Aggressive Vertebral Hemangioma Causing Acute Spinal Cord Compression

Clinical evaluation of preoperative embolization, vertebroplasty, and decompression in the treatment of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative embolization and vertebroplasty in the treatment of aggressive hemangioma.

METHODS

A retrospective clinical review of patients diagnosed with aggressive vertebral hemangiomas was conducted. All the patients were assigned to three groups according to the treatment strategies: patients in Group A underwent embolization and decompression with internal fixation, patients in Group B underwent vertebroplasty and decompression with internal fixation, patients in Group C received all three treatments. Clinical indexes were compared within three groups.

RESULTS

There were 16 patients received embolization and decompression (Group A), 19 patients underwent decompression with vertebroplasty (Group B) and 16 patients in Group C. The operative duration of patients in group A (198.33 ± 38.43 min) were less than another two groups (p = 0.001). The intraoperative blood loss of patients in group C was 713.33 ± 165.13 mL, which was significantly less than group A and group B (p = 0.045). Patients in group C exhibited the lowest volume of drainage on POD 1 (178.33 ± 66.76 mL), which showed significant difference compared with group A (368.33 ± 191.15 mL, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference of preoperative and postoperative VAS and JOA score among three groups, as well as drainage on POD 2, total volume and hospital duration.

CONCLUSION

Both embolization and vertebroplasty are efficient and safe measures to reduce blood loss in the surgical treatment of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas, combination of all three methods is also competent.

Surgical management of symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: A case report and literature review

Background:

Vertebral hemangiomas (VHs) are common benign tumors that only rarely become symptomatic. There is a paucity of data regarding their surgical management and outcomes. Here, we reported a case involving an aggressive cervical VH, discussed its surgical management and outcomes, and reviewed the literature.

Methods:

We assessed the clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes for a patient with an aggressive cervical VH. We also performed a systematic review of the literature according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to describe surgical outcomes for symptomatic VH.

Results:

A total of 154 studies including 535 patients with VH were included in the study. The majority of patients were female (62.8%), the average age was 43 years, and the thoracic spine was most commonly involved (80.6%). Utilizing Odom’s criteria, outcomes were excellent in 81.7% (95% CI 73.2–90.2) of cases. For those presenting with myelopathy (P = 0.045) or focal neurological deficits (P = 0.018), outcomes were less likely to be excellent. Preoperative embolization was not associated with excellent outcome (P = 0.328).

Conclusion:

Surgical outcomes for VH are predominantly favorable, but aggressive VHs have the potential to cause significant residual postoperative neurological morbidity.