Impact of Recipient Vein Selection on Venous Patency and Free Flap Survival in 652 Head and Neck Reconstructions

Flap loss in head and neck reconstruction: Is there a singular cause for failure?

Despite the high success rates reported in head and neck reconstruction, free flap failures continue to persist. Understanding the factors associated with flap loss and improving overall success are paramount. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the factors influencing flap revision and free tissue transfer survival in head and neck reconstruction. The study included 70 patients with defects in the lower two-thirds of the head and neck region and underwent reconstruction using free flaps. Patient age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities and data on the location and aetiology of the defect, the specific type of flap employed, the recipient artery and vein chosen, instances of revision and the overall success of the flap were collected. The investigation aimed to establish correlations between these variables as well as flap success and revision rates. No statistically significant differences were observed in arterial and venous anastomosis revision rates, or flap survival, in relation to variables such as age, gender, flap type, smoking status, comorbidities, recipient artery or vein and the number of vein anastomoses. The malignant tumour group exhibited a lower requirement for arterial revision and a higher flap survival rate compared to the benign tumour group. This study underscores the comparable safety profiles of perforator-based and conventional flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Furthermore, it reveals that patient characteristics are not contraindications for free tissue transfer. Additionally, the quantity of the veins and choice of recipient vessels are flexible and do not significantly impact flap success. The higher rates of flap success in patients with malignant aetiology requires further investigation.

Evolution and current status of microsurgical tongue reconstruction, part II

Tongue reconstruction remains a major aspect of head and neck reconstructive procedures. Surgeons planning tongue reconstruction should consider several factors to optimize the overall outcomes. Specifically, various technical aspects related to tongue reconstruction have been found to affect the outcomes. Multidisciplinary teams dedicated to oncologic, reconstructive, and rehabilitative approaches play an essential role in the reconstructive process. Moreover, operative planning addressing certain patient-related and defect-related factors is crucial for optimizing functional speech and swallowing, as well as quality of life outcomes. Furthermore, tongue reconstruction is a delicate process, in which overall functional outcomes result from proper flap selection and shaping, recipient vessel preparation and anastomosis, surgical approaches to flap insetting, and postoperative management. The second part of this review summarizes these factors in relation to tongue reconstruction.

Optimization of Vascular Supply in Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: Analysis of a Young Team’s Experience

Background

For head and neck reconstructive procedures, free flap survival depends on microsurgical and anatomical choices besides multimodal clinical management. The aim of the present study is to identify relevant variables for flap survival in our initial consecutive series.

Methods

A single-center, novel reconstructive team consecutive surgical series was revised. The outcome was analyzed in terms of flap survival observing variables considered more relevant: flap type, recipient artery, vein(s), and graft interposition were discussed for facial thirds to be reconstructed. Statistical analysis was performed with Chi-square, Mann–Whitney, and Odds ratio.

Results

A total of 118 free flaps were performed in 115 microsurgical procedures (93.9% for malignancies) on 109 patients, with a flap survival rate of 91.5%. For reconstruction of the middle and lower third of the face, the facial artery was privileged, because it was already transected during lymph node dissection in order to save the superior thyroid artery for further microsurgical needs. Flap failure was 50% venous. Double vein anastomosis was not related to flap survival. Deep venous drainage (as the internal jugular vein system) required fewer revisions. Half of the re-explorations saved the flap. Grafts were a risk for flap survival. Bony flaps were more critical.

Conclusion

At comparable reconstructive quality, flap choice should avoid a vascular graft. The facial artery is a preferable recipient vessel, since it saves other arteries both in the case of an arterial revision and in the case of recurrence, for further free flap reconstruction. For venous anastomosis, a deep venous recipient is safer, since it offers the possibility to choose the level of anastomosis optimizing the vascular pedicle geometry. A close postsurgical flap monitoring is advisable up to 7 days postoperatively to allow for timely flap salvage.

Free Flap Outcome in Irradiated Recipient Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The impact of previous radiotherapy on free flap outcome is still a subject of debate. Clinical investigations have come to divergent conclusions and the true effect of radiotherapy (XRT) on flap survival is not definitely known. Most studies investigating the factor often have their methodological limitations such as lack of statistical power as a consequence of the overall low failure rates together with few irradiated cases. This study will attempt to address the question whether previous radiotherapy is associated with a significantly higher incidence of flap failure or not.

Venous Size Discrepancy Is a Critical Factor When Using Superficial Temporal Vessels as Recipient Vessels for Free Flaps

BACKGROUND

 Superficial temporal vessels have been used successfully as recipient vessels for head and neck reconstruction. This study evaluates the impact of several treatment variables on flap failure and take-back rate when using these recipient vessels.

METHODS

 We conducted a retrospective study of all microsurgical reconstructions using superficial temporal vessels as recipient vessels in a period of 10 years. Variables collected included previous treatments (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, neck dissection, free flap reconstruction), type of flaps used (soft tissue, osteocutaneous), and vessel size discrepancy between donor and recipient vessels.

RESULTS

 A total of 132 patients were included in the study. The flap success rate was 98.5%. The take-back rate was 10.6%. The most frequent reason for take-back was venous congestion secondary to thrombosis. None of the studied variables was associated with flap failure. Reconstructions using osteocutaneous flaps and vein diameter discrepancy (ratio ≥ 2:1) had significantly higher take-back rates.

CONCLUSION

 Flaps with a significant size discrepancy between donor and recipient veins (ratio ≥ 2:1) and fibula flaps (compared with soft tissue flaps) were associated with a higher risk of take-back. It is crucial to minimize venous engorgement during flap harvest and anastomosis, and limit vein redundancy during flap in-setting.

Effect of preoperative radiation on free flap outcomes for head and neck reconstruction: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate about whether neoadjuvant radiation therapy is associated with higher rates of postoperative complications after head and neck reconstruction. Herle et al. conducted a systematic review in 2014 of 24 studies, finding higher complication rates in irradiated fields. We sought to perform an exhaustive updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted an updated systematic review of the literature, as outlined in our protocol, which was registered on PROSPERO. Databases included Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science. There were no limits placed on the date range, place of publication, or origin. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years of age, studies with less than 20 participants (n < 20), case studies, skull base reconstructions, and local tissue rearrangements. The combined results of the studies and relative risks (RR) were calculated.

RESULTS

53 studies were included for analysis, including 5,086 free flaps in an irradiated field, and 9,110 free flaps in a non-irradiated field. Of the 53 studies, 21 studies overlapped with those discussed in Herle et al.'s study, with a total of 32 additional studies. Neoadjuvant radiation was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for postoperative complications (RR 1.579, P < 0.001), total flap failure (RR, 1.565; P < 0.001), and fistula (RR, 1.810; P < 0.001). Our work reaffirmed the findings of the Herle et al.

STUDY

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiation was associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of total flap failure, fistula, and total complications but not partial flap failure. These high-morbidity complications must be taken into consideration when determining which patients should receive neoadjuvant radiation therapy.

Differences in free flaps’ reconstructions with and without coupling device for venous anastomosis

<br><b>Introduction:</b> Introduction of the coupler devices for anastomoses of neck vessels changes planning and performance of the surgical procedures. The Rigid ring of the coupling devices keeps a vein open and less prone to occlusion. Therefore, this should improve the flap survival rate and surgery duration.</br> <br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to point out the differences in surgery planning between couplers and sutures for venous microsurgical anastomoses.</br> <br><b>Methods:</b> The medical records of 209 patients who underwent 212 microvascular free flap reconstructions from January 2011 till December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed; 103 received radial forearm free flap (RFFF); 43 – anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF); 51 – fibula free flap (FFF); 15 – iliac crest free flap (ICFF). In 189 cases, reconstruction was performed simultaneously with tumor resection and in 23 cases, reconstruction was secondary, after previous oncological treatment. Among 443 anastomoses, suturing was used for 212 arteries and 127 venous anastomoses, while coupling was used for 104 venous anastomoses.</br> <br><b>Results:</b> The mean surgery duration for suturing was 452.82 min vs 358.88 min for coupling (P<0.05). Differences in flap survival and partial necrosis rates between coupling and suturing groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Donor vessel distribution in the neck was significantly different in both groups. Estimated costs of the surgical procedures performed with and without coupler devices were not equal.</br> <br><b>Conclusions:</b> The use of couplers for venous anastomosis in free flap head and neck reconstructions impacts the surgery process by shortening surgery duration which leads to cost reduction.</br>

Microsurgical and Endovascular Management of Congenital Iliac Aneurysms in the Neonatal Period: Two Cases and a Literature Review

Introduction

Congenital aneurysms of major arteries are very rare diagnoses and prognosis can be poor if treatment is not initiated rapidly. This is the presentation of two cases of infants with congenital iliac aneurysms who underwent treatment in the neonatal period. The report then proceeds with a literature review of paediatric iliac aneurysms.

Report

Case 1: A female neonate was diagnosed antenatally with right common iliac (CIA) and internal iliac (IIA) artery aneurysms. Embolisation on day of life (DOL) eight was impossible because of partial thrombosis. The infant was subsequently observed for several months and the aneurysm was injected percutaneously with thrombin on DOL 78. A small residual aneurysm was coil embolised at five months of age. Satisfactory results were observed at one year follow up. Case 2: A female neonate was diagnosed antenatally on routine third trimester ultrasound with voluminous, bilateral CIA aneurysms. The patient underwent surgery on DOL 9 for aneurysm resection and microsurgical vascular reconstruction. The intervention was successful with triphasic flow through the anastomoses on colour Doppler ultrasound at six week follow up.

Discussion

Ten cases of congenital iliac aneurysms have been reported previously, with just two diagnosed in the neonatal period and eight undergoing surgical intervention. Definitive management to avoid aneurysm rupture or thrombosis should be timed carefully, and sometimes delayed with watchful waiting, to maximise success and minimise complications. Surgery is the key treatment modality, but endovascular intervention can be considered in selected cases. Congenital iliac aneurysms should be addressed at the safest time for the patient. Following resection, primary microvascular anastomosis is the ideal reconstructive technique, but other options for neonates have been described. Endovascular treatment should be considered for anatomically amenable saccular aneurysms.

Reliability of Temporal Vascular Anastomosis and Techniques for Better Outcomes

BACKGROUND

 Although there are several potential recipient vessels in the neck, those in the temporal region are limited. In skull base reconstruction, there are difficulties associated with the anastomosing recipient vessels in the neck region since long nutrient vessels are needed in the flap. We evaluated the reliability of temporal vascular anastomosis by comparing surgical outcomes between reconstructive methods and examined which surgical procedures may achieve better results.

METHODS

 We examined the medical records of free tissue transfer cases between April 2007 and March 2018. Seventy-three surgeries were performed in the temporal region, including skull base reconstruction in 48, head and neck reconstruction (without skull base) in 16, and secondary surgery for head deformities in nine cases. In total, 445 neck surgeries were performed. Postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

 The postoperative complication rates were 8.2 and 2.7% for all temporal and neck surgeries, respectively. There were no arterial complications in the temporal region and all of the six postoperative anastomotic complications were due to venous thrombosis. In contrast, there were 12 cases of vascular anastomotic complications, with six cases each of arterial and venous thrombosis in the neck. In the temporal region, the complication rate was 2.1% for skull base reconstruction, 11% for secondary revision, and 25% in head and neck reconstruction. The corresponding values for middle temporal vein (MTV) usage rates were 54, 22, and 25%. In skull base reconstruction, a coronal incision was made in all cases. A more frequent use of the MTV was associated with a reduced complication rate.

CONCLUSION

 The low complication rate in the temporal region was attributed to the wide surgical field and low tension of anastomotic vessels. Multiple venous anastomoses, including those of the MTV, are recommended to prevent complications.

[Thrombosis of sewn vs. coupled anastomoses in microvascular head and neck reconstructions]

OBJECTIVE

The Anastomotic Coupling Device for microvascular anastomoses has become widely used in free tissue transplantation. This study compares the thrombosis rate and flap failure as a function of the anastomosis technique at a large head and neck cancer center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients receiving free flap reconstructions in the period 2001-2019. Reconstruction type, recipient vessels, number of venous anastomoses, coupler size, and operation time were investigated. We compared the rates of venous thrombosis between hand sewn and coupled anastomoses, as well as the rate of flap failure.

RESULTS

A total of 403 free flap reconstructions were performed for over 17 years. The venous anastomosis was sewn in 113 flaps in single suture technique, and in 290 cases, coupler device was used. The rate of venous thrombosis requiring immediate surgical revision was 6.2 % (7/113) in the sewn group compared to 7.6 % in the coupled group (22/290; p = 0.627). With an overall success rate of 95.0 % (383/403), the rate of flap failure was 3.6 % (4/113) and 5.5 % (16/290; p = 0.421), respectively. Surgical time is comparable with 680 ± 144 minutes in the hand-sewn group and 688 ± 167 minutes in the coupled group (p = 0.678).

CONCLUSIONS

With similar success rates, the coupler device is an effective alternative to venous anastomosis in single suture technique. Due to the generally low rate of pedicle thrombosis in both groups, we cannot separate the influence of the anastomosis technique from possible interfering variables.