Thiele H, Dörr R, Gutberlet M. [Diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: Clinical value of different imaging methods].
Herz 2012;
37:887-99; quiz 900-1. [PMID:
23064548 DOI:
10.1007/s00059-012-3688-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
This continuing medical education (CME) article describes the different non-invasive imaging methods with the exception of positron emission tomography for ischemia and viability testing. While stress methods, such as myocardial scintigraphy, stress echo or stress magnetic resonance imaging can detect the functional relevance of coronary artery stenosis, multislice computed tomography allows the visualization of the coronary anatomy and potential stenoses. Recently developed hybrid imaging allows the coronary anatomy and simultaneous functional testing of ischemia to be depicted. The different imaging methods for ischemia and viability testing are described.
Collapse