1
|
Arosio AD, Coden E, Lambertoni A, Sileo G, Dalfino G, Monti G, Daloiso A, Gaudioso P, Ferrari M, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Bignami M. Surgical margin assessment and prognostic impact in sinonasal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA : ORGANO UFFICIALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI OTORINOLARINGOLOGIA E CHIRURGIA CERVICO-FACCIALE 2025; 45:S25-S55. [PMID: 40400376 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-suppl.1-45-2025-n1127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2025] [Accepted: 03/31/2025] [Indexed: 05/23/2025]
Abstract
Objective Surgery remains a cornerstone in treatment of sinonasal malignancies, but the prognostic role of margin status is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the prognostic significance of surgical margins in sinonasal cancer and their impact on survival, alongside key challenges in its evaluation. Methods A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 64 studies (34,120 patients). Results The overall margin infiltration rate was 33.2%, varying widely across studies (4.5-88.2%) and histotypes, and was the highest in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC, 61.5%). Meta-analysis of 31 studies showed positive margins were associated with worse survival (overall survival, odds ratio [OR] 2.61; disease-specific survival, OR 5.89; disease-free survival, OR 4.40). Squamous cell carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, and mucosal melanoma had the strongest correlation with margin status, while for ACC and adenocarcinomas statistical significance was not reached. High heterogeneity was noted across studies, alongside inconsistent margin classification, distance thresholds, and use of frozen sections, limiting cross-study comparability. Conclusions This study confirms the prognostic value of surgical margins, but underscores the urgent need for standardised definitions to improve prediction of oncologic outcomes and clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Daniele Arosio
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Elisa Coden
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Alessia Lambertoni
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Giorgio Sileo
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Giulia Monti
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Antonio Daloiso
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Gaudioso
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
- Head and Neck Surgery & Forensic Dissection Research Center (HNS&FDRc), Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Maurizio Bignami
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
- Head and Neck Surgery & Forensic Dissection Research Center (HNS&FDRc), Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okada S, Mukaigawa T, Goto S, Hiiragi Y, Sato F, Deguchi S, Ogawa H, Onoe T, Murayama S, Yasunaga Y, Hayashi N. Salvage skull base surgery after proton beam therapy for recurrent sinonasal malignancies: A retrospective study. Head Neck 2024; 46:2389-2397. [PMID: 38406918 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to examine treatment outcomes and postoperative complications associated with salvage skull base surgery following radical proton beam therapy (PBT). METHODS Nine patients who underwent salvage skull base surgery following curative PBT as the initial treatment at our institution between September 2002 and May 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS The cohort comprised four males and five females with a mean age of 48.1 years. The average proton dose administered during initial therapy was 68.5 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). Among the salvage surgeries, eight were anterior skull base surgeries, and one was an anterior middle skull base surgery. No local recurrences or perioperative deaths were observed. Postoperative complications occurred in three patients (33.3%), all experiencing surgical site infections, with one also having cerebrospinal fluid leakage. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates that salvage skull base surgery after PBT effectively achieves local control and safety in patients with recurrent sinonasal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Okada
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takashi Mukaigawa
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Seiya Goto
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yohei Hiiragi
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Fuyuki Sato
- Division of Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Shoichi Deguchi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Ogawa
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Onoe
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Murayama
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshichika Yasunaga
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Nakamasa Hayashi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen MY, Wen X, Wei Y, Chen L, Huang ZX, Lu T, Zheng NZ, Li J, Wen WP, Wen YH. Oncologic outcome of multimodality treatment for sinonasal malignancies: An 18-year experience. Front Oncol 2022; 12:958142. [PMID: 36132140 PMCID: PMC9484525 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.958142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the oncologic outcomes of sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) of various histologic subtypes and investigate the impact of multimodality treatment on prognosis of SNM. Methods SNM patients treated with curative-intent surgery from 2000 to 2018 were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS). Survival was then assessed through Cox proportional hazards models. Results Three hundred and three patients were eligible for the analysis. The 5-year OS and event-free survival (EFS) were 61.0% (95% CI: 55.4%–67.1%) and 46.2% (95% CI: 40.4%–52.7%). The 5-year OS was the worst for malignant melanoma and the best for adenocarcinoma. Patients who received surgery had better OS than those who only received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Endoscopic surgery had better OS than the open approach (p < 0.05). Microscopically margin-negative resection (R0 resection) significantly benefited OS and EFS (p < 0.001). No significant difference in OS was observed between patients who received macroscopic complete resection (R1 resection) followed by adjuvant therapy and patients who received R0 resection. Older age (HR = 1.02, p = 0.02), R1 resection (HR = 1.99, p = 0.02), sinonasal surgical history of more than 3 months before diagnosis (HR = 2.77, p = 0.007), and radiotherapy history (HR = 3, p = 0.006) are risk factors for worse EFS. Conclusions Curative-intent surgery is irreplaceable in the treatment of SNM. The endoscopic approach is an effective alternative to the open approach. EFS is worse among patients with older age, R1 resection, sinonasal surgical history of more than 3 months before diagnosis, and radiotherapy history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng-Yu Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Wen
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Wei
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zi-Xuan Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tong Lu
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nian-Zhen Zheng
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Ping Wen
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Otolaryngology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Yi-Hui Wen, ; Wei-Ping Wen,
| | - Yi-Hui Wen
- Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Yi-Hui Wen, ; Wei-Ping Wen,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhanani R, Faisal M, Shahid H, Malik KI, Jamshed A, Hussain R. Outcomes of Management of Sinonasal Malignancies at a Dedicated Cancer Institution: A Retrospective Study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2021; 11:115-120. [PMID: 34522665 PMCID: PMC8407647 DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_16_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of cancers with an incidence of 3%-5% of all head-and-neck tumours. The aim of the present study was to identify the characteristic features of SNMs and to analyze the treatment outcomes and the prognostic factors affecting it. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of patients with SNM treated at a dedicated cancer center of Pakistan between 2004 and 2018 was carried out. All patients with histologically proven diagnosis of malignancy arising from nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses and being treated with curative intent were included. The medical records of 184 cases were utilized for final analysis. Chi-square test was applied to identify significant differences. Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curve via log-rank test and comparison was made between squamous and nonsquamous histologies. P ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histopathology (n = 62, 33.7%). 130 (70.7%) patients presented with stage IV disease. Nodal metastasis was seen in 24 (13%) patients. Treatment failure was seen in 96 (52.2%) patients and was significantly associated with tumour size and the overall stage. DSS of patients with squamous cell carcinoma was 29% as compared to 52% for patients with nonsquamous histologies (P = 0.001). Discussion SNM is a diverse group of cancers presenting in late stages. A higher rate of treatment failure associated significantly with stage of the disease was identified in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahim Dhanani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Faisal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Hamza Shahid
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Kashif Iqbal Malik
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Arif Jamshed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Raza Hussain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
König M, Osnes T, Bruland Ø, Sundby Hall K, Bratland Å, Meling TR. The Role of Adjuvant Treatment in Craniofacial Malignancy: A Critical Review. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1402. [PMID: 32850452 PMCID: PMC7426725 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tumors originating from the craniofacial region usually present in a locally advanced stage with frequent involvement of adjacent sites and have a strong tendency for local recurrence in the absence of adjuvant therapy, even when the original surgical resection was presumed to be radical. In the past decades, several advances in the radiological diagnosis and treatment of craniofacial malignancies have been introduced. There are, however, no randomized trials that define the optimal multimodal treatment of these tumors because of their rarity as well as heterogeneity in both histology and site of origin. The aim of this study was to conduct a critical review of the role of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of craniofacial malignancy. Method: We conducted a critical review of the past and contemporary literature available, focusing on adjuvant oncological treatments of the most common craniofacial malignancies. Results: Preoperative radiotherapy can have a documented role in the treatment of olfactory neuroblastoma and soft tissue sarcoma, while preoperative chemotherapy can be advocated in the treatment of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, and craniofacial sarcoma (both soft-tissue and high-grade osteosarcoma). Postoperative radiotherapy has a well-established role in the treatment of most craniofacial malignancies. The role of postoperative chemotherapy is unclear in most histologies, but is commonly used during the treatment of well-selected cases of paranasal sinus carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, mucosal melanoma, soft tissue sarcoma and high-grade craniofacial osteosarcoma. Discussion: Alongside developments in surgery, there have also been improvements in diagnostics, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Implementation of novel radiation techniques allows delivery of higher radiation doses while minimizing irradiation-related morbidity. Better understanding of tumor biology allows the construction of more complex treatment strategies, incorporating adjuvant chemotherapy either pre- or postoperatively. In the era of personalized targeted therapy, rapid strides are being made to identify specific tumor-targets for use of novel biologic agents, with the potential to change current management paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marton König
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Terje Osnes
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Bruland
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Åse Bratland
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torstein R. Meling
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|