[Surgical Treatment of Acetabulum Fractures with a New Acetabulum Butterfly Plate]

Pararectus approach vs. Stoppa approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures - a comparison of approach-related complications and operative outcome parameters from the German Pelvic Registry

PURPOSE

The Pararectus approach has been introduced as an alternative anterior approach to the Stoppa approach in acetabular surgery. There is no evidence which approach should be preferred, especially regarding approach-related complications. Therefore, aim of this registry study was to compare the Pararectus approach to the Stoppa approach regarding complications and quality of reduction.

METHODS

Patients from the German Pelvic Registry with a surgically treated acetabular fracture, either through the Pararectus approach or the Stoppa approach, were analyzed or compared regarding demographic, clinical and operative parameters.

RESULTS

In total, 384 patients with an acetabular fracture received a surgical procedure with either the Pararectus approach (n=120) or the Stoppa approach (n=264). There were no differences between the two groups regarding demographic parameters and fracture pattern. The overall complication rate (35.0% vs. 31.4%), the mortality rate (5.0% vs. 3.0%) and the osteosynthesis-associated complication rate (5.8% vs. 4.2%) tended to be higher in the Pararectus group with no statistical significance. There were significantly more anatomical reductions in the Pararectus group (56% vs. 43%; p=0.01). However, operation time was significantly longer in the Pararectus group (255±125 vs. 205±103 minutes; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite a longer operation time, the Pararectus approach and the Stoppa approach are equivalently applicable for the treatment of acetabular fractures regarding complication rates and quality of reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Differences in fixation to young and elderly quadrilateral surfaces with anatomic quadrilateral surface plate (AQSP) based on cortical thickness morphological results

Aims

With relatively thinner cortical thickness, the management of acetabulum osteoporotic fractures in elderly patients is difficult. The aim of the research was to compare and present the morphological characteristics of the quadrilateral plate in young and elderly age groups, such as the area, and position distribution of the thin cortical thickness region, fracture lines maps, and propose a revised design plate for elderly patients based on these anatomic information.

Methods

As a retrospective research, acetabular fracture with one normal hemipelvises, including 110 men and 39 women, were collected to present the morphological characteristics of the quadrilateral region. The subjects were divided into three different age groups: Group I = 18–40 years (31.3 ± 6.6 years), Group II = 41–60 years (49.9 ± 5.3 years), and Group III ≥ 61 years (68.7 ± 6.8 years). The area of the quadrilateral surface, the area and position distribution of the thin cortical thickness region, the ratio and fracture lines maps were calculated and compared with Mimics in different groups.

Results

The thin cortical thickness/width region area (TCWRA) was significantly increased in Group III compared with Group I and Group II. The ratio of TCWRA accounted for in the quadrilateral region was also significantly increased in Group III (≥ 61 years) compared with Group I (P = 0.01) and Group II (P = 0.011). None of the subjects had a component involving the “A” zone, thirty-three thin cortical thickness regions were located in the “B” zone, and one hundred and sixteen involved both zones of the quadrilateral plate (“A + B” zone). Furthermore, there were a significant differences in the fracture line distributions in three age groups. More fracture lines of elderly patients were located at anterior part (B zone) compared with Group I and Group II.

Conclusions

It was identified the area of thin cortical thickness region increased as age grown, and fracture lines were inclined to be more distributed in “B” zone in elderly patients. To meet the demands of acetabular fixation in different age groups, cortical thickness changes in young and elderly individuals should be given special attention when the quadrilateral surface plate is designed.

Level of evidence Level IV, observational study.

The acetabular roof reinforcement plate for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly: results in 59 patients

INTRODUCTION

Open reduction and internal fixation is considered the gold standard of treatment for displaced acetabular fractures in younger patients. For elderly patients with osteoporotic bone quality, however, primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the advantage of immediate postoperative mobilization might be an option. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment of displaced osteoporotic acetabular fractures using the acetabular roof reinforcement plate (ARRP) combined with THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2019, 84 patients were operated using the ARRP combined with THA. Inclusion criteria were displaced osteoporotic fractures of the acetabulum with or without previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty, age above 65 years, and pre-injury ability to walk at least with use of a walking frame. Of the 84 patients, 59 could be followed up after 6 months clinically and radiographically. Forty-nine (83%) were primary fractures and 10 (17%) periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

RESULTS

The mean age was 80.5 years (range 65-98 years). The average time from injury to surgery was 8.5 days (range 1-28). Mean time of surgery was 167 min (range 100-303 min). Immediate postoperative full weight bearing (FWB) was allowed for 51 patients (86%). At the 6-month follow-up, all 59 patients except one showed bony healing and incorporation of the ARRP. One case developed a non-union of the anterior column. No disruption, breakage or loosening of the ARRP was seen. Additional CT scans performed in 18 patients confirmed bony healing. Twenty-six patients (44%) had regained their pre-injury level of mobility. Complications requiring revision surgery occurred in 8 patients. Five of them were suffering from a prosthetic head dislocation, one from infection, one from hematoma and one from a heterotopic ossification.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARRP has proven to provide sufficient primary stability to allow for immediate FWB in most cases and represents a valuable option for the surgical management of displaced acetabular fractures in this challenging patient group.

Single Ilioinguinal Approach to Treat Complex Acetabular Fractures with Quadrilateral Plate Involvement: Outcomes Using a Novel Dynamic Anterior Plate-Screw System

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel fixation technique referred to as the dynamic anterior plate–screw system for quadrilateral plate (DAPSQ) for complex acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement through the single ilioinguinal approach.

Methods

A total of 32 patients with acetabular fractures, selected between January 2009 and March 2016, were managed by DAPSQ with “quadrilateral screws” through single ilioinguinal approach. The primary outcomes measure was the reduction quality evaluated according to the Matta radiological criteria, and the functional outcomes were evaluated by the modified Merle d'Aubigné score at the last follow‐up. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and intraoperative conditions included, for instance, operation time and blood loss.

Results

Of these 32 consecutive patients, 19, 9, and 4 were classified as both columns, anterior column posterior hemi‐transverse, and T‐shaped fractures, respectively, and with an average of 47 months’ follow‐up. Anatomic reduction was obtained in 19 cases (59%), imperfect reduction in 9 cases (28%), and poor reduction in 4 cases (13%). The modified Merle d'Aubigné scores were excellent in 15 cases (47%), good in 13 cases (41%), fair in 2 cases (6%), and poor in 2 cases (6%). Three cases sustained temporary lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injuries. One patient had a superficial wound infection that resolved after debridement. Five patients had posttraumatic arthritis; one of them underwent total hip arthroplasty at 46 months. No cases had quadrilateral screws entering the hip joint.

Conclusion

The use of DAPSQ with quadrilateral screws is an effective and safe choice for complex acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement through the single ilioinguinal approach.