1
|
Gray MM, Bruno C, French H, Myers P, Carbajal MM, Reber KM, Christou H, Karpen H, Johnston LC. Changes, Challenges, and Variations in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship: A View from the Program Directors. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:e163-e173. [PMID: 35554889 DOI: 10.1055/a-1850-3929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship programs in the United States support >800 learners annually. Understanding variations in the programmatic structure, challenges, and needs is essential to optimize the educational environment and ensure the specialty's future. STUDY DESIGN NPM fellowship program directors (PDs) and associate program directors (APDs) were invited to complete an electronic survey on their program administration, recruitment, clinical training, assessment methods, scholarly program, and career pathways. Each participant identified individual programmatic strengths, challenges, opportunities, and threats to the field. RESULTS Representatives from 59 NPM fellowships provided data (response rate 59/96 = 61%). In total, 30% of PDs received less than the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education -recommended protected time for administrative duties, and 44% of APDs received no protected time. Fellow clinical service assignments varied widely from 13 to 18 months and 90 to 175 call nights over 3 years. Recruitment practices varied across programs; 59% of respondents raised concerns over the pipeline of applicants. Conflicts between fellows and advanced practice providers were identified by 61% of responders. Programs varied in their scholarly offerings, with 44% of NPM fellowships interested in adding broader research opportunities. CONCLUSION NPM fellowship leaders identified a need for improved programmatic support, enhanced measures to assess competency, opportunities to strengthen scholarly programs, shared curricular resources, and strategies to balance education with clinical demands. PDs and APDs identified threats to the future of NPM training programs including the diminishing pipeline of applicants into neonatology, challenges with clinical exposure and competence, inadequate support for the educational mission, issues supporting high-quality scholarship, and fewer graduates pursuing physician-investigator pathways. National organizations and academic institutions should take action to address these challenges so that fellowships can optimally prepare graduates to meet their patients' needs. KEY POINTS · Numerous challenges exist for current program directors in NPM including balancing clinical work with scholarly activities, accurately assessing competency, optimizing the culture of the learning environment, and ensuring that fellows are adequately prepared for a range of postgraduate positions.. · Significant variation exists across NPM fellowship programs in clinical service/calls assigned over 3 years of fellowship training, as well as opportunities to pursue scholarly activities across a variety of areas.. · Challenges exist related to ensuring an adequate number of future applicants into the specialty, including those from backgrounds traditionally underrepresented in medicine, as well as those seeking to pursue careers as physician-investigators..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan M Gray
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christie Bruno
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Heather French
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick Myers
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Melissa M Carbajal
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Kristina M Reber
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Helen Christou
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Heidi Karpen
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lindsay C Johnston
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnston LC, Falck AJ, Vasquez MM, Dadiz R, French H, Izatt S, Bonachea E, Karpen HE, Carbajal MM, Payne A, Gillam-Krakauer M, Gray MM. Flipping the Teachers: Impact of a Standardized Physiology Curriculum on Neonatology Medical Educators. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:e755-e764. [PMID: 36041469 DOI: 10.1055/a-1933-4893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Academic physicians must teach elements in an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-mandated curriculum while balancing career development and clinical workload. Exploring educator perceptions on the learning environment and comparing two instructional methods (traditional didactics [TD] vs. flipped classroom [FC]) in one pediatric subspecialty may elucidate current challenges, barriers, and strategies to optimize learning and educator satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN A randomized trial comparing effectiveness and learner preference for FC versus TD physiology teaching was conducted in ACGME-accredited neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship programs in 2018 to 2019. Educator preferences were elicited through online surveys pre- and postintervention. Free-text comments were provided for questions exploring strengths, challenges, and opportunities in fellowship education. Statistical analysis included comparisons of demographics and pre-post-intervention educator responses between groups. Thematic analysis of text responses was conducted to identify common subthemes. RESULTS From 61 participating programs, 114 FC educators and 130 TD educators completed surveys. At baseline, all educators experienced professional satisfaction from teaching fellows, but noted challenges with time available to create and/or deliver educational content, limited content expertise amongst faculty, colleagues' limited enthusiasm toward educating fellows, and lack of perceived value of education by institutions given limited protected time or credit toward promotion. Postintervention, educators in both groups noted a preference to teach physiology using FC due to interactivity, learner enthusiasm, and learner-centeredness. FC educators had a 17% increase in preference to teach using FC (p = 0.001). Challenges with FC included ensuring adequate trainee preparation, protecting educational time, and providing educators with opportunities to develop facilitation skills. CONCLUSION Overall, NPM educators in a trial evaluating a standardized, peer-reviewed curriculum report professional satisfaction from teaching, but described logistical challenges with developing/delivering content. Educators preferred instruction using FC, but identified challenges with learner preparedness and ensuring adequate educator time and skill. Future efforts should be dedicated to addressing these barriers. KEY POINTS · Many challenges exist for educators teaching neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows, including time, support, and recognition.. · Many educators preferred using flipped classroom methodology with a standardized curriculum due to interactivity and learner-centeredness.. · Benefits of a standardized, peer-reviewed curriculum include reduced preparation time, adaptability of content, and learning environment enhancement..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay C Johnston
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Alison J Falck
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Margarita M Vasquez
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Rita Dadiz
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Heather French
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan Izatt
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth Bonachea
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, NY
| | - Heidi E Karpen
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Allison Payne
- Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Maria Gillam-Krakauer
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Megan M Gray
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dyess NF, Carr CB, Mavis SC, Caruso CG, Izatt S, French H, Dadiz R, Bonachea EM, Gray MM. Implicit Bias and Health Disparities Education in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Am J Perinatol 2024. [PMID: 38190976 DOI: 10.1055/a-2240-1979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to characterize implicit bias (IB) and health disparities (HD) education in neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM), including current educational opportunities, resources, and barriers. STUDY DESIGN A national web-based survey was sent to NPM fellows, neonatologists, and frontline providers after iterative review by education experts from the National Neonatology Curriculum Committee. Quantitative data were analyzed with chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Qualitative data were evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS Of the 452 NPM survey respondents, most desired additional IB (76%) and HD (83%) education. A greater proportion of neonatologists than fellows received IB (83 vs. 57%) and HD (87 vs. 74%) education. Only 41% of neonatologists reported that their institution requires IB training. A greater proportion of fellows than neonatologists expressed dissatisfaction with the current approaches for IB (51 vs. 25%, p < 0.001) and HD (43 vs. 25%, p = 0.015) education. The leading drivers of dissatisfaction included insufficient time spent on the topics, lack of specificity to NPM, inadequate curricular scope or depth, and lack of local educator expertise. A minority of faculty who were tasked to educate others have received specific educator training on IB (21%) and HD (16%). Thematic analysis of survey free-text responses identified three main themes on the facilitators and barriers to successful IB and HD education: individual, environmental, and curricular design variables. CONCLUSION NPM trainees and neonatologists desire tailored, active, and expert-guided IB and HD education. Identified barriers are important to address in developing an effective IB/HD curriculum for the NPM community. KEY POINTS · There is a gap between the current delivery of IB/HD education and the needs of the NPM community.. · NPM trainees and neonatologists desire tailored, active, and expert-guided IB and HD education.. · A successful curriculum should be widely accessible, NPM-specific, and include facilitator training..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cara Beth Carr
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephanie C Mavis
- Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Catherine G Caruso
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Susan Izatt
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Heather French
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rita Dadiz
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Elizabeth M Bonachea
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Megan M Gray
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chang CL, Dyess NF, Johnston LC. Simulation in a blended learning curriculum for neonatology. Semin Perinatol 2023; 47:151824. [PMID: 37748941 DOI: 10.1016/j.semperi.2023.151824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Blended learning is a learner-centered educational method that combines online and traditional face-to-face educational strategies. Simulation is a commonly utilized platform for experiential learning and an ideal component of a blended learning curriculum. This section describes blended learning, including its strengths and limitations, educational frameworks, uses within health professions education, best practices, and challenges. Also included is a brief introduction to simulation-based education, along with theoretical and real-world examples of how simulation may be integrated into a blended learning curriculum. Examples of blended learning in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, specifically within the Neonatal Resuscitation Program, procedural skills training, and the National Neonatology Curriculum, are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine L Chang
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nicolle Fernández Dyess
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Lindsay C Johnston
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gray MM, Dadiz R, Izatt S, Gillam-Krakauer M, Carbajal MM, Johnston LC, Payne A, Vasquez MM, Bonachea EM, Karpen H, Falck AJ, Chess PR, Huber M, French H. Comparison of knowledge acquisition and retention following traditional didactic vs. flipped classroom education utilizing a standardized national curriculum: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol 2022; 42:1512-1518. [PMID: 35660790 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-022-01423-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Measure the effectiveness of and preference for a standardized, national curriculum utilizing flipped classrooms (FC) in neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowships. STUDY DESIGN Multicentered equivalence, cluster randomized controlled trial of NPM fellowship programs randomized to receive standardized physiology education as in-class lectures (traditional didactic, TD arm) or as pre-class online videos followed by in-class discussions (FC arm). Four multiple-choice question quizzes and three surveys were administered to measure knowledge acquisition, retention, and educational preferences. RESULTS 530 fellows from 61 NPM fellowships participated. Quiz performance was comparable between groups at all time points (p = NS, TD vs FC at 4 time points). Post intervention, more fellows in both groups preferred group discussions (pre/post FC 42% vs. 58%, P = 0.002; pre/post TD 43% vs. 60%, P = < 0.001). FC fellows were more likely to rate classroom effectiveness positively (FC/TD, 70% vs. 36%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS FCs promote knowledge acquisition and retention equivalent to TD and FC modalities are preferred by fellows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan M Gray
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, 4800 Sand Point Way, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Rita Dadiz
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 651, Rochester, 14642, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Susan Izatt
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, DUMC Box 102509, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Maria Gillam-Krakauer
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 11112 Doctor's Office Tower, 2200 Children's Way, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Melissa M Carbajal
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin Street, W6104, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Lindsay C Johnston
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Allison Payne
- Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, RBC Suite 3100, Mailstop 6010, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Margarita M Vasquez
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MSC 7812, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Bonachea
- Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University, 700 Children's Drive, FB 6th floor Neonatology, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA
| | - Heidi Karpen
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University/Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, 2105 Uppergate Drive NE, Rm 324, Atlanta, GA, 30033, USA
| | - Alison J Falck
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 South Paca 8th floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Patricia R Chess
- Departments of Pediatrics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 651, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Matthew Huber
- Division of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Heather French
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Caruso C, Arias-Shah A, Rent S, Mukthapuram S, Dadiz R. Fellows as Teachers: Supporting Future Educators. Neoreviews 2022; 23:e438-e447. [PMID: 35773507 DOI: 10.1542/neo.23-7-e438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Teaching is inherent to the practice of medicine, as physicians are relied on to educate those around them, including staff, trainees, colleagues, and the patients and families for whom they provide care. Neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows uniquely serve as both trainee and subspecialty expert and are additionally expected to be strong teachers. In this article, the authors review the benefits of developing fellows as teachers, the challenges and potential mitigating strategies of fulfilling this objective, and the educational foundations and future directions that may inform the development of curricula for training fellows as teachers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Caruso
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - AnnaMarie Arias-Shah
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA
| | - Sharla Rent
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Shanmukha Mukthapuram
- The Perinatal Institute, Section of Neonatology, Perinatal and Pulmonary Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Rita Dadiz
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grabow Moore K, Ketterer A, Wheaton N, Weygandt PL, Caretta-Weyer HA, Berberian J, Jordan J. Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Open Access, Level-Specific, Core Content Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents. J Grad Med Educ 2021; 13:699-710. [PMID: 34721800 PMCID: PMC8527934 DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-21-00067.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leaders in graduate medical education must provide robust clinical and didactic experiences to prepare residents for independent practice. Programs traditionally create didactic experiences individually, requiring tremendous resources with variable content exposure and quality. OBJECTIVE We sought to create and implement a free, open access, learner-centric, level-specific, emergency medicine (EM) residency curriculum. METHODS We developed Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM) Foundations I and II courses using Kern's model of curriculum development. Fundamental topics were identified through content guidelines from the American Board of Emergency Medicine. We incorporated learner-centric strategies into 2 flipped classroom, case-based courses targeting postgraduate year (PGY) 1 and PGY-2 residents. The curriculum was made freely available online in 2016. Faculty and resident users were surveyed annually for feedback, which informed iterative refinement of the curriculum. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2020, registration for FoEM expanded from 2 sites with 36 learners to 154 sites and 4453 learners. In 2019, 98 of 102 (96%) site leaders and 1618 of 2996 (54%) learners completed the evaluative survey. One hundred percent of responding leaders and 93% of learners were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with FoEM content. Faculty and residents valued FoEM's usability, large volume of content, quality, adaptability, organization, resident-faculty interaction, and resident-as-teacher opportunities. Challenges to implementation included resident attendance, conference structure, technology limitations, and faculty engagement. CONCLUSIONS We developed and implemented a learner-centric, level-specific, national EM curriculum that has been widely adopted in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Grabow Moore
- Kristen Grabow Moore, MD, MEd, is Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University
| | - Andrew Ketterer
- Andrew Ketterer, MD, MA, is Clinical Instructor and Assistant Residency Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School
| | - Natasha Wheaton
- Natasha Wheaton, MD, is Associate Clinical Professor, Associate Program Director, and Medical Student Clerkship Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
| | - Paul Logan Weygandt
- Paul Logan Weygandt, MD, MPH, is Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Holly A. Caretta-Weyer
- Holly A. Caretta-Weyer, MD, MHPE, is Assistant Professor and Associate Residency Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Jeremy Berberian
- Jeremy Berberian, MD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Christiana Care Health System
| | - Jaime Jordan
- Jaime Jordan, MD, MAEd, is Associate Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, Associate Program Director, and Vice Chair, Acute Care College, Department of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Suppan M, Gartner B, Golay E, Stuby L, White M, Cottet P, Abbas M, Iten A, Harbarth S, Suppan L. Teaching Adequate Prehospital Use of Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Gamified e-Learning Module. JMIR Serious Games 2020; 8:e20173. [PMID: 32516115 PMCID: PMC7295001 DOI: 10.2196/20173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to increased use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Adequate use of this equipment is more critical than ever because the risk of shortages must be balanced against the need to effectively protect health care workers, including prehospital personnel. Specific training is therefore necessary; however, the need for social distancing has markedly disrupted the delivery of continuing education courses. Electronic learning (e-learning) may provide significant advantages because it requires neither the physical presence of learners nor the repetitive use of equipment for demonstration. OBJECTIVE Inclusion of game mechanics, or "gamification," has been shown to increase knowledge and skill acquisition. The objective of this research was to develop a gamified e-learning module to interactively deliver concepts and information regarding the correct choice and handling of PPE. METHODS The SERES framework was used to define and describe the development process, including scientific and design foundations. After we defined the target audience and learning objectives by interviewing the stakeholders, we searched the scientific literature to establish relevant theoretical bases. The learning contents were validated by infection control and prehospital experts. Learning mechanics were then determined according to the learning objectives, and the content that could benefit from the inclusion of game mechanics was identified. RESULTS The literature search resulted in the selection and inclusion of 12 articles. In addition to gamification, pretesting, feedback, avoiding content skipping, and demonstrations using embedded videos were used as learning mechanics. Gamification was used to enhance the interactivity of the PPE donning and doffing sequences, which presented the greatest learning challenges. The module was developed with Articulate Storyline 3 to ensure that it would be compatible with a wide array of devices, as this software generates HTML5-compatible output that can be accessed on smartphones, tablets, and regular computers as long as a recent browser is available. CONCLUSIONS A gamified e-learning module designed to promote better knowledge and understanding of PPE use among prehospital health care workers was created by following the SERES framework. The impact of this module should now be assessed by means of a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélanie Suppan
- Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Gartner
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eric Golay
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Marion White
- Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Cottet
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Abbas
- Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anne Iten
- Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Harbarth
- Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Suppan
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|