[Contrast medium-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvic and leg vessels with an automated table-feed technique]

Intra-arterial MR angiography in the iliac system: initial clinical experience with 25 patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate intra-arterial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the iliac arteries. Therefore, 25 consecutive patients (17 male, 8 female) suffering from symptomatic occlusive disease of the lower limbs were investigated prospectively. Catheter angiography was performed before MRA and served as the standard of reference. Contrast-enhanced intra-arterial MRA was performed using a 1.5 Tesla MRI system. Contrast agent (gadodiamide) was injected by a conventional pigtail-shaped angiography catheter placed in the abdominal aorta. Vascular lesions were assessed by four investigators. The degree of stenosis was compared with the findings of conventional catheter angiography. Additionally, the diagnostic quality of the MR angiograms was assessed by the investigators using a semi quantitative five-point scale. All lesions shown by catheter angiography were detected and correctly localized by intra-arterial MRA. MR angiograms exhibit a specificity of 95% and a sensitivity of 96% for stenoses of 50% or more. The diagnostic quality of the images was judged from good to excellent, on average. Intra-arterial MRA exhibits a specificity and sensitivity comparable with intravenous angiography. The image quality appears to be adequate for supporting MR-guided vascular intervention.

Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has evolved over the past years from an experimental imaging modality to a technique that is now widely applied in clinical practice. This article reviews the fundamentals of the different magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and how they can be applied for abdominal and peripheral arterial imaging. Currently, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), whereby a luminogram is obtained during initial arterial passage of contrast material, is the most widely used technique. With current hardware and software, high-spatial resolution images of the abdominal aorta and proximal visceral branches can be obtained that are equivalent to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). High-quality imaging of the renal arteries demands isotropic voxels and reformations orthogonal to the vessel axis for evaluation. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vascular tree is now a highly accurate technique and has replaced diagnostic intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and duplex ultrasonography in many hospitals.

Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Contrast-enhanced MRA (ce-MRA) has been claimed by many authors as a replacement of conventional angiography evaluating peripheral arterial occlusive disease. However, reliable detection of relevant stenoses (>70%) has to be provided for planning vascular interventions. Only few data in the literature focuses on this crucial problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this topic using a two-step body-coil-based MRA protocol.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Forty three patients presenting with 82 stenoses >/=50% and 61 stenoses >70% on conventional catheter angiogram received fast Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced high resolution 3D MR angiography at 1.5 T covering the pelvic and peripheral vascular tree in two examination steps using the body-coil. The data were evaluated double-blinded by three readers distinguishing moderate (50-70%) from severe stenoses (>70%).

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity/specificity/accuracy was 84/60/70% evaluating 143 segments. Specificity was rather poor in the iliac (58%) and crural (50%) region and moderate in the femoral and popliteal level (73%). The negative predictive value ranged between 78 and 91%. The grade of stenosis tend to be overestimated rather than underestimated in all levels with positive predictive values between 55 and 78%.

DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Body-coil-based contrast-enhanced MRA has limited potential in distinguishing moderate from severe stenoses in peripheral occlusive disease. Overestimations are more common than underestimations. Both occur mainly in small-sized crural arteries but also in larger iliac arteries where vessel course in partition direction may cause inadequacy between voxel size and lumen diameter in severe stenosis.