1
|
Abouelhassan Y, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP, Abdelraouf K. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of sulbactam against Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia: establishing in vivo efficacy targets in the epithelial lining fluid. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2024; 6:dlae203. [PMID: 39712636 PMCID: PMC11660682 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2024] [Accepted: 11/30/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Sulbactam is an effective therapy for Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Previous sulbactam pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) analyses established exposure efficacy targets in plasma against A. baumannii pneumonia. Herein, we established sulbactam efficacy targets in epithelial lining fluid (ELF). The PTA following clinical sulbactam regimens was estimated. Methods Sulbactam (dosed as ampicillin-sulbactam) bronchopulmonary PK was assessed in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model. The percentage of the dosing interval during which the free drug concentration remained above the MIC (%fT > MIC) required to achieve different efficacy endpoints was estimated in 21 clinical A. baumannii isolates. PTA was assessed using Monte Carlo Simulations and utilizing previously published healthy volunteers sulbactam ELF pharmacokinetics. Results Median (IQR) %fT > MIC required to achieve 1-log kill in isolates resistant to both sulbactam and meropenem was 47.51 (39.7-54.2). This target was much higher than isolates with other phenotypes (i.e. sulbactam-susceptible/intermediate and sulbactam-resistant but meropenem susceptible) that required 16.62 (5.3-22.0). The PTA following sulbactam 1 g q6h 0.5h infusion regimen was >90% up to MIC of 2 mg/L while the PTA for MIC 4 mg/L (susceptibility breakpoint) was 81%. Conversely, previous assessment in plasma demonstrated the same regimen exceeded 90% PTA up to MIC of 4 mg/L. Sulbactam 3 g q8h 4h infusion provided PTA >90% for MIC 8 mg/L (sulbactam-intermediate), similar to previous assessment in plasma. Conclusion Based on the ELF assessment, the maximum FDA approved dose of sulbactam (1 g q6h 0.5h infusion) provided >90% PTA for isolates with sulbactam MIC only up to 2 mg/L. Nevertheless, sulbactam 3 g q8h for 4 hours of infusion achieved higher PTA and conferred additional benefit against sulbactam-susceptible/intermediate isolates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmeen Abouelhassan
- Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Joseph L Kuti
- Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - David P Nicolau
- Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Kamilia Abdelraouf
- Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geilen J, Kainz M, Zapletal B, Schweiger T, Jäger W, Maier-Salamon A, Zeitlinger M, Stamm T, Ritschl V, Geleff S, Schultz MJ, Tschernko E. Effects of lung inflammation and injury on pulmonary tissue penetration of meropenem and vancomycin in a model of unilateral lung injury. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2024; 64:107180. [PMID: 38649034 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The timing and dosing of antimicrobial therapy are key in the treatment of pneumonia in critically ill patients. It is uncertain whether the presence of lung inflammation and injury affects tissue penetration of intravenously administered antimicrobial drugs. The effects of lung inflammation and injury on tissue penetration of two antimicrobial drugs commonly used for pneumonia were determined in an established model of unilateral lung injury. METHODS Unilateral lung injury was induced in the left lung of 13 healthy pigs through cyclic rinsing; the right healthy lung served as control. Infusions of meropenem and vancomycin were administered and concentrations of these drugs in lung tissue, blood, and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were compared over a period of 6 h. RESULTS Median vancomycin lung tissue concentrations and penetration ratio were higher in inflamed and injured lungs compared with uninflamed and uninjured lungs (AUC0-6h: P = 0.003 and AUCdialysate/AUCplasma ratio: P = 0.003), resulting in higher AUC0-24/MIC. Median meropenem lung tissue concentrations and penetration ratio in inflamed and injured lungs did not differ from that in uninflamed and uninjured lungs (AUC0-6: P = 0.094 and AUCdialysate/AUCplasma ratio: P = 0.173). The penetration ratio for both vancomycin and meropenem into ELF was similar in injured and uninjured lungs. CONCLUSION Vancomycin penetration into lung tissue is enhanced by acute inflammation and injury, a phenomenon barely evident with meropenem. Therefore, inflammation in lung tissue influences the penetration into interstitial lung tissue, depending on the chosen antimicrobial drug. Measurement of ELF levels alone might not identify the impact of inflammation and injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Geilen
- Department of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Kainz
- Department of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Zapletal
- Department of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Schweiger
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Walter Jäger
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Markus Zeitlinger
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacogenetics and Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Institute of Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Valentin Ritschl
- Institute of Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvana Geleff
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus J Schultz
- Department of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Intensive Care and Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edda Tschernko
- Department of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|