Validation of the Siggaard-Andersen Acid-Base Nomogram for Hemoglobin F: Implications for Fetal Cord Blood Gas Analysis

Is it time to end the use of base deficit for fetal well-being assessment?

Authors have expressed reservations regarding the use of base deficit measured in umbilical artery blood samples to assess fetal well-being during the course of labor and to predict neonatal neurologic morbidity. Despite its integration into clinical practice for more than 50 years, obstetricians and maternal-fetal medicine specialists may not realize that this marker has significant limitations in accurately identifying neonatal metabolic acidosis as a proxy for fetal well-being. In brief, there are 2 large families of base deficit, namely whole blood and extracellular fluid. Both rely on equations that use normal adult acid-base characteristics (pH 7.40 and partial CO2 pressure of 40 mm Hg) that overlook the specificity of the normal in utero acid-base status of pH 7.27 and partial CO2 pressure of 54 mm Hg. In addition, it ignores the unique characteristic of the in utero fetal response to acute hypoxia. The dependence on placental circulation for CO2 elimination may lead to extremely high values (up to 130 to 150 mm Hg) during hypoxic events, a phenomenon that is absent in adults with acute metabolic acidosis who can hyperventilate. The dispute over if to include a correction for high partial CO2 pressure in the bicarbonate estimation, as presented in the Great Trans-Atlantic Debates, remains unresolved. The key constants computed for adult acid-base physiology in the current base deficit algorithms, without accounting for the impact of high partial CO2 pressure or other fetal characteristics of buffering capacity (eg, differences in body water content composition, plasma protein, and hemoglobin attributes), may lead to an overestimation of metabolic acidosis, especially in newborns who are experiencing hypercarbia during the early stages of the hypoxic response. These unrecognized limitations impact the base deficit results and may mislead clinicians on fetal well-being assessments when discussing the management of fetal heart rate monitoring and neonatal outcomes. Based on our arguments, we believe that it is prudent to consider an alternative to base deficit for drawing conclusions regarding fetal well-being during the course of birth management. We propose a marker specifically related to the newborn acid-base physiology--the neonatal eucapnic pH correction. This marker can be added to arterial cord blood gas analysis, and we have described how to interpret it as a marker of neonatal metabolic acidosis.