[Stimulated acoustic emissions with the ultrasound contrast medium levovist: a clinically useful contrast effect with liver-specific properties]

A review of ultrasound contrast media

Efforts have been made over the last five decades to create effective ultrasonic contrast media (UCM) for cardiac and noncardiac applications. The initial UCM was established in the 1980s, following publications from the 1960s that detailed the discovery of ultrasonic contrast enhancement using small gaseous bubbles in echocardiographic examinations. An optimal contrast agent for echography should possess the following characteristics: non-toxicity, suitability for intravenous injection, ability to traverse pulmonary, cardiac, and capillary circulations, and stability for recirculation. Definity, Optison, Sonazoid, and SonoVue are examples of current commercial contrast media. These contrast media have shown potential for various clinical reasons, both on-label and off-label. Several possible UCMs have been developed or are in progress. Advancements in comprehending the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of microbubbles have significantly improved the visualization of tumor blood vessels, the identification of areas with reduced blood supply, and the enhanced detection of narrowed blood vessels. Innovative advances are expected to enhance future applications such as ultrasonic molecular imaging and therapeutic utilization of microbubbles.

Ultrasound contrast agents

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays an important role in imaging of the mediastinum and abdominal organs. Since the introduction of US contrast agents (UCA) for transabdominal US, attempts have been made to apply contrast-enhanced US techniques also to EUS. Since 2003, specific contrast-enhanced imaging was possible using EUS. Important studies have been published regarding contrast-enhanced EUS and the characterization of focal pancreatic lesions, lymph nodes, and subepithelial tumors. In this manuscript, we describe the relevant UCA, their application, and specific image acquisition as well as the principles of image tissue characterization using contrast-enhanced EUS. Safety issues, potential future developments, and EUS-specific issues are reviewed.

Evolution of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated drug delivery

Ultrasound (US) is one of the most frequently used diagnostic methods. It is a non-invasive, comparably inexpensive imaging method with a broad spectrum of applications, which can be increased even more by using bubbles as contrast agents (CAs). There are various different types of bubbles: filled with different gases, composed of soft- or hard-shell materials, and ranging in size from nano- to micrometers. These intravascular CAs enable functional analyses, e.g., to acquire organ perfusion in real-time. Molecular analyses are achieved by coupling specific ligands to the bubbles' shell, which bind to marker molecules in the area of interest. Bubbles can also be loaded with or attached to drugs, peptides or genes and can be destroyed by US pulses to locally release the entrapped agent. Recent studies show that US CAs are also valuable tools in hyperthermia-induced ablation therapy of tumors, or can increase cellular uptake of locally released drugs by enhancing membrane permeability. This review summarizes important steps in the development of US CAs and introduces the current clinical applications of contrast-enhanced US. Additionally, an overview of the recent developments in US probe design for functional and molecular diagnosis as well as for drug delivery is given.

Cavitation and contrast: The use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy

Microbubbles and cavitation are playing an increasingly significant role in both diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound. Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents have been in clinical use now for more than two decades, stimulating the development of a range of new contrast-specific imaging techniques which offer substantial benefits in echocardiography, microcirculatory imaging, and more recently, quantitative and molecular imaging. In drug delivery and gene therapy, microbubbles are being investigated/developed as vehicles which can be loaded with the required therapeutic agent, traced to the target site using diagnostic ultrasound, and then destroyed with ultrasound of higher intensity energy burst to release the material locally, thus avoiding side effects associated with systemic administration, e.g. of toxic chemotherapy. It has moreover been shown that the motion of the microbubbles increases the permeability of both individual cell membranes and the endothelium, thus enhancing therapeutic uptake, and can locally increase the activity of drugs by enhancing their transport across biologically inaccessible interfaces such as blood clots or solid tumours. In high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) surgery and lithotripsy, controlled cavitation is being investigated as a means of increasing the speed and efficacy of the treatment. The aim of this paper is both to describe the key features of the physical behaviour of acoustically driven bubbles which underlie their effectiveness in biomedical applications and to review the current state of the art.

[Value of vascular ultrasound in the evaluation of hemodialysis fistulas]

Vascular ultrasound has been proven to be effective in the assessment of hemodialysis fistulas providing noninvasive diagnostic work-up of vascular morphology and hemodynamics. The most common reason for hemodialysis fistula failure is thrombosis due to stenosis. Therefore, early identification of stenosis is essential to avoid complications. Ultrasound-based identification of hypoechoic plaques and intimal proliferation helps to reach therapeutic decisions. An estimation of the grade of stenosis is also feasible. An occlusion rate of up to 45% due to reduced blood flow justifies follow-up examinations. Due to frequent puncture of the fistula the risk of hemodynamically relevant stenoses is increased. Establishment of new ultrasound methods like B-flow and advanced dynamic flow (ADF) enable direct visualization of the flow in the area of the anastomosis. In addition, high-resolution ultrasound techniques allow improved flow detection without aliasing. Our report addresses the topics of examination strategy, possible complications, and treatment like percutaneous intervention techniques.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for examining tumor biology

This paper reviews the potential of ultrasound for assessing the viability and biological behavior of tumors. Unlike color Doppler sonography, modern techniques for contrast-enhanced ultrasound permit the measurement of tissue perfusion irrespective of vessel size or flow velocity. Perfusion can also be assessed quantitatively, using replenishment kinetics or derivates thereof. The perfusion of tumors is a surrogate parameter of their viability and may mirror their response to therapy. Furthermore, the degree of vascularity in a tumor may express its aggressiveness and help to predict its response to treatment. In animal models, a decrease in blood flow has been shown to precede a shrinkage of tumors treated with anti-angiogenic compounds. In liver metastases, arterial and portal blood supply can be assessed separately, and a response to stereotactic radiotherapy was found to go along with a decrease in arterial perfusion. Moreover, a relatively high arterial perfusion of liver metastases may predict a response to chemotherapy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be a potent tool for assessing the effects of anti-angiogenic treatment in patients.

Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview

With the introduction of microbubble contrast agents, diagnostic ultrasound has entered a new era that allows the dynamic detection of tissue flow of both the macro and microvasculature. Underpinning this development is the fact that gases are compressible, and thus the microbubbles expand and contract in the alternating pressure waves of the ultrasound beam, while tissue is almost incompressible. Special software using multiple pulse sequences separates these signals from those of tissue and displays them as an overlay or on a split screen. This can be done at low acoustic pressures (MI<0.3) so that the microbubbles are not destroyed and scanning can continue in real time. The clinical roles of contrast enhanced ultrasound scanning are expanding rapidly. They are established in echocardiography to improve endocardial border detection and are being developed for myocardial perfusion. In radiology, the most important application is the liver, especially for focal disease. The approach parallels that of dynamic CT or MRI but ultrasound has the advantages of high spatial and temporal resolution. Thus, small lesions that can be indeterminate on CT can often be studied with ultrasound, and situations where the flow is very rapid (e.g., focal nodular hyperplasia where the first few seconds of arterial perfusion may be critical to making the diagnosis) are readily studied. Microbubbles linger in the extensive sinusoidal space of normal liver for several minutes whereas they wash out rapidly from metastases, which have a low vascular volume and thus appear as filling defects. The method has been shown to be as sensitive as three-phase CT. Microbubbles have clinical uses in many other applications where knowledge of the microcirculation is important (the macrocirculation can usually be assessed adequately using conventional Doppler though there are a few important situations where the signal boost given by microbubbles is useful, e.g., transcranial Doppler for evaluating vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage). An important situation where demonstrating tissue devitalisation is important is in interstitial ablation of focal liver lesions: using microbubble contrast agents at the end of a procedure allows immediate evaluation of the adequacy of the ablation which can be extended if needed; this is much more convenient and cost-saving than moving the patient to CT and perhaps needing an additional ablation session at a later date. Similar considerations suggest that contrast-enhanced ultrasound might have a role in abdominal trauma: injury to the liver, spleen and kidneys can be assessed rapidly and repeatedly if necessary. Its role here alongside dynamic CT remains to be evaluated. Infarcts or ischaemia and regions of abnormal vascularity, especially in malignancies, in the kidneys and spleen seem to be useful and improved detection of the neovascularisation of ovarian carcinomas is promising. Similar benefits in the head-and-neck and in the skin while the demonstration of the neovascularisation of atheromatous plaques and of aggressive joint inflammation offer interesting potentials.

Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications

The use of microbubble contrast agents for general tissue delineation and perfusion enjoys steady interest in ultrasound imaging. Microbubbles as contrast materials require a small dosage and show excellent detection sensitivity. Targeting ligands on the surface of microbubbles permit the selective accumulation of these particles in the areas of interest, which show an up-regulated level of receptor molecules on vascular endothelium. Selective contrast imaging of inflammation, ischemia-reperfusion injury, angiogenesis, and thrombosis has been achieved in animal models. Ultrasound-assisted drug delivery and activation, performed by combining microbubble agent containing drug substances or coadministered with pharmaceutical agents (including plasmid DNA for transfection), has been achieved in multiple model systems in vitro and in vivo. Ultrasound and microbubbles-based targeted acceleration of the thrombolytic enzyme action already have reached clinical trials. Overall, microbubble targeting and ultrasound-assisted microbubble-based drug-delivery systems will offer a step toward the application of targeted personalized diagnostics and therapy.

Bolus versus Continuous Infusion of Microbubble Contrast Agent for Liver US: Initial Experience

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. To prospectively assess if continuous infusion of galactose-palmitic acid can prolong the duration of hepatic enhancement at ultrasonography over bolus injection, 11 patients received two injections--one bolus injection (2 mL/sec) and one continuous infusion (1.5 mL/min)--with the same dose of galactose-palmitic acid (4 g, 300 mg/dL). Two unenhanced baseline sweep scans (mechanical index of 0.7 and 1.3) of the relevant liver lobe were acquired followed by contrast-enhanced sweeps after bolus injection and continuous infusion. Each sweep was saved as cine loops and analyzed with a personal computer. Duration of enhancement more than 3 dB was prolonged by continuous infusion from 4.3 minutes +/- 2.4 (+/-standard deviation) at bolus injection to 10.1 minutes +/- 3.0 (P < .005). Maximal parenchymal enhancement was 11.0 dB +/- 3.2 (bolus injection) and 9.2 dB +/- 3.8 (infusion, P < .05). Peak liver-to-lesion contrast was 14.2 dB +/- 6.3 (bolus injection) and 13.2 dB +/- 7.1 (infusion, not significant). Continuous infusion of galactose-palmitic acid markedly prolongs but slightly diminishes hepatic enhancement; liver-to-lesion contrast remains unchanged.

Pitfalls in der kontrastverstärkten Lebersonographie: Konsequenzen für die Praxis

Contrast-enhanced sonography performed as phase inversion harmonic imaging is a promising new technique for detection and characterization of hepatic foci. It has been reported that malignant liver tumors can be differentiated from benign entities with almost 100% sensitivity and that diagnosis of the type is possible with an accuracy of over 90%. The following report describes seven of our own cases and then compares the results we obtained with current knowledge, followed by a discussion. In summary, most hepatic lesions can be correctly characterized by supplemental use of enhanced sonography; practitioners should nevertheless be aware of atypical phenomena to be able to critically evaluate the findings.

Real-time imaging with the sonographic contrast agent SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant hepatic lesions

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the ability of contrast-enhanced sonography with SonoVue (Altana Pharma, Konstanz, Germany), a sulfur hexafluoride microbubble contrast agent, to reveal differences between benign and malignant focal hepatic lesions.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six lesions in 124 patients with focal hepatic lesions detected by B-mode sonography (hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 36; metastasis, n = 25; cholangiocellular carcinoma, n = 1; lymphoma, n = 2; focal nodular hyperplasia, n = 9; adenoma, n = 4; regenerative cirrhotic nodule, n = 13; hemangioma, n = 29; and focal hyposteatosis, n = 7) were examined in a prospective study. After intravenous injection of 2.4 mL of SonoVue, the liver was examined continuously for 3 minutes by low-mechanical index pulse inversion sonography.

RESULTS

For the discrimination of malignant versus benign liver lesions, SonoVue-enhanced sonography improved sensitivity from 78% to 100% and specificity from 23% to 92% compared with baseline sonography. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a significant improvement in this discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.510 +/- 0.054 [SD] at baseline sonography, 0.998 +/- 0.003 with SonoVue-enhanced sonography; P < .001). The following flow patterns in the early phase were diagnosis specific: early central starlike pattern for focal nodular hyperplasia, peripheral globular-nodular pattern for hemangioma, and diffuse arterial enhancement for malignant lesions. Homogeneous enhancement in the late phase was predictive for benign lesions (P < .001). Conversely, 93% of patients without contrast enhancement in the late phase had malignant lesions (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

SonoVue-enhanced sonography has greater specificity and sensitivity than baseline sonography for the differentiation of benign and malignant liver lesions.

Liver metastases in cancer: detection with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

In patients with known or suspected malignancy, ultrasonography (US) is often the first choice for liver imaging because of its widespread availability and low cost. Compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the sensitivity of conventional US for detecting hepatic metastases is relatively poor. The advent of microbubble contrast agents changed this situation. Sensitivity and specificity increased substantially with the use of these contrast agents and contrast-specific imaging modes in recent years. Currently, numerous US imaging methods exist, based on Doppler techniques or harmonic imaging. They exploit the complex nonlinear behavior of microbubbles in a sound field to achieve marked augmentation of the US signal. Although microbubble contrast agents are essentially blood pool agents, some have a hepatosplenic specific late phase. Imaging during this late phase is particularly useful for improving the detection of malignant liver lesions and allows US to perform similarly to spiral CT as shown by recent studies. In addition, this late phase imaging is very helpful for lesion characterization. Low mechanical index imaging with the newer perfluor agents permits real-time imaging of the dynamic contrast behavior during the arterial, portal venous, and late phases and is particularly helpful for lesion characterization. The use of US for hemodynamic studies of the liver transit time may detect blood flow changes induced by micrometastases even before they become visible on imaging. In this field of functional imaging, further research is required to achieve conclusive results, which are not yet available.

[Ultrasound contrast agents]

Ultrasound contrast agents consist of tiny gas bubbles encapsulated by a stabilising membrane or shell. When combined with recent contrast-specific ultrasound techniques, they provide substantial enhancement of vessels and solid organs. The clinical use and the diagnostic value of ultrasound contrast agents are in principle comparable to those of contrast agents for CT and MRI. They add an additional dimension of information to sonography, which results in considerable improvement of diagnostic accuracy in many cases. This paper reviews the physicochemical properties of various microbubble contrast agents, discusses non-linear bubble behaviour and contrast-specific imaging techniques. An overview of the most important radiological clinical applications in the liver, kidney and spleen is given.

Imaging of paediatric splenic injury with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

We report two children who sustained traumatic parenchymal splenic injury and were monitored with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In both cases, unenhanced US failed to diagnose splenic haematoma, but the injury was well demonstrated after injection of contrast agent. In one case agreement with CT was excellent; in the other, CT was not performed due to the comprehensive information provided by CEUS.

Improved detection of hepatic metastases with pulse-inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: multicenter study

PURPOSE

To compare conventional B-mode ultrasonography (US) alone with the combination of conventional B-mode US and contrast material-enhanced (SHU 508A) late-phase pulse-inversion US for the detection of hepatic metastases by using dual-phase spiral computed tomography (CT) as the standard of reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-three patients underwent conventional US, US in the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A, and single-section spiral CT. US and CT images were assessed by blinded readers. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and the number and smallest size of metastases at conventional and contrast-enhanced US were compared by using CT as the standard of reference. Lesion conspicuity was assessed objectively (quantitatively) and subjectively by one reader before and after contrast material administration.

RESULTS

In 45 of 80 (56%) patients with metastases, more metastases were seen at contrast-enhanced US than at conventional US. In three of these patients, conventional US images appeared normal. The addition of contrast-enhanced US improved sensitivity for the detection of individual metastases from 71% to 87% (P <.001). On a patient basis, sensitivity improved from 94% to 98% (P =.44), and specificity improved from 60% to 88% (P <.01). Contrast enhancement improved the subjective conspicuity of metastases in 66 of 75 (88%) patients and the objective contrast by a mean of 10.8 dB (P <.001). Contrast-enhanced US showed more metastases than did CT in seven patients, and CT showed more than did contrast-enhanced US in one of 22 patients in whom an independent reference (magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative US, or pathologic findings) was available.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced US improved sensitivity and specificity in the detection of hepatic metastases.

Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents

Ultrasonography (US) is the first choice for screening patients with suspected liver lesions. However, due to a lack of contrast agents, US used to be less sensitive and specific compared with computed tomography (CT) and magnet resonance imaging (MRI). The advent of microbubble contrast agents increased both sensitivity and specificity dramatically. Rapid developments of the contrast agents as well as of special imaging techniques were made in recent years. Today numerous different US imaging methods exist which based either on Doppler or on harmonic imaging. They are using the particular behaviour of microbubbles in a sound field which varies depending on the energy of insonation (low/high mechanical index, MI) as well as on the properties of the agent themselves. Apart from just blood pool enhancement some agents have a hepatosplenic specific late phase. US imaging during this late phase using relatively high MI in phase inversion mode (harmonic imaging) or stimulated acoustic emission (SAE; Doppler method) markedly improves the detection of focal liver lesions and is also very helpful for lesion characterisation. With regards to detection, contrast enhanced US performs similarly to CT as shown by recent studies. Early results of studies using low MI imaging and the newer perfluor agents are also showing promising results for lesion detection. Low MI imaging with these agents has the advantage of real time imaging and is particularly helpful for characterisation of focal lesions based on their dynamic contrast behaviour. Apart from the techniques which based on the morphology of liver lesions there were some attempts for the detection of occult metastases or micrometastases by means of liver blood flow changes. Also in this field the use of US contrast agents appears to have advantages over formerly used non contrast-enhanced methods although no conclusive results are available yet.

Heterogeneous delayed enhancement of the liver after ultrasound contrast agent injection--a normal variant

We report a characteristic heterogeneous delayed liver enhancement pattern that we have encountered in a total of 6 of approximately 1500 subjects who underwent contrast-enhanced liver ultrasonography. The heterogeneous enhancement occurred several min after contrast injection and persisted for up to 1 h. It was seen in diseased as well as healthy livers and appears to represent a "normal variant" of liver enhancement. It was observed with two different contrast agents. The cause of the described effect is unknown; it may be related to the formation of large bubbles and vascular entrapment of these bubbles in the liver.

Phase-inversion sonography during the liver-specific late phase of contrast enhancement: improved detection of liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to assess whether phase-inversion sonography during the late, liver-specific phase of contrast enhancement using Levovist improves the detection of hepatic metastases relative to unenhanced conventional B-mode sonography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients were studied with unenhanced B-mode sonography and phase-inversion sonography 2.5 min after the injection of Levovist. All patients underwent one reference examination (CT, MR imaging, or intraoperative sonography). The conspicuity, number, size, and distribution of metastases before and after contrast administration as judged by a sonographer (who was unaware of other imaging findings) were compared with each other and with reference imaging.

RESULTS

The conspicuity of metastases was improved by contrast-enhanced phase inversion in 94% of patients. Thirty-nine patients showed metastases on reference imaging; 36 of these were positive on baseline sonography and 38 on phase-inversion sonography. Phase-inversion sonography showed more reference imaging-confirmed metastases than baseline sonography in 28 patients (45%). The average number of confirmed metastases per patient was 3.06 for baseline sonography and 5.42 for contrast-enhanced phase-inversion sonography (p < 0.01). The average sensitivity for detecting individual metastases improved from 63% to 91%. Metastases of less than 1 cm were shown in 14 patients on baseline sonography, in 24 patients on phase-inversion sonography, and in 26 on reference imaging. Both sonographic techniques showed false-positive lesions in six patients.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced phase-inversion sonography in the liver-specific phase of contrast enhancement using Levovist provides a marked improvement in the detection of hepatic metastases relative to unenhanced conventional sonography, without loss of specificity. Phase-inversion sonography was particularly advantageous in detecting small metastases and may be a competitive alternative to CT and MR imaging.

B-mode enhancement at phase-inversion US with air-based microbubble contrast agent: initial experience in humans

Pulse- or phase-inversion ultrasonography (US) sums the signals returned from two 180 degrees ultrasound pulses. Linear scattering from tissue results in a signal void while nonlinear signals from microbubbles stand out. The technique was applied with a US contrast agent in 39 human subjects. B-mode enhancement of vessels and organ parenchyma was seen in all cases. Enhancement occurred from flowing and stationary microbubbles. The flow-independent enhancement of normal and abnormal tissue represents a major advance in contrast material-enhanced US with many potential applications especially in tumor imaging.