Meningiomas of the Planum Sphenoidale and Tuberculum Sella

Anatomical Step-by-Step Dissection of Complex Skull Base Approaches for Trainees: Surgical Anatomy of the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Anterior Cranial Fossa

Introduction  The development of endoscopic techniques has made endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to the anterior cranial fossa (ACF) increasingly popular. Still, the steps and nuances involved in the approach may be difficult to understand for trainees. Thus, we aim to didactically describe the EEAs to the ACF in an anatomically based, step-by-step manner with supplementary clinical cases. Methods  Six cadaveric head specimens were dissected. Endoscopic endonasal Draf I, IIA, IIB, and III frontal sinusotomies, endoscopic endonasal superior ethmoidectomy, and endoscopic endonasal transcribriform and transplanum approaches were modularly performed. The specimens were photodocumented with endoscopic techniques. Results  Draf I frontal sinusotomy started with the complete removal of the anteromedial portion of the agger nasi cell, exposing the medial orbital wall, cranial base, and anterior cribriform plate. Draf II frontal sinusotomy proceeded with the removal of the floor of the frontal sinus between the lamina papyracea and the middle turbinate (IIa), and the nasal septum (IIb) until the first olfactory filaments were exposed. Draf III proceeded by creating a superior septal window just below the floor of the frontal sinus. The bone of the ACF bounded by the limbus sphenoidale posteriorly, frontal sinus anteriorly, and the medial orbital walls bilaterally was removed; the cribriform plate was removed; and the crista galli was dissected free from the dural leaflets of the falx cerebri and removed. Conclusion  We provide a step-by-step dissection describing basic surgical steps and anatomy of the EEAs to the ACF to facilitate the learning process for skull base surgery trainees.

Endonasal versus supraorbital approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: Results and quality of life assessment from a single-surgeon cohort

OBJECTIVE

In this prospective non-randomized study we reported our experience related to planum sphenoidale (PS) and tuberculum sellae (TS) meningiomas in a similar cohort of patients operated via the endonasal or the supraorbital route. A comprehensive quality of life analysis has been performed.

METHODS

Being comparable in general features, between November 2017 to January 2020, a total of 20 patients with anterior skull base meningioma were included. Hence, 10 patients were treated using the supraorbital keyhole procedure (SO) while 10 patients received an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Both surgical techniques were analyzed and compared. Quality of life has been analyzed with the SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified who underwent either EEA (n=10) or SO (n=10). The average extent of resection achieved was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Post-operatively, the EEA group demonstrated a longer hospital stay and bed days compared with SO patients as well as a longer surgical time. There was a significant rate of more CSF leakage after EEA then after SO (20% vs 0%, p=0,0491). The follow-up period resulted shorter in the SO group, with a slight increased recurrence rate. Overall, no differences in visual outcome were detected. There were no differences in terms of quality of life between the two groups in all the explored items.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center single-surgeon study of similarly sized and located PS and TS meningiomas, EEA showed longer hospital stays with higher degree of CSF leak compared with the SO group. Supraorbital craniotomy via eyebrow incision reported a comparable quality of life results, even if with a slightly higher percentage of recurrence and less follow-up.

Giant 20/20 Meningioma: The Diagnostic Value of Confrontation Visual Fields

Meningiomas are benign tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) that usually result in compression to adjacent structures and rarely cause pathology on their own. Meningiomas can affect the visual pathways originating from perineural or optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM), sellar, or clinoid, to the frontal-temporal-parietal-occipital lobes. Frontal meningiomas have an indolent presentation with frequent behavioral changes (i.e., personality or emotional changes, visual hallucinations), but they rarely present with visual disturbances. We present a case of a giant frontal meningioma causing progressive visual field loss despite preserved visual acuity and no behavioral changes. We aim to highlight the diagnostic value of performing a detailed ophthalmologic evaluation with confrontation visual field (CVF) testing and interpretation in aiding the discovery and diagnosis of intracranial tumors.

Surgical Management of Complex Skull Base Tumor Using Preoperative Multimodal Image Fusion Technology

OBJECTIVE

To review our single-institution experience in the surgical management of complex skull base tumors using multimodal image fusion technology.

METHODS

From October 2019 to January 2022, 7 cases of complex skull base tumors that performed preoperative multimodal image fusion in Zhuhai People's Hospital neurosurgery department were involved in this study. The image data were uploaded to the GE AW workstation. Corresponding image sequences were opened in the workstation to complete registration fusion and 3D reconstruction. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging data, and surgical strategy, respectively.

RESULTS

one case of recurrent C2 schwannoma, 1 case of recurrent spindle cell tumor of the left cranio-orbital communication, 1 case of lobular malignant tumor of the left infratemporal fossa, 1 case of central giant cell repairing granuloma, 1 case of mesenchymal malignant tumor in left pharyngeal process, 1 case of meningioma in jugular foramen, and 1 case of hemangioblastoma with vascular malformation in fourth ventricular. All cases underwent preoperative multimodal image fusion for the surgical plan and all cases had gross total resection. Except for one case of mesenchymal malignant tumor in left pharyngeal process that had dysphagia and one case of hemangioblastoma that had discoordination, others cases were without postoperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative multimodal image fusion and surgical approach simulation benefit complex skull base tumor surgical treatment. Individually multiple image assessment of complex skull base tumors to determine the specific surgical strategy is more rational and should be recommended (Supplemental Digital Content 1, Supplementary Video, http://links.lww.com/SCS/F936).