Comparison of Minimally Invasive Operative Treatment with Conservative Treatment for Acute, Minimally Displaced Scaphoid Fractures at 12 Months' Follow-up

[Scaphoid fractures : Current diagnostic and treatment concepts]

Scaphoid fractures are by far the most frequent fractures of the carpal bones of the hand and often lead to problematic healing processes if the diagnostics and treatment are inadequate. The main complication of a scaphoid fracture is pseudarthrosis, which leads to carpal collapse and degenerative arthritis of the wrist if left untreated. Early diagnosis and individualized differentiated treatment aim to achieve bony healing with restoration of the scaphoid shape and preservation of the function of the wrist. The anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the scaphoid can impede bony healing after a fracture and, in contrast to the diagnostics and treatment, cannot be influenced. A history of trauma and typical clinical signs of a scaphoid fracture should lead to systematic imaging diagnostics with obligatory computed tomography. Only by determining the exact fracture morphology can an appropriate treatment concept be established. Conservative treatment should be restricted to stable fractures without relevant displacement. Fractures of the proximal scaphoid pole are considered unstable even if they are not displaced. Operative treatment is indicated for all unstable fractures. The favored surgical procedure is osteosynthesis with a cannulated double-threaded screw, which can be used in a retrograde or antegrade manner and in a minimally invasive or open technique, depending on the fracture type. Surgical treatment results in earlier bony healing and quicker restoration of function but can be associated with a higher complication rate. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis after healing in malalignment is usually asymptomatic.