Complications and Solutions in Propeller Flap Surgery

Perforator-Based Propeller Flap Application in Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis With Advancement Flaps

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers are a prevalent and debilitating condition, often necessitating surgical reconstruction. Various flap techniques, such as Advancement Flaps (AF) and Perforator-based Propeller Flaps (PBPF), are commonly used for pressure sore reconstruction. While both techniques have proven effective, there is limited research comparing their outcomes in different clinical scenarios. In recent years, PBPF has demonstrated favorable outcomes in various reconstruction fields. However, there remains a need to establish the optimal technique for specific clinical conditions and patient populations. Therefore, this study aims to compare the outcomes of PBPF and AF in patients undergoing pressure ulcer reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent pressure sore reconstruction utilizing either AF or PBPF techniques between January 2020 and December 2023. Data on demographics, pressure ulcer details, operative time, hospital stay, recurrence rate, and complications were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In this study of 56 patients, 30 underwent AF, and 26 underwent PBPF. Demographic and clinical characteristics showed no significant differences. Clinical and surgical outcomes indicated no significant differences in defect size (p = 0.517), hospitalization period (p = 0.786), follow-up duration (p = 0.746), number of preoperative debridements (p = 0.781), time to recurrence (p = 0.224), or postoperative complications (p = 0.757). However, PBPF resulted in a smaller flap size (93.7 ± 29.5 cm2 for AF vs. 70.5 ± 19.7 cm2 for PBPF, p < 0.001), a longer operation time compared to AF (94.6 ± 39.1 min for AF vs. 161.0 ± 38.9 min for PBPF, p < 0.001), and lower recurrence rate in long-term follow-up (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

PBPF may have the drawback of prolonged surgical time due to the complexity of the surgical procedure. However, when applied appropriately, it can be a meaningful surgical approach for reducing the recurrence rate of pressure ulcers.

Autologous porcine VRAM flap model for VCA research

INTRODUCTION

As research advances in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), large animal models are essential for translational studies related to immune rejection and graft survival. However, procurement of large flaps can cause significant defects, complicating wound closure and increasing postoperative risks. This study details the surgical techniques and outcomes of autologous vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap transplantation and neck flap isolation with induced ischemia in a swine model. The purpose of this study was to identify the most effective control procedure for use in future VRAM flap allotransplantation research.

METHODS

We performed two left heterotopic autologous VRAM flap transplants and two right anterolateral neck flap isolations using female Yucatan pigs. Postoperatively, animals were monitored for complications and flap healing, with punch biopsies taken on POD1, 5, and at the end of the study for histological analysis. Transcutaneous oxygen and temperature were also recorded.

RESULTS

Both autologous flaps survived after vessel anastomosis, with effective closure of abdominal defects using suturable mesh, and no postoperative complications were observed. Histology revealed mild dermal edema and perivascular inflammation on POD5. In the neck flap group, both flaps survived temporary ischemia, however, postoperative complications included dorsal flap necrosis and wound dehiscence, requiring reoperation. No gross inflammation or edema was observed following surgery and histologically there was only mild dermal edema on POD5.

DISCUSSION

We have developed a low-risk, technically feasible porcine autologous VRAM flap transplantation model and our findings support its use in future VCA studies.

Extensive Defect Reconstruction Using Multiple Perforator Propeller Flaps in a Jigsaw Puzzle Approach

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of extensive defects remains a challenge. The authors report their experience with extensive defect reconstruction using multiple perforator propeller flaps and provide a systematic review of the literature on this approach.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent defect reconstruction with multiple perforator propeller flaps from 2014 to 2021. A systematic review was conducted by retrieving studies on reconstructive strategy from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus published before December 1, 2022.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent defect reconstruction using 65 perforator propeller flaps. The posterior trunk (66.7%) was the most common site of defects. Complete flap survival was achieved in 61 flaps (93.8%). Partial necrosis of 4 flaps in 3 patients and venous congestion of 1 flap resulted in an overall complication rate of 13.3%. One flap experienced distal tip necrosis in 21 patients undergoing posterior trunk or perineal defect reconstruction, leading to an overall complication rate of 4.7%. Other complications were observed during the reconstruction of defects in the lower extremities (1 of 5 patients) and anterior trunk (2 of 4 patients). In the systematic review, 11 articles involving 74 patients were identified. Commonly reported locations of the defects were the perineum (55.4%) and posterior trunk (33.8%). Flap-related complications included venous congestion; no flaps were lost.

CONCLUSION

This study on the use of multiple perforator propeller flaps in a jigsaw puzzle approach demonstrated that the method can be used effectively for extensive posterior trunk and perineal defect reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of perforator-based propeller flaps (PPF) versus free flaps (FF) in traumatic lower leg and foot reconstructions are debated. PPFs are perceived as simpler due to advantages like avoiding microsurgery, but concerns about complications, such as flap congestion and necrosis, persist. This study aimed to compare outcomes of PPF and FF in trauma-related distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 38 flaps in 33 patients who underwent lower leg and foot soft tissue reconstruction due to trauma at our hospital from 2015 until 2022. Flap-related outcomes and complications were compared between the PPF group (18 flaps in 15 patients) and the FF group (20 flaps in 18 patients). These included complete and partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, delayed osteomyelitis, and the coverage failure rate, defined as the need for secondary flaps due to flap necrosis.

RESULTS

The coverage failure rate was 22% in the PPF group and 5% in the FF group, with complete necrosis observed in 11% of the PPF group and 5% of the FF group, and partial necrosis in 39% of the PPF group and 10% of the FF group, indicating no significant difference between the two groups. However, venous congestion was significantly higher in 72% of the PPF group compared to 10% of the FF group. Four PPFs and one FF required FF reconstruction due to implant/fracture exposure from necrosis. Additionally, four PPFs developed delayed osteomyelitis post-healing, requiring reconstruction using free vascularized bone graft in three out of four cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Flap necrosis in traumatic lower-leg defects can lead to reconstructive failure, exposing implants or fractures and potentially causing catastrophic outcomes like osteomyelitis, jeopardizing limb salvage. Surgeons should be cautious about deeming PPFs as straightforward and microsurgery-free procedures, given the increased complication rates compared to FFs in traumatic reconstruction.

DATA ACCESS STATEMENT

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Smartphone Thermal Imaging for Preoperative Perforator Mapping in Perforator Based Flaps

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone thermal imaging for preoperative perforator mapping in perforator-based flaps, taking visual inspection as gold standard.

METHODOLOGY

It was a cross-validation study conducted at the Department of Plastic Surgery, Dr. Ruth K. Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from August 2022 to January 2023. All adult patients aged 18 to 40 years of either gender undergoing perforator flap surgery were included. Each patient followed the same treatment regimen, which involved the preoperative identification of the perforator location using the FLIR One camera. Subsequently, confirmation was achieved during the surgical procedure through visual inspection. A two-by two table was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 30.10±6.87 years, ranging from 18 to 40 years. Most of the patients were males (58.7%), and 41.3% were females. Almost 80.4% were pedicle flaps, and 19.6% were free flaps. The accuracy of thermal imaging was found to be 83.2%, with a sensitivity of 84.3%, a specificity of 80%, a PPV of 92.9%, and a NPV of 62.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Smartphone-based thermal imaging is useful for the diagnosis of perforators and has high sensitivity and specificity.

Conjoined thoracodorsal perforator-supercharged dorsal intercostal artery perforator propeller flap for reconstruction of a complex upper back defect: Case report and review of the literature on supercharged pedicled perforator flaps

The reported complications' rate of perforator propeller flaps is variably high, but the etiology of distal flap necrosis, potentially linked to vascular insufficiency, is yet to be clarified. Vascular augmentation procedures have been previously described involving an extra anastomosis of a superficial vein, while a perforator-to-perforator supercharging approach has been only sporadically documented in literature. We present a case of perforator-to-perforator vascular supercharging of an extended dorsal intercostal artery perforator (DICAP) propeller flap to provide a salvage option for pedicled flap complicated by venous congestion. A 71-year-old male patient underwent Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans resection in the upper back, leading to a 17 × 17 cm defect with bone exposure. A 30 × 9 cm DICAP propeller flap was planned, with the distal third of the flap designed over the adjacent Thoracodorsal artery perforasome, in a conjoined fashion. Considering the small DICAP pedicle caliber and the flap lateral extension, a thoracodorsal artery perforator vein was dissected and included in the distal flap. Once the flap was raised on its main pedicle, the skin paddle turned blue, showing signs of venous insufficiency. Indocyanine green angiography (ICG) showed a viable proximal half of the flap. Hence, after rotating the skin paddle to reach the upper margin of the defect, an additional anastomosis between the perforating thoracodorsal vein and the perforating vein of the dorsal scapular pedicle was performed according to the perforator-to-perforator approach. Doing so, both clinical and ICG examinations showed a well perfused flap, with normal capillary refill. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient obtained a good oncological and reconstructive result 4 months postoperatively. The second Vasconez law ("all of the flap will survive except the part that you need") is often encountered in propeller flaps surgery. Our case shows that it is possible to prevent or overcome this problem by planning appropriate vascular augmentation procedures according to the perforator-to-perforator approach, being guided by advanced vascular imaging tools like ICG.

Immediate Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Lower Limb Traumas Using Propeller Perforator Flaps

BACKGROUND

Open bone fractures represent a demanding clinical condition that can be life- or limb-threatening. For small- to medium-size soft tissue defects of the lower extremity, propeller perforator flaps are a viable option for reconstruction. We report our experience in Gustilo IIIB open fractures treatment with immediate coverage through propeller-based perforator flaps performed in acute setting.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2022, 94 Gustilo III fractures were admitted to our trauma center, and 28 were Gustilo IIIB fractures. Five patients were eligible for an immediate perforator-based propeller flaps reconstruction. The mean age of the patients was 33.8 years. All of them were male. One of them was a heavy smoker (15 cigarettes per day). No other comorbidities were present.

RESULTS

The mean operating time, including fracture reduction and fixation time, was 106 minutes. The length of the defect varied between 5 and 7 cm and the width between 3 and 4 cm. We reported no major complications, and none of the patients required a surgical revision of the flap. A patient with smoking habit reported a superficial flap necrosis. The mean follow-up was 5.5 months. No cases of nonunion or osteomyelitis have developed so far.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of perforator-based propeller flaps, in acute trauma setting, has not been reported in literature so far. In our experience, propeller perforator flaps are a viable reconstructive option in immediate reconstruction during the acute management of open fractures.

A. Perforator-Based Propeller Flap with Additional Venous Pedicle for Lower Limb Reconstruction

Propeller flaps are effective reconstructive tools for small-to-medium sized defects of the lower limb and a reasonable alternative to free flaps. A major vessel of the lower limb remains undisturbed while raising the flap and the flap donor and recipient areas are addressed in the same operative field. Perforator-based propeller flaps are based on single perforator arising from a major vessel and during rotation of the larger paddle there is a possibility of kink in the venous component leading to congestion of flap. In our modification, one superficial vein of the lower limb namely the great saphenous or short saphenous vein was included in the flap territory to enhance the retrograde or antegrade venous drainage of the flap. We observed, no flap congestion or necrosis in the postoperative period. Also, the patency of the incorporated vein was confirmed using handheld and color Doppler.

Lower Trapezius Myocutaneous Propeller Flap Based on Dorsal Scapular Artery

BACKGROUND

The pedicled lower trapezius myocutaneous flap is generally transferred to the recipient site through a subcutaneous tunnel, and a portion of the flap buried in the tunnel needs to be de-epithelialized. Thus, considerable amount of normal skin is sacrificed, and the redundant tissue buried in the tunnel can cause bulging deformity. We believe that transferring the lower trapezius myocutaneous flap in a propeller fashion can avoid the aforementioned issues.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all lower trapezius myocutaneous propeller flap reconstructions by a single surgeon from July 2013 to March 2021. Data on patient demographics, diagnosis, features of the defect, characteristics of the flap, and the outcome were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three lower trapezius myocutaneous propeller flaps were used to reconstruct soft tissue defects in the head, neck, and back. The etiologies were malignancy, trauma, postburn scar contracture, and congenital melanocytic nevus. The mean skin paddle dimensions were 29.0 cm in length (range, 13-45 cm) and 10.9 cm in width (range, 6-15 cm). The donor sites were closed primarily in 30 patients, closed using a skin graft in 1 patient, and covered with the second flap in 2 patients. Venous congestion occurred in the distal portion of 4 flaps and partial necrosis in the distal 6 cm of 1 flap. The average follow-up time was 17.5 months (range, 1-56 months). The normal contour of the back was preserved without bulging deformity. No patient developed a winged scapula or a decrease in shoulder elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower trapezius myocutaneous propeller flap may be an option for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the head, neck, and back with less waste of normal tissue and bulging deformity.

[Application of perforator propeller flap of lower limb in the treatment of foot and ankle defect in children]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of perforator propeller flap of lower limb in the treatment of foot and ankle defect in children.

Methods

The clinical data of 28 children with foot and ankle defect treated with perforator propeller flap of lower limb between January 2018 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 18 boys and 10 girls with an average age of 7.3 years (range, 6-14 years). There were 8 cases of traffic accident injury and 20 cases of chronic infection wound. The disease duration was 2-4 months, with an average of 2.8 months. After thorough debridement, the residual wound size ranged from 5 cm×4 cm to 9 cm×5 cm. Repairing was performed after 7-28 days of the infection in control. According to the location, size, and shape of the wound, the perforating vessels were located by ultrasonic Doppler, and the perforator propeller flap (area ranged from 6 cm×5 cm to 11 cm×6 cm) was designed and harvested to repair the wound. Flap transfer combined with free split-thickness skin graft covered the wound in 2 cases. The donor site was sutured directly (22 cases) or repaired with skin graft (6 cases).

Results

Twenty-six flaps survived, of which 20 cases were in primary healing, and 6 cases had epidermal necrosis at the end of small paddle, which healed after dressing change. Necrosis occurred in 2 cases due to venous crisis which healed after anterolateral femoral flap free transplantation. Primary wound healing was achieved in donor site. All 28 children were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 10.5 months). The texture, shape, and motor function of the lower limb was satisfactory. At last follow-up, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) score was 89.8±8.0, which was significantly different from the preoperative score (79.6±10.4) ( t=-11.205, P<0.001); 20 cases were excellent, 6 cases were good, and 2 cases were poor, and the excellent and good rate was 92.8%.

Conclusion

The perforator propeller flap of lower limb in children has its own characteristics. It is a reliable method to repair the foot and ankle defect in children.

Analysis of risk factors for complications of perforator propeller flaps used for soft tissue reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perforator propeller flaps (PPFs) have been widely used due to their numerous advantages; however, they were also associated with various complications. Herein, we analyzed the risk factors for complications of PPFs used for soft tissue reconstruction after malignant tumor resection.

METHODS

We searched databases for articles on soft tissue reconstruction using PPFs after malignant tumor resection published between January 1991 and April 2021. Studies were selected according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Fixed effects models and relative risks were used for data analysis. Funnel plots and Begg's test were used to evaluate publication bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Complications were found in 24.7% of all patients. The four significant risk factors were age equal or older than 60 years (pooled relative risk, 1.83; p = .04), smoking (pooled relative risk, 2.32; p = .03), diabetes (pooled relative risk, 2.59; p = .01) and radiotherapy (pooled relative risk, 2.09; p = .01). Hypertension, defects located in the extremities, flap size equal or greater than 100 cm² , and pedicle rotation equal or greater than 120 degrees were not significant risk factors for complications. No publication bias was found in the included articles.

CONCLUSION

Age equal or older than 60 years, smoking, diabetes and radiotherapy are four risk factors for complications when PPFs are used to reconstruct soft tissue defects resulting from malignant tumor resection.

Outcome of distal lower leg reconstruction with the propeller perforator flap in diabetic patients

In diabetic foot patients, wound coverage options are quite limited due to vascular abnormalities. However, even though significant atherosclerotic changes are found in major vessels of the lower leg in diabetic foot patients, perforating vessels, which are used as the vascular pedicle of propeller perforator flaps, are often spared from atherosclerosis. Therefore, the propeller perforator flap could be an alternative option for diabetic foot patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of the propeller perforator flap between diabetic and nondiabetic patients in reconstruction of the distal lower leg. We retrospectively included all patients who underwent reconstruction of the distal lower leg with a propeller flap between 2014 and 2018. Thirty-five propeller perforator flaps in 20 diabetic patients and 15 nondiabetic patients were included. Of the 35 patients, 21 showed complete healing, and 14 showed flap complications. The rate of complications in diabetic patients was approximately 85.7%. Sex (p = .002), diabetes (p = .007), chronic renal failure (p < .001), and diabetic neuropathy (p = .011) were associated with flap complications. Crude regression analysis showed that the female sex (p = .002), diabetes (p = .01), and diabetic neuropathy (p = .012) were significant risk factors for the occurrence of any complications, but the significance of diabetes and diabetic neuropathy was not maintained in the adjusted models. Therefore, the propeller perforator flap might not be effective for reconstructing diabetic foot ulcers.

How to Design and Harvest a Propeller Flap

Propeller flaps are local flaps based either on a subcutaneous pedicle, a single perforator, or vessels entering the flap in such a way so as to allow the flap to rotate on their axis. Depending on the kind of pedicle and the anatomical area, the preoperative investigation and the harvesting techniques may vary. An adequate knowledge of skin and subcutaneous tissue perfusion in the different areas of the body is very important to plan a propeller flap to be successful. The surgeon should begin by finding the most suitable perforators in the area surrounding the defect using available technology. The position, size, and shape of the flap are planned about this point. For perforator-pedicled propeller flaps, the procedure starts with an exploration from the margins of the defect or through a dedicated incision to visualize any perforators in the surroundings. The most suitable perforator is selected and isolated, the skin island is replanned, and the flap is harvested and rotated into the defect. The variations in surgical technique for other types of propellers and in specific anatomical areas are also described. Compared with free flaps, propeller flaps have the advantage of a simpler, shorter operation, without the need for a recipient vessel for microanastomosis. Yet, from a technical point of view, an adequate experience in dissecting perforators and the use of magnifying glasses are almost always required.

Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction

Reconstruction of the lower extremity is considered a major challenge due to frequent bone exposure and the absence of local tissue redundancy, as well as often due to the presence of vascular insufficiency. Many surgeons have preferred free flaps especially for reconstructing the more distal lower limb defects until the evolution of pedicled perforator flaps and propeller flaps in particular provided a like-with-like reconstruction of the lower extremity without affecting the main vessels of the limb or the underlying muscles, and without the risk of any microanastomosis especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps as local flaps in the lower extremity are best suited for small- and medium-sized defects with minimal donor-site morbidity, regardless of the cause of the defect. Any of the three source vessels of the leg can provide reliable perforators for propeller flap coverage of the distal leg and foot. The three main risk factors that are relative contraindications may be advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease.