Ex Vivo Ovine Model for Surgical and Microsurgical Training on Parotidectomy and Facial Nerve Reanimation: Proposal of Structured Training Program

Detailed anatomical study of the peripheral motor branches of the facial nerve in the swine model: A novel investigative approach for facial paralysis research

INTRODUCTION

Large animal models aid in innovating surgical approaches and developing medical devices for the treatment of facial paralysis. However, there is a lack of information on facial nerve anatomy in swine. This study aimed to investigate the branching pattern and histologic characteristics of the swine facial nerve, thereby establishing the anatomical patterns of preclinical models in facial paralysis research.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The five peripheral motor branches of the facial nerve were dissected in 30 hemifaces of fresh swine cadavers. Starting at the stylomastoid foramen, the course, branching pattern, and diameter of each motor branch was recorded. Samples were taken at the start of each branch for epoxy embedding, toluidine blue staining, and histomorphologic analysis.

RESULTS

The dissections demonstrated consistent anatomy of the buccal and marginal mandibular branches in contrast to the temporal and zygomatic branches, which showed more variation in branching patterns. The buccal branch had the largest mean diameter of 1.34 mm (± 0.26 mm), whereas the marginal mandibular branch had the largest fascicular area of 0.558 mm² (± 0.12 mm²) and highest axon count of 3636.35 (± 526.36). The zygomatic branch had both the smallest diameter of 0.74 mm (± 0.25 mm) and fascicular area of 0.187 mm² (± 0.14 mm²).

CONCLUSIONS

The swine facial nerve is anatomically similar to the human facial nerve, making the pig a suitable large animal model. Detailed anatomical and histological information is crucial for developing preclinical models of novel facial nerve reconstruction approaches.

Surgical Training on Ex Vivo Ovine Model in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

Background: Nowadays, head and neck surgical approaches need an increased level of anatomical knowledge and practical skills; therefore, the related learning curve is both flat and long. On such procedures, surgeons must decrease operating time as much as possible to reduce the time of general anesthesia and related stress factors for patients. Consequently, little time can be dedicated for training skills of students and young residents in the operating theater. Fresh human cadavers offer the most obvious surrogate for living patients, but they have several limitations, such as cost, availability, and local regulations. Recently, the feasibility of using ex vivo animal models, in particular ovine ones, have been considered as high-fidelity alternatives to cadaveric specimens. Methods: This comprehensive review explores all of head and neck otolaryngology applications with this sample. We analyzed studies about ear surgery, orbital procedures, parotid gland and facial nerve reanimation, open laryngeal and tracheal surgery, microlaryngoscopy procedures, laryngotracheal stenosis treatment, and diagnostic/operative pediatric endoscopy. For each different procedure, we underline the main applications, similarities, and limitations to human procedures so as to improve the knowledge of this model as a useful tool for surgical training. Results: An ovine model is easily available and relatively inexpensive, it has no limitations associated with religious or animal ethical issues, and it is reliable for head and neck surgery due to similar consistencies tissues and neurovascular structures with respect to humans. However, some other issues should be considered, such as differences about some anatomical features, the risk of zoonotic diseases, and the absence of bleeding during training. Conclusion: This comprehensive review highlights the potentials of an ex vivo ovine model and aims to stimulate the scientific and academic community to further develop it for other applications in surgical education.

Superiority of living animal models in microsurgical training: beyond technical expertise

Background

Many studies are investigating the role of living and nonliving models to train microsurgeons. There is controversy around which modalities account for the best microsurgical training. In this study, we aim to provide a systematic literature review of the practical modalities in microsurgery training and compare the living and nonliving models, emphasizing the superiority of the former. We introduce the concept of non-technical skill acquisition in microsurgical training with the use of living laboratory animals in the context of a novel proposed curriculum.

Methods

A literature search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus within the past 11 years based on a combination of the following keywords: “microsurgery,” “training,” “skills,” and “models.” The online screening process was performed by two independent reviewers with the Covidence tool. A total of 101 papers was identified as relevant to our study. The protocol was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Results

Living models offer the chance to develop both technical and non-technical competencies (i.e., leadership, situation awareness, decision-making, communication, and teamwork). Prior experience with ex vivo tissues helps residents consolidate basic skills prior to performing more advanced techniques in the living tissues. Trainees reported a higher satisfaction rate with the living models.

Conclusions

The combination of living and nonliving training microsurgical models leads to superior results; however, the gold standard remains the living model. The validity of the hypothesis that living models enhance non-technical skills remains to be confirmed.

Level of evidence: Not ratable.