How to Design and Harvest a Propeller Flap

Successful Reconstruction of Complex Sacrococcygeal Defects Using Chimeric Perforator Propeller Flap

BACKGROUND

Complex soft tissue defects, which result from the surgical resection of sacral tumors, manifest as a combination of skin defects, dead space, infection, and prosthesis exposure. Because the traditional musculocutaneous flap lacks flexibility because of the close connection between the skin flap and the muscle component, the musculocutaneous flap is not suitable for reconstructing complex soft tissue defects where the dead space and skin defects are located at different sites. Furthermore, the perforator flap is also not appropriate for reconstructing complex defects because it lacks the muscular component. We considered the possibility of using the chimeric perforator propeller flap for reconstructing complex sacrococcygeal defects.

METHODS

This study included 7 patients who underwent, between July 2007 and July 2021, the reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects of the sacrococcygeal region using a chimeric perforator propeller flap.

RESULTS

Among the included cases, the etiologies were chordoma (n = 3), sacral tumor (n = 3), and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1). In all the cases, vacuum-assisted closure therapy was used to treat wound infections before surgery. The average sizes of the skin and muscle flaps were 195.8 cm 2 (range, 100-350 cm 2 ) and 83.6 cm 2 (range, 60-140 cm 2 ), respectively. The superior gluteal artery was the source artery for the chimeric perforator propeller flap. The donor sites were primarily closed in all cases. One patient had delayed wound healing, and the secondary wound healed using conservative dressing changes. The other 6 flaps had no complications. The average follow-up time was 5.3 months (range, 1-9 months). Muscle weakness and compromised ambulation in the affected lower extremities were not observed in any of the patients. Furthermore, all 7 patients had no tumor recurrence, prosthesis exposure, and infection events in the sacrococcygeal region.

CONCLUSIONS

The chimeric perforator propeller flap may be an option for reconstructing complex soft tissue defects in the sacrococcygeal region.

Immediate Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Lower Limb Traumas Using Propeller Perforator Flaps

BACKGROUND

Open bone fractures represent a demanding clinical condition that can be life- or limb-threatening. For small- to medium-size soft tissue defects of the lower extremity, propeller perforator flaps are a viable option for reconstruction. We report our experience in Gustilo IIIB open fractures treatment with immediate coverage through propeller-based perforator flaps performed in acute setting.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2022, 94 Gustilo III fractures were admitted to our trauma center, and 28 were Gustilo IIIB fractures. Five patients were eligible for an immediate perforator-based propeller flaps reconstruction. The mean age of the patients was 33.8 years. All of them were male. One of them was a heavy smoker (15 cigarettes per day). No other comorbidities were present.

RESULTS

The mean operating time, including fracture reduction and fixation time, was 106 minutes. The length of the defect varied between 5 and 7 cm and the width between 3 and 4 cm. We reported no major complications, and none of the patients required a surgical revision of the flap. A patient with smoking habit reported a superficial flap necrosis. The mean follow-up was 5.5 months. No cases of nonunion or osteomyelitis have developed so far.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of perforator-based propeller flaps, in acute trauma setting, has not been reported in literature so far. In our experience, propeller perforator flaps are a viable reconstructive option in immediate reconstruction during the acute management of open fractures.

Lower Trapezius Myocutaneous Propeller Flap Based on Dorsal Scapular Artery

BACKGROUND

The pedicled lower trapezius myocutaneous flap is generally transferred to the recipient site through a subcutaneous tunnel, and a portion of the flap buried in the tunnel needs to be de-epithelialized. Thus, considerable amount of normal skin is sacrificed, and the redundant tissue buried in the tunnel can cause bulging deformity. We believe that transferring the lower trapezius myocutaneous flap in a propeller fashion can avoid the aforementioned issues.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all lower trapezius myocutaneous propeller flap reconstructions by a single surgeon from July 2013 to March 2021. Data on patient demographics, diagnosis, features of the defect, characteristics of the flap, and the outcome were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three lower trapezius myocutaneous propeller flaps were used to reconstruct soft tissue defects in the head, neck, and back. The etiologies were malignancy, trauma, postburn scar contracture, and congenital melanocytic nevus. The mean skin paddle dimensions were 29.0 cm in length (range, 13-45 cm) and 10.9 cm in width (range, 6-15 cm). The donor sites were closed primarily in 30 patients, closed using a skin graft in 1 patient, and covered with the second flap in 2 patients. Venous congestion occurred in the distal portion of 4 flaps and partial necrosis in the distal 6 cm of 1 flap. The average follow-up time was 17.5 months (range, 1-56 months). The normal contour of the back was preserved without bulging deformity. No patient developed a winged scapula or a decrease in shoulder elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower trapezius myocutaneous propeller flap may be an option for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the head, neck, and back with less waste of normal tissue and bulging deformity.

A propeller superficial transverse cervical artery perforator flap for defect coverage of the submental area: a case report

Reconstruction of submental defects is a challenge that needs to be approached carefully, since many important anatomical structures are located in this small space. Both aesthetic and functional outcomes should be considered during reconstruction. In this report, we describe a case where a superficial branch of the transverse cervical artery (STCA) perforator propeller flap was applied for coverage of the submental area. An 85-year-old woman presented with a 3-cm ovoid mass on her submental area. We covered the large submental defect with a STCA rotational flap in a 180° propeller pattern. The flap survived well without any complications at 1 year of follow-up. A STCA propeller flap is a useful surgical option in reconstruction for defect coverage of the submental area.

Smartphone Thermal Imaging Can Enable the Safer Use of Propeller Flaps

The use of thermography for the identification of cutaneous "hot spots" that coincide with perforators is not a new concept, but the required professional cameras may be prohibitively expensive. Only relatively recently, incredibly cheap but adequate thermal imaging cameras have become available that work in concert with the ubiquitous cell phone. This can now serve as a rapid, accurate, and complementary method for finding a perforator sufficient to serve as the hub for a perforator pedicled propeller flap. In addition, the preferred direction of rotation about that hub, effect of flap insetting on perfusion, and then postoperative monitoring are possible by proper interpretation of corresponding thermograms. Every reconstructive surgeon should be able to obtain this device, and then easily learn what potential attributes for them are available when planning a propeller flap.

Our Definition of Propeller Flaps and Their Classification

The term propeller flap was introduced for the first time by Hyakusoku to define an island flap, based on a subcutaneous pedicle hub, that was rotated 90 degrees to correct scar contractures due to burns. With the popularization of perforator flaps, the propeller movement was applied for the first time to a skin island vascularized only by an isolated perforator, and the terms propeller and perforator flap were used together. Thereafter, the surgical technique of propeller flaps evolved and new applications developed. With the "Tokyo consensus," we proposed a definition and a classification schema for propeller flaps. A propeller flap was defined as an "island flap that reaches the recipient site through an axial rotation." The classification included the SPP (SPP) flap, the perforator pedicled propeller (PPP) flap, and the supercharged PPP (SCP) flap. A recent update added a new category, the axial pedicled propeller (APP) flap. Here we propose our updated and comprehensive classification of propeller flaps, taking into account the previous classification and subsequent publications. Based on their vascular pedicle, we consider the following five types of propellers: (1) SPP flap, 2.PPP flap, its subtype (2a) SCP flap, (3) APP flap, (4) muscle propeller flap, and (5) chimeric propeller flap. The variables that can be taken into account in the classification are as follows: type of nourishing pedicle, degrees of skin island rotation, position of the nourishing pedicle, artery of origin of the pedicle, and flap shape.

Perforator-Pedicled Propeller Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction

Reconstruction of the lower extremity is considered a major challenge due to frequent bone exposure and the absence of local tissue redundancy, as well as often due to the presence of vascular insufficiency. Many surgeons have preferred free flaps especially for reconstructing the more distal lower limb defects until the evolution of pedicled perforator flaps and propeller flaps in particular provided a like-with-like reconstruction of the lower extremity without affecting the main vessels of the limb or the underlying muscles, and without the risk of any microanastomosis especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps as local flaps in the lower extremity are best suited for small- and medium-sized defects with minimal donor-site morbidity, regardless of the cause of the defect. Any of the three source vessels of the leg can provide reliable perforators for propeller flap coverage of the distal leg and foot. The three main risk factors that are relative contraindications may be advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease.

Complications and Solutions in Propeller Flap Surgery

Propeller perforator flaps (PPFs) have long been proven as valid reconstructive tools for a wide range of soft tissue defects in different body regions. During the last decade, despite their numerous advantages, many authors have thoroughly analyzed outcomes of these flaps, sometimes discouraging their use mainly because of a high failure rate. Accurate patient selection, adequate preoperative planning, and an appropriate dissection technique seem to potentially improve outcomes. Our study provides a review of the relevant literature related to PPF complications and of our experience, describing reasons for failure, measures for preventing them, and approaches for a prompt evaluation and management of complications.