Plate Fixation for Unstable Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in Children

Metaphyseal distal radius fractures in adolescents: is closed reduction and casting sufficient for most?

PURPOSE

There is limited evidence to support decision-making in adolescents with metaphyseal distal radius fractures. This study aims to review injury patterns, treatments, and clinical outcomes in this age group.

METHODS

Patients aged 11-16 years presenting with metaphyseal distal radius fractures were obtained from our institutional trauma database. Radiographs and records were reviewed to obtain injury details, management, complications, and long-term sequelae.

RESULTS

One hundred and five fractures were included. Mean age was 12.6 years and 79% occurred in males. 75.2% were angulated and 24.8% off-ended. The median initial angulation was 22.1° (2.3-46.7), and the majority were dorsally displaced (74.3%). Emergent management for 91 (86.7%) patients was surgical with either manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) and cast in theatre (59.3%), Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation (35.8%), or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (3.3%). Fourteen patients were initially managed non-operatively, and 71.4% of these re-displaced requiring surgery. There was no statistical difference in final angulation of fractures managed with MUA and cast or fixation (5.35 vs. 5.5°, respectively). Complications occurred in 14.3%, including two cases of osteomyelitis. Twenty cases had final angulation of greater than 9°, but none underwent corrective osteotomy.

CONCLUSION

In adolescents, metaphyseal distal radius fractures have a higher risk of early re-displacement when not reduced in theatre; however, both casting and fixation resulted in similar final angulation. Complications were common at 14.3%, but only occurred in those that underwent fixation. Few long-term issues were observed in those treated in cast, even with up to 20° of residual angulation.

Intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation of displaced distal forearm fractures in children

AIM OF THE WORK

This study was designed to highlight internal fixation by intramedullary K-wires for displaced distal forearm fractures among children and analyze the results of this technique. We hypothesize that physis-sparing intramedullary fixation prevents displacement with a lower complication rate.

METHODS

This prospective case series involving 47 patients was conducted between February 2018 and December 2019. All patients with open physis presented with recent displaced distal forearm fractures were included, and all of them were treated with an intramedullary k-wire fixation for both bones with the assessment of the union rate, union time, suspected complication, radiographic evaluation, and functional outcome.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 31 boys (66%) and 16 girls (34%). The mean age of the patients was 10.68 ± 2.728 years (range, 7-15 years). All fractures were united in a median of 6 weeks (range, 4-8 weeks), The functional outcome after 12 months was normal in 42 patients (89.4%), whereas, in five patients (10.6%), the functional parameters were minimally reduced. The median preoperative angulation improved from 36° (range, 24°-52°) preoperatively to 4° (range, 0°-10°) on immediate postoperative radiographs. After 12 months, the median angulation was 2° (range, 0°-7°) (p < 0.001). The angulation of the distal radius immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up was statistically correlated with the functional outcome (p < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This technique provides a good result with less susceptibility to re-displacement and low complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Early Management of Paediatric Wrist and Forearm Fractures in a Busy District General Hospital Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison Study and Audit of BOAST Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

In response to the strain that the COVID-19 pandemic put on hospitals in the UK, the British Orthopaedic Association, in May 2021, set out British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines for the early management of distal forearm fractures in children. Following this, a local pathway was introduced at our Trust to manage these injuries in the Emergency Department (ED). The aim of this audit was to monitor compliance with the BOAST guidelines and compare the practice with a similar pre-COVID cohort.

METHODS

A fixed-date retrospective cohort study was conducted that included cases that presented to the emergency department during a six-month period (August 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022). Data was analysed for rates of primary ED manipulation, documentation of consent and neurovascular status in the notes, orthogonal X-ray data, time till the clinic follow-up, theatre time saved and complications. The ED fracture manipulation rate was also compared with another similar pre-COVID cohort (August 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020) to look for any improvement in the practice.

RESULTS

A total of 86.31% cases were found to have primary fracture manipulation in the ED following the introduction of Trust guidelines in accordance with the BOAST recommendations. This is an improvement in comparison to the 31.94% fracture manipulation rate before the COVID pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the Trust pathway in accordance with the BOAST guidelines along with staff education has standardized the practice at our Trust. It saved approximately 63 hours of trauma theatre time for the six-month data collection period. Our findings also suggest that this has favourable outcomes for the patients with no complications.

Review of pediatric functional outcomes measures used to evaluate surgical management in pediatric patients with an upper extremity fracture

For two decades, many scores, questionnaires, and rating systems have been used to evaluate the functional outcome of children with an upper extremity fracture (UEF). However, only a few of these were created specifically for children, and many assess only elbow function. In the absence of any published review on this topic, we set out to identify and categorize different scores used to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of surgically treated pediatric UEFs. A literature search was performed, and 38 studies were identified. The scores used more often were the shortened version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score/Index. In a lower number of studies, authors used other scoring systems, including the Mayo Wrist Score, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation, the Métaizeau functional scoring system, the Oxford Elbow Score, the Price and Flynn criteria, the Hardacre Functional Score, the Neer Shoulder Score, the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score, the Modified Orthopedic Trauma Association Score, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. Some specific pediatric scoring systems to evaluate the functional outcome of children with a UEF have been suggested, but a single tool that is valid and reliable for skeletally immature patients of all ages is not yet available. Further studies are needed to identify specific pediatric measurements to increase validity, responsiveness, sensitivity, and interpretability of upper limb functional outcome scores in common clinical practice.

Bioresorbable implants vs. Kirschner-wires in the treatment of severely displaced distal paediatric radius and forearm fractures - a retrospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures are very common in paediatric patients. Severely displaced fractures may require surgical intervention. The gold standard surgical method is percutaneous K-wire osteosynthesis followed by immobilisation. Metal implants can be removed with a second intervention; however, these extra procedures can cause further complications. Several studies confirm the benefits of bioabsorbable implants for paediatric patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the complication rates of displaced distal metaphyseal radius (AO 23r-M/3.1) and forearm (AO 23-M/3.1) fractures in children operated on with K-wires versus a novel technique with bioresorbable implants.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 94 patients in three paediatric trauma centres who underwent operations due to severely displaced distal forearm or metaphyseal radial fractures between January 2019 and January 2020. The mean age was 8.23 (ranging from 5-12). 30 patients (bioresorbable group, BR-group) were treated with biodegradable PLGA implants (Bioretec®, ActivaPin®), 40 patients with one or two stainless steel Kirschner-wires (K-wires, Sanatmetal®) which were buried under the skin (KW I-group) and 24 children with K-wires left outside the skin. (KWII. Group). We examined the number of minor and major complications as well as the need for repeated interventions. Follow-up was at least one and half year.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the complication rates at the two KW groups (p = 0.241; Cramer's V = 0.211), while the complication rate of the BR group was significantly lower. (p = 0.049; Cramer's V = 0.293 and p = 0.002; Cramer's V = 0.418 respectively). No later than half a year after the injury, no difference was observed between the functional outcomes of the patients in each group. One and a half years after the injury, no signs of growth disturbance were found in any of the children. No second surgical intervention was required in the BR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeries with bioresorbable intramedullary implants may have fewer complications than K- wire osteosynthesis in the treatment of severely displaced distal forearm fractures. The benefits are most pronounced in the first six weeks after surgery, reducing the number of outpatient visits and increasing the child's sense of comfort. As no second intervention is required, this can lead to significant cost savings. After half a year, there is no difference in the outcomes between the different surgical treatment strategies.

Retrospective study of radial dome osteotomy with volar plate fixation versus K-wires in Madelung's deformity: long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

The emerging role of the locking plate improved the technique also in corrective osteotomies in Madelung's deformity, but there is a lack of analyses between the fixation techniques, as well as little information in functional outcomes and long-term follow-up. The current study compared the outcomes, pitfalls, and advantages of volar plate and screws fixation versus K-wires fixation in a long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Twenty-eight children presenting the "distal radius" variant of Madelung's deformity underwent Vickers ligament release and distal radial dome osteotomy between 2009 and 2015. Twenty-three children (20 females and 3 males, mean age 15 years and 7 months at surgery and 24 years and 8 moths at follow-up), with 26 operatively treated wrists, were available for follow-up. A retrospective two-cohort study, evaluating clinically and radiologically results, has been conducted with a mean eight years and seven months follow-up.

RESULTS

Bone union and pain relief were obtained in all cases, as well as improvements in wrist motion and radiographic indices. A statistically significant correlation was identified between the volar plate fixation and an improved lunate subsidence on X-ray, and a trend towards an improved DASH score in the cohort with plate and screws, as well as significant improvement in wrist extension and supination always in the plate fixation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term follow-up enabled the patients to report on more definitive outcomes in terms of functional and cosmetic improvements. Volar plate fixation is an effective technique allowing for simple post-operative management and earlier rehabilitation program with improved clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Adolescent Patients

BACKGROUND

While management recommendations for distal radius fractures in both young and skeletally mature patients have been generally well-established, controversy still exists regarding optimal management in adolescent patients approaching skeletal maturity. Thus, the goal of this review is to analyze relevant literature and provide expert recommendations regarding the management of distal radius fractures in this patient population.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed to identify literature pertaining to distal radius fractures in adolescent patients, defined as 11 to 14 years in girls and 13 to 15 years in boys. Relevant articles were selected and summarized.

RESULTS

Distal radius fractures demonstrate significant potential for remodeling of angular deformity and bayonet apposition, even in patients older than 12 years of age. Rotational forearm range of motion and functional outcomes are acceptable with up to 15 degrees of residual angulation. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning reduces fracture redisplacement but has a high associated complication rate. There is no literature comparing plate versus pin fixation of distal radius fractures in the pediatric population, but in adults plate fixation is associated with higher cost with no improvement in long-term functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Remodeling can still be expected to occur in adolescent patients, and even with residual deformity functional outcomes after distal radius fractures are excellent. Up to 15 degrees of residual angulation can be accepted before considering operative management. Smooth pins should be considered over plates as first-line operative management for unstable fractures that fail nonoperative treatment.

Analysis of 1430 hand fractures and identifying the 'Red Flags' for cases requiring surgery: Head: Hand Fracture Treatment

BACKGROUND

Hand fractures constitute 20% of hand injury patients who apply to emergency services. Conservative approaches are satisfactory in the majority of the cases. However, the minority group in need of surgery reaches a serious number of patients considering the frequency of these injuries. Retrospective questioning of the indications of the performed surgeries is a proper way of understanding the decisional process for surgery.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Patients treated for hand fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Patient gender, age, finger/fingers involved, soft tissue involvement, treatment method (conservative/surgery) and if operated, devices used for fixation were noted. Plain radiographs of the patient were evaluated. Descriptive statistics of these variables and the effect of each variable on the decision for surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study involved 1430 fractures of 1303 patients (1016 male and 287 female). Fifth finger was the most commonly injured digit (31%). Comminuted fractures (29%) followed by transverse fractures (29%) and spiral/oblique fractures (22%) were commonly diagnosed fracture types. Thirteen percent (13%) of the study group needed tendon/nerve/vessel repairs. Male patients, cases with soft tissue involvement, second, third and fourth finger fractures, fractures involving multiple digits, fractures with an intra-articular component, fractures with dislocation more than 4 mm and angulation more than 15° had a significantly higher rate of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Less than half of the hand fractures require surgery, and conservative treatment is usually preferred. Certain variables that indicate surgical treatment were identified with our study. These findings may help to weigh the options and choose the right path in doubtful conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, Case-control study.