[Computer-assisted navigated acetabulum placement in hip prosthesis implantation--application study in routine clinical care]

Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study

BACKGROUND

The goal of the current prospective randomised radiological study was to determine the accuracy of conventional and computer-assisted femoral component implantation in surface arthroplasty (SRA).

METHODS

We analysed on standard radiographs the femoral component positions after 30 conventional instrumented (Group 1) and 30 navigated (Group 2) SRA femoral components. We evaluated: varus or valgus orientation, horizontal femoral offset and translation of the component.

RESULTS

The tendency to implant the femoral component in mild valgus position (2.8 degrees in Group 1 compared to 2.1 degrees in Group 2), more distally and ventrally in the femoral neck (in Group 1) and with femoral off-set increase (4.8 mm in Group 1 compared to 3.4 mm in Group 2) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The navigation system enables a more accurate insertion of the femoral component.

The transverse pelvic plane: a new and practical reference frame for hip arthroplasty

Acetabular orientation is a crucial part of the planning and performance of hip arthroplasty. Currently, most surgeons use the anterior pelvic plane (APP) to orient themselves when navigating the acetabulum, despite the fact that the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) of the unaffected side is not accessible in the lateral position. We have identified another plane, the transverse pelvic plane (TPP), relying on both posterior superior iliac spines and the ASIS of the affected side. In a CT-based study, this plane was found to be as reliable as the APP for the orientation of the cup in both anteversion and inclination. The substantial variation in both measurements between patients is documented, and their relation to the "safe zone" is shown. We recommend consideration of the TPP by surgeons who perform arthroplasty in the lateral position. It may reduce operating time and improve accuracy in computer-assisted arthroplasty.

Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion

This retrospective study compared the efficacy of computer navigation and conventional freehand techniques to place acetabular component orientation in the target position of acetabular cup inclination of 45 degrees and anteversion of 20 degrees . We selected 69 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty with freehand cup insertion who had computed tomography (CT) to plan for acetabular cup placement of the contralateral side. This group was compared with 98 patients who underwent CT-based cup insertion, and all had postoperative CT. After CT-based cup placement, average cup position was 43 degrees inclination (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97; range, 30 degrees -58 degrees ) and 22.2 degrees anteversion (95% CI, 1.72; range, 5 degrees -38 degrees ). For freehand, average cup position was 45.7 degrees inclination (95% CI, 2.63 degrees ; range, 26 degrees -64 degrees ) and 28.5 degrees anteversion (95% CI, 3.80 degrees ; range, 9 degrees -53 degrees ). F ratio was 5.56 for inclination and 3.67 for anteversion (P < .0001). This study demonstrated substantial statistical improvement in accuracy of cup placement using CT-based navigation compared with freehand methods.

Assessment of video tracking usability for training simulators

OBJECTIVE

A simulator was developed to mimic commercial CAS systems in implementing most tasks required to carry out a surgical operation. As tracking systems are generally expensive components, an alternative solution based on low-cost video-based tracking was used. Video tracking accuracy was assessed to determine whether or not this kind of approach was suitable for use in the training domain. Ultimately, video-based tracking should enable sufficiently accurate registration between a bony model and its virtual 3D representation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Video tracking was assessed using two types of camera. For each one, common accuracy tests were realized as a series of 10 trials at ranges of 0.5-1.0 m from the camera lens. The pointer used as a digitizer was equipped with tracked video markers. Three sizes of marker were evaluated to estimate the impact of marker size on accuracy.

RESULTS

For the better of the two cameras tested, results were encouraging. Results are presented as rounded whole-number values in millimeters. The noise test gave accuracies of 2 mm for the 80-mm marker, 3 mm for the 60-mm marker and 5 mm for the 40-mm marker. Relative accuracies, as evaluated on a grid of equally spaced dots, were 4 mm with the 80-mm marker, 7 mm with the 60-mm marker and 12 mm with the 40-mm marker. A pivoting test around the pointer tip gave 3 mm of accuracy for the 80-mm marker, 5 mm for the 60-mm marker and 11 mm for the 40-mm marker. An additional pivoting test was completed on increasing the distance of the marker from the pointer tip, giving accuracies of 5 mm for the 80-mm marker, 6 mm for the 60-mm marker and 13 mm for the 40-mm marker. The registration test gave accuracies of 8 mm for the 80-mm marker, 9 mm for the 60-mm marker and 11 mm for the 40-mm marker.

CONCLUSIONS

The video-based approach offers sufficient accuracy to achieve registration in the domain of CAS training.