1
|
Messina A, Mariani A, Brandolisio R, Tavella E, Germano C, Lipari G, Leo L, Masturzo B, Manzoni P. Candidiasis in Pregnancy: Relevant Aspects of the Pathology for the Mother and the Fetus and Therapeutic Strategies. Trop Med Infect Dis 2024; 9:114. [PMID: 38787047 PMCID: PMC11125970 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed9050114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common condition that can lead to significant discomfort, affecting approximately 70-75% of women at least once in their lives. During pregnancy, the prevalence of VVC is estimated to be around 20%, peaking at about 30% in the third trimester, with a number of specific risk factors predisposing to yeast infection being identified and needing elucidation. This review aims to provide updated knowledge on candidiasis during pregnancy, addressing risk factors and maternal and neonatal outcomes, as well as discussing optimal therapeutic strategies to safeguard mothers and newborns. The bibliographic search involved two biomedical databases, PubMed and Embase, without imposing time limits. Among all Candida spp., Candida albicans remains the most frequent causative species. The hyperestrogenic environment of the vaginal mucosa and reduced immune defenses, physiological effects of pregnancy, create conditions favorable for Candida spp. vaginal colonization and hence VVC. Recent evidence shows an association between VVC and adverse obstetric outcomes, including premature membrane rupture (PROM), chorioamnionitis, preterm birth, and puerperal infections. Prompt and effective management of this condition is therefore crucial to prevent adverse obstetric outcomes, maternal-fetal transmission, and neonatal disease. Additional studies are required to confirm the benefits of systemic treatment for maternal candida infection or colonization in preventing premature birth or neonatal systemic candidiasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Messina
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University Hospital “Degli Infermi”, 13875 Ponderano, Italy (A.M.); (C.G.); (G.L.); (B.M.)
| | - Alessia Mariani
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University Hospital “Degli Infermi”, 13875 Ponderano, Italy (A.M.); (C.G.); (G.L.); (B.M.)
| | - Romina Brandolisio
- Division of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University Hospital “Degli Infermi”, 13875 Ponderano, Italy; (R.B.); (E.T.)
- Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University of Torino School of Medicine, 10125 Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Tavella
- Division of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University Hospital “Degli Infermi”, 13875 Ponderano, Italy; (R.B.); (E.T.)
- Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University of Torino School of Medicine, 10125 Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Germano
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University Hospital “Degli Infermi”, 13875 Ponderano, Italy (A.M.); (C.G.); (G.L.); (B.M.)
| | - Giovanni Lipari
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University Hospital “Degli Infermi”, 13875 Ponderano, Italy (A.M.); (C.G.); (G.L.); (B.M.)
| | - Livio Leo
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopital Beauregard, AUSL Valleè d’Aoste, 11100 Aosta, Italy;
| | - Bianca Masturzo
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University Hospital “Degli Infermi”, 13875 Ponderano, Italy (A.M.); (C.G.); (G.L.); (B.M.)
| | - Paolo Manzoni
- Division of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University Hospital “Degli Infermi”, 13875 Ponderano, Italy; (R.B.); (E.T.)
- Department of Maternal, Neonatal and Infant Medicine, University of Torino School of Medicine, 10125 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Z, Xiu X, Zhong L, Wang Y, Fang Z, Lin S, Huang H. Significance of cervical secretion culture in predicting maternal and fetal outcome in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes: a retrospective cohort study. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1328107. [PMID: 38455965 PMCID: PMC10917918 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1328107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: To investigate the clinical value of cervical secretion culture in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) in predicting maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of pregnant women who underwent obstetric examination and delivered in Fujian Maternal and Child Healthcare from December 2013 to December 2016. Pregnant women with a clear diagnosis of PROM, who underwent cervical secretion culture immediately after hospital admission were selected for the study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of chorioamnionitis. The secondary outcome was neonatal admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Correlation between maternal and fetal outcomes and the results of the cervical secretion culture was analyzed by one-way analysis and multifactorial analysis, respectively. The predictive efficacy of cervical secretion culture was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), area under the curve (AUC) and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Results: A total of 7,727 pregnant women with PROM were included in the study. Of them, 1812 had positive cervical secretion cultures (635 positive for mycoplasma infection, 475 for bacterial, 637 for fungal, and 65 for chlamydial infections). Pregnant women with positive mycoplasma and bacterial cultures had higher rates of developing chorioamnionitis compared to women with negative cervical secretion cultures (9%, 12% vs. 1%, respectively). Similarly, positive mycoplasma and bacterial cultures were associated with higher rate of the preterm (before 34 weeks) labor (3%, 3% vs. 1% in women with negative cultures, respectively), and neonatal admission to the NICU (9%, 11% vs. 7%, respectively). After adjusting for various confounding factors, our analysis demonstrated that a positive cervical secretion culture for mycoplasma or bacterial pathogens remained an independent risk factor for chorioamnionitis. Cervical secretion culture outcome was less effective in predicting chorioamnionitis (AUC 0.569) compared to white blood count (WBC) (AUC 0.626) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (AUC 0.605). The IDI of the combined predictive model incorporating WBC, CRP, maternal fever and cervical secretion culture results was 0.0029. Conclusion: Positive cervical secretion cultures, especially for mycoplasma and bacteria, are associated with higher incidence of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. However, the predictive value of this test is poor, and cannot be efficiently used for predicting chorioamnionitis.
Collapse
|