Gastric mucosal surface in cirrhosis evaluated by magnifying endoscopy and scanning electronic microscopy

Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy in post-endoscopic resection scar for early gastric neoplasm: A prospective short-term follow-up endoscopy study

AIM: To investigate the relationship between post-endoscopic resection (ER) scars on magnifying endoscopy (ME) and the pathological diagnosis in order to validate the clinical significance of ME.

METHODS: From January, 2007 to June, 2008, 124 patients with 129 post-ER scar lesions were enrolled. Mucosal pit patterns on ME were compared with conventional endoscopy (CE) findings and histological results obtained from targeted biopsies.

RESULTS: CE findings showed nodular scars (53/129), erythematous scars (85/129), and ulcerative scars (4/129). The post-ER scars were classified into four pit patterns of sulci and ridges on ME: (I) 47 round; (II) 54 short rod or tubular; (III) 19 branched or gyrus-like; and (IV) 9 destroyed pits. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.9% and 62.5%, respectively, by the presence of nodularity on CE. Erythematous lesions were high sensitivity (100%), but specificity was as low as 36.7%. The range of the positive predictive value (PPV) on CE was as low as 10.6%-25%. Nine type IV pit patterns were diagnosed as tumor lesions, and 120 cases of type I-III pit patterns revealed non-neoplastic lesions. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, and the PPV of ME were 100%.

CONCLUSION: ME findings can detect the presence of tumor in post-ER scar lesions, and make evident the biopsy target site in short-term follow-up. Further large-scale and long-term studies are needed to determine whether ME can replace endoscopic biopsy.

Surface pattern classification by enhanced-magnification endoscopy for identifying early gastric cancers

BACKGROUND

The correlation between fine surface patterns of gastric mucosal lesions and early gastric cancer is not sufficiently clear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of surface pattern classification by enhanced-magnification endoscopy (EME) for identifying early gastric cancers.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

All procedures were performed at Mie University Hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 380 consecutive patients who underwent EGD by using magnification endoscopy. Among these subjects were found 250 newly detected lesions suspected of being gastric cancer.

METHODS

Conventional magnification endoscopy (CME), magnification chromoendoscopy (MCE), and EME were performed, and surface patterns of lesions were classified into 5 types: type I, small round pits of uniform size and shape; type II, slit-like pits; type III, gyrus and villous patterns; type IV, irregular arrangement and size; and type V, destructive pattern. Biopsy specimens were obtained from all lesions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Correlation between surface pattern classification by EME and histopathologic findings of early gastric cancer.

RESULTS

Surface patterns were evident by CME/MCE in only 66.4% (166/250) of lesions but in 100% (250/250) of lesions by EME. Classification by EME was as follows: type I, 52 lesions; type II, 12; type III, 146; type IV, 32; and type V, 8. By histopathologic examination, 16 early gastric cancers were detected between type IV or V lesions. Thus, classification of types IV-V strongly correlated with the presence of gastric cancer (sensitivity 100%, specificity 89.7%).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface pattern classification by EME may be useful for identifying early gastric cancers.

N/A

N/A

Endoscopic patterns of gastric mucosa and its clinicopathological significance

AIM

To explore the correlation of magnifying endoscopic patterns and histopathology, Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection of the gastric mucosa.

METHODS

Gastric mucosal patterns in 140 patients with chronic gastritis were studied using Olympus GIF-Q240Z magnifying endoscope. Histopathological examination, rapid urease test and Warrthin-Starry staining were taken with biopsy samples from the magnified sites of stomach. The magnifying endoscopic patterns were compared with histopathological results and H pylori detection.

RESULTS

The pit patterns of gastric mucosa were classified as types A (round spot), B (short rod), C (branched), D (reticular) and E (villus). The detection rate of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) by magnifying endoscopy was 94.3% (33/35), which was significantly higher than that by routine endoscopy (22.9%, 8/35) (P<0.01). The pit patterns of 31 cases of intestinal metaplasia (IM) appeared as type E in 18 cases (58.1%), type D in 8 cases (25.8%) and type C in 5 cases (16.1%). Fourteen out of 18 patients (77.8%) with complete type (type I) of IM appeared as type E of pit patterns, whereas only 4 of 13 (30.8%) patients with incomplete type (types II and III) of IM appeared as type E (P<0.05). Collecting venules in the anterior of lower part of gastric corpus were subgrouped into types R (regular), I (irregular) and D (disappeared). H pylori infection was found in 12.2%(9/74), 60%(9/15) and 84.3%(43/51) cases in these types respectively. H pylori infection rate in type R was significantly lower than that in other two types (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Magnifying endoscopy may have an obvious value in diagnosing chronic atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia and H pylori infection.

Classification of Barrett's epithelium by magnifying endoscopy

BACKGROUND

The specialized columnar epithelium of Barrett's esophagus can be detected by obtaining random or 4 quadrant biopsy specimens at conventional endoscopy. However, little is known about the fine mucosal structure of specialized columnar epithelium.

METHODS

Thirty patients with Barrett's esophagus were studied by magnifying endoscopy. The fine mucosal pattern (pit pattern) of 67 regions in Barrett's mucosa was recorded and compared with methylene blue staining. Histologic, mucin immunohistologic, and cell proliferation analyses of biopsy specimens were performed in relation to the pit patterns determined by magnifying endoscopy.

RESULTS

Pit pattern was classified into 5 types. Tubular and villous pit patterns were not only characteristics of both specialized columnar epithelium and methylene blue absorption, but also possessed an intestinal mucin phenotype with a high Ki-labeling index, whereas other pit patterns (dot and straight) did not have specialized columnar epithelium and were categorized as the gastric phenotype. The long oval pit pattern had an intermediate phenotype between gastric and intestinal.

CONCLUSIONS

The classification of the superficial mucosal appearance of Barrett's epithelium by magnifying endoscopy reflects not only histologic features but also mucin phenotypes.