Preoperative MRI of Articular Cartilage in the Knee: A Practical Approach

Preoperative diagnosis of knee cartilage, meniscal, and ligament injuries by magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to report on the current accuracy measures specific to 1.5-Tesla MRI of the knee in the patient population prone to injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the menisci, and the articular cartilage.

METHODS

We accrued patients between January 2018 through August 2021 who underwent a preoperative MRI and were diagnosed with an articular cartilage injury either due to unevenness of articular cartilage in T2-weighted sequences or due to the irregularity of subchondral bone in T1-weighted sequences. All patients were treated arthroscopically. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for the detection of ACL, meniscus, and cartilage injuries. A P-value of < 0.05 represented statistical significance.

RESULTS

One-hundred and forty-seven cases which included 150 knee joints were enrolled in this study. The mean age at the time of surgery was 42.9 years-old. The sensitivity in the diagnosis of ACL injuries was significantly greater than that in the diagnosis of cartilage injuries (P = 0.0083). The ratios of the equality of operative indication in 6 recipient sites were found to be between 90.0% and 96.0%. The diagnostic critical point was within a 1 cm in diameter.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic sensitivity in cartilage injuries was significantly lower than ones of ACL and meniscal injuries. The ratios of the equality of operative indication was determined to be between 90.0% and 96.0%, if we consider the unevenness of articular cartilage or the irregularity of subchondral bone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Prospective diagnostic cohort study.

Can the MRI based AMADEUS score accurately assess pre-surgery chondral defect severity according to the ICRS arthroscopic classification system?

Purpose

The AMADEUS (Area Measurement And DEpth and Underlying Structures) scoring and grading system has been proposed for the MRI based evaluation of untreated focal chondral defects around the knee. The clinical practicability, its correlation with arthroscopically assessed grading systems (ICRS – International Cartilage Repair Society) and thereby its clinical value in terms of decision making and guiding prognosis was yet to determine.

Methods

From 2008 to 2019 a total of 89 individuals were indicated for high tibial valgus osteotomy (HTO) due to tibial varus deformity and concomitant chondral defects of the medial compartment of the knee. All patients received a preoperative MRI (1.5 Tesla or 3.0 Tesla) and pre-osteotomy diagnostic arthroscopy. Chondral defects of the medial compartment were scored and graded with the MRI based AMADEUS by three independent raters and compared to arthroscopic defect grading by the ICRS system. Interrater and intrarater reliability as well as correlation analysis with the ICRS classification system were assessed.

Results

Intraclass correlation coefficients for the various subscores of the AMADEUS showed an overall good to excellent interrater agreement (min: 0.26, max: 0.80). Intrarater agreement turned out to be substantially inferior (min: 0.08, max: 0.53). Spearman correlation revealed an overall moderate correlative association of the AMADEUS subscores with the ICRS classification system, apart from the defect area subscore. Sensitivity of the AMADEUS to accurately identify defect severity according to the ICRS was 0.7 (0.69 for 3.0 Tesla MRI, 0.67 for 1.5 Tesla MRI). The mean AMADEUS grade was 2.60 ± 0.81 and the mean ICRS score 2.90 ± 0.63.

Conclusions

Overall, the AMADEUS with all its subscores shows moderate correlation with the arthroscopic chondral grading system according to ICRS. This suggests that chondral defect grading by means of the MRI based AMADEUS is well capable of influencing and guiding treatment decisions. Interrater reliability shows overall good agreement.

How to Report: Knee MRI

The knee is the most commonly examined joint with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, as such, it is the joint that most trainee radiologists start reporting. This article addresses the main pathologies encountered on MRI examination of the knee, outlining the key features to note and report, as well as providing examples of terminology used to describe these findings.