Anatomical accuracy of interactive and automated rigid registration between X-ray CT and FDG-PET

Anatomical accuracy of abdominal lesion localization

Software-based image registration can improve the diagnostic value of imaging procedures and is an alternative to hybrid scanners. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical accuracy of automatic rigid image registration of independently acquired datasets of positron emission tomography with 18F-deoxyglucose and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging. Patients, methods: Analyses were performed on 28 abdominal lesions from 20 patients. The PET data were obtained using a stand-alone PET camera in 14 cases and a hybrid PET/CT scanner in 9 cases. The abdominal T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans were acquired on 1.5 T MRI scanners. The mean time interval between MRI and PET was 7.3 days (0–28 days). Automatic rigid registration was carried out using a self-developed registration tool integrated into commercial available software (InSpace for Siemens Syngo). Distances between the centres of gravity of 28 manually delineated neoplastic lesions represented in PET and MRI were measured in X-, Y-, and Z-direction. The intra- (intraclass correlation 0.94) and inter- (intraclass correlation 0.86) observer repeatability were high. Results: The average distance in all MRI sequences was 5.2 ± 7.6 mm in X-direction, 4.0 ± 3.7 mm in Y-direction and 6.1 ± 5.1 mm in Z-direction. There was a significantly higher misalignment in Z-direction (p < 0.05). The misalignment was not significantly different for the registration of T1- and T2- weighted sequences (p = 0.7). Conclusion: The misalignment between FDG-PET and abdominal MRI registered using an automated rigid registration tool was comparable to data reported for software-based fusion between PET and CT. Although this imprecision may not affect diagnostic accuracy, it is not sufficient to allow for pixel-wise integration of MRI and PET information.

Computer-aided evaluation of the anatomical accuracy of hybrid SPECT/spiral-CT imaging of lesions localized in the neck and upper abdomen

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical accuracy of hardware-based single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) registration in the upper abdomen and neck.

METHODS

The database consisted of 90 patients referred for SPECT/CT for diagnostic workup of either thyroid/parathyroid disease (n=46) or abdominal neuroendocrine tumours (n=44). In the first group, 99mTc-MIBI was used as the tracer and in the second 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (n=13), 111In-octreotide (n=28) or 99mTc-octreotide (n=3). For predefined structures represented by both modalities, the distances between the centres of gravity of their CT and SPECT representation were determined in a semiautomated manner. In cervical data sets, this analysis was performed for the submandibular salivary glands (n=92) and in abdominal data sets for 69 neoplastic foci.

RESULTS

The mean distances were 5.7 ± 2.0 mm (range: 1.84-9.67 mm) in the neck and 6.8 ± 3.3 mm (range: 1.4-19.7 mm) in the abdomen. In 42 out of 92 of the cervical and 40 out of 69 of the abdominal data sets at least one of the X-direction-determined, Y-direction-determined, and Z-direction-determined distances was greater than the SPECT pixel width of 4.6 mm.

CONCLUSION

The anatomical accuracy of hardware-based SPECT/CT fusion depends also on the region of the body studied. For example, in the neck and upper abdomen the accuracy is lower than in the lower lumbar spine. In clinical routine, SPECT/CT data sets acquired for the neck and upper abdomen should be regularly checked and corrected for SPECT/CT misalignment. This is, in particular, important when CT-based corrections of SPECT involving pixelwise data integration such as for attenuation correction are made.

Diagnostic value of software-based image fusion of computed tomography and F18-FDG PET scans in patients with malignant lymphoma

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and software-based image fusion of both modalities in the imaging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD).

METHODS

77 patients with NHL (n = 58) or HD (n = 19) underwent a FDG PET scan, a contrast-enhanced CT, and a subsequent digital image fusion during initial staging or followup. 109 examinations of each modality were evaluated and compared to each other. Conventional staging procedures, other imaging techniques, laboratory screening, and follow-up data constituted the reference standard for comparison with image fusion. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for CT and PET separately.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity for detecting malignant lymphoma were 90% and 76% for CT and 94% and 91% for PET, respectively. A lymph node region-based analysis (comprising 14 defined anatomical regions) revealed a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 97% for CT and 96% and 99% for FDG PET, respectively. Only three of 109 image fusion findings needed further evaluation (false positive).

CONCLUSION

Digital fusion of PET and CT improves the accuracy of staging, restaging, and therapy monitoring in patients with malignant lymphoma and may reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures.

Molecular imaging of malignant tumor metabolism: whole-body image fusion of DWI/CT vs. PET/CT

PURPOSE

To prospectively investigate the technical feasibility and performance of image fusion for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (wbDWI) and computed tomography (CT) to detect metastases using hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) as reference standard.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients (60 ± 14 years; 18 women) with different malignant tumor disease examined by PET/CT for clinical reasons consented to undergo additional wbDWI at 1.5 Tesla. WbDWI was performed using a diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging during free breathing. Images at b = 0 s/mm(2) and b = 700 s/mm(2) were acquired and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated. Image fusion of wbDWI and CT (from PET/CT scan) was performed yielding for wbDWI/CT fused image data. One radiologist rated the success of image fusion and diagnostic image quality. The presence or absence of metastases on wbDWI/CT fused images was evaluated together with the separate wbDWI and CT images by two different, independent radiologists blinded to results from PET/CT. Detection rate and positive predictive values for diagnosing metastases was calculated. PET/CT examinations were used as reference standard.

RESULTS

PET/CT identified 305 malignant lesions in 39 of 52 (75%) patients. WbDWI/CT image fusion was technically successful and yielded diagnostic image quality in 73% and 92% of patients, respectively. Interobserver agreement for the evaluation of wbDWI/CT images was κ = 0.78. WbDWI/CT identified 270 metastases in 43 of 52 (83%) patients. Overall detection rate and positive predictive value of wbDWI/CT was 89% (95% CI, 0.85-0.92) and 94% (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), respectively.

CONCLUSION

WbDWI/CT image fusion is technically feasible in a clinical setting and allows the diagnostic assessment of metastatic tumor disease detecting nine of 10 lesions as compared with PET/CT.