How do Orthopedic Surgeons Manage Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture in the Middle-Aged Patient? Brazilian Survey of 78 Orthopaedic Surgeons

Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous compression plate and femoral neck system in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.

RESULTS

Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.

Factors that influence surgical decision-making for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures: Bullet Health Analysis (BHA) I : Worldwide Orthopaedic Research Collaboration: Leveraging Big Data (WORLD) I

PURPOSE

The management of geriatric femoral neck fractures, which includes options like hemiarthroplasty (HA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and fixation, exhibits regional and healthcare setting variations. However, there is a lack of information on global variations in practice patterns and surgical decision factors for this injury.

METHODS

Survey data were collected from April 2020 to June 2023 via Orthobullets Case Studies, a global clinical case collaboration platform hosted on a prominent orthopedic educational website. Collaboratively developed standardized polls, based on the best available evidence and a comprehensive, peer-reviewed, evidence-based item list, were used to capture surgeons' treatment preferences worldwide. Subsequent analyses explored preferences within subspecialties and practice settings. Multivariable regression analysis identified associations between subspecialty, practice type, the likelihood of choosing THA, and the preferred femoral fixation method.

RESULTS

Our study encompassed 2595 respondents from 76 countries. Notably, 51.5% of participants (n = 1328; 51.5%, 95% CI 49.6-53.4%) leaned towards THA and 44.9% for HA, while 3.6% favoured surgical fixation. Respondents affiliated with academic institutions and large non-university-affiliated hospitals were 1.74 times more likely to favour THA, and arthroplasty specialists exhibited a 1.77-fold preference for THA. There was a 19-fold variation for cemented femoral fixation between the United Kingdom (UK) and USA with the UK favouring cemented fixation.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals a significant shift towards THA preference for managing geriatric femoral neck fractures, influenced by subspecialty and practice settings. We also observed a pronounced predominance of cement fixation in specific geographic locations. These findings highlight the evolving fracture management landscape, emphasizing the need for standardization and comprehensive understanding across diverse healthcare settings.

Treatment of non-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures with dynamic hip and cannulated screws resulting in avascular necrosis: A comparative study of complications

OBJECTIVES

To compare the complications associated with cannulated hip screws (CHS) and dynamic hip screws (DHS) techniques.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective chart study, we reviewed the records and data of all patients operated upon by DHS or CHS for treatment of Garden type I and type II intracapsular non-displaced femoral neck fracture from January 2017 to December 2022. Patients with incomplete files or follow-ups of less than one year were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 85 patients, 35 males, and 50 females, with a mean age of 72±5.4 for males and 70.6±7.6 for females. A total of 44 patients were operated upon with DHS, and 41 patients with CHS. The mortality rate of DHS was 15.9% and was 17.1% in the CHS group (p>0.05). Non-union was recorded in 4.5% of the DHS group and 4.9% of CHS patients (p>0.05). Avascular necrosis (AVN) was significantly higher in DHS (9.1%) than in CHS (4.9%, p<0.05). A revision was required in 15.9% of DHS patients and 14.6% of CHS patients (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study found that DHS was superior to CHS in AVN rate. However, there was no significant difference between both methods regarding mortality, revision, and non-union.

The oblique triangle configuration of three parallel screws for femoral neck fracture fixation using computer-aided design modules

Closed reduction and internal fixation with three cannulated compression screws is a common method for treating femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Protocols including the inverted triangle configuration and dispersion of the screws still needed further supports. The purpose of this study was to explore a novel oblique triangle configuration (OTC) of three screws in fixing femoral neck fractures based on the morphology of the femoral neck isthmus (FNI). The computer-aided design modules were used to explore the ideal spatial configuration with largest triangle by three parallel screws. A univariate evaluation model was established based on the oval-like cross-section of the FNI. When the three screws were positioned by the OTC, Inverted Equilateral Triangle Configuration (IETC), and the Maximum Area Inverted Isosceles Triangle Configuration (MA-IITC) respectively, the proportion of area and circumference in the cross-section of FNI and the changing trend of proportion were compared under various torsion angles, eccentricity, and cross-sectional area of FNI. The area and circumference ratios of the parallel screws using the OTC method were significantly higher than in the IETC and MA-IITC groups. In the univariate evaluation model, the OTC area ratio and circumference ratio remained stable under the different femoral neck torsion angles, FNI cross-sectional area, and eccentricity. The OTC method provided an ideal spatial configuration for the FNA fixation with the largest area using three parallel screws. The position of the posterior screw was also away from the metaphyseal artery, potentially reducing the possibility of vascular injury and screw penetrating.

The Oval-like Cross-section of Femoral Neck Isthmus in Three-dimensional Morphological Analysis

Objectives

To investigate the cross‐section shape of the femoral neck isthmus (FNI) in three‐dimensional reconstruction model of the femoral neck.

Methods

From December 2009 to December 2012, computed tomography (CT) data of bilateral hip joint from 200 consecutive patients (137 males and 63 females, 69.41 ± 9.21 years old, ranged from 50–85 years old) who underwent surgical treatments for proximal femoral fracture were retrospectively reviewed. The 3D model of the proximal femur was reconstructed, and the “inertia axis” method, which was applied to measure the long and short axes of the cross‐section of the FNI, was established. The cross‐sectional area and perimeter were calculated by a formula using the length of the long and short axes and then compared with the actual measured values by the software. Correlation between the descriptive parameters of the FNI cross‐section (area, perimeter, and eccentricity) and patients' demographics (age, height, and weight) was analyzed. Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to determine the main relevant factors.

Results

The ICC results showed excellent data reproducibility ranged from 0.989 to 0.996. There was no significant difference in the cross‐sectional area of the FNI between the actual measured values and the predicted values using the formula (732.83 ± 126.74 mm²vs 731.62 ± 128.15 mm², P = 0.322). The perimeter using the two methods showed narrow while significant difference (97.86 ± 8.60 mm vs 92.84 ± 8.65 mm, P < 0.001), the actual measured values were about 5 mm greater than the predicted values. The parameters (area, perimeter, and eccentricity) were significantly larger in male than female (P < 0.001). A positive correlation between the cross‐sectional area, perimeter, height, and weight was observed. The stepwise linear regression analysis showed that the regression equation of the FNI area was as follows: Y = −1083.75 + 1033.86 × HEIGHT + 1.92 × WEIGHT, R² = 0.489.

Conclusion

The cross‐section shape of the FNI appears to be oval‐like in the 3D model, which is separated according to the inertia axis, and the findings proposed an anatomical basis for the further study of the spatial configuration of cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Dynamic hip screw (DHS) and cannulated screws (CS) are widely used for femoral neck fractures. However, there is no definite result as to which surgical method bring less complications. We performed this study to compare the complication (mortality, non-union, avascular necrosis (AVN), and revision) of DHS and CS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures patients.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other relevant studies related the comparison of DHS versus CS for femoral neck fractures from inception to Jan 7, 2020. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Newcastle-Ottawa (NOS), respectively. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.2 software.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs and seven retrospective cohort studies were included for meta-analysis. CS was found to be superior to DHS with respect to AVN rate (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08-1.99; p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to mortality, non-union, and revision (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DHS and CS have similar complication including mortality, revision rate, and non-union, but CS has superior to DHS on ANV. However, further studies are required to provide more robust evidence owing to some limitations.