Comparative Plasma Heparin Levels after Subcutaneous Sodium and Calcium Heparin

Heparin-grafted dialysis membrane allows minimal systemic anticoagulation in regular hemodialysis patients: a prospective proof-of-concept study

This prospective, multicenter, proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate the possibility to reduce the ordinary heparin dose and the systemic anti-Xa activity during hemodialysis (HD) sessions using a new heparin-grafted HD membrane. In 45 stable HD patients, the use of a heparin-grafted membrane with the ordinary heparin dose was followed by a stepwise weekly reduction of dose. Reduction was stopped when early signs of clotting (venous pressure, quality of rinse-back) occurred during two out of three weekly HD sessions. Heparin dose was decreased for 67% of patients resulting in the lowering of these patients' anti-Xa activity by 50%. Dose reductions were achieved with both types of heparin (low-molecular-weight heparin: 64 ± 14 to 35 ± 12 IU/kg, P < 0.0001; unfractionated heparin: 82 ± 18 to 46 ± 13 IU/kg, P < 0.0001) resulting in a decrease of anti-Xa activity at dialysis session end (low-molecular-weight heparin: 0.51 ± 0.25 to 0.25 ± 0.11 IU/mL, P < 0.0001; unfractionated heparin: 0.28 ± 0.23 to 0.13 ± 0.07 IU/mL, P < 0.0001). Failure to further decrease heparin dose was related to signs of clotting in blood lines (57% of sessions), in dialyzer (9%), or both (34%). Significant reduction of heparin dose and anti-Xa activity at the end of HD sessions was possible in stable HD patients using heparin-grafted membrane. HD patients who require low anti-Xa activity at the end of HD sessions might benefit from a heparin-grafted membrane to reduce bleeding risk and other heparin adverse events.

Effect of low-dose heparin on fibrinogen levels in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease

Several prospective studies have demonstrated that high plasma fibrinogen levels are associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease. Since in most patients an increased thrombin generation has been reported, we investigated whether the control of thrombin generation could affect plasma fibrinogen levels. Forty male outpatients (20 asymptomatic with previous myocardial infarction and 20 with stable effort angina) were enrolled in a randomized medium-term (6 months) cross-over study. Clottable fibrinogen, according to Clauss, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and fibrinopeptide A were evaluated in relation to treatment with low-dose heparin. After a 15-day wash-out period, during which patients had been treated only with nitrates if needed, patients were allocated to two sequential periods of treatment with standard heparin (12,500 U, subcutaneously daily) plus antianginal treatment or antianginal treatment alone, separated by a second 15-day wash-out period. At the end of the treatment period with low-dose heparin significant decreases in the plasma fibrinogen (2.5 +/- 0.6 g/l vs. 3.3 +/- 0.5 g/l, P < 0.001), prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (1.4 +/- 0.5 nmol/l vs. 1.9 +/- 0.7 nmol/l, P < 0.001), thrombinantithrombin (4.5 +/- 2.4 ng/ml vs. 9.7 +/- 3.6 ng/ml, P < 0.001), and fibrinopeptide A (2.1 +/- 1.1 ng/ml vs. 3.5 +/- 2.1 ng/ml, P < 0.001) were observed compared with the period without heparin. The present results indicate that low-dose heparin can effectively control the increased abnormal thrombin generation and elevated fibrinogen levels in patients with ischemic heart disease, possibly decreasing the risk of cardiovascular death.

Heparin as adjunctive therapy to coronary thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction

For many years anticoagulation has played a role in the prevention and management of thromboembolic complications associated with acute myocardial infarction. However, the role of heparin therapy after pharmacologic thrombolysis in myocardial infarction remains controversial. Debate continues regarding the necessity of heparin treatment after thrombolytic therapy as well as the mode by which it is administered. The purpose of this review is to summarize the findings of clinical trials designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of heparin as an adjuvant agent to thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Data regarding the clinical effectiveness of heparin are presented. Information and recommendations regarding the optimal dose, route of administration, timing of initiation, and duration of heparin treatment are provided.

Highly variable anticoagulant response after subcutaneous administration of high-dose (12,500 IU) heparin in patients with myocardial infarction and healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

In this study, the anticoagulant response of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. was investigated in patients with myocardial infarction and healthy volunteers to determine variabilities in response and modifying factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

On the fourth day after thrombolytic therapy, blood samples were taken before and at frequent intervals until 10 hours after the injection of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. Plasma anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were measured in addition to body weight and thickness of the abdominal subcutaneous fat layer. Contrary to expectations, the increase of anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, and APTT compared with baseline (predrug) levels was very small, with an average maximal APTT of 42.6 seconds (SD, 12.4 seconds; range, 30.4-70.7 seconds). Subsequently, the influence of the length of the injection needle on the anticoagulant effect of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. was studied in 10 healthy volunteers to find a factor that could be responsible for the poor response in the patients. The length of the injection needle did not influence the anticoagulant effect of heparin. Large interindividual and intraindividual variabilities were seen in the volunteers. The majority of volunteers had minimal prolongation of the APTT, but very strong prolongation was also seen (maximal APTT, 163 seconds). There was no correlation between the abdominal skinfold thickness and anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, or APTT (p > 0.05), but in the patient study, there was a correlation between weight and anti-Xa activity and anti-IIa activity (p < 0.05), and in the volunteer study, there was a correlation between weight and anti-Xa activity and APTT (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous administration of heparin in a fixed dose for prophylactic and therapeutic purposes may be inadequate because of the large interindividual and intraindividual variations in anticoagulant effect.

[Asthma attacks in low-dose preventive use of heparin in a male with femoral neck fracture and aortic aneurysm]

Hypersensitivity reactions to heparin preparations with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations have been reported frequently in the past, but are a rarity now. A 88 year old man was admitted for physical therapy of a collum femoris fracture. Treatment with a diuretic, Reserpine and Verapamil was continued. Chest x-ray revealed a large thoracic aortic aneurysm. From the 12th to the 18th day of low dose heparin prophylaxis with calcium heparin, 7500 U twice daily, at least eight attacks of asthma or cyanosis were observed, starting about two hours after heparin injection. The last attack began suddenly with wheezing, tachypnoea and cough and was associated with apprehension, a sudden blood pressure increase and severe cyanosis. Ventilation improved with oxygen and a beta 2-stimulator, but hypertension and cyanosis lasted for three hours. After discontinuation of heparin no further attacks occurred. Causes other then heparin could not be found. Despite the use of porcine mucosa heparin, avoidance of preservatives and use of low doses a hypersensitivity reaction occurred in our case. The delayed onset after preceding subcutaneous application as well as difficulties in separating the reaction from complications of underlying disease may delay heparin discontinuation.