1
|
Gutiérrez-Martínez S, Fernández-Martínez MN, Adánez-García JM, Fernández-Fernández C, Pérez-Prieto B, García-Gallego A, Gómez-Salgado J, Medina-Díaz M, Fernández-García D. Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital. J Clin Med 2023; 13:252. [PMID: 38202259 PMCID: PMC10780088 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caesarean section is necessary to save the lives of mothers and newborns at times, but it is important to perform it only when it is essential due to all the risks involved. This study aimed to examine the rate of caesarean sections performed at a tertiary hospital using the Robson classification to detect methods for the detection of and/or reduction in these caesarean section rates. METHODS A descriptive, cross-sectional study of a retrospective database was carried out. RESULTS A total of 10,317 births were assessed. The Robson classification was used to assess these interventions and verify whether the indication for performed caesarean sections was appropriate. In total, 2036 births by caesarean section were performed in the whole sample. The annual caesarean section rate varied between 18.67% and 21.18%. CONCLUSIONS Caesarean sections increased by about 20% in 2021 compared to 2020 even though the trend over the years of study was decreasing. Vaginal delivery after caesarean section is a reasonable and safe option. Caesarean section rates could be improved, mostly in Robson's Group 2. The Robson classification facilitated progress in the implementation of measures aimed at improving care and adjusting caesarean section rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Gutiérrez-Martínez
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of León, 24071 León, Spain; (S.G.-M.); (C.F.-F.)
| | - María Nélida Fernández-Martínez
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Faculty of Veterinary, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
| | - José Manuel Adánez-García
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Oviedo, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (J.M.A.-G.); (M.M.-D.)
| | - Camino Fernández-Fernández
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of León, 24071 León, Spain; (S.G.-M.); (C.F.-F.)
| | - Beatriz Pérez-Prieto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of León, 24071 León, Spain; (S.G.-M.); (C.F.-F.)
| | - Ana García-Gallego
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Leon, 24071 León, Spain
| | - Juan Gómez-Salgado
- Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain
- Safety and Health Postgraduate Program, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil 092301, Ecuador
| | - María Medina-Díaz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Oviedo, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (J.M.A.-G.); (M.M.-D.)
| | - Daniel Fernández-García
- Health Research Nursing Group (GREIS), Department of Nursing and Physioterapy, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Effect of urinary catheter removal at different times after caesarean section: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 280:160-167. [PMID: 36502759 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the optimal time for removal of a urinary catheter (UC) following caesarean section (CS). METHODS Several electronic databases were searched from inception to 31 December 2021 regarding the timing of UC removal following CS. The effect of UC removal at different times following CS was calculated using odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine the best time for UC removal. All analyses were performed using Stata Version 14.0. RESULTS In total, 19 studies including 3086 women were included in this review. Compared with UC removal 0-6 h after CS, UC removal 6.1-12 h, 12.1-24 h and > 24 h after CS were more likely to result in urinary tract infection (UTI), with pooled OR of 5.95 (95 % CI 1.58-22.38), 11.26 (95 % CI 2.99-42.44) and 27.25 (95 % CI 6.82-108.90), respectively. UC removal > 24 h after CS was more favourable to prevent urinary retention than immediate UC removal (OR 0.05, 95 % CI 0.00-0.64). UC removal 0-6 h after CS was the optimal timing to prevent UTI and frequent urination, and reduce length of hospital stay as well as time to first ambulation, with maximum SUCRA values of 92.30 %, 85.00 %, 80.60 % and 72.60 %, respectively. CONCLUSION UC removal 0-6 h after CS may be the optimal timing to prevent several complications in the absence of a clear indication for UC removal after CS. This study may provide a scientific basis for the timing of UC removal after CS.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ioscovich A, Guasch E, Brogly N, Shatalin D, Manrique-Muñoz S, Sánchez Royo ME, Zimro S, Ginosar Y, Lages N, Weinstein J, Berkenstadt H, Greenberger C, Lazutkin A, Izakson A, Ioscovich D, Orbach-Zinger S, Weiniger CF. Peripartum anesthetic management of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in eight medical centers across three European countries: prospective cohort observation study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 35:7756-7763. [PMID: 34107853 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1937105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several reports of obstetric anesthesia management have been published since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to collect high-quality broad and detailed data from different university medical centers in several European Society of Anesthesiologist countries. METHODS This prospective observational survey was performed in eight medical centers in Spain, Israel and Portugal from 1st April to 31st July 2020. Institutional review board approval was received at each participating center. Inclusion criteria: all women with a positive test for COVID-19. Retrieved data included maternal, delivery, anesthetic, postpartum details, and neonatal outcomes. Descriptive data are presented, and outcomes were compared for women with versus without respiratory signs and symptoms. RESULTS Women with respiratory symptoms (20/12.1%) had significantly higher mean (standard deviation) temperature (37.2 °C (0.8) versus 36.8 °C (0.6)), were older (34.1 (6.7) years versus 30.5 (6.6)) and had higher body mass index kg m-2 - (29.5 (7.5) versus 28.2 (5.1)). Women with respiratory symptoms delivered at a significantly earlier gestational age (50% < 37 weeks) with a 65% cesarean delivery rate (versus 22.1% in the group without respiratory symptoms) and 5-fold increased rate of emergency cesarean delivery, 30% performed under general anesthesia. A higher rate of intrauterine fetal death (3%) was observed than expected from the literature (0.2-0.3%) in developed countries. There was no evidence of viral vertical transmission. CONCLUSION Well-functioning neuraxial analgesia should be available to manage laboring women with respiratory symptoms, as there is a higher frequency of emergency cesarean delivery. We report a higher rate of undiagnosed parturient and intrauterine fetal death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Ioscovich
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Emilia Guasch
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nicolas Brogly
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Shatalin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | - Sabastine Zimro
- Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yehuda Ginosar
- Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Neusa Lages
- Serviço de Anestesiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jacob Weinstein
- The Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Haim Berkenstadt
- The Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Sharon Orbach-Zinger
- Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikvah, Affiliated with Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|