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in therapeutic doses is the treatment of choice during pregnancy, and anticoagulation (LMWH or vitamin K antagonists postpartum) should be continued until 6 weeks after delivery with a minimum total duration of 3 months. Use of LMWH or vitamin K antagonists does not preclude breastfeeding. Whether dosing should be based on weight or anti-Xa levels is unknown, and practices differ between centers. Management of delivery, including the type of anesthesia if deemed necessary, requires a multidisciplinary approach, and several options are possible, depending on local preferences and patient-specific conditions.

Once versus twice daily LMWH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

In the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is administered once or twice daily. A once daily treatment regimen is more convenient for the patient and may optimise home treatment. However, it is not clear whether a once daily treatment regimen is as safe and effective as a twice daily treatment regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of once daily versus twice daily administration of LMWH.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through searching the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group (last searched April 2005), the Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) (last searched Issue 2, 2005), handsearches of relevant journals, checking cross-references and through personal communication with experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials in which LMWH given once daily is compared to LMWH given twice daily for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies were included with a total of 1508 participants. The pooled data showed a statistically non-significant difference in recurrent venous thromboembolism between the two treatment regimens (OR 0.82, 0.49 to 1.39). A comparison of major haemorrhagic events (OR 0.77, 0.40 to 1.45) and mortality (OR 1.14, 0.62 to 2.08) also showed a statistically non-significant difference between the two treatment regimens.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Once daily treatment with LMWH is as effective and safe as twice daily treatment with LMWH. However, the 95% confidence interval implies that there is a possibility that the risk of recurrent VTE might be higher when people are treated once daily. Hence, the decision to treat a person with a once daily regimen will depend on the evaluated balance between increased convenience and the potential for a lower efficacy.

Once versus twice daily LMWH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

In the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is administered once or twice daily. A once daily treatment regimen is more convenient for the patient and may optimise home treatment. However it is not clear whether a once daily treatment regimen is as safe and effective as a twice daily treatment regimen.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of once daily administration to a twice daily administration of LMWH.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group (last searched May 2001), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR/CENTRAL) (last searched Issue 1, 2002), by hand-searching other relevant journals, by checking cross-references and through personal communication with experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials in which a once daily treatment regimen with LMWH is compared to a twice daily regimen in the initial treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trials on criteria for inclusion and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies were included with a total of 1508 patients. The pooled data showed a statistically non-significant difference in recurrent venous thromboembolism between the two treatment regimens (OR 0.82; 0.49 - 1.39). A comparison of major haemorrhagic events (OR 0.77; 0.40 - 1.45) and mortality (OR 1.14; 0.62 - 2.08) also showed a statistically non-significant difference between the two treatment regimens.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Once daily treatment with LMWH is as effective and safe as twice daily treatment with LMWH. However, the 95% confidence interval implies that there is a possibility that the risk of recurrent VTE might be higher when patients are treated once daily. Hence the decision to treat the patient with a once daily regimen will depend on the evaluated balance between increased convenience and the potential for a lower efficacy.

The pharmacodynamics of tinzaparin in healthy volunteers

We report the pharmacodynamic properties of tinzaparin (175 U/kg antifactor Xa) given as a single daily administration for 5 consecutive days to 14 healthy volunteers as a known safe, effective treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Cmax for antifactor Xa (0.87 +/- 0.15 U/ml) was associated with a 2.4 +/- 0.5-fold prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and a high antithrombin activity (0.38 +/- 0.1 U/ml). The Cmax value of antifactor Xa was 1.5- and twofold lower than those generated by similar doses of nadroparin and enoxaparin respectively. The clearance of antifactor Xa activity (1.29 +/- 0.2 l/h) was 1.5- and twofold greater than those reported for nadroparin and enoxaparin respectively. These results indicated that the antithrombotic and prohaemorrhagic effects of a low molecular weight heparin were independent from the absolute levels of antifactor Xa activities and from the prolongation of the APTT.

Markers of hemostatic system activation during treatment of deep vein thrombosis with subcutaneous unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin

Prothrombin fragments (F1+2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D-dimers, markers of hemostatic system activation, were measured in 59 consecutive patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients were randomly treated either with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UH) administered in two to three subcutaneous doses adjusted to activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (dalteparin) administered in a fixed dose of 200 IU/kg body weight in one subcutaneous injection daily. Before treatment, F1+2, TAT and D-dimer were above the cut-off level in 27/59 (46%), 34/59 (58%) and all (100%) patients, respectively. Significant associations were observed between F1+2 and TAT (r=.66, P<.001), TAT and D-dimer (r=.36, P<.005) and F1+2 and D-dimer (r=.30, P<.050). On the third day of treatment, F1+2 and TAT significantly decreased to reference values in almost all patients (in 64/66 determinations of both F1+2 and TAT) and remained low on the seventh day of treatment. Compared to pretreatment values, a nonsignificant decrease of D-dimer was noted in both groups, but all values remained above the cut-off value. When markers of hemostatic system activation in the UH and LMWH groups were compared, no significant differences were observed. It was concluded that subcutaneous UH in an APTT-adjusted dose and subcutaneous LMWH in a once-daily weight-adjusted dose controlled these markers of hemostatic system activation in a similar manner.

Low molecular weight heparin versus oral anticoagulants in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) could be equal or more effective than conventional oral anticoagulants (OAs) in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

One hundred fifty-eight patients with symptomatic DVT of the lower limbs confirmed by means of duplex ultrasound scan were randomized to receive 3 to 6 months' treatment with nadroparine calcium or acenocoumarol. Quantitative and qualitative duplex scan scoring systems were used to study the evolution of thrombosis in both groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

During the 12-month surveillance period, two (2.5%) of the 81 patients who received LMWH and seven (9%) of the 77 patients who received OAs had recurrence of venous thrombosis (not significant). In the LMWH group no cases of major bleeding were found, and four cases (5.2%) occurred in the OA group (not significant). The mortality rate was nine (11.1%) in the LMWH group and 7.8% in the OA group (not significant). The quantitative mean duplex scan score decreased in both groups during the follow-up and had statistical significance after long-term LMWH treatment on iliofemoral DVT (1, 3, 6, and 12 months), femoropopliteal DVT (1-3 months), and infrapopliteal DVT (first month). Duplex scan evaluation showed that the rate of venous recanalization significantly increased in the common femoral vein at 6 and at 12 months and during each point of follow-up in the superficial and popliteal veins in the LMWH group. Reflux was significantly less frequent in communicating veins after LMWH treatment (17.9% vs 32.2% in the OA group). The reflux rates in the superficial (22.4% in the LMWH group, 30.6% in OA group) and deep (13.4% vs 17.7%) venous system showed no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The unmonitored subcutaneous administration of nadroparine in fixed daily doses was more effective than oral acenocoumarol with laboratory control adjustment in achieving recanalization of leg thrombi. With nadroparine, there was less late valvular communicating vein insufficiency, and it was at least as efficacious and safe as oral anticoagulants after long-term administration. These results suggest that LMWHs may therefore represent a real therapeutic advance in the long-term management of DVT.