1
|
Peters MJ, Mazor A, Glaris Z, Goetz TJ. Patient Satisfaction with Pisiform Excision for Pisotriquetral Instability or Arthritis: A Prospective Review. J Wrist Surg 2023; 12:331-336. [PMID: 37564611 PMCID: PMC10411070 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background Pisotriquetral pain and instability is an elusive cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain. Initial treatment of chronic pisotriquetral pathology should involve a trial of nonoperative therapy such as neutral wrist splint, anti-inflammatories, and intra-articular steroid injections. The mainstay of surgical management of pisotriquetral pain is pisiform excision. Purpose This prospective study seeks to understand patient satisfaction after pisiform excision in patients with isolated pisotriquetral pathology. Patients and Methods A consecutive series of nine cases of pisiform excision was performed by the senior surgeon. The primary outcome measure was determined a priori to be the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. Wrist range of motion, grip strength, and QuickDASH (shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scores were also collected preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively as secondary outcome measures. Results There was a very rapid improvement in the PRWE by 3 months, which was maintained at 12 months. The QuickDASH score was slower to improve, with a significant improvement by 12 months. There was no change in grip strength or wrist range of motion at any time point. Conclusion Pisiform excision results in a very rapid improvement of symptoms and should be considered in cases of pisotriquetral instability or arthritis that fail conservative management. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela J. Peters
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Avi Mazor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Hand Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Zafeiria Glaris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas Joseph Goetz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller TT, Bis G. Ultrasound-guided injection of the pisotriquetral joint: technique and case series. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:1687-94. [PMID: 35079865 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-03992-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe our techniques for ultrasound-guided injection of the pisotriquetral joint (PTJ), and to report our experience in a case series. METHODS Between 7/1/14 and 11/30/20, we performed 42 injections in 33 patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain, referred by clinicians who suspected the PTJ as the pain generator. There were 16 males and 17 females, average age 46.7 years. The patients were positioned in one of five ways: sitting with the hand maximally supinated; sitting with the hand maximally pronated; supine with the elbow flexed across the chest and the ulnar aspect of the wrist facing upward; supine with the elbow flexed, the arm externally rotated, and the ulnar aspect of the wrist facing upward; prone with the symptomatic hand at their side and the ulnar aspect of the wrist facing upward. RESULTS The procedures were performed by any of twelve fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Fifteen patients reported immediate relief of symptoms, including 6 patients whose pisotriquetral joints were normal sonographically. Four patients underwent subsequent surgical excision of their pisiforms and the fifth underwent arthroscopic debridement of the pisotriquetral joint. CONCLUSION Ultrasound is a facile imaging modality for guiding pisotriquetral injections, which may be accomplished with a variety of patient positions and injection techniques.
Collapse
|
3
|
Teunissen JS, van der Oest MJW, Selles RW, Ulrich DJO, Hovius SER, van der Heijden B. Long-term outcomes after ulna shortening osteotomy: a mean follow-up of six years. Bone Jt Open 2022; 3:375-382. [PMID: 35514114 PMCID: PMC9134835 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.35.bjo-2022-0031.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The primary aim of this study was to describe long-term patient-reported outcomes after ulna shortening osteotomy for ulna impaction syndrome. Methods Overall, 89 patients treated between July 2011 and November 2017 who had previously taken part in a routine outcome evaluation up to 12 months postoperatively were sent an additional questionnaire in February 2021. The primary outcome was the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) total score. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with treatment results, complications, and subsequent treatment for ulnar-sided wrist pain. Linear mixed models were used to compare preoperative, 12 months, and late follow-up (ranging from four to nine years) PRWHE scores. Results Long-term outcomes were available in 66 patients (74%) after a mean follow-up of six years (SD 1). The mean PRWHE total score improved from 63 before surgery to 19 at late follow-up (difference in means (Δ) 44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 39 to 50; p = <0.001). Between 12 months and late follow-up, the PRWHE total score also improved (Δ 12; 95% CI 6 to 18; p = < 0.001). At late follow-up, 14/66 of patients (21%) reported a PRWHE total score of zero, whereas this was 3/51 patients (6%) at 12 months (p = 0.039). In all, 58/66 patients (88%) would undergo the same treatment again under similar circumstances. Subsequent treatment (total n = 66; surgical n = 57) for complications or recurrent symptoms were performed in 50/66 patients (76%). The most prevalent type of reoperation was hardware removal in 42/66 (64%), and nonunion occurred in 8/66 (12%). Conclusion Ulna shortening osteotomy improves patient-reported pain and function that seems to sustain at late follow-up. While satisfaction levels are generally high, reoperations such as hardware removal are common. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(5):375–382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris S. Teunissen
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
- Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J. W. van der Oest
- Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W. Selles
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Dietmar J. O. Ulrich
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Steven E. R. Hovius
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
- Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte van der Heijden
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, Brabant, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|