The Bilobe Flap for Nasal Reconstruction

Decision Making in Nasal Reconstruction: When to Use the Forehead Flap?

In this review, the paramedian forehead flap indications and uses are reviewed, specifically examining clinical situations where patient selection is important. In these settings, a preoperative discussion with a patient regarding surgical expectations and goals in the setting of their defect is paramount. The authors review the literature regarding the psychosocial aspects of major nasal reconstruction and review preoperative discussion points that are key to a well-informed patient and improved patient satisfaction through the nasal reconstructive process.

[Cosmetic outcome of nasal tip reconstruction with the frontonasal flap and other locoregional flaps - Cosmetic Outcome of Nasal Tip Reconstruction]

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the results of nasal tip reconstruction with the frontonasal flap compared with other locoregional flaps.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All nasal tip reconstructions with locoregional flaps performed during a 10-year period were included. Defect size, flap type, risk factors, comorbidities, complications, revisions, and secondary operations were retrospectively assessed. Clinical follow-up examinations were performed after 12 months. Digital photographs were taken in standard projections preoperatively and at the time of the last follow-up examination, and the aesthetic results were assessed by three independent examiners, with nasal contour, symmetry, scarring, and match of skin colour between flap and nasal skin rated on a 4-point scale. Finally, patient satisfaction was obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 112 nasal tip reconstructions were performed in 68 women and 44 men with a mean age of 71,4±10,2 years. Taking into account defect size, individual factors and patient preference, reconstruction was performed with 58 frontonasal flaps, 23 Rintala flaps, 20 paramedian forehead flaps and 11 bilobed flaps. Mean age and comorbidities of patients were comparable between flap types, except for a higher incidence of arterial hypertension and a lower incidence of diabetes mellitus in patients treated with frontonasal flaps. Defect size was the same in reconstructions with frontonasal flaps and Rintala flaps, smaller in bilobed flaps, and more extensive in paramedian forehead flaps. There were no differences in complication rates between the different flap techniques. Taking into account the planned second interventions (flap pedicle separations) in the paramedian forehead flaps, the frequency of unplanned corrections was comparable for all flap techniques. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction were rated as very good or good in more than 90% with all techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the paramedian forehead flap, the frontonasal flap avoids a planned secondary procedure and an extensive donor defect. It allows for the coverage of defects at least the size of the Rintala flap and larger defects than the bilobed flap.

The single-stage melolabial flap for internal lining of full thickness defects of the nasal ala

BACKGROUND

Full-thickness defects of the nasal ala necessitate composite repair of the nasal lining, cartilage and soft tissue envelope. Repair of the nasal lining is particularly challenging due to access and geometry of this area.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the melolabial flap as a single stage operation for repair of full-thickness nasal ala defects.

METHODS

Retrospective study of seven adult patients with full-thickness nasal ala defects who underwent melolabial flap repair. Complications and operative technique were recorded and described.

RESULTS

Of the seven patients who underwent melolabial flap repair, each had excellent coverage of the defect postoperatively. There were two cases of mild ipsilateral congestion, and no revision procedures performed.

CONCLUSION

The melolabial flap is a versatile reconstructive option for repair of the internal lining of the nasal ala, and in our series there were no significant complications or revision procedures performed.

Current strategies for aesthetic soft tissue refinement in nasal reconstruction

The challenges of successful nasal reconstruction, which are related to the anatomical complexity of the region, have been extensively studied. Revisional operations are often required to achieve proper nasal reconstruction, with results resembling the premorbid nasal status. This is necessary to ensure the quality of life of skin cancer patients. Fundamental nasal reconstruction requires both proper soft tissue coverage and proper function. However, earlier studies in the field primarily focused on the functional aspect of nose reconstruction, although the cosmetic aspect is also an important factor to consider. In response to this need, many recent studies on nose reconstruction have proposed various refinement strategies to improve aesthetic satisfaction. Most plastic surgeons accept the nasal aesthetic subunit principle as a standard for nasal reconstruction. This review outlines the commonly used surgical refinement options and management strategies for postoperative complications based on the subunit principle. In patients with nasal defects, a proper technical strategy might help minimize revision operations and optimize the long-term results.

Reading Man Flap: A Nasal Reconstruction Technique Alternative

BACKGROUND

Closure of the nasal skin defects that resulted from excision of the skin neoplasms represents a challenging problem in reconstructive surgery. Here, the use of the reading man procedure as a new alternative in reconstruction of the skin defects of the nose is presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this procedure, 2 local flaps designed in an unequal Z-plasty manner are used. Defect coverage is achieved by transposing the first flap to the defect area, whereas the second flap is used for closure of the first flap's donor site. In last 10 years, this technique has been used for closure of the nasal skin defects that resulted from removal of skin cancers in 28 patients (15 men and 13 women) aged from 45 to 98 years. The defects were ranging between 1.5 and 3.1 cm in diameter.

RESULTS

In all patients, a tension-free 1-stage closure was obtained. There was no patient with dog ear formation and/or distortion of the mobile anatomical structures, such as nasal tip, alar lobules, and nostrils. All patients healed without complications. A mean follow-up of 52 months (8 months to 6.5 years) revealed satisfactory cosmetic results in all patients. No tumor recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the advantage of extra tissue relaxation provided by an unequal Z-plasty, the reading man procedure seems to be a useful alternative for the closure of nasal defects with alike local skin. As a critical achievement, this procedure does not require excision of additional healthy tissue. Borrowing tissue from multiple directions, it avoids dog ear formation and distortion of the mobile anatomic structures.

Fine Details That Improve Nasal Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify common negative outcomes that arise with conventional nasal reconstruction. 2. Understand the technical refinements that help avoid and reduce negative outcomes in nasal reconstruction. 3. Learn about the utility of regional axial island flaps for nasal reconstruction, in particular, the lateral nasal artery flap.

SUMMARY

Nasal reconstruction has been a preoccupation of surgeons dating to before 600 bc. The nose is the central focal point of the face and a key identifying facial feature, and surgery to the nose can prove to be challenging to even the most experienced surgeon. The objective of this CME article is to outline the most commonly used surgical options for each nasal aesthetic subunit, and the specific complications observed for each. The best surgical options and technical refinements are highlighted, and principles that may help restore the nose are outlined.

Soft Tissue Trauma to the Nose: Management and Special Considerations

The nose is one of the most common sites of facial injury due to its prominence and anatomical placement. Given its intricate anatomy, function, and high visibility, it also proves to be one of the most complex regions for repair. We provide a review of the management of soft tissue injuries to the nose, including the various reconstructive tools available and adjunctive wound care measures. We also discuss special considerations based on mechanism of injury and treatment of this condition in the pediatric population. The main goals of reconstruction should be to preserve function while achieving optimal cosmetic results in this highly visible region of the face.