Cost Analysis of Azithromycin versus Erythromycin in Pregnancies Complicated by Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

Latency Antibiotics in Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Comparison of Azithromycin Regimens

BACKGROUND

Treatment with antibiotics at the time of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) has been shown to prolong pregnancy. Due to the recurrent shortage of erythromycin, azithromycin has been substituted in the traditional regimen; however, there are little data on optimal dosing.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in latency from onset of PPROM to delivery in patients who received a single dose of azithromycin compared with a 5-day course.

METHODS

This was a single-center, multisite, retrospective, IRB approved analysis of patients admitted with a diagnosis of PPROM. Patients were included if rupture occurred between 22 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation and received either a single dose or a 5-day course of azithromycin along with a beta lactam.

RESULTS

A total of 376 patients were reviewed with 296 patients included in the final analysis. There was no statistical difference in the primary outcome of latency days in patients who received the 5-day versus the single-dose course (4 vs 5 days, P = 0.641). There was a significantly higher rate of histologic chorioamnionitis in the single-dose course of azithromycin (46.4% vs 62.6%, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There was no difference in latency for patients who received a 5-day course of azithromycin versus a single dose for the treatment of PPROM. A higher rate of histologic chorioamnionitis was observed in those who received the single-day course. Prospective follow-up studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Directive clinique no 430 : Diagnostic et prise en charge de la rupture prématurée des membranes avant terme

OBJECTIF

Fournir des directives claires et concises pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de la rupture prématurée des membranes avant terme (RPMAT).

POPULATION CIBLE

Toute patiente manifestant une rupture prématurée des membranes avant 37 semaines d'aménorrhée. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La présente directive clinique vise à fournir les premières recommandations générales canadiennes sur la prise en charge de la rupture des membranes avant terme. Elle repose sur un examen complet et à jour des données probantes sur le diagnostic de la rupture et sur la prise en charge, le bon moment et les modes d'accouchement. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans PubMed-Medline et Cochrane en 2021 en utilisant les termes suivants : preterm premature rupture of membranes, PPROM, chorioamnionitis, Nitrazine test, ferning, commercial tests, PAMG-1, IGFBP-1 test, ultrasonography, PPROM/antenatal corticosteroids, PPROM/Magnesium sulphate, PPROM/antibiotic treatment, PPROM/tocolysis, PPROM/preterm labour, PPROM/neonatal outcomes, PPROM/mortality, PPROM/outpatient/inpatient, PPROM/cerclage, previable PPROM. Les articles retenus sont des essais cliniques randomisés, des méta-analyses, des revues systématiques, des directives cliniques et des études observationnelles. D'autres publications pertinentes ont été sélectionnées à partir des notices bibliographiques de ces articles. Seuls les articles en anglais ont été examinés. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins de santé prénatale ou périnatale. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Guideline No. 430: Diagnosis and management of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes

OBJECTIVE

To provide clear and concise guidelines for the diagnosis and management of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) TARGET POPULATION: All patients with PPROM <37 weeks gestation BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This guideline aims to provide the first Canadian general guideline on the management of preterm membrane rupture. It includes a comprehensive and up-to-date review of the evidence on the diagnosis, management, timing and method of delivery.

EVIDENCE

The following search terms were entered into PubMed/Medline and Cochrane in 2021: preterm premature rupture of membranes, PPROM, chorioamnionitis, Nitrazine test, ferning, commercial tests, placental alpha microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1) test, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) test, ultrasonography, PPROM/antenatal corticosteroids, PPROM/Magnesium sulphate, PPROM/ antibiotic treatment, PPROM/tocolysis, PPROM/preterm labour, PPROM/Neonatal outcomes, PPROM/mortality, PPROM/outpatient/inpatient, PPROM/cerclage, previable PPROM. Articles included were randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. Only English-language articles were reviewed.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

All prenatal and perinatal health care providers.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Developing a Core Outcome Set for the Evaluation of Antibiotic Use in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Semi-Structured Interview

Background: Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) is associated with maternal and neonatal infections. Although guidelines suggest prophylactic antibiotics for pregnant women with PROM, the optimal antibiotic regimen remains controversial. Synthesizing the data from different studies is challenging due to variations in reported outcomes.

Objective: This study aimed to form the initial list of outcomes for the core outcome set (COS) that evaluates antibiotic use in PROM by identifying all existing outcomes and patients’ views.

Methods: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases. We also screened the references of the included studies as a supplementary search. We extracted basic information from the articles and the outcomes. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, extracted the outcomes, and grouped them into domains. Then, semi-structured interviews based on the potential factors collected by the systematic review were conducted at West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University. Pregnant women who met the diagnostic criteria for PROM were enrolled. Participants reported their concerns about the outcomes. Two researchers identified the pregnant women’s concerns.

Results: A total of 90 studies were enrolled in this systematic review. The median outcomes in the included studies was 7 (1–31), and 109 different unique outcomes were identified. Pre-term PROM (PPROM) had 97 outcomes, and term PROM (TPROM) had 70 outcomes. The classification and order of the core outcome domains of PPROM and TPROM were consistent. The physiological domain was the most common for PPROM and TPROM outcomes. Furthermore, 35.1 and 57.1% outcomes were only reported once in PPROM and TPROM studies, respectively. Thirty pregnant women participated in the semi-structured interviews; 10 outcomes were extracted after normalized, and the outcomes were reported in the systematic review. However, studies rarely reported pregnant women’s concerns.

Conclusion: There was considerable inconsistency in outcomes selection and reporting in studies about antibiotics in PROM. An initial core outcomes set for antibiotics in PROM was formed.

Erythromycin vs azithromycin for treatment of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the effect of erythromycin vs azithromycin on the duration of latency and the rate of clinical chorioamnionitis in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature.

DATA SOURCES

From inception to October 2021, we explored MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies comparing the duration of latency and the rate of clinical chorioamnionitis between women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes who were treated with erythromycin and those who were treated with azithromycin at the time of diagnosis were included.

METHODS

Here, 2 reviewers separately ascertained studies, obtained data, and gauged study quality. The mean length of latency and the rate of clinical chorioamnionitis were compared and mean differences and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies with 1289 women were identified. The mean length of latency in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes was similar between individuals treated with erythromycin and those treated with azithromycin: 6.6 days vs 6.7 days (mean difference, 0.07 days; 95% confidence interval, -0.45 to 0.60; I², 0%). The median point prevalence rates of clinical chorioamnionitis were 25% (95% confidence interval, 12-32) in women treated with erythromycin and 14% (95% confidence interval, 9-24) in women treated with azithromycin. The overall clinical chorioamnionitis rate in women treated with azithromycin was lower than women treated with erythromycin (pooled odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.71; I², 0%).

CONCLUSION

The administration of azithromycin in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes was associated with a similar latency period but a lower rate of clinical chorioamnionitis than the administration of erythromycin.

Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217

Preterm birth occurs in approximately 10% of all births in the United States and is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality (). Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) that occurs preterm complicates approximately 2-3% of all pregnancies in the United States, representing a significant proportion of preterm births, whereas term PROM occurs in approximately 8% of pregnancies (). The optimal approach to assessment and treatment of women with term and preterm PROM remains challenging. Management decisions depend on gestational age and evaluation of the relative risks of delivery versus the risks (eg, infection, abruptio placentae, and umbilical cord accident) of expectant management when pregnancy is allowed to progress to a later gestational age. The purpose of this document is to review the current understanding of this condition and to provide management guidelines that have been validated by appropriately conducted outcome-based research when available. Additional guidelines on the basis of consensus and expert opinion also are presented. This Practice Bulletin is updated to include information about diagnosis of PROM, expectant management of PROM at term, and timing of delivery for patients with preterm PROM between 34 0/7 weeks of gestation and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation.

Erythromycin compared to amoxicillin and azithromycin for antimicrobial prophylaxis for preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a retrospective study

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is widely recommended for pregnant women who have preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Erythromycin prophylaxis was used during an initial period (control) and then changed to intravenous amoxicillin for 48 h, followed by 5 days of oral amoxicillin along with a single dose of azithromycin (case). Healthcare records were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was latency (between membrane rupture and delivery) and the secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, maternal high dependency unit (HDU) admission, and several laboratory parameters. There were 78 women in the case group (amoxicillin and azithromycin) and controls were selected on a 1:1 ratio. There was no statistically significant difference between cases and controls with respect to group B Streptococcus or E.coli carriage, previous preterm birth, assissted fertility and parity. No babies had a positive blood culture with Group B Streptococcus. There was a longer latency to delivery for those prescribed amoxicillin and azithromycin (median = 5.5 days), compared with controls on erythromycin (median = 2 days, p < .001). There was no difference in the mode of delivery or maternal HDU admission. Given the potential sequelae of preterm birth, this warrants further prospective investigation in a randomised control trial.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended for women who have preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM). It has been shown to increase latency of delivery. However there are different regimens recommended in North America (amoxicillin and a macrolide) and the United Kingdom (macrolide monotherapy).What do the results of this study add? This study has shown that in our population, women who were prescribed the PPROM regimen of amoxicillin with azithromycin had a longer median latency from time of rupture of membranes to delivery, than women in a historical control group who were prescribed erythromycin monotherapy.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This retrospective study has shown that there may be a difference in latency between different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens for PPROM. A randomised control trial, with sufficient patient numbers, is needed to determine the best regimen for prophylaxis, and would allow harmonisation of international guidelines.

Azithromycin vs erythromycin for the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes

BACKGROUND

Preterm premature rupture of membranes complicates 2-3% of pregnancies. Many institutions have advocated for the use of azithromycin instead of erythromycin. This is secondary to national shortages of erythromycin, ease of administration, better side effect profile, and decreased cost of azithromycin as compared with erythromycin.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether there are differences in the latency from preterm premature rupture of membranes to delivery in patients treated with different dosing regimens of azithromycin vs erythromycin.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort of women with singleton pregnancies with confirmed rupture of membranes between 23⁰ and 33⁶ weeks from January 2010 to June 2015. Patients were excluded if there was a contraindication to expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Patients received 1 of 4 antibiotic regimens: (1) azithromycin 1000 mg per os once (azithromycin 1 day group); (2) azithromycin 500 mg per os once, followed by azithromycin 250 mg per os daily for 4 days (azithromycin 5 day group); (3) azithromycin 500 mg intravenously for 2 days, followed by azithromycin 500 mg per os daily for 5 days (azithromycin 7 day group); or (4) erythromycin intravenously for 2 days followed by erythromycin per os for 5 days (erythromycin group). The choice of macrolide was based on institutional policy and/or availability of antibiotics at the time of admission. In addition, all patients received ampicillin intravenously for 2 days followed by amoxicillin per os for 5 days. Primary outcome was latency from diagnosis of rupture of membranes to delivery. Secondary outcomes included clinical and histopathological chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-three patients who met inclusion criteria were identified. Seventy-eight patients received azithromycin for 1 day, 191 patients received azithromycin for 5 days, 52 patients received azithromycin for 7 days, and 132 patients received erythromycin. Women who received the 5 day regimen were younger and less likely to be non-African American, have hypertension, have sexually transmitted infection, or experienced substance abuse. There was no statistical difference in median latency time of azithromycin 1 day (4.9 days, 95% confidence interval, 3.3-6.4), azithromycin 5 days (5.0, 95% confidence interval, 3.9-6.1), or azithromycin 7 days (4.9 days, 95% confidence interval, 2.8-7.0) when compared with erythromycin (5.1 days, 95% confidence interval, 3.9-6.4) after adjusting for demographic variables (P = .99). Clinical chorioamnionitis was not different between groups in the adjusted model. Respiratory distress syndrome was increased in the azithromycin 5 day group vs azithromycin 1 day vs erythromycin (44% vs. 29% and 29%, P = .005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in latency to delivery, incidence of chorioamnionitis, or neonatal outcomes when comparing different dosing regimens of the azithromycin with erythromycin, with the exception of respiratory distress syndrome being more common in the 5 day azithromycin group. Azithromycin could be considered as an alternative to erythromycin in the expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes if erythromycin is unavailable or contraindicated. There appears to be no additional benefit to an extended course of azithromycin beyond the single-day dosing, but final recommendations on dosing strategies should rely on clinical trials.