Diagnostic Value of Compression Ultrasonography and Fibrinogen-related Parameters for the Detection of Postoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis following Elective Hip Replacement: a Pilot Study

Association between age and incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with spinal cord injury: an observational cross-sectional study

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the association between age and incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Rehabilitation Medicine Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of China University of Science and Technology.

METHODS

Patients from August 2018 to December 2020 with SCI (N = 260) were tertiles divided the age into three groups to analyze the association between age and incidence of DVT.

RESULTS

American Spinal Cord Injury Association impairment scale (AIS), urinary tract infection (UTI), pulmonary infection (PI), and anticoagulation therapy (AT) were confounders for the association between age and incidence of DVT. The incidence of DVT increased by 1.07-fold (Non-adjusted model, OR = 1.07, P < 0.001), 1.05-fold (Minimally-adjusted model: adjusted for confounders, OR = 1.05, P = 0.010) and 1.06-fold [Fully-adjusted model: adjusted for confounders and unbalanced probable variables: AIS, UTI, PI, AT, Sex, D-dimer(new), Fibrinogen (new), Modes of injury and Level of injury, OR = 1.06, P = 0.012] when age increased by 1 year. The incidence of DVT had an increasing trend with age in different age tertile in the three models (P for trend <0.05). Age had a linearly association with incidence of DVT (OR = 1.07, P = 0.065) and stable in different subgroups, for lower age, the association was also linearly (OR = 4.40, P = 1.000), for middle (fold point = 46.46, P < 0.001) and higher age (fold point = 66, P = 0.017), the association was curvilinear.

CONCLUSION

Age had a linearly association with incidence of DVT. Quitting smoking, preventing/treating UTI and AT should be adopted in advance for patients with SCI for all age, especially for older.

Postoperative plasma D-dimer value for predicting deep venous thrombosis following hip arthroplasty with nadroparin prophylaxis

The aim of the study was to assess the value of D-dimer as an event predicitor for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients given low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Plasma D-dimer levels were obtained preoperatively and at days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively in 83 consecutive patients undergoing THA treated with nadroparin prophylaxis plus intermittent pneumatic compression. Unilateral ascending venography was performed at postoperative day 7 or 8. There was a significant difference between the D-dimer levels in the DVT group (28 patients) and non-DVT group (55 patients) on each day (P<0.01). ROC analysis showed the AUC on postoperative days 1, 3 and 7 was 0.706, 0.712 and 0.772 respectively. The D-dimer concentration on postoperative day 1, day 3 or day 7 is of moderate predicting value of DVT in patients undergoing THA, treated with nadroparin prophylaxis plus intermittent pneumatic compression.

Deep venous thrombosis following different isolated lower extremity fractures: what is known about prevalences, locations, risk factors and prophylaxis?

INTRODUCTION

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) offers a high risk of morbidity and mortality, especially in case of pulmonary embolism. Precise data as to DVT after isolated lower extremity fractures (ILEFs) are rare. Even organizations like the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons or the American College of Chest Physicians do not state exact recommendations as to optimal DVT prophylaxis (ppx) after ILEFs.

PREVALENCE

The incidence of DVT ranges from 5 to 86 % depending on the fracture whereas femur fractures offer the highest risk for clotting. The incidence seems to decrease in more distal fractures.

LOCATION

The risk to develop proximal clots is likely low, however, especially these are feared by surgeons. DVT can occur in both the injured and uninjured leg with a trend for higher incidences in the injured leg.

RISK FACTORS

Risk factors for DVT after ILEF seem to be similar to risk factors for DVT development after orthopaedic surgery and in general. Risk factors caused by surgeons are the use of a tourniquet, prolonged operative time and a delay from injury to surgery.

PROPHYLAXIS

Low molecular weight heparin is favoured by many authors, however, warfarin and acetylsalicylic acid are also used. Clear recommendations are still missing.

CONCLUSION

The rate of morbidity caused by DVT after ILEF is poorly understood so far. Exact data on prevalences are missing and optimal DVT prophylaxis still has to be defined.

Deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty in Korean patients and D-dimer as a screening tool

INTRODUCTION

This prospective study was designed to confirm risk factors and to assess the incidence of deep vein thrombosis after total hip and surface replacement arthroplasty in Korean patients not receiving anticoagulation prophylaxis and to determine efficacy of plasma D-dimer levels as a screening test.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 2003 to August 2004, 221 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing were evaluated. All patients underwent ultrasonography preoperatively and venography and/or ultrasonography on postoperative day 7. Plasma D-dimer levels were estimated by latex immuno-assay preoperatively and on days 3 and 7 postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients in our cohort, 23 developed deep vein thrombosis (10.4%). Age (r = 0.245, P < 0.001) and gender (r = 0.155, P = 0.021) significantly correlated with deep vein thrombosis. Rise in incidence paralleled increase in age (X(2) = 32.860, P < 0.001). D-dimer levels on postoperative days 3 (gamma = 0.364, P < 0.001) and 7 (gamma = 0.470, P < 0.001) were significantly correlated to the development of DVT.

CONCLUSION

While incidence of deep vein thrombosis in Korean population after THA was lower than that in the West; it increased with age, and in female gender. Significant correlation was found between D-dimer levels and the development of deep vein thrombosis.

O papel do mapeamento dúplex no diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda assintomática dos membros inferiores

O diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda sintomática está bem estabelecido com o uso do mapeamento dúplex, que apresenta sensibilidade de 100% e especificidade de 98%, para trombose venosa profunda proximal, e sensibilidade de 94% e especificidade de 75%, para distal. Na trombose venosa profunda recente e assintomática, o diagnóstico com o mapeamento dúplex ainda não está bem estabelecido, mostrando uma queda na acurácia desse método diagnóstico. Essa queda é devida ao fato de o trombo recente não ser oclusivo, apresentar a mesma ecogenicidade do sangue e uma consistência diminuída, prejudicando o teste da compressibilidade, que é o mais sensível para diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda. Nesta revisão, serão revistos artigos publicados que avaliaram a acurácia do mapeamento dúplex no diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda assintomática.

Variation in the diagnostic performance of D-dimer for suspected deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have evaluated the accuracy of D-dimer in diagnosing suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but results are conflicting.

AIM

To overview estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer and identify causes of variation.

DESIGN

Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Database of Reviews of Effectiveness, the ACP Journal Club, citation lists, and contacted manufacturers. We selected studies that compared D-dimer to a reference standard in patients with suspected DVT. Data were analysed by random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

We included 97 studies reporting 198 assays in 99 different patient groups. Overall estimated sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer were 90.5% and 54.7%, but both estimates were subject to significant heterogeneity (p < 0.001). Meta-regression identified that some heterogeneity was explained by study setting, exclusion criteria, whether recruitment was consecutive or the study prospective, whether D-dimer and the reference standard were measured blind, and whether the D-dimer threshold was determined a priori. Sensitivity and specificity also varied between ELISA (94% and 45% respectively), latex (89% and 55%) and whole blood agglutination assays (87% and 68%). Sensitivity was higher for proximal than distal DVT. Specificity was dependent upon whether clinical probability of DVT was high (specificity 51%), intermediate (67%) or low (78%).

DISCUSSION

D-dimer has good sensitivity, but poor specificity, for DVT. Estimates are subject to substantial heterogeneity from various sources. D-dimer specificity appears to be strongly dependent upon the pre-test clinical probability of DVT.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This article discusses the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following. We recommend against the use of aspirin alone as thromboprophylaxis for any patient group (Grade 1A). For moderate-risk general surgery patients, we recommend prophylaxis with low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH) (5,000 U bid) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) [< or = 3,400 U once daily] (both Grade 1A). For higher risk general surgery patients, we recommend thromboprophylaxis with LDUH (5,000 U tid) or LMWH (> 3,400 U daily) [both Grade 1A]. For high-risk general surgery patients with multiple risk factors, we recommend combining pharmacologic methods (LDUH three times daily or LMWH, > 3,400 U daily) with the use of graduated compression stockings and/or intermittent pneumatic compression devices (Grade 1C+). We recommend that thromboprophylaxis be used in all patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery (Grade 1A) or major, open urologic procedures, and we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH two times or three times daily (Grade 1A). For patients undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty, we recommend one of the following three anticoagulant agents: LMWH, fondaparinux, or adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [international normalized ratio (INR) target, 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0] (all Grade 1A). For patients undergoing hip fracture surgery (HFS), we recommend the routine use of fondaparinux (Grade 1A), LMWH (Grade 1C+), VKA (target INR, 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 2B], or LDUH (Grade 1B). We recommend that patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, or HFS receive thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days (Grade 1A). We recommend that all trauma patients with at least one risk factor for VTE receive thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1A). In acutely ill medical patients who have been admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure or severe respiratory disease, or who are confined to bed and have one or more additional risk factors, we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH (Grade 1A) or LMWH (Grade 1A). We recommend, on admission to the intensive care unit, all patients be assessed for their risk of VTE. Accordingly, most patients should receive thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1A).

The assessment of deep vein thromboses for therapeutic trials

In the current paper, we provide recommendations for the assessment of deep vein thromboses for the purpose of therapeutic trials evaluating antithrombotic drugs in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis. We have reviewed recently published articles on diagnostic and therapeutic studies, and we have evaluated methods of assessments. Ascending venography has been considered as the reference test for the confirmation of DVT. A roentgenographic image is subsequently available for review and allows classification by blinded, objective observers. However, venography poses substantial clinical and methodological limitations, particularly in the setting of systematic screening for all patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Compression ultrasonography may replace venography for systematic screening of DVT in clinical trials, provided that specific methodological details are specified in the protocol and are fulfilled to ensure high and comparable sensitivity and specificity from all participating centers. This non-invasive technique has virtually no contraindications, and therefore more patients can be enrolled and evaluated. Furthermore, the compression ultrasonograph can be videotaped for central reading. Compression ultrasonography has already been adopted as the principal method for evaluating DVT in several ongoing large scale prevention trials with the approval of major drug agencies.

Dose-adjusted thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma surgery according to levels of D-Dimer

In 234 trauma surgery patients, thrombosis prophylaxis with Nadroparin-Calcium low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was adjusted according to levels of D-Dimer. Basic prophylaxis was 2,850 IU per day. If D-Dimer concentrations rose above 2 mg/L after the fourth postoperative (p.o.) day, LMWH was administered twice a day. Color Doppler ultrasound was performed between the fifth and seventh p.o. days. Patients were divided into a high-risk (group 1: hip, femur, or knee replacement surgery, n=102) and a moderate-risk group (group 2: other surgery of the knee, tibia, fibula, or foot, n=132). Group 1 showed significantly higher D-Dimer levels than group 2 (p<0.001). Measurement of D-Dimer on days 2 and 4 p.o. showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 72.8% in identifying patients at risk (i.e., D-Dimer>2 mg/L after day 4 p.o.). The overall deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate in group 1 was 3.9%, and the rate of proximal DVT was 1.96%. In group 2, one distal DVT (0.8%) occurred. The results show that D-Dimer is a useful marker to monitor p.o. coagulation activation and to manage LMWH prophylaxis in trauma surgery patients.

Ruling out acute deep vein thrombosis by ELISA plasma D-dimer assay versus ultrasound in inpatients more than 70 years old

In geriatric care, deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is mostly diagnosed by noninvasive techniques. The objectives of this prospective study were: (1) to evaluate the power of ELISA plasma D-dimer assay versus ultrasound (US) in ruling out acute DVT of the lower limbs in symptomatic geriatric inpatients, and (2) to determine the most effective D-dimer cutoff value over the age of 70 years. Over a 10-month period, inpatients with suspected lower limb DVT simultaneously underwent US examination and ELISA plasma D-dimer assay. Noninclusion criteria were comorbid conditions able to modify the D-dimer level. Data were processed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In total, 150 patients (125 women, 25 men), average age 86.3 years (range 70-101) were included. A diagnosis of lower limb DVT was established in 53 patients (35.3%). With a 500 ng/mL D-dimer cutoff conventional value, DVT was ruled out in only five patients (3.3%), whereas a 750 ng/mL value ruled out DVT in 19 patients (12.7%) with a sensitivity of 98.1%, and a negative predictive value of 95.0%. The only false negative corresponded to a patient with a 15-mm thrombus in the distal calf. In inpatients above 70, an ELISA plasma D-dimer value smaller than 750 ng/mL is a rapid reliable noninvasive means to rule out lower limb DVT, if color flow Doppler ultrasound is not available on site.

Laboratory diagnosis of venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism is a common medical condition in both out-patients and in-patients. Despite the development of non-invasive tests, the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism remains a clinical challenge. In an effort to improve diagnostic accuracy and to reduce the necessity of serial testing, laboratory markers of thrombin generation and fibrinolysis have been investigated as first-line screening tests. Although the majority of markers are elevated in acute thrombosis, D-dimer, a specific derivative of cross-linked fibrin, appears to have the most potential clinical utility. Accuracy studies and preliminary management trials suggest that rapid D-dimer enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and the whole blood agglutination assay, SimpliRED D-dimer (Agen Biomedical, Brisbane, Australia), have strong potential as exclusionary tests in patients with suspected venous thrombosis.

Diagnostic value of plasma thrombin-antithrombin III complex and D-dimer concentration in patients with varicose veins for exclusion of deep-vein thrombosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of determining plasma D-dimer (DD) and thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) levels in the diagnostic workup for the screening of deep-venous thrombosis (DVT) among varicose vein patients. One hundred forty consecutive patients being treated for DVT or varicose veins underwent color-flow duplex scanning, and 25 patients had DVT and the remaining 115 had primary varicose veins. When DD and TAT were analyzed statistically in combination, it was determined that the combination of either positive DD (cutoff level 1.0 microg/ml) or positive TAT (cutoff level 3.0 microg/l) had a sensitivity of 100% for DVT with a specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 79%, 51%, and 100%, respectively. This study demonstrates plasma levels of DD (less than 1.0 microg/ml) and TAT (less than 3.0 microg/l) in combination to be useful for the exclusion of DVT among patients with varicose veins. Patients with negative hematological data may safely undergo surgical treatment for varicose veins without further evaluation such as duplex scanning or contrast venography.

Prediction of postoperative venous thrombosis using haemostasis tests

The prediction of patients who are at sufficiently high risk of postoperative deep venous thrombosis to indicate perioperative antithrombotic prophylaxis has traditionally used only clinical risk factors. The associations of preoperative and/or postoperative haemostatic tests with postoperative deep venous thrombosis are reviewed. In general, the results support the biological concept of a preoperative and postoperative prothrombotic tendency in patients who develop deep venous thrombosis. Increased levels of coagulation activation markers and decreased assays of fibrinolytic potential show consistent relationships to postoperative deep venous thrombosis. At present, however, the clinical utility of such tests is unproven; so that at present they cannot be advocated for routine preoperative or postoperative screening.