Vagusnervstimulation in der Behandlung von Epilepsiepatienten

Comparing the accuracy of ultrasound-based measurements of the cervical vagus nerve

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has become a promising therapy especially for drug resistant epilepsy and other pathologies. Side effects or missing therapeutic success are observed due to cuff electrodes that are too narrow or too wide. Preoperative high-resolution ultrasound is used to evaluate the size of the cervical vagus nerve (CVN) to estimate the size of cuff electrodes for VNS. It remains unclear how precise ultrasound reflects the CVN dimensions, which has been the objective of this study. CVN cross-sections and diameters were investigated in 23 sides from 12 bodies, using ultrasound, histology, and CVN casting in situ as a reference. Morphometric data were obtained including fascicle count and nerve composition in histology. CVN yielded significant side-, age-, and BMI-related differences. CVN cross-sections were smaller in ultrasound when compared to casting and histology (1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9 vs. 2.3 ± 0.7 mm²). With the given setting in ultrasound, CVN cross-sections were consistently underestimated when compared to casting. Ultrasound-based cross-section measurements are related to a biased estimation of CVN size. A factor to correct for method related differences may help to adjust for accurate cuff electrode sizes for patient needs and to reduce undesired effects and potentially material consumption.

Vagus nerve stimulation for conservative therapy-refractive epilepsy and depression

Numerous studies confirm that the vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an efficient, indirect neuromodulatory therapy with electrically induced current for epilepsy that cannot be treated by epilepsy surgery and is therapy-refractory and for drug therapy-refractory depression. VNS is an established, evidence-based and in the long-term cost-effective therapy in an interdisciplinary overall concept.Long-term data on the safety and tolerance of the method are available despite the heterogeneity of the patient populations. Stimulation-related side effects like hoarseness, paresthesia, cough or dyspnea depend on the stimulation strength and often decrease with continuing therapy duration in the following years. Stimulation-related side effects of VNS can be well influenced by modifying the stimulation parameters. Overall, the invasive vagus nerve stimulation may be considered as a safe and well-tolerated therapy option.For invasive and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, antiepileptic and antidepressant as well as positive cognitive effects could be proven. In contrast to drugs, VNS has no negative effect on cognition. In many cases, an improvement of the quality of life is possible.iVNS therapy has a low probability of complete seizure-freedom in cases of focal and genetically generalized epilepsy. It must be considered as palliative therapy, which means that it does not lead to healing and requires the continuation of specific medication. The functional principle is a general reduction of the neuronal excitability. This effect is achieved by a slow increase of the effectiveness sometimes over several years. Responders are those patients who experience a 50% reduction of the seizure incidence. Some studies even reveal seizure-freedom in 20% of the cases. Currently, it is not possible to differentiate between potential responders and non-responders before therapy/implantation.The current technical developments of the iVNS generators of the new generation like closed-loop system (cardiac-based seizure detection, CBSD) reduce also the risk for SUDEP (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy patients), a very rare, lethal complication of epilepsies, beside the seizure severity.iVNS may deteriorate an existing sleep apnea syndrome and therefore requires possible therapy interruption during nighttime (day-night programming or magnet use) beside the close cooperation with sleep physicians.The evaluation of the numerous iVNS trials of the past two decades showed multiple positive effects on other immunological, cardiological, and gastroenterological diseases so that additional therapy indications may be expected depending on future study results. Currently, the vagus nerve stimulation is in the focus of research in the disciplines of psychology, immunology, cardiology as well as pain and plasticity research with the desired potential of future medical application.Beside invasive vagus nerve stimulation with implantation of an IPG and an electrode, also devices for transdermal and thus non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation have been developed during the last years. According to the data that are currently available, they are less effective with regard to the reduction of the seizure severity and duration in cases of therapy-refractory epilepsy and slightly less effective regarding the improvement of depression symptoms. In this context, studies are missing that confirm high evidence of effectiveness. The same is true for the other indications that have been mentioned like tinnitus, cephalgia, gastrointestinal complaints etc. Another disadvantage of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation is that the stimulators have to be applied actively by the patients and are not permanently active, in contrast to implanted iVNS therapy systems. So they are only intermittently active; furthermore, the therapy adherence is uncertain.

[Invasive stimulation procedures and EEG diagnostics in epilepsy]

Stimulation has been performed experimentally and in small case series to treat epilepsy since the 1970s. Since the introduction of vagus nerve stimulation in 1997 and intracranial stimulation methods in 2011 into patient care, invasive stimulation has become a rapidly developing but infrequently used therapeutic option in Europe. Whereas vagus nerve stimulation is frequently used, particularly in the USA, intracranial stimulation differs in its regional availability. In order to improve the efficacy of stimulation, develop criteria for its use and assure low complication rates, a concentration on experienced centers and multicenter data acquisition and sharing are needed.Invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with subdural electrodes and especially with stereotactically implanted depth electrodes have been used increasingly more often for presurgical evaluation in recent years. They are applied when non-invasive diagnostics show insufficient results to exactly identify the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone or cannot be adequately distinguished from eloquent cortex areas. Complications include intracranial hemorrhage, infections and increased intracranial pressure but lasting deficits or even death are rare (≤2 %). The outcome of invasive monitoring is inferior to non-invasive monitoring because of the higher degree of complexity of the cases; however, it is far superior to the seizure-free rates achieved by anticonvulsant drug treatment alone.