Outcome of Precontoured Titanium Mesh in the Reconstruction of Orbital Blowout Fractures

Application of Titanium Mesh in the Early Treatment of Flail Chest

Objective: To investigate the effect of the titanium mesh on flail chest and bone healing from clinical and animal experiments. Methods: Clinical experiment: 24 patients with flail chests in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2023 were prospectively selected and divided into control and titanium mesh groups according to different treatment plans and basic data-matching principles, with 12 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conservative external fixation, and the titanium mesh group was treated with titanium mesh fixation. The clinical efficacy index, visual analog scale and blood gas indexes and hemodynamic indexes of the two groups of patients were recorded. Chest CT and pulmonary function and life quality were examined after operation. Animal experiment: The flail chest sheep were treated conservatively with a titanium mesh, and the expression of bone-healing-related proteins was detected. Results: The mechanical ventilation time, drain indwelling time, ICU observation time, and hospital time in the titanium mesh group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The PaO2, CVP, FVC, FEV1, MVV, and life quality of the titanium mesh group were significantly better than those of the control group after operation, and the visual analog scale, PaCO2, CI, ELWI, and the proportions of atelectasis, thoracocyllosis, and consolidation tardive after operation were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). The expressions of BMP2, IGF-1, VEGF, and PDGFD in the rib tissue of titanium mesh sheep were higher than those of control sheep at 4 weeks after operation (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Titanium mesh is a safe and effective treatment for flail chest, which can improve pain, blood gas, hemodynamic indexes, and pulmonary function and promote fracture healing.

Does Integration of Technology and Customization of Implants Produce Better Outcomes in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This review aims to compare and evaluate the outcomes achieved by integrating technological aids and the influence of different implant designs in the reconstruction of post-traumatic orbital defects.

METHODS

Electronic searches of the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases until March 2023 were conducted. Clinical controlled trials, observational studies, cohort studies, and retrospective studies were identified and included. The predictor variables were the integration of technological aids namely, computer-assisted surgical planning, mirror image overlay, and intraoperative navigation with the utilization of different orbital implant designs (standard orbital meshes, preformed implants, prebent implants, and patient-specific implant [PSI]) during post-traumatic orbital reconstruction. The primary outcome variables were orbital volume, diplopia, and enophthalmos. Weighted or mean difference and risk ratios at 95% confidence intervals were calculated, where P ＜ .05 was considered significant and a random effects model was adopted.

RESULTS

This review included 7 studies with 560 participants. The results indicate that the difference in postoperative orbital volume between affected and nonaffected eye showed no statistically significant difference between PSI and prebent group (mean difference, -0.41 P = .28, I2 = 46%). PSI group resulted in diplopia 0.71-fold less than that of the standard orbital mesh group but was not statistically significant (P = .15). Standard orbital mesh group is 0.30 times at higher risk of developing enophthalmos as compared to PSI group (P = .010). The literature suggests PSIs are preferred for patients with large defects (Jaquiéry's III-IV), whereas prebent implants are equally effective as PSIs in patients with preserved infraorbital buttress and retrobulbar bulge.

CONCLUSION

PSIs are associated with improved outcomes, especially for correcting enophthalmos. The data suggests the potential efficacy of prebent implants and PSIs in orbital volume corrections. There is a lack of randomized studies. This review should serve as a recommendation for further studies to contribute to the existing literature.

The Use of Functional Biomaterials in Aesthetic and Functional Restoration in Orbital Surgery

The integration of functional biomaterials in oculoplastic and orbital surgery is a pivotal area where material science and clinical practice converge. This review, encompassing primary research from 2015 to 2023, delves into the use of biomaterials in two key areas: the reconstruction of orbital floor fractures and the development of implants and prostheses for anophthalmic sockets post-eye removal. The discussion begins with an analysis of orbital floor injuries, including their pathophysiology and treatment modalities. It is noted that titanium mesh remains the gold standard for orbital floor repair due to its effectiveness. The review then examines the array of materials used for orbital implants and prostheses, highlighting the dependence on surgeon preference and experience, as there are currently no definitive guidelines. While recent innovations in biomaterials show promise, the review underscores the need for more clinical data before these new materials can be widely adopted in clinical settings. The review advocates for an interdisciplinary approach in orbital surgery, emphasizing patient-centered care and the potential of biomaterials to significantly enhance patient outcomes.