High miss rate for gastric superficial cancers at endoscopy: what is necessary for gastric cancer screening and surveillance using endoscopy?

Novel Endoscopic Polypectomy Surveillance Technique for Fundic Gland Polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Can Improve Early Detection of Dysplasia and Gastric Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) are commonly found in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and are considered benign. Biopsies are not routinely performed, and conventional forceps may be time-consuming and/or yield nonrepresentative histology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of a novel endoscopic polypectomy surveillance (EPS), a large volume cold-snare polypectomy technique of random FGPs, in the incidence of dysplasia and gastric cancer (GC) in FAP.

METHODS

This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort of patients with FAP referred to a tertiary care center for duodenal adenoma surveillance and who underwent EPS of FGPs between 2001 and 2019. Demographic, endoscopic, and clinicopathologic information was reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with FAP were identified at initial endoscopy by the mean age of 43.4 years (±12.8). One hundred thirteen surveillance endoscopies were performed in total using EPS. Dysplasia of FGPs was present on initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 7 patients (20%), and 13 additional patients (46.4%) progressed to low-grade dysplasia. Three patients (15%) who subsequently had progression to GC were found to have signet ring cell cancer within the foci of FGPs through EPS. One patient presented as metastatic GC. Progression from nondysplastic FGP to low-grade dysplasia occurred over 63 months (±46.3) with further progression to GC over 34 months (±8.5). Endoscopic risk factors for cancer were polyps >10 mm in size ( P < 0.001) and carpeting of polyps ( P < 0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of developing dysplasia was 35.7%.

DISCUSSION

We identified that the incidence of dysplasia and GC is higher than previously reported in patients with FAP. Our study used a novel EPS technique and was able to identify GC within the foci of FGPs. Upper endoscopic guidelines should include a more rigorous sampling method for FGPs, such as EPS, to optimize early detection of dysplasia and GC.

Clinical Features of False-Negative Early Gastric Cancers: A Retrospective Study of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Cases

Background

We frequently encounter early gastric cancer (EGC) that could not be detected in the previous esophagogastroduodenoscopy even if the procedure was annually performed. However, little evidence exists regarding the characteristics of false-negative EGCs. Our aim was to reveal the clinical features of false-negative EGCs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for EGCs in Fukuchiyama City Hospital between January 2013 and May 2019. False-negative EGCs were defined as EGCs within 3 years of negative endoscopy. We evaluated the clinical characteristics of false-negative and initially detected EGCs and the difference in the detected and last missed endoscopy in false-negative EGCs. The miss rates of false-negative EGCs were compared between trainees (nonboard-certified endoscopists) and experienced endoscopists (board-certified endoscopists); thereafter, the characteristics of false-negative EGCs missed by trainees were investigated.

Results

Of 219 cases, 119 were classified as false-negative EGCs. False-negative EGCs were characterized as smaller lesions, which presented with normal color or gastritis-like appearance, and were diagnosed after ESD and H. pylori eradication (P < 0.01). The rate of trainees in the last missed endoscopy was significantly higher than that in the detected endoscopy. The miss rate of false-negative EGC by trainees was higher than that of experienced endoscopists but not significantly different (0.70% vs. 0.57%, P = 0.08). The false-negative EGCs missed by trainees were characterized as reddish or well-differentiated lesions, which were located in the lower or lesser curvature of the stomach (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The characteristics of false-negative EGCs were similar to those of H. pylori-eradicated EGC. Procedures with shortened examination time and those performed by trainees were risk factors of missing false-negative EGCs. Trainees should pay attention to reddish or well-differentiated EGCs located in the lower or lesser curvature of the stomach.

Comparison of endoscopic visibility and miss rate for early gastric cancers after Helicobacter pylori eradication with white-light imaging versus linked color imaging

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We aimed to investigate whether linked color imaging (LCI) improves endoscopic visibility of early gastric cancers (EGC) after Helicobacter pylori eradication, which are often difficult to detect, and reduces the miss rate when compared with white-light imaging (WLI).

METHODS

The visibility study used two images, one each with WLI and LCI, from 84 consecutive EGC after H. pylori eradication. Endoscopic visibility was evaluated using a visibility score and color difference (CD) value. To analyze miss rates, we studied a library of recorded videos using both WLI and LCI for 70 other consecutive patients after H. pylori eradication, among whom 19 had EGC. Endoscopic screening was done using the same protocol to map the entire stomach. Six endoscopists reviewed the videos in a randomized order. Miss rates of EGC were compared among the modalities.

RESULTS

Mean [(±standard deviation) visibility scores with LCI were significantly higher than those with WLI (3.19 ± 0.84 vs 2.52 ± 0.98, P < 0.001), as were mean CD values (26.3 ± 9.1 vs 13.6 ± 6.3, P < 0.001). Miss rates of the six endoscopists were significantly lower with LCI than with WLI (30.7% vs 64.9%, P < 0.001). Both expert and trainee endoscopists had significantly better results with LCI than with WLI.

CONCLUSIONS

Linked color imaging significantly improved the visibility of EGC after H. pylori eradication compared with WLI using both subjective and objective criteria. Furthermore, LCI significantly reduced miss rates of these lesions compared with WLI.

Linked color imaging improves the endoscopic visibility of gastric mucosal cancers

Background and study aims  As a newly developed endoscopy technique, linked color imaging (LCI) provides very bright images with enhanced color tones. With the objective of improving the detection rate of gastric mucosal cancers, which are often difficult to detect, we examined the utility of LCI from the viewpoint of visibility. Patients and methods  The current study used 100 consecutive gastric mucosal cancers ≤ 20 mm in diameter. For each lesion, we selected one endoscopic image acquired by white-light imaging (WLI), blue-laser imaging (BLI) -bright, and LCI modes. Four endoscopists interpreted the images; using a previously reported scale, we scored the visibility level on a scale of 1 - 4. Results  The mean (± SD) visibility scores were 2.54 ± 1.10 for WLI, 3.02 ± 1.07 for BLI-bright, and 3.28 ± 0.97 for LCI. The score was significantly higher for BLI-bright compared with WLI ( P  < .001) and again higher for LCI compared with BLI-bright ( P  < .001). For the experts, the scores for BLI-bright and LCI were similar, but both were significantly higher than the score for WLI. For the trainees, there was no significant difference between the WLI and BLI-bright scores, but LCI score was significantly higher than those for WLI and BLI-bright scores. With regard to clinical characteristics, LCI particularly enhanced visibility of normochromic, flat and depressed lesions, which had the lowest visibility scores of all three modalities compared with those of the other lesions. Conclusion  LCI increased visibility and may contribute to early detection of gastric mucosal cancers.

Preliminary study of magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy for diagnosing superficial gastric neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (MCCG) is a newly developed non-invasive method designed for gastric examination. Although favorable diagnostic accuracy has been reported, there is little if any data about its ability to diagnose gastric cancer.

AIMS

To compare the detectability of superficial gastric neoplasia by MCCG and gastroscopy.

METHODS

This study was a self-controlled comparison study. Ten subjects diagnosed with superficial gastric neoplasia and scheduled to undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at a tertiary hospital were prospectively invited for an MCCG examination. The diagnostic agreement of MCCG, ESD and pathology were compared, including location, size and endoscopic appearance of the lesions.

RESULTS

Of the 10 enrolled patients, 6 were confirmed as having early gastric cancer/high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 2 gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), 1 tubular adenoma with LGIN and 1 neuroendocrine tumor. The per-patient and per-lesion sensitivities of MCCG for superficial gastric neoplasia detection were 100% and 91.7%. Location and size of the lesions were compared favorably to gastroscopy whilst one cardiac lesion was missed. Endoscopic appearances of these lesions observed on MCCG and EGD demonstrated good consistency. No adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

With good gastric preparation and careful examination of stomach, MCCG is able to detect superficial gastric neoplasms.