[Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: sonographic monitoring of conservative therapy with intravenous atropine sulfate]

Successful management of pylorospasm with atropine in a failure-to-thrive neonate case report

Pylorospasm is an elusive diagnosis that can mimic the presentation of pyloric stenosis. There is limited discussion regarding its management in neonates with few case reports describing the use of antispasmodic agents. The following case reviews this management in a unique neonate. A 2-month-old female presented with persistent nonbilious, nonbloody emesis and failure-to-thrive. A thorough workup was performed due to its pronounced persistence while inpatient. Pyloric ultrasounds remained negative for pyloric stenosis; however, an upper gastrointestinal (GI) study was significant for pylorospasm. The workup also revealed hypothyroidism. Antispasmodic therapy with atropine was pursued as she was not a surgical candidate. Patient tolerated IV atropine therapy well with quick resolution of emesis and successfully transitioned to oral atropine therapy, displaying continued weight gain with exclusive oral feeds. This case displays a unique presentation of pylorospasm with successful management utilizing IV and oral atropine therapy in a neonate with failure-to-thrive and concomitant hypothyroidism.

Treating idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis with sequential therapy: A clinical study

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of treating idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis with sequential therapy (ST).

METHODS

From January 2010 to June 2013, 49 children with idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were divided into two groups to accept either atropine ST (ST group, n = 26) or laparoscopic surgery (operation group, n = 23). The remission rate of vomiting, complications, hospital stay and medical expenditure were compared between the two groups. The body weight and the thickness of the pyloric muscle at 6 months after the treatments were also compared.

RESULTS

The remission rate of vomiting was lower in the ST group (88.5%; 23/26) than in the operation group (100%, 23/23). The difference in the incidence rate of complications, body weight and pyloric muscle thickness was not statistically significant between the two groups. However, the hospital stay was significantly longer, while the medical expenditure was significantly lower in the ST group than in the operation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Atropine ST is safe, effective and cost-effective as compared with operation; however, the efficacy of ST is lower than operation.

Conservative treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis with intravenous atropine sulfate does not replace pyloromyotomy

Pyloromyotomy as described by Weber and Ramstedt has been the standard therapy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis since the 1960's and conservative therapy has been abandoned. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of systemic atropine applied intravenously for 7 days as a conservative therapeutic strategy and as an alternative to primary operation. Forty-two consecutive term infants with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were enrolled in the study over a period of 5 years. After confirmation of the diagnosis they all received intravenous atropine at a dose of 0.04 mg/(kg day) and increased by 0.01 mg/(kg day) up to 0.12 mg/(kg day), given as 6-8 single doses per/day. Nine pairs of parents requested that their child should be operated before completing the 7 days of medical therapy. Surgery was necessary in 8 of the remaining 33 infants (24,.2%) who did not improve after 7 days of conservative treatment. Successful treatment with i.v. atropine sulfate was achieved only in 25/33 term infants at an average maximal dose of 0.11 mg/(kg day), without any major side effects. Intravenous atropine sulfate has been considered as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy in the treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Clinical improvement however was often not seen before the 6th or 7th day of intravenous treatment. A success rate for the conservative approach of only 75% at day 7 in our study does not favour atropine therapy, in view of success rates above 95% with surgical repair.