Evaluation of a New Rapid Quantitative D-dimer Assay in Patients with Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for venous thromboembolism: a systematic review

Guideline developers consider cost-effectiveness evidence in decision making to determine value for money. This consideration in the guideline development process can be informed either by formal and dedicated economic evaluations or by systematic reviews of existing studies. To inform the American Society of Hematology guideline on the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), we conducted a systematic review focused on the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for VTE within the guideline scope. We systematically searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and the Cost-effectiveness Analysis Registry; summarized; and critically appraised the economic evidence on diagnostic strategies for VTE. We identified 49 studies that met our inclusion criteria, with 26 on pulmonary embolism (PE) and 24 on deep vein thrombosis (DVT). For the diagnosis of PE, strategies including d-dimer to exclude PE were cost-effective compared with strategies without d-dimer testing. The cost-effectiveness of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) in relation to ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan was inconclusive. CTPA or V/Q scan following ultrasound or d-dimer results could be cost-effective or even cost saving. For DVT, studies supporting strategies with d-dimer and/or ultrasound were cost-effective, supporting the recommendation that for patients at low (unlikely) VTE risk, using d-dimer as the initial test reduces the need for diagnostic imaging. Our systematic review informed the American Society of Hematology guideline recommendations about d-dimer, V/Q scan and CTPA for PE diagnosis, and d-dimer and ultrasound for DVT diagnosis.

Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities can be associated with significant morbidity and may progress to pulmonary embolism and postthrombotic syndrome. Early diagnosis and treatment are important to minimize the risk of these complications. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of diagnostic tests for first-episode and recurrent DVT of the lower extremities, including proximal compression ultrasonography (US), whole leg US, serial US, and high-sensitivity quantitative D-dimer assays. We searched Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for eligible studies, reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. Two investigators screened and abstracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The review included 43 studies. For any suspected DVT, the pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of proximal compression US were 90.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.5-92.8) and 98.5% (95% CI, 97.6-99.1), respectively. For whole-leg US, pooled estimates were 94.0% (95% CI, 91.3-95.9) and 97.3% (95% CI, 94.8-98.6); for serial US pooled estimates were 97.9% (95% CI, 96.0-98.9) and 99.8% (95% CI, 99.3-99.9). For D-dimer, pooled estimates were 96.1% (95% CI, 92.6-98.0) and 35.7% (95% CI, 29.5-42.4). Recurrent DVT studies were not pooled. Certainty of evidence varied from low to high. This systematic review of current diagnostic tests for DVT of the lower extremities provides accuracy estimates. The tests are evaluated when performed in a stand-alone fashion, and in a diagnostic pathway. The pretest probability of DVT often assessed by a clinical decision rule will influence how, together with sensitivity and specificity estimates, patients will be managed.

Implication of d-dimer in rheumatic severe mitral stenosis – A tertiary centre study

Background

In rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS), left atrial (LA) thrombus and LA spontaneous echo contrast (LA SEC) reflect hypercoagulability. The study focuses on whether D-dimer levels predict the existence of LA thrombus and SEC in patients with severe MS.

Methods

95 consecutive patients with severe MS referred for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) between July 2011 and March 2012 to evaluate LA thrombus prior to balloon mitral valvotomy (BMV) were included in the study. D-Dimer levels in these patients were observed.

Results

Out of the 95 patients, 15 (15.8%) had LA thrombus and 52 patients had LA SEC (54.7%). Any correlation between D-Dimer levels and existence (or non-existence) of LA thrombus was not noticed from the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve with an area of .535. For patients with LA SEC, the D-Dimer levels were found to be considerably higher (776 ± 866 μg/L vs. 294 ± 331 μg/L, p = .001). An ideal cut-off level of 393 μg/L for diagnosing LA SEC was illustrated by the ROC curve with a sensitivity of 63.4%, specificity of 83.72%, positive predictive value of 82.5% and a negative predictive value of 65.45%.

Conclusions

D-dimer levels were not representative of the presence or absence of LA thrombus in patients with severe MS. Nonetheless, this study demonstrated the substantial link between D-Dimer level and LA SEC. If a D-Dimer level of 400 μg/L or higher is taken as positive, it has high specificity and positive predictive value for diagnosing LA SEC.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Modern diagnostic strategies for venous thromboembolism (VTE) incorporate pretest probability (PTP; prevalence) assessment. The ability of diagnostic tests to correctly identify or exclude VTE is influenced by VTE prevalence and test accuracy characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to support patients, clinicians, and health care professionals in VTE diagnosis. Diagnostic strategies were evaluated for pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower and upper extremity, and recurrent VTE.

METHODS

The American Society of Hematology (ASH) formed a multidisciplinary panel including patient representatives. The McMaster University GRADE Centre completed systematic reviews up to 1 October 2017. The panel prioritized questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess evidence and make recommendations. Test accuracy estimates and VTE population prevalence were used to model expected outcomes in diagnostic pathways. Where modeling was not feasible, management and accuracy studies were used to formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

Ten recommendations are presented, by PTP for patients with suspected PE and lower extremity DVT, and for recurrent VTE and upper extremity DVT.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients at low (unlikely) VTE risk, using D-dimer as the initial test reduces the need for diagnostic imaging. For patients at high (likely) VTE risk, imaging is warranted. For PE diagnosis, ventilation-perfusion scanning and computed tomography pulmonary angiography are the most validated tests, whereas lower or upper extremity DVT diagnosis uses ultrasonography. Research is needed on new diagnostic modalities and to validate clinical decision rules for patients with suspected recurrent VTE.

Doppler ultrasound and D-dimer

The diagnosis of venous thromboembolism has evolved considerably with the development of standardized diagnostic algorithms that include clinical probability assessment, D-dimer measurement and the use of non-invasive imaging modalities such as compression ultrasonography and computed tomography angiography. The implementation of these strategies aims to improve resource allocation and patient outcome. The judicious use of these diagnostic tools requires a thorough knowledge of the appropriate clinical setting in which every test and strategy is efficient and can be used safely. For this purpose, D-dimer measurement and compression ultrasonography are complementary: the former is mainly used to exclude VTE in selected patients, while the latter is used to confirm the presence of an underlying DVT.

This review provides an appraisal of the features and use of D-dimer and compression ultrasonography in the context of suspected venous thromboembolism.

Misinterpreting risk and test results delays diagnosis in a patient with pulmonary embolism

We report the case of a middle-aged man where a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) was delayed due to initial underestimation of risk and over-reliance on D-dimer testing. The patient presented with pleuritic chest pain after a 5 h domestic flight. The treating clinicians presumed that this duration of immobilisation was insufficient to cause a PE, D-dimer was not measured and the patient was discharged home. One week later, the patient re-presented due to persistence of chest pain. On this occasion, D-dimer was measured and it was normal, which was interpreted as excluding a PE. Subsequently, a CT pulmonary angiogram was performed, which demonstrated a subsegmental PE. This case highlights the importance of accurate assessment of PE-risk factors and following clinical guidelines, since a delayed diagnosis of PE is associated with increased mortality.

The influence of fondaparinux on the diagnosis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis by soluble fibrin and D-dimer

INTRODUCTION

There are many reports concerning the fondaparinux prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after surgery, but little is known about the usefulness of diagnosing DVT by the thrombotic markers such as soluble fibrin (SF) and D-dimer in patients treated with fondaparinux. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of SF and D-dimer tests for DVT screening in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated with fondaparinux.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 519 patients who underwent THA or TKA were evaluated. SF and D-dimer levels were evaluated on postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 14 and 21. DVT was confirmed by ultrasonography 4 days after surgery.

RESULTS

The incidence of DVT in patients treated with fondaparinux was significantly lower than in patients without fondaparinux. The SF test on postoperative day 1, and the D-dimer test on postoperative days 1, 4, and 7 were useful in untreated patients. However, in the patients treated with fondaparinux, the D-dimer test on postoperative day 7 only was useful for DVT screening.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of SF and D-dimer test for the diagnosis of DVT was decreased by administration of fondaparinux. A new strategy for diagnosing DVT might be required for patients receiving fondaparinux.

Fibrin D-Dimer Concentration, Deep Vein Thrombosis Symptom Duration, and Venous Thrombus Volume

Introduction: To determine the relationship between fibrin D-dimer levels, symptom duration, and thrombus volume, consecutive patients with incident deep venous thrombosis (DVT) were evaluated. Methods: In a cross-sectional study design, patient symptom onset was determined by careful patient questioning. Venous thrombosis was confirmed by compression duplex ultrasonography. Thrombus volume was estimated based on patient’s femur length using a forensic anthropology method. Fibrin D-dimer was measured by latex immunoassay. Results: 72 consecutive patients with confirmed leg DVT agreed to participate. The median symptom duration at the time of diagnosis was 10 days. The median D-dimer concentration was 1050 ng/dL. The median thrombus volume was 12.92 cm3. D-Dimer levels correlated with estimated thrombus volume (P < .0006 CI 0.12-0.41; R2adjusted = .15) but not symptom duration, patient’s age, or gender. Conclusions: Despite varying symptom duration prior to diagnosis, fibrin D-dimer remains a sensitive measure of venous thrombosis and correlates with thrombus volume.

Evaluation of soluble fibrin and D-dimer in the diagnosis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis

Soluble fibrin (SF) and D-dimer are useful for making the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the evidence for using such markers and optimal timing to diagnose postoperative DVT are unclear. We evaluate the usefulness of SF and D-dimer testing for the diagnosis of postoperative DVT. A total of 207 patients who had total hip arthroplasty or knee arthroplasty were evaluated. SF and D-dimer were tested on postoperative days 1 and 7. DVT was confirmed with ultrasonography. SF level on postoperative day 1 was the most useful, although D-dimer evaluation on postoperative days 1 and 7 was also useful. Using a SF cut-off of more than 4.00 microg ml(-1), the sensitivity was 90%, the specificity was 33%. Although the SF and D-dimer tests cannot be used as stand-alone tests, SF and D-dimer are valuable screening tools. We recommend two-stage screening including first with the SF or D-dimer test, followed by ultrasonography or venography.

The use of D-dimer in specific clinical conditions: a narrative review

The use of D-dimer in combination with a clinical decision rule has been widely investigated in pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Although it has been shown to be safe in excluding venous thromboembolism, the clinician is often faced with specific situations in which the use of D-dimer is controversial. We review the best available evidence on these patients. We conclude that it is not safe to use D-dimer testing in patients with symptoms of a venous thromboembolism for over 14 days, patients receiving therapeutic heparin treatment and patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis during oral anticoagulant therapy. In these populations the levels of D-dimer can be lower then expected giving rise to false-negative results. It is safe to use D-dimer testing in combination with a clinical decision rule in patients of all ages, patients presenting with a suspected recurrent venous thromboembolism or inpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. As patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism, elderly patients and inpatients have higher levels of D-dimer, D-dimer testing has a low specificity and the need for additional radiological testing is increased.

D-Dimer for venous thromboembolism diagnosis: 20 years later

Twenty years after its first use in the diagnostic workup of suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE), fibrin D-dimer (DD) testing has gained wide acceptance for ruling out this disease. The test is particularly useful in the outpatient population referred to the emergency department because of suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), in which the ruling out capacity concerns every third patient clinically suspected of having the disease. This usefulness is based on the high sensitivity of the test to the presence of VTE, at least for some assays. Due to its poor specificity precluding its use for ruling in VTE, DD testing must be integrated in comprehensive, sequential diagnostic strategies that include clinical probability assessment and imaging techniques such as lower limb venous compression ultrasonography for suspected DVT or multi-slice helical computed tomography for suspected PE. The present narrative review updates the data available on the use of the various commercially available DD assays in the diagnostic approach of clinically suspected VTE in distinct patient populations or situations, including outpatients and inpatients, patients with cancer, older age, pregnancy, a suspected recurrent event, limited thrombus burden, and patients already on anticoagulant treatment.

The value of D-dimer in the detection of early deep-vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty in Asian patients: a cohort study

Background and purpose

The relationship of D-dimer and deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of D-dimer in the detection of early DVT after TKA.

Methods

The measurements of plasma D-dimer level were obtained preoperatively and at day 7 postoperatively in 78 patients undergoing TKA. Ascending venography was performed in 7 to 10 days after surgery. The plasma D-dimer levels were correlated statistically with the venographic DVT.

Results

Venographic DVT was identified in 40% of patients. High plasma D-dimer level >2.0 μg/ml was found in 68% of patients with DVT and 45% without DVT (P < 0.05). Therefore, high D-dimer level greater than 2.0 μg/ml showed 68% sensitivity, 55% specificity, 60% accuracy, 50% positive predictive rate and 72% negative predictive rate in the detection of early DVT after TKA.

Conclusion

High plasma D-dimer level is a moderately sensitive, but less specific marker in the detection of early of DVT after TKA. Measurement of serum D-dimer alone is not accurate enough to detect DVT after TKA. Venography is recommended in patients with elevated D-dimer and clinically suspected but asymptomatic DVT after TKA.

Evaluation of a quantitative D-dimer latex immunoassay for acute pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomographic angiography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a quantitative plasma fibrin D-dimer latex immunoassay (LIA) for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Study subjects were Mayo Clinic Rochester inpatients and outpatients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism; all had undergone quantitative D-dimer LIA testing and multidetector-row computed tomographic (CT) angiography between August 3, 2001, and November 10, 2003. Multidetector-row CT angiography was the diagnostic reference standard.

RESULTS

Of 1355 CT studies, 208 (15%) were positive for acute pulmonary embolism. Median D-dimer levels were significantly higher for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (1425 ng/mL) than for patients without (500 ng/mL) (P<.001). The highest specificity that optimizes sensitivity for acute pulmonary embolism was achieved by using a discriminant value of 300 ng/mL, which yielded a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.97), a specificity of 0.27 (95% CI, 0.25-0.30), and a negative predictive value of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98).

CONCLUSION

The quantitative D-dimer LIA with a discriminant value of 300 ng/mL had high sensitivity and high negative predictive value but low specificity for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. On the basis of these results, we believe that a negative quantitative D-dimer LIA result and a low pretest probability of thromboembolism together are sufficient to exclude acute pulmonary embolism.

Normal D-dimer concentration is a common finding in symptomatic outpatients with distal deep vein thrombosis

The D-dimer analysis has been shown to have a high sensitivity and a high negative predictive value for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, most D-dimer studies, including recent clinical management studies, are performed without examination of the calf veins and/or performed on patient populations with a predominance of proximal DVT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the D-dimer test in a population with a suspected high incidence of distal DVT. In the present study, 393 outpatients with clinically suspected symptomatic DVT of the lower extremities were examined with whole-leg duplex ultrasonography. The D-dimer analysis was performed using an automated micro-latex assay (Tina-quant). A total of 137 of 393 patients had a proven DVT, with the majority presenting with distal DVT (59%). Twenty-eight out of 81 patients with distal DVT had a normal D-dimer, compared with two of 56 patients with proximal DVT. The sensitivity for distal DVT was only 65% compared with 96% for proximal DVT; the negative predictive values were 84 and 99%, respectively. In conclusion, the prevalence of distal DVT in a study population seems to have a great impact on the diagnostic performance of the D-dimer analysis. The study results also show that normal D-dimer levels do not exclude distal DVT in outpatients; instead, it can be hypothesized that normal D-dimer levels exclude DVT that require treatment, as indicated by the good outcome in recent management studies.

Diagnostic methods in pulmonary embolism

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) is challenging since clinical signs and symptoms are non-specific. The diagnostic tests available for demonstrating PE all have their drawbacks and are often costly and consume considerable amounts of resources. Simple tools that have become available in the last several years include clinical prediction rules and D-dimer testing. Assessment of the clinical probability, combined with a D-dimer test, can limit the need for additional diagnostic tests by 30%. For outpatients with a normal, sensitive ELISA D-dimer test and a low-to-moderate clinical probability, PE can safely be ruled out. Pulmonary angiography, though still the gold standard, is rarely used nowadays because of its invasiveness, its high costs and limited availability, and the declining experience of radiologists with the technique. Two imaging techniques--lung scintigraphy and helical CT--are the diagnostic methods of choice. A normal perfusion lung scan can safely exclude PE. However, 55-65% of patients have indeterminate lung scan results, making additional imaging tests necessary. Helical CT is increasingly being used as the first-line test because it can directly visualize a thromboembolus, it can suggest an alternative diagnosis, and there is excellent inter-observer agreement. A normal helical CT, followed by compression ultrasonography of the leg veins, can safely rule out PE. Finally, the safety of withholding anticoagulant treatment from patients with a normal multi-row detector helical CT as the sole test has not yet been demonstrated.

A negative D-dimer assay does not rule out cerebral venous thrombosis: a series of seventy-three patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an infrequent variety of cerebrovascular disease with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and a notoriously difficult diagnosis. Previous reports have emphasized the potential clinical utility of D-dimer assay in CVT diagnosis.

METHODS

A rapid sensitive D-dimer assay was performed at entry in 73 patients with CVT <30 days duration, examined in our institution between 1999 and 2003.

RESULTS

The mean value of D-dimer levels was 1521 ng/mL; 7 patients (10% of all patients and 26% of those presenting with isolated headache) had values <500 ng/mL. In a multivariate analysis, isolated headache was the only variable associated with a negative D-dimer assay.

CONCLUSIONS

A negative D-Dimer assay does not confidently rule out CVT, particularly in the setting of recent isolated headache.

Variation in the diagnostic performance of D-dimer for suspected deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have evaluated the accuracy of D-dimer in diagnosing suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but results are conflicting.

AIM

To overview estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer and identify causes of variation.

DESIGN

Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Database of Reviews of Effectiveness, the ACP Journal Club, citation lists, and contacted manufacturers. We selected studies that compared D-dimer to a reference standard in patients with suspected DVT. Data were analysed by random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

We included 97 studies reporting 198 assays in 99 different patient groups. Overall estimated sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer were 90.5% and 54.7%, but both estimates were subject to significant heterogeneity (p < 0.001). Meta-regression identified that some heterogeneity was explained by study setting, exclusion criteria, whether recruitment was consecutive or the study prospective, whether D-dimer and the reference standard were measured blind, and whether the D-dimer threshold was determined a priori. Sensitivity and specificity also varied between ELISA (94% and 45% respectively), latex (89% and 55%) and whole blood agglutination assays (87% and 68%). Sensitivity was higher for proximal than distal DVT. Specificity was dependent upon whether clinical probability of DVT was high (specificity 51%), intermediate (67%) or low (78%).

DISCUSSION

D-dimer has good sensitivity, but poor specificity, for DVT. Estimates are subject to substantial heterogeneity from various sources. D-dimer specificity appears to be strongly dependent upon the pre-test clinical probability of DVT.

[D-dimer levels in venous thromboembolism]

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The clinical signs and symptoms are unspecific, widely varying from asymptomatic to sudden death. The diagnostic algorithm of VTE is an evolving field, in which D-dimers (DD) determination has been used as one of the preferred screening tests. Clinical management studies are clarifying the role of DD in the diagnostic paradigm of VTE. Published reports support the use of plasma DD determination in patients with a low clinical probability of VTE. Patients with moderate or high clinical probability of VTE show a higher probability of false negative plasma DD values. This fact forces the clinician to use more complex diagnostic test in order to either confirm or exclude VTE. A variety of different qualitative and semi-quantifiable assays are available for plasma DD determination. There is a wide variation in performance and there are discrepancies in the comparability of the different assays. Therefore, in order to both appropriately incorporate plasma DD determination in the diagnostic strategies of VTE and to reduce unnecessary investigations, clinicians should ensure that they are familiar with the diagnostic performance of the assay used in their own institution allowing a safer and cost-effective procedure.

Changes in coagulation-fibrinolysis marker and neutrophil elastase following the use of tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty and the influence of neutrophil elastase on thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

To clarify in detail the mechanism underlying the development and exacerbation of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), we focused on the following factors: the thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), D-dimer and neutrophil elastase (NE). We basically investigated whether NE played an important role in the development of PTE I a mice model.

METHODS

Nineteen rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and six osteoarthritis (OA) patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with tourniquet, and 13 RA and 12 OA patients underwent TKA without tourniquet in each group. The blood levels of TAT, D-dimer and NE were measured before surgery, immediately after and during the days following surgery. For the induction of experimental PTE due to coagulation of platelets, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was administrated, and human NE with ADP was also administrated for the development of DVT and/or PTE.

RESULTS

The rates of increase in the mean TAT, D-dimer and NE levels in the group with tourniquet were statistically higher than those in the group without tourniquet after surgery. The mortality of the mouse due to PTE increased from 43 to 67% following ADP and human NE administration compared to a single ADP administration. Histological changes of the lungs in the mice receiving NE and ADP injections were characterized by a diffuse and extensive accumulation of platelets and fibrin in alveolar capillaries and other microvessels.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that during TKA, the use of tourniquet induces local release of a large amount of NE from neutrophils, inducing the development of DVT and/or PTE and their exacerbation.

Assessment of red blood cell and coagulation laboratory data

Critically ill patients present with a myriad of hematologic problems of various etiologies. The astute advanced practice nurse carefully reviews laboratory data incorporating principles of diagnostic reasoning and critical thinking while developing the plan of care. An in-depth understanding of hematology including red blood cells, red blood cell indices, and coagulation laboratory data is essential in the quest to understand the patient's pathophysiology. With every decade, nurses and physicians learn more about diseases that have plagued mankind for centuries--learning in greater detail about the deleterious effects and subsequent outcomes that often begin as subtle changes in traditional laboratory data. Greater focus on interpreting hematologic data and seeking support for diagnoses in clinical correlates will serve nurses well. This article intends to move advanced practice nurses beyond their current understanding of hematologic values--enabling them to understand that how and why we measure is as important as what we measure. No longer is it enough to simply measure physiologic data to develop a care plan driven by the patient's diagnoses. The contemporary nurse understands the importance of assigning meaning to data. Meaningful data are manageable data.

Ultrasound diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis

The ultrasound diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis by an emergency physician is occurring with increased frequency. The examination is simple to perform and, when combined with a clinical pretest probability or D-dimer, can aid in the rapid disposition ofa patient with lower extremity pain and swelling. The technique and findings of the limited lower extremity ultrasound and the data to support its use in the emergency department are discussed.

D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: a metaanalysis

BACKGROUND

The use of D-dimer assays as a rule-out test for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is controversial. To clarify this issue we performed a systematic review of the relevant literature.

METHODS

We identified eligible studies, using MEDLINE entries from February 1995 through October 2003, supplemented by a review of bibliographies of relevant articles. Studies reporting accuracy evaluations comparing D-dimer test results with lower extremity ultrasound or venography in symptomatic patients with suspected acute DVT were selected for review. Two reviewers critically appraised each study independently according to previously established methodologic standards for diagnostic test research. Those studies judged to be of highest quality were designated Level 1.

RESULTS

The 23 Level 1 studies reported data on 21 different D-dimer assays. There was wide variation in assay sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values, and major differences in methodology of reviewed studies. A multivariate analysis of assay performance, controlling for sample size, DVT prevalence, reference standard, and patient mix, found few differences among the assays in effect on test performance as measured by diagnostic odds ratio. Increasing prevalence of DVT was associated with poorer test performance (P = 0.01), whereas the choice of venography as the reference standard was associated with better test performance (P <0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Explanations for the wide variation in assay performance include differences in biochemical and technical characteristics of the assays, heterogeneity and small size of patient groups, and bias introduced by choice of reference standards. Assay sensitivity and negative predictive value were frequently <90%, uncharacteristic of a good rule-out test. General use of D-dimer assays as a stand-alone test for the diagnosis of DVT is not supported by the literature.

Sensitivity and specificity of the semiquantitative latex agglutination D-dimer assay for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism as defined by computed tomographic angiography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the semiquantitative latex agglutination plasma fibrin D-dimer assay for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism by using computed tomographic (CT) angiography as the diagnostic reference standard.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1, 1998, to June 26, 2000, patients who had both semiquantitative latex agglutination plasma fibrin D-dimer testing and CT angiography for suspected acute pulmonary embolism were selected for the study. A D-dimer value greater than 250 ng/mL was considered positive for thromboembolic disease. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism was based solely on the interpretation of the CT angiogram. The D-dimer assay results were then compared with the CT angiographic diagnoses.

RESULTS

Of 946 CT studies, 172 (18%) were positive for acute pulmonary embolism. The D-dimer assay was positive for 612 (65%) of the 946 patients. For acute pulmonary embolism, the D-dimer assay had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.88), a specificity of 039 (95% CI, 036-0.43), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.44 (95 % CI, 032-0.62), and a negative predictive value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The semiquantitative latex agglutination plasma fibrin D-dimer assay had moderate sensitivity and low specificity for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. When used alone, the results of this test were insufficient to exclude this serious and potentially fatal disorder. Approximately two thirds of our patients had positive D-dimer assays and required further evaluation to exclude acute pulmonary embolism.

Evaluation of a canine D-dimer point-of-care test kit for use in samples obtained from dogs with disseminated intravascular coagulation, thromboembolic disease, and hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a canine D-dimer point-of-care (cD-d POC) test kit for use in healthy dogs and dogs with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), thromboembolic disease (TED), and hemorrhage.

ANIMALS

12 healthy dogs, 18 dogs with DIC, 23 dogs with TED (19 acute and 4 chronic), and 18 dogs with hemorrhage.

PROCEDURE

The cD-d POC, canine D-dimer ELISA (cD-d ELISA), human D-dimer latex agglutination (hD-d LA), and fibrin degradation product (FDP) tests were performed on citrated plasma.

RESULTS

All healthy dogs had negative cD-d POC test results and mean cD-d ELISA value of 0.2 U/mL. All dogs with DIC had positive cD-d POC test results and mean cD-d ELISA value of 44 U/mL. Dogs with acuteTED had a mean cD-d ELISA value of 34 U/mL, and 17 of 19 had positive cD-d POC test results. Mean cD-d ELISA value in dogs with hemorrhage was 14 units/mL, and 15 of 18 had positive cD-d POC test results. The cD-d ELISA values in dogs with hemorrhage were significantly higher than those of healthy dogs but lower than those of dogs with DIC and acute TED. The cD-d POC, cD-d ELISA, and hD-d LA tests were comparable in differentiating healthy dogs from dogs with DIC, acute TED, or hemorrhage and appeared to be superior to measurement of FDPs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The cD-d POC test kit can be quickly and easily used and reliably detects dogs with DIC or acute TED. Positive results may also be seen in dogs with internal hemorrhage.

The usefulness of five D-dimer assays in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis

D-Dimer measurement is a promising tool in the exclusion of venous thrombosis. New d-dimer assays have been introduced, but need clinical validation. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of four relatively new d-dimer assays and a classical ELISA in outpatients suspected for deep venous thrombosis. In 537 patients, participants in a large prospective management study using a clinical probability score and a d-dimer measurement (Tina-quant), additional samples were taken for d-dimer measurement using the Asserachrom ELISA, the VIDAS New, the STA-LIA and the Miniquant assay. Performances of each test were calculated using clinical data during a 3-month follow-up. Thrombosis was detected in 224 patients (42%). The area under the ROC curve was significantly higher for the Tina-quant as compared to the other assays. Using standard cut-off values, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity of the Asserachrom were 97, 94 and 33%, respectively. For the VIDAS New, values were 100, 96 and 8%, respectively. The Tina-quant showed values of 99, 98 and 41%, respectively, and the STA-LIA 98, 95 and 32%. Values for the Miniquant were 95, 94 and 52%. The d-dimer assays in our study all show a high sensitivity and negative predictive value, but none of the assays reached an NPV of > 98% at standard cut-off values. d-Dimer assays with a low specificity still necessitate additional diagnostic tests in the majority of the patients.

The d-dimer test for deep venous thrombosis: gold standards and bias in negative predictive value

BACKGROUND

Because venous ultrasound (US) fails to fully image the calf veins, there is the potential for US gold standard studies to classify patients with calf deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the nondiseased category, causing bias in test index calculations. A false increase in negative predictive value (NPV) is especially likely because calf DVT false-negative tests will be counted in the numerator along with the true-negative tests in NPV calculations. We verified the presence and magnitude of this bias for the d-dimer test.

METHODS

We abstracted data on overall (calf and thigh) and thigh-only test sensitivity, specificity, and NPV from the six English language studies published between March 1995 and October 2001 that compared d-dimer to a gold standard (GS) capable of imaging both thigh and calf veins and that also stratified results by thigh and calf location. Thigh specificity and NPV were calculated classifying calf DVT patients as free of disease.

RESULTS

The six studies included 81-214 participants and provided 26 comparisons of 16 different d-dimer assays to the GS. Thigh sensitivity was higher than overall sensitivity in 22 of 26 comparisons (range, -0.3 to 8.6); thigh specificity was lower than overall specificity in all comparisons (range, -0.7 to -7.8); and thigh NPV was higher than overall NPV in 22 of 26 comparisons and unchanged in 4 comparisons (range, 0.0-9.2). NPV was >95% in 20 of the thigh results but >95% in only 8 of the overall results.

CONCLUSIONS

Different GS can produce clinically significant differences in test indices. Care must be taken in interpreting DVT studies that evaluate d-dimer as a rule-out test and that use US as a GS, because missed calf DVT can falsely increase the NPV.

Limitations of D-dimer testing in unselected inpatients with suspected venous thromboembolism

PURPOSE

To determine the utility and limitations of D-dimer testing for the evaluation of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We performed D-dimer testing by four different methods in unselected inpatients undergoing radiologic evaluation for possible venous thromboembolism. We included patients with a history of malignancy, recent surgery, thrombosis, and anticoagulation treatment. C-reactive protein levels were assayed as a measure of inflammation.

RESULTS

Of 45 patients with radiographically proven proximal deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, 43 had elevated D-dimer levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (sensitivity, 96%); the specificity of the test was 23% (36/157). The qualitative non-ELISA tests had higher specificities, but their sensitivities were <70%. Nineteen patients (42%) with thrombosis had false-negative D-dimer tests by at least one assay. The specificity of the tests decreased with increasing duration of hospitalization, increasing age, and increasing C-reactive protein levels. D-dimer testing had little or no utility in distinguishing patients with thrombosis from those without in patients who had been hospitalized for more than 3 days, were older than 60 years, or had C-reactive protein levels in the highest quartile.

CONCLUSION

In unselected inpatients, D-dimer testing has limited clinical utility because of its poor specificity. This is particularly true for older patients, those who have undergone prolonged hospitalization, and those with markedly elevated C-reactive protein levels. In some patient subsets, a negative non-ELISA D-dimer test cannot discriminate between inpatients with and without thrombosis.

Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism

This clinical policy focuses on critical issues in the evaluation and management of patients with signs or symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE). A MEDLINE search for clinical trials published from January 1995 through April 2001 was performed using the key words "pulmonary embolus" with limits of "clinical investigations" and "clinical policies." Subcommittee members and expert peer reviewers also supplied articles with direct bearing on the policy. This policy focuses on 2 major areas of current interest and/or controversy: (1) diagnostic: utility of D -dimer, ventilation-perfusion scanning, and spiral computed tomography angiogram in the evaluation of PE; and (2) therapeutic: indications for fibrinolytic therapy. Recommendations for patient management are provided for each 1 of these topics based on strength of evidence (Level A, B, or C). Level A recommendations represent patient management principles that reflect a high degree of clinical certainty; Level B recommendations represent patient management principles that reflect moderate clinical certainty; and Level C recommendations represent other patient management strategies based on preliminary, inconclusive, or conflicting evidence, or based on panel consensus. This guideline is intended for physicians working in emergency departments or chest pain evaluation units.

Comparative evaluation of d-dimer assays for exclusion of deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients

Diagnostic work-up of patients sent to the hospital for diagnosing of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) often combines the determination of D-dimer and the application of a clinical probability score. To fulfill diagnostic as well as economic needs, D-dimer assays should exhibit a high negative predictive value (NPV) as well as reasonable specificity. In this study, we evaluated both a latex-enhanced immunoassay for use on routine coagulation analyzers and a radial partition immunoassay (RPIA) for use on a point-of-care analyzer. Samples included were from 344 outpatients with suspected deep venous thrombosis. Among them, 100 had deep venous thrombosis. Results obtained for both assays show a good efficiency for exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with well-acceptable specificity.

A detailed analysis of equivocal duplex findings in patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze equivocal duplex findings in patients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis and thus to increase the diagnostic utility of color duplex sonography in this category of patients.

METHODS

Phlebography was requested in a series of 102 consecutive patients with inconclusive duplex findings. These patients were, according to the duplex findings only, subdivided into having low, intermediate, and high probability of deep venous thrombosis.

RESULTS

Phlebographywas attempted in 71 cases and successfully performed in 49. The remaining 53 patients were prospectively followed clinically for 6 months. Phlebography showed deep venous thrombosis in 1 of 63 patients in the group with low probability, 3 of 31 in the intermediate group, and all of the 8 patients with high probability. Twenty-two (31%) of the 71 attempted phlebographic examinations were nondiagnostic. None of the patients in the follow-up group had any thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if a duplex examination is equivocal, it is still possible to extract clinically useful information by categorizing the duplex results into subgroups with low, intermediate, and high probability of deep venous thrombosis. This can have implications for the diagnostic or therapeutic handling of these patients and thus can increase the utility of sonography in patients with inconclusive duplex findings.

[Diagnostic value of D-dimer in patients with a low pretest probability of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities]

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the accuracy of a diagnostic strategy including broth clinical assessment and determination of D-dimer (DD) in patients with clinically suspicion of low pretest probability of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

METHOD

149 outpatients (mean age 69; SD 16) with clinically suspected proximal DVT attending our Emergency Department and classified as low pretest probability were included in an observational prospective study. In patients with a DD (STA Liatest D-Di, Diagnostica Stago, Asnières sur Seine, France) concentration below the cut-off value (0.4 ng/ml) the diagnosis of DVT was readily ruled out, whereas those individuals with a positive DD result underwent compression Doppler venous ultrasound. A 3-month clinical follow-up was carried out in those patients in whom a diagnosis of DVT was initially excluded.

RESULTS

Only 2 cases of DVT were confirmed (prevalence 1.3%; CI 95%, 0.2-5.3). In 47.6% of cases, a DD negativity ruled out the diagnosis of DVT. The rate of negative DD results was significantly lower in patients below 70 years of age as compared to older patients (73.6 versus 33.3%) (p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DD in our series were 100% (CI 95%,19.7-95.1), 48.3% (CI 95%, 40.0-56.7), 2.6% (CI 95%, 0.4-9.8) and 100% (CI 95%, 93.6-99.8) respectively, the latter being similar in the two age groups. No case of DVT was diagnosed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a low pretest probability of DVT a negative DD result reliably and safely rules out such diagnosis. However, the diagnostic value of DD is lower in elderly patients (>= 70 years of age) due to a lower rate of negative results in these individuals.

Decrease in sensitivity of D-dimer for acute venous thromboembolism after starting anticoagulant therapy

D-dimer testing is useful for the exclusion of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulant therapy is expected to reduce D-dimer levels in patients with thrombosis and, consequently, it may not be safe to use D-dimer levels to exclude VTE after anticoagulant therapy has been started. The objectives of this study were to estimate the decrease in D-dimer levels after 24 h of heparin therapy and, applying this estimate to the results of a recent study, to calculate the expected reduction in sensitivity. Using pre-defined criteria, we first performed a literature review to determine whether, and by how much, D-dimer levels decrease within 24 h of starting heparin therapy in patients with acute VTE. Using D-dimer levels that were measured in a prospective study of patients with confirmed deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism as baselines, we then determined the change in sensitivity (and specificity) that would result from the fall in D-dimer levels that the literature review suggested would have occurred after 24 h of heparin therapy. On the basis of the literature review, we calculated that mean D-dimer levels decrease by 25%, 24 h after starting heparin therapy in patients with acute VTE. This 25% decrease in D-dimer levels resulted in a decrease in sensitivity from 95.6% (95% confidence interval, 90.0-98.6) to 89.4% (95% confidence interval, 83.7-95.1). There is a decrease in D-dimer levels in patients with acute VTE 24 h after starting heparin therapy that is expected to result in a clinically important drop in sensitivity.

Clinical prediction of deep venous thrombosis using two risk assessment methods in combination with rapid quantitative D-dimer testing

PURPOSE

The optimal approach to diagnosing deep venous thrombosis is not entirely clear. In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the yield of two methods of assessing the pretest probability of deep venous thrombosis-the treating physician's implicit assessment and the Wells score, a validated prediction rule that incorporates signs, symptoms, and the presence or absence of an alternative diagnosis-used in isolation and in combination with D-dimer measurement.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We studied 278 patients who were referred for suspicion of deep venous thrombosis. All patients were stratified into groups of low, moderate, or high risk of deep venous thrombosis on the basis of the clinical assessment and Wells score, and underwent rapid quantitative D-dimer testing (with a cutoff of 500 microg/mL), ultrasound examination, and follow-up for the occurrence of venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (29%) had a deep venous thrombosis. The accuracy of both methods was good (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.72), despite only fair agreement at the level of individual patients (weighted kappa = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23 to 0.40). The negative predictive value of D-dimer measurement was 96% (95% CI: 91% to 100%). When restricted to patients with low pretest probability, the negative predictive value of D-dimer measurement was 100% (95% CI: 96% to 100%) with the use of the Wells score and 96% (95% CI: 88% to 100%) with the physician's assessment. Our results were unchanged in analyses restricted to patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis or outpatients.

CONCLUSION

Clinical assessment to stratify a patient's likelihood of having deep venous thrombosis should be taught to physicians.

Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We derive a decision rule to partition emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) into a small, high-risk group (>40% pretest probability) that is unsafe for D -dimer testing and a larger group that is safe to have PE ruled out with either a whole-blood D -dimer plus alveolar deadspace measurement or a quantitative D -dimer assay.

METHODS

Nine hundred thirty-four patients with suspected PE were studied at 7 urban EDs in the United States. Patients were prospectively interviewed and examined for recognized symptoms, signs, and risk factors associated with PE. These data were collected before standard objective imaging for PE. Selected variables were analyzed by multivariate logistic analysis to determine factors associated with PE (P <.05). A decision rule was then constructed to categorize approximately 80% of ED patients as safe for D -dimer testing.

RESULTS

Pretest prevalence of PE was 19.4% (181/934; 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.3% to 21.7%). Six variables found to be significant on multivariate analysis were used to construct the decision rule. Unsafe patients had either a shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) more than 1.0 or age older than 50 years, together with any one of the following conditions: unexplained hypoxemia (SaO (2) <95%; no prior lung disease), unilateral leg swelling, recent major surgery, or hemoptysis. These criteria were met by 197 (21.0%) of 934 patients, and 83 of 197 (42.1%; 95% CI 35.3% to 49.6%) patients had PE. Exclusion of these 197 unsafe patients significantly decreased the probability of PE in the remaining 737 (79.0%) safe patients to 13.3% (95% CI 10.9% to 15.9%).

CONCLUSION

Simple clinical criteria can permit safe D -dimer testing in the majority of ED patients with suspected PE. These criteria warrant prospective validation.

Emergency department D-dimer testing

Since the early 1980s, much attention has been paid to the development of a biochemical marker for venous thromboembolism. D-dimers are derivatives of fibrinolysis and recently have been touted as a means of screening for thromboemoblism. We review the physiologic, pathologic, and chemical bases for this new test, and outline the specific D-dimer assays currently available. We conclude with a discussion of the clinical utility of D-dimer in the evaluation of patients with venous thromboembolism.

Pulmonary embolism: making sense of the diagnostic evaluation

Despite the publication of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis in 1990, the diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary embolism continues to be approached in an inconsistent fashion. The reasons for this are unclear but likely have to do with inadequate methods for predicting pretest probability of disease and the inconvenience and perceived risk of pulmonary angiography. Because pulmonary embolism and its treatment carry substantial risk of morbidity and mortality, a consistent approach to evaluation is desirable. This article reviews large, prospective studies that suggest that it may be unnecessary to diagnose pulmonary embolism with the certainty that pulmonary angiography allows. Finally, the article proposes an algorithm that may be acceptable to patients and clinicians alike if safety is confirmed in future prospective studies.

Rapid D-dimer testing and pre-test clinical probability in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients

We assessed the performance of three rapid D-dimer tests (Auto Dimertest, VIDAS and Tinaquant) in combination with a pretest clinical probability model for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in 106 consecutive outpatients with suspected DVT. Contrast venography or colour-coded duplex ultrasonography demonstrated the presence of DVT in 47 patients (14 distal DVT and 33 proximal DVT). First, we assessed the accuracy indices for different cut-off levels of the rapid D-dimer tests. Sensitivity was found to be 97.9-100%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.3-100%, and the exclusion rate was 24.5-31.1%. Next, the patients were grouped according to the pre-test clinical probability model in categories with low, moderate or high probability. In patients with a low pre-test probability, DVT would have been directly ruled out and the patients would not have undergone further investigations. In patients with a moderate probability, D-dimer testing and, in the case of a positive result, objective testing would have been performed and, in the case of a negative result, they would have been ruled out of having DVT. Patients with high probability would directly have undergone objective tests for DVT. The combination with the pre-test clinical probability model improved the exclusion rate (43.5-44.6%), whereas sensitivity (97.5-100%) and NPV (97.6-100%) remained roughly unchanged. The combination of rapid D-dimer tests with a pre-test clinical probability model may help to reduce unnecessary work-up in patients with suspected DVT.

A new method for measuring D-dimer using immunoturbidometry: a study of 255 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis

D-Dimer testing has been suggested as a non-invasive method for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In this study, we compared a new method, the Miniquant D-dimer (Biopool International, Ventura, California, USA) to other previously validated D-dimer methods used for the purpose. Patients who were undergoing a definitive diagnostic study for thromboembolism had a blood sample drawn at that time. A whole-blood D-dimer (SimpliRed; Agen Biomedical Ltd, Brisbane, Australia) test was performed, and residual plasma was frozen and later analyzed using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods (D-dimer Gold; Agen, and Asserachrome D-Di; Stago International, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA) and the Miniquant D-dimer. Once all samples were analyzed, the correlation and accuracy of the Miniquant was compared with the ELISA method using Spearman's regression and Dunn's multiple paired comparison. All D-dimer methods were compared with radiographic studies. The data was analyzed collectively and segregated into in-patient (n = 112) and out-patient (n = 143) populations. The Miniquant D-dimer sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) for all patients were 95, 21, and 94% for DVT, and 100, 26, and 100% for PE. This new D-dimer method demonstrates acceptable sensitivity in patients with PE and DVT and, based on the high NPV of this method, it can be used for the exclusion of thromboembolism.

Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in the year 2000

Deep-vein thrombosis is a relatively common disease, amenable to therapy but with a potentially fatal outcome if untreated. The diagnosis can be made in most patients with the noninvasive imaging procedure ultrasonography, but limitations exist. As with all tests, there is a potential for false-positive and false-negative results. The latter are especially an issue for calf vein thrombi, and this in part has led to the concept of serial testing of the proximal venous system and not imaging the calf. The premise of the repeat (serial) test is that only thrombi that extend to the proximal system are clinically relevant and such thrombi will be detected on the repeat test. However, despite the safety of the serial testing concept, it is inconvenient and expensive. In the last few years, the diagnostic process has been improved by the validation of a clinical model that accurately categorizes patients as having low, moderate, or high probability. Among the improvements this provides is the elimination of serial testing if the ultrasonogram is normal and the clinical probability low. The fibrin degradation product D-dimer has been demonstrated to have a high negative predictive value and has also proven useful in diagnostic algorithms. The combination of the D-dimer with clinical model assessment will enable diagnostic testing strategies that are more safe, effective, and convenient for patients.

Rapid ELISA D-dimer testing in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients

The clinical diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is known to be unreliable. Until now, no biological marker has been found to confirm thrombosis, but help can be gained from a biological marker ruling out the diagnosis of DVT or PE, i.e., the sensitive measurement of D-dimer (DD) species. This article summarizes our experience in introducing a rapid D-dimer test (ELISA VIDAS D-dimères test, bioMérieux) in a collaborative strategy for thrombosis diagnosis during 9 consecutive months involving 1,131 measurements. The efficacy of the DD test was very different according the type of patient, and departments where the DD test provides a real diagnostic benefit were identified. High clinical probability for thrombosis was encountered in 32 patients and radiology was carried out, although D-dimer was negative: none of these patients was found to have a thrombosis after radiologic examination. However, extensive progress must be made in test prescription to reduce the excessive rate of positive D-dimer tests (78%) and positive measurements that are not followed up by radiology (42%).

New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism

In 1990, the multicenter Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED), sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, compared the diagnostic value of the radioisotopic ventilation-perfusion lung scan (V/Q scan) with that of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Despite the endurance of the radioisotopic V/Q scan as the most widely used test for evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE), a better screening tool is clearly needed for use in the emergency department. During the past decade, several new modalities have emerged for evaluation of patients with suspected PE. We evaluate the diagnostic utility of the D-dimer test and the alveolar dead space determination as potential screening tests and of spiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography as potential confirmatory tests for PE. For comparison, recent data on the diagnostic utility of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and the V/Q scan are included. The potential application of these new tests to a hypothetical ED population is described.

Ruling out acute deep vein thrombosis by ELISA plasma D-dimer assay versus ultrasound in inpatients more than 70 years old

In geriatric care, deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is mostly diagnosed by noninvasive techniques. The objectives of this prospective study were: (1) to evaluate the power of ELISA plasma D-dimer assay versus ultrasound (US) in ruling out acute DVT of the lower limbs in symptomatic geriatric inpatients, and (2) to determine the most effective D-dimer cutoff value over the age of 70 years. Over a 10-month period, inpatients with suspected lower limb DVT simultaneously underwent US examination and ELISA plasma D-dimer assay. Noninclusion criteria were comorbid conditions able to modify the D-dimer level. Data were processed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In total, 150 patients (125 women, 25 men), average age 86.3 years (range 70-101) were included. A diagnosis of lower limb DVT was established in 53 patients (35.3%). With a 500 ng/mL D-dimer cutoff conventional value, DVT was ruled out in only five patients (3.3%), whereas a 750 ng/mL value ruled out DVT in 19 patients (12.7%) with a sensitivity of 98.1%, and a negative predictive value of 95.0%. The only false negative corresponded to a patient with a 15-mm thrombus in the distal calf. In inpatients above 70, an ELISA plasma D-dimer value smaller than 750 ng/mL is a rapid reliable noninvasive means to rule out lower limb DVT, if color flow Doppler ultrasound is not available on site.