The Use of Dynamic Assist Orthosis for Muscle Reeducation following Brachial Plexus Injury and Reconstruction

Assessment, management, and rehabilitation of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries for non-surgeons

Electrodiagnostic evaluation is often requested for persons with peripheral nerve injuries and plays an important role in their diagnosis, prognosis, and management. Peripheral nerve injuries are common and can have devastating effects on patients' physical, psychological, and socioeconomic well-being; alongside surgeons, electrodiagnostic medicine specialists serve a central function in ensuring patients receive optimal treatment for these injuries. Surgical intervention-nerve grafting, nerve transfers, and tendon transfers-often plays a critical role in the management of these injuries and the restoration of patients' function. Increasingly, nerve transfers are becoming the standard of care for some types of peripheral nerve injury due to two significant advantages: first, they shorten the time to reinnervation of denervated muscles; and second, they confer greater specificity in directing motor and sensory axons toward their respective targets. As the indications for, and use of, nerve transfers expand, so too does the role of the electrodiagnostic medicine specialist in establishing or confirming the diagnosis, determining the injury's prognosis, recommending treatment, aiding in surgical planning, and supporting rehabilitation. Having a working knowledge of nerve and/or tendon transfer options allows the electrodiagnostic medicine specialist to not only arrive at the diagnosis and prognosticate, but also to clarify which nerves and/or muscles might be suitable donors, such as confirming whether the branch to supinator could be a nerve transfer donor to restore distal posterior interosseous nerve function. Moreover, post-operative testing can determine if nerve transfer reinnervation is occurring and progress patients' rehabilitation and/or direct surgeons to consider tendon transfers.

Modern Medical Rehabilitation Methods for Patients with Peripheral Nerve and Brachial Plexus Injuries (Review)

Peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries represent one of the most serious medical challenges due to the high frequency of disabling consequences. Medical rehabilitation for such injuries is critically important as it ensures the most complete functional recovery for patients. The aim of this review is to summarize and interpret the data on medical rehabilitation methods, as well as to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies and techniques for restoring upper limb functions after peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries. Information is provided on the theoretical foundations of functional recovery following peripheral nerve and nerve plexus injuries, as well as on factors that may hinder the full functional recovery of patients. There are discussed rehabilitation strategies and methods aimed at accelerating nerve fiber regeneration, preventing complications, correcting cortical plasticity, restoring patients' functional capabilities, and improving their quality of life. Special attention is given to pain management, electrical stimulation, sensory deficit correction, and physical therapy in the postoperative period. Rehabilitation modalities and the medical rehabilitation duration are highly individualized and depend on numerous factors that determine the rehabilitation interventions direction. However, a significant number of rehabilitation methods have a low evidence base: many scientific studies are based on small samples, do not consider the heterogeneous nature of injuries, and do not evaluate longterm outcomes. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of both individual rehabilitation techniques and comprehensive rehabilitation programs that facilitate the recovery of motor activity in patients with peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries.

Assessment, patient selection, and rehabilitation of nerve transfers

Peripheral nerve injuries are common and can have a devastating effect on physical, psychological, and socioeconomic wellbeing. Peripheral nerve transfers have become the standard of care for many types of peripheral nerve injury due to their superior outcomes relative to conventional techniques. As the indications for, and use of, nerve transfers expand, the importance of pre-operative assessment and post-operative optimization increases. There are two principal advantages of nerve transfers: (1) their ability to shorten the time to reinnervation of muscles undergoing denervation because of peripheral nerve injury; and (2) their specificity in ensuring proximal motor and sensory axons are directed towards appropriate motor and sensory targets. Compared to conventional nerve grafting, nerve transfers offer opportunities to reinnervate muscles affected by cervical spinal cord injury and to augment natural reinnervation potential for very proximal injuries. This article provides a narrative review of the current scientific knowledge and clinical understanding of nerve transfers including peripheral nerve injury assessment and pre- and post-operative electrodiagnostic testing, adjuvant therapies, and post-operative rehabilitation for optimizing nerve transfer outcomes.

Review of rehabilitation protocols for brachial plexus injury

Brachial plexus injury (BPI) is one of the most serious peripheral nerve injuries, resulting in severe and persistent impairments of the upper limb and disability in adults and children alike. With the relatively mature early diagnosis and surgical technique of brachial plexus injury, the demand for rehabilitation treatment after brachial plexus injury is gradually increasing. Rehabilitation intervention can be beneficial to some extent during all stages of recovery, including the spontaneous recovery period, the postoperative period, and the sequelae period. However, due to the complex composition of the brachial plexus, location of injury, and the different causes, the treatment varies. A clear rehabilitation process has not been developed yet. Rehabilitation therapy that has been widely studied focusing on exercise therapy, sensory training, neuroelectromagnetic stimulation, neurotrophic factors, acupuncture and massage therapy, etc., while interventions like hydrotherapy, phototherapy, and neural stem cell therapy are less studied. In addition, rehabilitation methods in some special condition and group often neglected, such as postoperative edema, pain, and neonates. The purpose of this article is to explore the potential contributions of various methods to brachial plexus injury rehabilitation and to provide a concise overview of the interventions that have been shown to be beneficial. The key contribution of this article is to form relatively clear rehabilitation processes based on different periods and populations, which provides an important reference for the treatment of brachial plexus injuries.

Rehabilitation Following Nerve Transfer Surgery

Nerve transfer surgery is an important new addition to the treatment paradigm following nerve trauma. The following rehabilitation plan has been developed over the past 15 years, in an interdisciplinary, tertiary peripheral nerve program at the "Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre." This center evaluates more than 400 patients with complex nerve injuries annually and has been routinely using nerve transfers since 2005. The described rehabilitation program includes input from patients, therapists, physiatrists, and surgeons and has evolved based on experience and updated science. The plan is comprised of phases which are practical, reproducible and will serve as a framework to allow other peripheral nerve programs to adapt and improve the "Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre" paradigm to enhance patient outcomes.

Application of a myoelectric elbow flexion assist orthosis in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury: patient perspectives

BACKGROUND

Individuals with brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) can be prescribed assistive devices, including myoelectric elbow orthoses (MEOs), for rehabilitation or functional use after failed treatment for elbow flexion restoration. Although recent case studies indicate potential for clinical improvements after using an MEO after BPI, the patients' perspectives on such use are still unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To explore patient perspectives on the use of an MEO after surgical treatment for a traumatic BPI.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative using both a focus group and semistructured interviews.

METHODS

Patients with BPI that used an MEO were recruited. Five patients participated in an in-person focus group, whereas three patients participated in individual phone interviews. Themes that emerged from the focus group were compared against those that emerged from the personal interviews.

RESULTS

Feedback was grouped into three themes: device usage, hardware performance, and device design. Within each theme, positive elements, areas for improvement, and additional considerations emerged. Patients indicated a positive attitude toward using an MEO as a rehabilitation tool. They desired a streamlined, stronger device to support them and assist during activities of daily living.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with BPI, a well-designed MEO that meets their needs could assist with rehabilitation and increase independence in daily activities. Continued patient engagement in the evaluation and development of both medical devices and treatment plans offers the best opportunity for improved outcomes that are important to the patient.

Therapeutic Implementation of a Custom Dynamic Elbow Brace for Children With Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy: A Case Report

PURPOSE

The objective of this analysis is to present the benefits and functional outcomes when using a custom dynamic elbow brace as an adjunct to therapeutic interventions for a child with neonatal brachial plexus palsy.

SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS

Impairments associated with neonatal brachial plexus palsy can cause lifelong limitations of mobility, dexterity, and functional use of the involved upper extremity. The functional design of the custom dynamic elbow brace provided therapeutic versatility including immobilization, active-assisted controlled movement, and resistance exercise. These features facilitated efficient and functional muscle activation patterns, negating compensatory or substitute movements.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The brace provided opportunities for focused muscle activation and subsequent improvements in strength, development of motor control, and functional mobility. Using a custom dynamic elbow brace was an effective therapeutic tool, used in conjunction with a comprehensive treatment program, and contributed to a successful outcome.