Outpatient Surgical Management of Orbital Blowout Fractures

Titanium Implants Coated with Hydroxyapatite Used in Orbital Wall Reconstruction-A Literature Review

With the increasing incidences of orbital wall injuries, effective reconstruction materials and techniques are imperative for optimal clinical outcomes. In this literature review, we delve into the efficacy and potential advantages of using titanium implants coated with nanostructured hydroxyapatite for the reconstruction of the orbital wall. Titanium implants, recognized for their durability and mechanical strength, when combined with the osteoconductive properties of hydroxyapatite, present a potentially synergistic solution. The purpose of this review was to critically analyze the recent literature and present the state of the art in orbital wall reconstruction using titanium implants coated with nanostructured hydroxyapatite. This review offers clinicians detailed insight into the benefits and potential drawbacks of using titanium implants coated with nanostructured hydroxyapatite for orbital wall reconstruction. The highlighted results advocate for its benefits in terms of osseointegration and provide a novel strategy for orbital reconstruction, though further studies are essential to establish long-term efficacy and address concerns.

Perioperative Management of Patients with Craniomaxillofacial Trauma

Successful surgical management of patients with facial fractures requires a detailed preoperative evaluation and postoperative management that differs from elective surgical patients. This review presents evidence-based recommendations from the surgical and anesthesiology literature that address many of the clinical questions that arise during the perioperative management of this group of patients. Surgeons and anesthesiologists must work together at numerous points and make joint decisions, especially where airway and pain management challenges may arise. The multidisciplinary nature of the decision-making process is emphasized.

Current Guidelines and Opinions in the Management of Orbital Floor Fractures

Orbital floor fractures are a common manifestation of facial trauma that is encountered by ophthalmology, otolaryngology, and oral maxillofacial specialists. Surgical intervention is required emergently in cases of tissue entrapment and less urgently in cases of presenting with persistent diplopia, enophthalmos greater than 2 mm, and/or fractures involving greater than 50% of the orbital floor. Surgical management is a debated topic with differing opinions among surgeons regarding timing of repair, type of implant, and surgical approach.

Ambulatory Orbital Fracture Repair: An Analysis of ER Visits After Surgery From a Multistate Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the 30-day postoperative emergency room (ER) visit rate following ambulatory orbital fracture repair with same-day discharge, and the causes and risk factors associated with ER visit.

STUDY DESIGN

Database study.

SETTING

State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD) and State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) for California, New York, and Florida for 2011.

METHODS

We identified orbital fracture repair procedures among adults from the SASD, which was linked to the SEDD to identify the incidence and causes of ER visits within 30 days. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the factors associated with ER visit.

RESULTS

Among 762 patients, the 30-day postoperative ER visit rate was 4.5%. Most ER visits (58.9%) occurred during the first week after surgery. The most common reasons for ER visits were related to pain, swelling, headache, dizziness, and fatigue (29.4%), followed by ophthalmologic etiologies including visual disturbances and infection of the eye (14.7%). There was no case of retrobulbar hematoma. In the multivariate analysis, patients living in Florida were at a significantly higher risk for ER visit compared to those in California (odds ratio: 4.48 [1.43-14.10], p = .010).

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory orbital fracture repair appears to be safe. Common reasons for ER visit included pain, swelling, and ophthalmic symptoms. An increased risk for ER visit was seen with certain geographic regions but not with medical comorbidities or concurrent facial fractures or procedures.

Ophthalmic Trauma Malpractice in the Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company Database

PURPOSE

To review ophthalmic trauma malpractice claims in the Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company (OMIC) database to determine the frequency and causes of litigation.

METHODS

A retrospective case series analysis of ophthalmic trauma claims from 2009 to 2019 was completed. Cases were selected only if the injury was secondary to trauma (e.g., fall, gunshot wound, paintball injury, etc.); iatrogenic traumatic surgical injuries were excluded.

RESULTS

31 closed cases associated with 40 total claims related to ophthalmic trauma out of 2565 claims (1.56%) in the OMIC database were analysed. 13 of the 31 cases (41.9%) were decided for the plaintiff. In decisions for the plaintiff, the median settlement amount was $330,000 (range $125,000-$1,000,000). The most frequent initial diagnoses were corneal abrasion (n = 10), hyphema (n = 5) and open-globe injury (n = 5), and the most common final diagnoses were endophthalmitis (n = 8), intraocular foreign body (n = 7) and retinal detachment (n = 7). The most common causes of malpractice litigation were a delay in referral or follow-up (n = 11) and failure to get appropriate imaging (n = 8). In the 13 cases decided for the plaintiff, experts concluded nine did not meet standard of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Ophthalmic trauma malpractice claims are very uncommon in the United States, however, the payout is higher than non-trauma settlements, and approximately 40% of cases were decided for the plaintiff. Care could be improved with a careful history and complete ophthalmic examination (with dilated fundoscopy), imaging in appropriate patients, meticulous documentation, and early sub-specialist referral when the diagnosis or management plan was unclear.

Towards an evolution in ambulatory surgery for orbital floor repair? Our experience over a period of 11 years

INTRODUCTION

Orbital floor fracture repair is a complex surgery with intra-orbital hematoma being the most feared complication as it can lead to visual loss if not treated in good time. This is why currently patients are monitored for almost 48 hours as inpatients. The purpose of this study was to find out if orbital floor repair surgery could be safely undertaken as a day case by reviewing the experience of the last 11 years at the Caen University Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted at the Caen University Hospital. All patients undergoing orbital floor reconstruction in a trauma setting from January 2008 to December 2019 were included.

RESULTS

Of the 130 included patients, none presented a post-operative complication such as intra-orbital hematoma. 3 patients had their surgery performed as a day case.

DISCUSSION

In the literature, more and more surgeons are proposing orbital floor fracture repair to be undertaken as day case. Indeed, the theoretical risk of intra-orbital hematoma is greater within the first 6 hours after surgery and can persist up to 10 days postoperatively. Provided patients meet the classic criteria for outpatient surgery, and are provided with a precise post-operative care protocol. Under these conditions, orbital floor fractures may be repair in ambulatory surgery.

Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview

The reconstruction of an orbit after complex craniofacial fractures can be extremely demanding. For satisfactory functional and aesthetic results, it is necessary to restore the orbital walls and the craniofacial skeleton using various types of materials. The reconstruction materials can be divided into autografts (bone or cartilage tissue) or allografts (metals, ceramics, or plastic materials, and combinations of these materials). Over time, different types of materials have been used, considering characteristics such as their stability, biocompatibility, cost, safety, and intraoperative flexibility. Although the ideal material for orbital reconstruction could not be unanimously identified, much progress has been achieved in recent years. In this article, we summarise the advantages and disadvantages of each category of reconstruction materials. We also provide an update on improvements in material properties through various modern processing techniques. Good results in reconstructive surgery of the orbit require both material and technological innovations.

Inpatient Versus Outpatient Operative Management of Isolated Facial Fractures

BACKGROUND

Patients with isolated facial fractures requiring operative fixation can be managed on an inpatient or outpatient basis. The goal of this study was to compare the safety of each approach using a large multi-institutional database.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project was reviewed for facial fractures between 2005 and 2018. Groups were identified using inpatient and outpatient status as designated in the database. Patients who required additional procedures, concurrent procedures, or other emergency procedures were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used for group comparisons and logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for complications.

RESULTS

We identified 3350 patients who underwent operative fixation of isolated facial fractures. The majority of these cases (70.3%) were done on an outpatient basis. Compared to those in the outpatient group, patients in the inpatient group were older, had more medical comorbidities, had higher wound class, and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class. Complication (6.3% versus 2.3%), reoperation (4.3% versus 1.7%), and readmission (6.9% versus 2.5%) rates were all higher in the inpatient group (P < 0.01). By logistic regression analysis, the odds ratios for complications, reoperation, and readmission were higher in the inpatient group. After adjusting for imbalanced preoperative patient characteristics, the increased risk of complications in the inpatient group persisted [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, confidence interval (CI) 1.2-3.0, P = 0.01] while the risk of reoperation (OR = 1.7, CI 1.0-2.9, P = 0.08) and risk of readmission (OR = 1.4, CI 0.7-2.6, P = 0.33) no longer showed statistical significance between the inpatient and outpatient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient operative management of isolated facial fractures is associated with an almost 2-fold increased risk of complications, though no increased risk of reoperation or readmission.