Complications and Treatment of Delayed or Inadequately Treated Nasoorbitoethmoid Fractures

Outcomes of Surgical Repair of Adult Naso-Orbital-Ethmoid Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Adult naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures are estimated to account for 5% of all adult facial fractures without published consensus on management. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the available literature regarding the treatment and outcomes of adult naso-orbital-ethmoid fractures.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, databases were searched from inception through July 25, 2024 for studies pertaining to the treatment of NOE fractures. Measures of interest included patient demographics, associated fractures, type of intervention, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included for meta-analysis, consisting of 459 patients. The patients included in the analysis had a mean age of 30.6 years (95% CI: 26.9-34.3 years) with a male-to-female gender ratio of 2.7:1. Operative intervention, specifically open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (90.1%; 95: CI: 76.6-98.1%), was the most commonly performed management. Closed reduction has been reported for all three types. The most frequently reported complications included nasolacrimal duct obstruction (38.6%; 95% CI: 10.6-71.7%), postoperative epiphora (24.9%; 95% CI: 6.4-50.4%), and telecanthus (20.9%; 95% CI: 1.7-53.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention can be considered for all NOE types. Despite surgical intervention, NOE fractures remain difficult to treat, and inadequate repair may result in complications. Laryngoscope, 135:991-999, 2025.

In- Versus Out-Fracture: A Novel Concept in Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Injury

Study Design

A retrospective study.

Objective

The Markowitz-Manson classification system categorizes nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fractures by severity of injury and remaining integrity of the medial canthal tendon. However, this system does not account for direction of bony displacement (in-fracture vs out-fracture), which can greatly affect symptomatology and management. We hypothesize that NOE fractures will present differently based upon their severity: Type I injuries are likely to present with medial nasal bone displacement (in-fracture), whereas Type III fractures will be more prone to lateral displacement (out-fracture).

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for all patients with NOE fractures who were evaluated by the plastic surgery department at a level 1 trauma center over a 6-year period. Computed tomography data were evaluated to assess for directionality of fracture segment displacement. Frequencies of medial, lateral, and non-displacement across NOE types were compared by Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit and Fisher's Exact Tests.

Results

111 patients met inclusion criteria. The patient population was 73.9% male and averaged 51.2 years old. When bilateral fractures were counted independently, there were 141 cases in total: 115 Type I, 20 Type II, and 6 Type III. Type I fractures were most commonly in-fractured (48.7%), while Type III injuries were consistently out-fractured (100%) (p < .001).

Conclusions

While Type II and III NOE fractures have dominated clinical focus, this study highlights the prevalence of impaction within Type I fractures. These findings advocate for a more comprehensive approach to the evaluation of Type I NOE fractures and their potential risks, including traumatic hypotelorism and nasal airway obstruction.

Evidence-Based Medicine for Midface/Orbit/Upper Facial Fracture Repair

The face is one of the most common areas of traumatic injury, making up approximately 25% of all injuries in 2016. Assault, motor vehicle collision (MVC), fall, sports, occupational, and gunshot wounds (GSW) are all common causes of facial fractures, with MVC and GSW leading to significantly higher severity of injuries. Most facial fractures occur in the upper two-thirds of the face. Most facial fractures require timely assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for optimal restoration of facial structures and functions. Without proper initial management, significant complications including immediate complications such as airway compromise, massive bleeding, infection, intracranial hemorrhages, or even death, and long-term complications such as poor functional outcomes and aesthetic setbacks can occur. The goal of this review is to summarize the management of fractures of the upper face, orbit, and midface and provide an update about complications and their management.

Nasal and Naso-orbito-ethmoid Fractures

Craniofacial fractures are common among trauma patients. Nasal fractures are the most common craniofacial fracture. Understanding how to evaluate and manage craniofacial fractures is important for the craniofacial trauma consultant. This manuscript describes the appropriate workup and management of nasal and naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures.

[Complex reconstructions in the facial and cranial regions]

Posttraumatic reconstruction of the neurocranium and viscerocranium is an essential part of modern oral and maxillofacial surgery, in addition to oncological surgery, surgery of congenital craniofacial deformities and dental surgery. Due to the complex anatomy of the facial skull and significant esthetic and functional demands on its reconstruction, reconstructive trauma surgery in this area places the highest demands on the surgeon. This is all the more true if definitive craniomaxillofacial surgical treatment can sometimes only be performed with considerable delays for the benefit of other life-threatening injuries. In order to take these prerequisites into account, achievements of modern biomedical technology, such as intraoperative real-time navigation, computer-assisted planning and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) of patient-specific biomodels and implants, came up early for use in oral and maxillofacial surgery. In combination with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging, these methods result in a treatment pathway tailored to the individual patient, which is directly checked for quality at every step and thus ensures the best possible result for the patient. The use of these technologies extends far beyond the original indications in the area of orbital reconstruction and restoration of bony defects with simple geometry, such as skull defects. Nowadays, even the most complex pan-facial fractures can be restored esthetically and functionally by means of digitalized preliminary planning and individualized skull, orbital and zygomatic implants as well as total temporomandibular joint prostheses.