Water Reductive Effect of Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis on Upper-Limb Lymphedema: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Comparison with Lower-Limb Lymphedema

The Role of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Predicting Secondary Surgical Interventions for Lymphedema

Background: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), known for its utility in monitoring fluid balance and lymphedema progression, is non-invasive and practical. However, circumferential tape measurements remain the gold standard for assessing limb volume changes, despite operator variability. This study investigated whether BIA could reliably assess the need for secondary surgical interventions in lymphedema patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed lower extremity lymphedema patients who underwent multiple lymphaticovenous anastomoses on both legs from April 2017 to June 2023. This study involved 14 patients with a single surgery and 34 requiring additional surgeries. Logistic regression evaluated associations between the number of surgeries and valuables, including extracellular water-to-total body water (ECW/TBW) ratios measured via BIA, the sum of five-part circumferential values via tape measuring, age, and body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for ECW/TBW and circumference values, analyzed separately for left and right legs. Results: ECW/TBW values were significantly associated with the need for a second surgery for both the right leg (p = 0.02, ROC-AUC = 0.86) and the left leg (p = 0.04, ROC-AUC = 0.86). In contrast, circumference measurements were not significant predictors for either the right leg (p = 0.46, ROC-AUC = 0.77) or the left leg (p = 0.60, ROC-AUC = 0.78). ECW/TBW demonstrated a higher AUC compared to circumference measurements, indicating its potential as a more sensitive tool for predicting the need for additional surgical interventions. Conclusions: BIA may serve as a valuable tool for monitoring treatment outcomes and guiding secondary surgical planning. Larger studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.

Clinical Utility of Bioimpedance Analysis for Upper Limb Lymphedema with Surgical Treatment

Background: In lymphedema, the accumulation of subcutaneous interstitial fluid is the most characteristic feature. Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) is a promising technique to measure the amount of body components using a noninvasive method. In this study, we determined the clinical significance of BIA parameters in upper limb lymphedema with surgical treatment such as lymphovenous anastomosis or vascularized lymph node transfer. Methods and Results: A single-center retrospective study using a multifrequency BIA. Perioperative BIA parameters such as extracellular water ratio or fat-free mass (FFM) ratio and limb volume defined as percentage of excess volume (PEV) were measured. The relationships between the magnitude of change in PEV and BIA parameters during surgery were evaluated. Out of 48 unilateral lymphedema patients, 46 were female and the average age was 55.4 years. PEV and all BIA parameters showed a significant decrease after surgery (p < 0.001). There were significant correlations between ΔPEV and the degree of changes in all BIA parameters. ΔFFM ratio showed the highest correlation with the amount of change in PEV (r = 0.599, p < 0.001). Conclusion: BIA parameters correlated well with the volume change after surgery. BIA could be useful as a quick and easy tool for follow-up after lymphedema surgery.

Changes in intracellular water volume after leg lymphedema onset and lymphaticovenular anastomosis as its surgical intervention

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the changes in the intracellular water (ICW) volume in lymphedema-affected legs after lymphedema onset and its surgical intervention (ie, lymphaticovenular anastomosis [LVA]), we investigated the changes in body water composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included 41 women with unilateral secondary leg lymphedema. The volume changes in the ICW and extracellular water (ECW) of the affected leg were measured using an InBody S10 (InBody Co, Ltd) multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer, at both lymphedema onset and 1 year after LVA.

RESULTS

The volume increase with leg lymphedema onset was comparable between the ECW and ICW (0.59 L vs 0.56 L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to 0.06; P = .27), and the increase rate was higher for ECW (35.3% vs 22.1%; 95% CI, 9.3%-17.2%; P < .001). The volume reduction at 1 year after LVA was comparable between ECW and ICW (0.23 L vs 0.27 L; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.02; P = .20), and the reduction rate was higher for ECW (8.7% vs 7.0%, 95% CI, 0.04%-3.2%; P = .044). The volume difference between ICW and ECW remained constant throughout the six measurements before and after LVA (F[3.01, 120.20] = 1.85; P < .14).

CONCLUSIONS

Leg LVA reduced ICW in the lymphedematous leg. The onset of leg lymphedema increased ECW and ICW in the affected limb, and LVA decreased both ECW and ICW. The volume change in the affected leg was comparable between ECW and ICW at both lymphedema onset and after LVA. However, the rate of change was higher for ECW. The volume difference between ICW and ECW remained constant. Using bioelectrical impedance analysis, alterations in ICW volume were detected in the legs affected by lymphedema, both after the onset of lymphedema and after LVA intervention.

Screening for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Development Using Extracellular Water Ratio

Background: This case-control retrospective study examined whether the extracellular water ratio (%ECW) of the upper extremity, as measured through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), could be an indicator of the development and severity of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods and Results: BIA was used to evaluate the changes in %ECW due to BCRL development, with the %ECW measured in female patients with unilateral BCRL and healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic ability of %ECW to distinguish BCRL patients from controls. Twenty female patients, who were eligible for inclusion, and 20 healthy control volunteers were included. The %ECW of the affected arm correlated with the water volume difference between the affected and unaffected arms (R2 = 0.7183). ROC analysis showed that %ECW had a high diagnostic ability as a screening tool for BCRL development (area under the ROC curve = 0.982). A cutoff %ECW value of 38.5% could predict the presence of BCRL with a sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 97.9%. Conclusions: This study confirmed that %ECW could assess the presence and severity of BCRL in a single measurement noninvasively in a shorter amount of time. The %ECW value strongly correlated with excess arm body water volume, an indicator of the severity of unilateral arm lymphedema. The cutoff %ECW value could predict the presence of BCRL with high accuracy.

Outcomes after microsurgical treatment of lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Microsurgical treatment options for lymphedema consist mainly of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfers (VLNTs). There are no standard measurements of the effectiveness of these interventions and reported outcomes vary among studies.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed based on a structured search in Embase, Medline, PubMed, Cinahl, Cochrane, and ProQuest in October 2020, with an update in February 2022. Firstly, a qualitative summary of the main reported outcomes was performed, followed by a pooled meta-analysis of the three most frequently reported outcomes using a random effects model. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts, retrospective cohorts, and cross-sectional and case-control studies that documented outcomes following microsurgery in adult patients were included. Studies of other surgical treatments (liposuction, radical excision, lymphatic vessel transplantation) or without reported outcomes were excluded. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) (ID: CRD42020202417). No external funding was received for this review.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty studies, including 6496 patients, were included in the systematic review. The qualitative analysis highlighted the three most frequently reported outcomes: change in circumference, change in volume, and change in the number of infectious episodes per year. The overall pooled change in excess circumference across 29 studies, including 1002 patients, was -35.6% [95% CI: -30.8 to -40.3]. The overall pooled change in excess volume across 12 studies including 587 patients was -32.7% [95% CI: -19.8 to -45.6], and the overall pooled change in the number of cutaneous infections episodes per year across 8 studies including 248 patients was -1.9 [95% CI: -1.4 to -2.3]. The vast majority of the studies included were case series and cohorts, which were intrinsically exposed to a risk of selection bias.

CONCLUSION

The currently available evidence supports LVA and vascularized lymph node transfers as effective treatments to reduce the severity of secondary lymphedema. Standardization of staging method, outcomes measurements, and reporting is paramount in future research in order to allow comparability across studies and pooling of results.

Clinical Utility of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Parameters for Evaluating Patients with Lower Limb Lymphedema after Lymphovenous Anastomosis

BACKGROUND

 In lymphedema, lymphatic fluid accumulates in the interstitial space, and localized swelling appears. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is the most widely used surgery to rebuild a damaged lymphatic system; however, assessing outcome of LVA involves performing volume measurements, which provides limited information on body composition changes. Therefore, we analyzed the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters that can reflect the status of lymphedema patients who underwent LVA.

METHODS

 We retrospectively reviewed records of 42 patients with unilateral lower extremity lymphedema who had LVA. We measured the perioperative BIA parameters such as extracellular water (ECW) ratio and volume as defined by the percentage of excess volume (PEV). We evaluated the relationship between the amount of change in PEV and in BIA parameters before and after surgery. We confirmed the correlation between ΔPEV and BIA parameters using Spearman's correlation.

RESULTS

 Most patients included had secondary lymphedema due to cancer. Average age was 51.76 years and average body mass index was 23.27. PEV and all BIA parameters after surgery showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared with preoperative measurements. The ECW ratio aff/unaff showed the strongest correlation with PEV with a correlation coefficient of 0.473 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

 Our findings suggest that BIA parameters, especially ECW ratio aff/unaff could reflect the status of patients with lower limb lymphedema after LVA. Appropriate use of BIA parameters may be useful in the postoperative surveillance of patients.

Relationship between Viscoelastic Properties of Tissues and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy in Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the viscoelastic properties of tissues and breast-cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). After a mastectomy, 46 females were allocated into a lymphedema group (L; n = 15, lymphedema occurred) and a control group (C; n = 31, lack of lymphedema). Bioimpedance spectroscopy was used to test BCRL. The mechanical properties of the tissues in both upper limbs were tested using myotonometry. In group L, tone, stiffness, relaxation time, and creep measured on the biceps brachii of the impaired limb significantly differed from the results on the unimpaired limb. In group C, the differences were not significant. Moreover, both tone and stiffness were inversely correlated with the level of lymphedema (r = −0.72 and r = −0.88, respectively), and both relaxation and creep were significantly related to the level of lymphedema (r = 0.71 and r = 0.59, respectively), when myotonometry was completed on the biceps brachii of the impaired limb in group L. The relationships were not significant in group C. Measurements of viscoelastic properties can provide useful information concerning lymphedema. Our findings suggest that significant correlations between selected mechanical properties of the tissues and BCRL can be used in BCRL detection and treatment.

Impact of Magnetic Resonance Lymphography on Lymphaticolvenular Anastomosis for Lower-Limb Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

 Although several investigations have described the safety, utility, and precision of magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) as a preoperative examination for lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA), it is unclear how much MRL assistance impacts LVA results. The present study aimed to clarify the outcome of MRL-assisted LVA for leg lymphedema using body water measurements obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis.

METHODS

 The water reductive effect of MRL-assisted LVA in female secondary leg lymphedema patients was compared with that of non-MRL-assisted controls in this retrospective study. In the MRL-assisted group, all LVA candidates underwent MRL prior to surgery, and the lymphatic vessels to be anastomosed were primarily determined by MRL findings. The body water composition of the treated legs was assessed before LVA and at 6 months postoperatively using a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer.

RESULTS

 Twenty-three patients in the MRL-assisted study group and an equal number in the non-MRL-assisted control group were analyzed. Although mean leg water volume before LVA, mean excess water volume of the affected leg before LVA, and number of anastomoses created were comparable between the groups, the water volume reduction (1.02 L versus 0.49 L; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-1.03, p < 0.05) and edema reduction rate (46.7% versus 27.2%; 95% CI: 3.7-35.5%, p < 0.05) in the MRL-assisted group were significantly greater than in controls.

CONCLUSION

 Preoperative MRL-assisted lymph vessel visualization and selection appeared to significantly enhance the water reductive effect of LVA for International Society of Lymphology classification stage 2 leg lymphedema. MRL also helped to reliably identify lymphatic vessels for anastomosis. Without increasing the number of anastomoses, LVA could be performed more effectively by better detecting stagnant lymphatic vessels using MRL.

Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis in Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema: A Short-Term Clinicopathological Analysis from Indonesia

BACKGROUND

 Locally advanced breast cancer is commonly found in Indonesia. In this group of patients, aggressive treatment such as axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) with or without regional nodal irradiation (RNI) will increase the risk of breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) in our patients. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) has been established as a minimally invasive approach in lymphedema surgery. In this study, we report our first experience of LVAs in BCRL patients.

METHODS

 This was a cross-sectional study taken from breast cancer patients receiving ALND with or without RNI. From December 2018 until June 2020, we collected and described general patient information, tumor characteristics, diagnostic methods, and the outcome of LVA. Postoperative subjective symptoms scores (lymphedema quality-of-life score [LeQOLiS]) and lymphedematous volume (upper extremity lymphedema [UEL] index) were compared with preoperative ones.

RESULTS

 Seventy patients experienced BCRL with the mean age of 54.8 (9.4) years and mean body mass index of 28.1 (4.5). ALND was performed in 66 (97.1%) cases and RNI was given in 58 (82.9%) patients. Thirty-one (44.3%) patients were in the International Society of Lymphology stage 1, 24 (34.3%) in stage 2A, and 15 (21.4%) in stage 2B. The mean lymphatic vessel diameter was 0.5 (0.26) mm and 0.80 (0.54) mm for the vein. Lymphosclerosis severity was 7 (4%) in S0 type, 129 (74.1%) in S1 type, 37 (21.3%) in S2 type, and 1 (0.6%) in S3 type. In histopathology examination, S1 types were in lower grade injury, while S2 and S3 types were in the higher grade. Seven (53.8%) cases of S2 type showed severe fibrosis from trichrome staining. Postoperative LeQOLiSs were significantly lower than preoperative ones (5.6 ± 2.4 vs. 3.7 ± 2.6; p = 0.000). With the mean follow-up of 7.4 (3.7) months, the overall UEL index reduction was 9.2%; mean -11 (16.8). Postoperative UEL index was significantly lower than preoperative ones (117.7 ± 26.5 vs. 106.9 ± 18.5; p = 0.000). No complications were observed during this period.

CONCLUSION

 LVA reduced the subjective symptoms and UEL index in BCRL cases. Future studies using updated imaging technologies of the lymphatic system and longer follow-up time are needed to confirm our results.

Extracellular Water Ratio as an Indicator of the Development and Severity of Leg Lymphedema Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

Background: This case-control retrospective study focused on the extracellular water ratio (%ECW) of lymphedemic limbs measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as a possible indicator of the development and severity of unilateral and bilateral leg lymphedema. Methods and Results: BIA was used to evaluate changes in %ECW due to lymphedema in female patients with unilateral secondary leg lymphedema and in healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to assess the diagnostic ability of %ECW to distinguish leg lymphedema patients from controls. Thirty-eight female patients were eligible for inclusion along with an equal number of healthy control volunteers. The %ECW of the affected leg correlated with leg body water volume (R² = 0.28) and the water volume difference between affected and unaffected legs (R² = 0.58). The ROC analysis showed that %ECW had a high diagnostic ability as a screening tool for the development of leg lymphedema (area under the ROC curve = 0.96). A cutoff %ECW value of 40.0% could predict the presence of leg lymphedema with a sensitivity of 81.6% and specificity of 97.4%. Conclusions: %ECW value may be a simple and useful indicator of the development and severity of leg lymphedema. As a screening test, %ECW measurement can predict the presence of unilateral or bilateral leg lymphedema in a single measurement without the need for arm, contralateral leg, or previous measurements as controls.