Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Splint versus Immediate Mobilization

Distal Radius Fracture Rehabilitation

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is arguably the most common upper extremity fracture resulting from a fall accident. These clinical practice guidelines (CPG) were developed to guide all aspects of the management of DRF by physical therapists and other rehabilitation practitioners, such as certified hand therapists. This CPG employed a systematic review methodology to locate, appraise, and synthesize contemporary evidence while developing practice recommendations for determining the prognosis of outcomes, examination, and interventions while managing individuals with DRF. The quality of the primary studies found in the literature search was appraised using standardized tools. The strength of the available evidence for a particular practice domain (e.g., prognosis or intervention) was graded as strong, moderate, weak, or conflicting, where such gradings guided the level of obligation for each practice recommendation. Lastly, the CPG also provided the gaps in the evidence pool for the rehabilitation of DRF that future research efforts can address. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(9):CPG1-CPG78. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.0301.

Validation of Temperature Sensors to Monitor Thermoplastic Splint Wear in Hand Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to validate the use of temperature sensors to accurately measure thermoplastic volar forearm splint wear in a healthy cohort of volunteers using 5- and 15-minute temperature measurement intervals.

METHODS

A prospective diagnostic study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of temperature sensors in monitoring splint wear in 8 healthy volunteers between December 2022 and June 2023. Temperature sensors were molded into thermoplastic volar forearm splints. Volunteers who were familiar with the study aims were asked to keep an exact log of the time spent wearing the splint ("actual wear time"). Sensors recorded temperatures every 5 or 15 minutes, and separate algorithms were developed to determine the sensor-detected wear time compared with the actual wear time as the gold standard. The algorithms were then externally validated with the total population.

RESULTS

The 5-minute and 15-minute algorithms demonstrated excellent sensitivity (99.1% vs 96.6%), specificity (99.9% vs 99.9%), positive (99.4% vs 99.5%) and negative (99.9% vs 99.3%) predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy (99.8% vs 99.3%), respectively. The 5-minute algorithm recorded 99.5% of the total splint hours, whereas the 15-minute algorithm recorded 96.1%. There was no significant difference between the actual time per wear session (5.4 ± 2.7 hours) and the time estimated by the 5-minute algorithm (5.4 ± 2.6 hours; P = .40), but there was a significant difference for the 15-minute algorithm (5.2 ± 2.6 hours; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Temperature sensors can be used to accurately monitor thermoplastic volar forearm splint wear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Rehabilitation after Distal Radius Fractures: Opportunities for Improvement

Background  Exercises are frequently prescribed to regain function; yet there is no consensus on a standardized protocol, and adherence is low. Smart technology innovations, such as mobile applications, may be useful to provide home-based patient support in rehabilitation after distal radius fractures. Purposes  Our purpose was to establish the potential of digital innovations for support and monitoring of patients and treatment adherence in rehabilitation programs, and additionally, to compare the current practice among physiotherapists to the various wrist exercise regimens and their effectiveness as described in the literature. Methods  Standard practice, including the use of support tools for treatment adherence, was evaluated using a nationwide survey. Then, scientific databases were searched using "distal radius fracture" and "physiotherapy" or "exercise therapy," and related search terms, up until 23 March 2023. Results of the survey and literature review were compared. Results  The survey was completed by 92 therapists. Nonstandardized support tools were used by 81.6% of respondents; 53.2% used some form of technology, including taking photos on the patients' smartphone for home reference. In the literature review, 23 studies were included, of which five described an exercise protocol. Treatment adherence was not reported in any of the included studies. Two studies described the use of smart technology or support tools. Conclusions  There is no consensus on a standardized exercise protocol for rehabilitation after distal radius fractures, neither from a systematic literature search nor from a nationwide survey. Smart technology may facilitate monitoring of patients and exercise adherence, hereby supporting self-efficacy and improving adherence and outcomes.

Technique, Indications and Limitations of a Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Distal Radius Fractures and Malunions

The minimally invasive flexor carpi radialis approach can be used for volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures. It offers the advantage of preserving ligamentotaxis, which facilitates the reduction and the small size of the scar improves the esthetic result of the procedure. It is indicated for extra-articular fractures of the distal radius. In the case of an intra-articular fracture, an arthroscopy may be associated. In the case of a proximal diaphyseal extension of the fracture, a second proximal approach can be added in order to use a longer plate. Relative contraindications are comminuted articular fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. Functional and radiological results are comparable to those obtained with the extented flexor carpi radialis approach. A conversion of the procedure for a larger incision is always possible in the case of a difficult reduction.

LIMPER trials: immediate mobilisation versus 2-week cast immobilisation after distal radius fracture treated with volar locking plate - a study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plate has become the most common fixation method in the treatment of unstable distal radius fracture (DRF). There is, however, no consensus as to whether or for how long a wrist should be immobilised after operative treatment. To date, there have been relatively few studies that have evaluated the effect of immediate postoperative mobilisation on functional outcomes. The aim of postoperative rehabilitation is to obtain a good function and to reduce impairment, recovery time, socioeconomical costs and absence from work. Therefore, there is a need for studies that evaluate the optimal method of postoperative rehabilitation to optimise wrist function and return to work.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a prospective, randomised, controlled trial in which a total of 240 working-age patients who undergo volar plating for DRF will be randomly assigned to either an early mobilisation group or a postoperative 2-week casting group. The aim of the study will be to compare early postoperative outcomes between the study groups. The primary outcome will be patient-rated wrist evaluation at 2 months after operation. A coprimary outcome will be the total length of sick leave. Our follow-up period will be 1 year, and secondary outcomes will include pain, patient satisfaction, perceived ability to work and complications identified at different time points. We expect those patients who undergo immediate mobilisation will have at least as rapid a return to work and function as those patients who undergo postoperative immobilisation, indicating/meaning that there will be no need for postoperative casting.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will be conducted according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement. The Ethics committee of Tampere University Hospital has approved the protocol. Ethics committee approval number is R21111, and it is accepted on 7 September 2021. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05150925.

Use of a 3D-printed splint for the treatment of distal radius fractures: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Management of distal radius fractures typically includes a period of immobilization with either a cast or a splint. Traditional immobilization methods can have inconveniences such as poor resistance to water and poor ventilation, which can result in skin maceration, skin breakdown, and infection in case of wetting.

HYPOTHESIS

3D-printed splints could potentially overcome the inconveniences of traditional casts. In this report, we compare a 3D-printed splint (3DPS) with a conventional removable splint (CRS) and a traditional cast in a randomized clinical trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with a recent distal radius fracture were randomized to receive either a 3DPS or a CRS. An additional subset of nine patients benefitted from both splints for a direct comparison. Primary outcomes were measured based on a subjective assessment questionnaire and a clinical outcome.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the subjective assessment between the 3DPS and the CRS groups. Based on the clinical assessment, patients with the 3DPS experienced more pressure-related pain. Among the sub-sample of nine patients that benefited from both splints, eight preferred the CRS and one chose the 3DPS. The 3DPS was judged better for perspiration, coolness, and water resistance.

DISCUSSION

The 3DPS was successful in solving shortcomings of conventional splints and cast (better ventilation, less perspiration, less warmness, more durability and water resistance). However, the rigid structure and sharp edges made it less comfortable, overall favouring the CRS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Comparative clinical and radiographic outcomes between early and delayed wrist mobilization after volar fixed-angle plate fixation of distal radius fracture

Postoperative immobilization protocols after volar fixed-angle plate fixation of distal radius fractures (DRF) vary among surgeons. This study aimed to compare functional outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complications between early and delayed mobilization after volar fixed-angle plate fixation of DRF. This study is a randomized controlled trial. The early group was allowed to perform wrist motion exercise immediately after surgery and the delayed group was allowed to perform it after 2 weeks of external immobilization. Postoperative patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), wrist range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and grip strength were evaluated. Forty-eight patients with DRF were enrolled and randomly allocated to the early or delayed mobilization groups. The PRWE, DASH, VAS pain score, grip strength, and wrist motion of both groups significantly improved over time. However, there were no significant differences between groups at any timepoint. Radiographic parameters were not different between groups. There were no significant differences in functional outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complications between early and delayed mobilization after volar fixed-angle plate of DRF. Immediate postoperative wrist range-of-motion exercise can be safely initiated after volar fixed-angle plate fixation of DRF without external immobilization.Clinical trial registration: Thaiclinicaltrials.org identifier: TCTR20180927005. Registered 27/09/2018-retrospectively registered. https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20180927005 .

Is early mobilization after volar locking plate fixation in distal radius fractures really beneficial? A meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies

STUDY DESIGN

This was a systematic review with a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Despite rising trends toward surgical treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) with volar locking plate (VLP) fixation, there is a lack of consensus on when to start vigorous wrist range of motion (ROM) exercises after surgery.

PURPOSE

We performed a meta-analysis to compare early and late mobilization after VLP fixation in patients with DRF.

METHODS

Four prospective randomized controlled trials with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were retrieved through MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the KoreaMed databases in March 2021. We divided patients into an early group (patients who started ROM exercises of the wrist within 2 weeks after surgery), and a late group (patients who started ROM exercises 5 or 6 weeks after surgery). The primary outcome was treatment efficacy which was measured through improvement in pain score, function score, ROM, and grip power. The secondary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 127 patients in the early group and 131 patients in the late group. The outcomes were compared at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. There was no significant difference in pain score, though the early group had a lower average visual analog scale score. The early group had a lower arm, shoulder, and hand disability score than the late group (95 % CI, -16.25 to -8.35 points; P < .001) at 6 weeks postoperatively, suggesting significantly superior outcomes. A similar trend persisted at 3 (n = 74 in the early group and n = 77 in the late group; 95% CI, -5.45 to -0.30; P = .029) and 6 months (n = 102 in the early group and n = 100 in the late group; 95% CI, -4.81 to 0.21; P = .073), but the differences were smaller. The early group had a higher grip power at all follow-up periods, but the difference was only significant at 6 months postoperatively (n = 88 in the early group and n = 83 in the late group; 95% CI, 0.50 to 6.99; P = 0.024). The early group also had more favorable ROM in all directions at 6 weeks, but only in supination at 6 months. The complication rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no differences in the rates of secondary operation and reduction loss.

CONCLUSION

Early ROM exercise after VLP in DRF resulted in superior functional scores and grip power until 6 months postoperatively. The dominance of the joint ROM, which was seen at 6 weeks after surgery in the early exercise group, decreased with time and ultimately showed little difference at 6 months. Early exercise is safe and did not increase complication rates.

Comparison of immobilization periods following open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION

The use of volar locking plate (VLP) in the fixation of fracture fragments promised a new era in the management of distal radius fracture (DRF).

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To compare the patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, pain, and adverse events between the different periods of immobilization following open reduction and internal fixation of DRFs with VLP.

METHODS

We searched Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science, Ovid, and CINAHL. The inclusion criteria was randomized controlled trials that compared different immobilization periods after open reduction and internal fixation of DRFs with VLP. The last search was performed on 2 June 2020. The different immobilization periods were divided into the following 3 groups: ≤1-week group, 2-3-week group, and 5-6-week group.

RESULTS

Seven eligible randomized controlled trials provided data on 509 patients. We found that compared to 5-6-week group, ≤1-week and 2-3-week groups showed a reduction in overall Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation score (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.22, P < .001; SMD = -0.69, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.41, P < .001, respectively). We also found that there were improvements in the other patient-reported outcomes including overall Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and pain; and functional outcomes including overall grip strength and range of motion measures in favor of ≤1-week and 2-3-week groups.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that compared to immobilization for 5 to 6 weeks after DRF repair, immobilization for ≤1 week or 2-3 weeks showed improvements in the patients-reported outcomes and functional outcomes. The differences between the 3 immobilization groups may not be clinically important considering the small changes as follow up progresses.

Rehabilitation Following Surgically Treated Distal Radius Fractures: Do Immobilization and Physiotherapy Affect the Outcome?

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are one of the most common fractures treated by orthopaedic surgeons around the globe. It has been estimated that the National Health Services (NHS) spends an average of £1375.34 per patient for surgical fixation of DRF with a volar locking plate as a day case. This figure climbs to £1983.39 if the same patient stays at the hospital overnight. Inpatient physiotherapy costs the NHS a staggering £82.03 per day, while each outpatient session with physiotherapy is £40.70 for the NHS. This means that a substantial amount is spent by the NHS on rehabilitation and physiotherapy for each DRF, whether fixed surgically or non-surgically. Post-operative rehabilitation involving initial immobilization followed by physiotherapy/hand therapy is an indispensable part of the total management concept of DRF. Most of the conservative management protocols also advocate a five-week immobilization followed by physiotherapy/hand therapy. Due to the fact that more than 50% of the patients with DRF are still employed, the impairment caused by a restriction of range of motion, duration of the sick leave and the effects of DRF on quality of life play a very important socio-economical role in the broadest sense. Patients are routinely referred to physiotherapists/hand therapists following DRF to improve the range of motion (ROM), manage pain, strengthen the wrist and develop full functionality to pre-injury levels. However, the real impact of supervised exercises and active physiotherapy in restoring mobility and strength to the fractured wrist is still not well understood. This article aims to review the existing literature and evidence base regarding the efficacy of immobilization and physiotherapy in improving the functional outcome of surgically treated DRFs.

Volar locking plate versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Background

The outcomes for volar locking plate (VLP) and external fixation (EF) in distal radius fracture cases remain controversial. The current study of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to assess VLP and EF, which might benefit distal radius fracture cases.

Methods

RCTs comparing VLP and EF in distal radius fracture cases, until 18 March 2020, were systematically reviewed and summarized. The functional and radiographic outcomes, together with complications, for distal radius fracture cases, were evaluated.

Results

In total, 12 studies comprising 1205 distal radius fracture cases were included. The VLP group had observed lower disability in the arm shoulder and hand score (DASH) at 3rd, 6th, and 12th -month post-operation, with the mean differences (MDs) of − 10.43 (95 % CI = − 15.77 to − 5.08, P < 0.01), − 3.48 (95 % CI = − 6.37 to − 0.59, P = 0.02), and − 4.13 (95 % CI = − 6.94 to − 1.33, P < 0.01), respectively. The VLP group also had lower visual analog scale scores (VAS) compared to the EF group, with MDs of − 0.10 (95 % CI = − 0.18 to − 0.03, P < 0.01) for the former at 6th -month post-operation. Also, the EF group exhibited better grip strength than that in the VLP group, with MD of 12.48 (95 % CI = 7.00–17.95, P < 0.01) at the 3rd month and 4.54 (95 % CI = 0.31–8.76, P = 0.04) at 6th month. No significant differences in radiographic outcomes were observed between the VLP and EF groups (P > 0.05). The VLP group had a lower complication rate than that in the EF group.

Conclusions

VLP had a lower DASH score and VAS score but with lower grip strength. No significant differences in radiographic outcomes were observed. VLP had a lower complication rate than that of EF.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04312-7.

Minimally invasive anterior plate osteosynthesis of the distal radius: A 710 case-series

INTRODUCTION

Since the 2000s, internal fixation of distal radius fracture by volar locking plate on an extended flexor carpi radialis (FCR) approach has become the gold standard.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to assess medium-term results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in distal radius fracture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The series comprised of 710 cases (512 female; mean age, 58 years). The 15mm approach was on the lateral edge of the FCR. The plate was slipped under the pronator quadratus. Closure used intradermal running suture without drain or orthosis.

RESULTS

At a mean 7 months' follow-up, mean scar length was 17mm (range, 10-40mm), pain 1.13/10 (0-8), Quick-DASH 13.28 (0-86.36), and patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) 11.48 (0-91). Compared to contralateral values, mean flexion was 87.23%, extension 88.52%, pronation 96.17%, supination 93.41%, and grip strength 79.68%. Hardware was removed in 45.92% of cases. There were 16 cases of secondary displacement, with 4 revision procedures, one of sepsis at 6 months, 10 of complex regional pain syndrome, and 14 of median nerve paresthesia, with 4 carpal tunnel release procedures.

DISCUSSION

The minimally invasive FCR approach can be used for volar plate fixation of distal radial fracture. It has the advantage of conserving ligamentotaxis, facilitating reduction and improving scar esthetics. The incision can be extended if need be.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; single-centre retrospective study.

Effectiveness of early versus delayed motion in patients with distal radius fracture treated with volar locking plate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of early versus delayed motion on the functional outcomes in patients with distal radius fracture (DRF) treated with a volar locking plate. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was performed. An electronic search was performed in the Medline, Central, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, Cinahl, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases. The eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials that compared the effect of early versus delayed motion on wrist and/or upper limb function, pain, grip strength, and wrist range of motion in subjects older than 18 years with DRF treated with a volar locking plate. Five clinical trials were included that met the eligibility criteria for the quantitative synthesis. At 6 weeks, the PRWE questionnaire showed a mean difference (MD) of -10.6 points (p < 0.001), the MD was -11.1 points for the DASH questionnaire (p < 0.001), -0.56 cm for pain on VAS (p = 0.01), 5.0 kg for grip strength (p = 0.01), 12.5 degrees for wrist flexion (p = 0.07), and 12.8 degrees for wrist extension (p = 0.05). All differences favored the early motion treatment. At 3 months of follow-up, only the DASH, pain on VAS, and grip strength showed significant differences in favor of early motion. At 1 year of follow-up, none of the variables studied were different between groups. In the short term, there was moderate to high evidence of clinically and statistically significant differences in the functional outcomes in favor of early versus delayed motion in patients with DRF treated with a volar locking plate. But these differences were not observed at 1 year of follow-up. PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42020158706.

A systematic review of how daily activities and exercises are recommended following volar plating of distal radius fractures and the efficacy and safety of early versus late mobilisation

Introduction

Following surgical repair of distal radius fractures, mobilisation timeframes and interventions vary. Early mobilisation (<2 weeks postoperatively) usually includes range of motion exercises and may include recommendations to perform daily activities. The review investigated (i) how early mobilisation was recommended, particularly with respect to wrist use during daily activities and (ii) the efficacy and safety of early versus delayed mobilisation (< or ≥2 weeks).

Methods

The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019136490). Five databases were searched for studies that compared early and delayed mobilisation in adults with volar plating of distal radius fractures. The Downs and Black Quality Index and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist were used for quality evaluation. Effect sizes were calculated for range of movement, function and pain at 6–8, 10–12 and 26 weeks. A descriptive analysis of outcomes and mobilisation regimes was conducted.

Results

Eight studies with a mean Quality Index score of 20 out of 28 (SD=5.6) were included. Performing daily activities was commonly recommended as part of early mobilisation. Commencing mobilisation prior to two weeks resulted in greater range of movement, function and less pain at up to eight weeks postoperatively than delaying mobilisation until two weeks or later.

Discussion

Performance of daily activities was used alongside exercise to promote recovery but without clearly specifying the type, duration or intensity of activities. In combination with exercise, early daily activity was safe and beneficial. Performing daily activities may have discrete advantages. Hand therapists are challenged to incorporate activity-approaches into early mobilisation regimes.

Rehabilitation after distal radius fractures: is there a need for immobilization and physiotherapy?

Although the literature generally agrees that displaced distal radius fractures require surgery, no single consensus exists concerning the length of immobilization and type of post-operative physiotherapeutic rehabilitation program. Palmar locking plate fixation represents a very stable fixation of the distal radius, and was assessed biomechanically in various studies. Surprisingly, most authors report additional immobilization after plate fixation. One reason might be due to the pain caused during active wrist mobilization in the early post-operative stages or secondly to protect the osteosynthesis in the early healing stages preventing secondary loss of reduction. This article addresses the biomechanical principles, current available evidence for early mobilization/immobilization and impact of physiotherapy after operatively treated distal radius fractures.

Splinting after Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Postoperative Plaster Splint versus Soft Dressing

Background  The effect of postoperative dressing and splinting after distal radius fracture (DRF) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is not well understood. A prospective cohort analysis was performed to assess differences in functional and radiographic outcomes with the use of plaster splinting or soft dressing following DRF ORIF. Methods  All patients undergoing DRF ORIF with locking volar plates were consecutively enrolled. Preoperative demographic and postoperative radiographic and functional outcome data were collected at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Functional data included range of motion (ROM), pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Radiographic data included loss of fracture reduction. Results  A total of 139 patients were enrolled (79 plaster splinting, 60 soft dressing). By the first postoperative visit (POV), there was one case of loss of reduction with plaster splinting and one case with soft dressing with no hardware failure or revision surgery in either group, and no difference in DASH, PRWE, or VAS pain scores. By the final POV, the soft dressing group showed greater ROM in extension by 9.6, flexion by 10.9, and supination by 4.8 degrees over plaster splinting. Additionally, the soft dressing group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PRWE and DASH scores, as well as VAS pain scores as compared with plaster splinting. Conclusions  Applying only soft dressing following DRF ORIF demonstrated improvements in ROM, VAS, and functional outcomes by final follow-up, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes. No benefit of applying a plaster splint was identified.

The minimally invasive flexor carpi radialis approach: a new perspective for distal radius fractures

The minimally invasive flexor carpi radialis approach can be used for volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures. After 15-mm incision on the lateral aspect of the FCR tendon and all structures but the radial artery are reclined ulnarly, a plate is inserted under the pronator quadratus just proximal to the "watershed line." The distal epiphyseal screws are put in place, and the proximal part of the plate is exposed by flexion of the wrist to put in place the proximal screws. No drainage or postoperative immobilization is used. It offers the advantage of preserving ligamentotaxis which facilitates the reduction, and the small size of the scar improves the esthetic result of the procedure. It is indicated for extra-articular fractures of the distal radius. In the case of an intraarticular fracture, an arthroscopy may be associated. In the case of a proximal diaphyseal extension of the fracture, a second proximal approach can be added in order to use a longer plate. Relative contraindications are comminuted articular fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. Functional and radiological results are comparable to those obtained with the extented flexor carpi radialis approach. A conversion of the procedure for a larger incision is always possible in the case of a difficult reduction.