Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the De Novo Detection of Chronic Total Occlusion Prior to Coronary Angiography: A Preliminary and Retrospective Study

Quantitative coronary computed tomography assessment for differentiating between total occlusions and severe stenoses

BACKGROUNDS

The impact of quantitative assessment to differentiate total occlusions (TOs) from severe stenoses on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether quantitative characteristics assessed on CCTA could help differentiate a TO from a severe stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

METHODS

This study is a sub-analysis of the FASTTRACK CABG (NCT04142021) in which both CCTA and ICA were routinely performed. Quantitative analysis was performed with semi-automated CCTA plaque-analysis software. Blinded analysts compared TOs on CCTA, defined as a complete lack of contrast opacification within the coronary occlusion, with corresponding ICA.

RESULTS

Eighty-four TOs were seen on CCTA in 59 of the 114 patients enrolled in the trial. The concordance in diagnosing a TO between ICA and CCTA was 56.0% (n ​= ​47). Compared to severe stenoses, TOs had a significantly longer lesion length (25.1 ​± ​23.0 ​mm vs 9.4 ​± ​11.2 ​mm, P ​< ​0.001). The best cut-off value to differentiate a TO from severe stenosis was a lesion length of 5.5 ​mm (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.87), with a 91.1% sensitivity and 61.1% specificity. Dense calcium percentage atheroma volume (PAV) was significantly higher in TOs compared to severe stenoses (18.7 ​± ​19.6% vs. 6.6 ​± ​13.0%, P ​< ​0.001), whilst the opposite was seen for fibro-fatty PAV (31.3 ​± ​14.2% vs. 19.5 ​± ​10.5%, P ​< ​0.001). On a multivariable logistic regression analysis, lesion length (>5.5 ​mm) was the only parameter associated with differentiating a TO from a severe stenosis.

CONCLUSION

In quantitative CCTA analysis, a lesion length >5.5 ​mm was the only independent predictor differentiating a TO from a severe stenosis.

NCT REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04142021.

Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Related Adverse Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With in-stent vs de novo Chronic Total Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contemporary literature reveals a range of cardiac complications in patients who receive the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). This study compared the adverse cardiac outcomes and procedural/technical success rates between the patients groups of in-stent (IS) CTO PCI and de novo CTO PCI. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared odds for primary (all-cause mortality, MACE, cardiac death post PCI, stroke) and secondary (bleeding requiring blood transfusion, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization, PCI procedural success, PCI technical success, and target-vessel MI) endpoints between 2734 patients who received PCI for IS CTO and 17,808 for de novo CTO. Odds ratios for outcome variables were calculated within 95% confidence intervals (CIs) via the Mantel-Haenszel method. The pooled analysis was undertaken for observational (retrospective/prospective) single- and multicentered studies published between January 2005 and December 2021. We found 57% higher, 166% higher, 129% higher, and 57% lower odds for MACE (OR: 1.57, 95% CI 1.31, 1.89, P < 0.001), ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (OR: 2.66, 95% CI 2.01, 3.53, P < 0.001), target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI) (OR: 2.29, 95% CI 1.70, 3.10, P < 0.001), and bleeding requiring blood transfusion (OR: 0.43, 95% CI 0.19, 1.00, P = 0.05), respectively, in patients with IS CTO PCI as compared to that of the de novo CTO PCI. No statistically significant differences between the study groups were recorded for the other primary/secondary outcome variables. The findings from this study indicated a high predisposition for MACE, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization, target vessel MI, and a lower incidence of bleeding episodes among IS CTO PCI patients as compared to those with de novo CTO PCI. The prognostic outcomes in CTO PCI cases require further investigation with randomized controlled trials.

Anesthetic Considerations for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusions-A Narrative Review

Advancing stent technology has enabled interventional cardiologists to perform percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to open chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Because PCI for CTOs improve patient anginal symptoms and quality of life, these procedures have been increasing over the past decade. Compared to standard PCI, these procedures are technically more difficult, with prolonged procedure time and increased risk of complications. Accordingly, anesthesiologists are increasingly being asked to provide sedation for these patients in the cardiac catheterization suite. In CTO PCI, anesthesiologists are more likely to encounter complications such as coronary artery perforation, malignant arrhythmias, non-target vessel ischemia, bleeding and shock. Additionally, CTO PCI may be supported by mechanical circulatory support devices. Understanding the procedural techniques of these complex PCI procedures is important to enable optimal anesthetic care in these patients. This narrative review discusses the pathophysiology, risks, benefits, procedural steps, and main anesthetic considerations for patients undergoing CTO PCI. Despite a growing body of literature, future research is still required to elucidate optimal anesthetic and mechanical support strategies in patients undergoing CTO PCI.