[Polymorphism of pro12Ala in peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma 2 (PPAgamma2): beta cell function and insulin sensitivity]

Aleglitazar, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/γ agonist, improves insulin sensitivity, glucose control and lipid levels in people with type 2 diabetes: findings from a randomized, double-blind trial

The present single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study investigated the effect of the balanced dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/γ agonist aleglitazar on whole-body and liver insulin sensitivity, β-cell function and other components of cardiometabolic syndrome after 16 weeks of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy who received once-daily 150 µg aleglitazar or matching placebo as add-on therapy to metformin. Baseline and 16-week assessments included a two-step hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, followed by a hyperglycaemic clamp, as well as evaluation of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipids and safety variables. The primary endpoint was change in whole-body insulin sensitivity (M-value) from baseline compared with placebo, derived from the second clamp step. M-value improved significantly from baseline with aleglitazar (n = 16) compared with placebo (n = 24; p = 0.05 for difference between arms). We found statistically significant treatment differences with aleglitazar versus placebo in fasting hepatic insulin resistance index (p = 0.01), and in total glucose disposal (p = 0.03) at the second insulin infusion step. Aleglitazar treatment resulted in significant improvements in HbA1c and lipids and was well tolerated.

Association of 18 confirmed susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes with indices of insulin release, proinsulin conversion, and insulin sensitivity in 5,327 nondiabetic Finnish men

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effects of 18 confirmed type 2 diabetes risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and conversion of proinsulin to insulin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 5,327 nondiabetic men (age 58 +/- 7 years, BMI 27.0 +/- 3.8 kg/m(2)) from a large population-based cohort were included. Oral glucose tolerance tests and genotyping of SNPs in or near PPARG, KCNJ11, TCF7L2, SLC30A8, HHEX, LOC387761, CDKN2B, IGF2BP2, CDKAL1, HNF1B, WFS1, JAZF1, CDC123, TSPAN8, THADA, ADAMTS9, NOTCH2, KCNQ1, and MTNR1B were performed. HNF1B rs757210 was excluded because of failure to achieve Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

RESULTS

Six SNPs (TCF7L2, SLC30A8, HHEX, CDKN2B, CDKAL1, and MTNR1B) were significantly (P < 6.9 x 10(-4)) and two SNPs (KCNJ11 and IGF2BP2) were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with early-phase insulin release (InsAUC(0-30)/GluAUC(0-30)), adjusted for age, BMI, and insulin sensitivity (Matsuda ISI). Combined effects of these eight SNPs reached -32% reduction in InsAUC(0-30)/GluAUC(0-30) in carriers of >or=11 vs. <or=3 weighted risk alleles. Four SNPs (SLC30A8, HHEX, CDKAL1, and TCF7L2) were significantly or nominally associated with indexes of proinsulin conversion. Three SNPs (KCNJ11, HHEX, and TSPAN8) were nominally associated with Matsuda ISI (adjusted for age and BMI). The effect of HHEX on Matsuda ISI became significant after additional adjustment for InsAUC(0-30)/GluAUC(0-30). Nine SNPs did not show any associations with examined traits.

CONCLUSIONS

Eight type 2 diabetes-related loci were significantly or nominally associated with impaired early-phase insulin release. Effects of SLC30A8, HHEX, CDKAL1, and TCF7L2 on insulin release could be partially explained by impaired proinsulin conversion. HHEX might influence both insulin release and insulin sensitivity.

PPARγ2 polymorphism and human health

The nuclear hormone receptor peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is an important transcription factor regulating adipocyte differentiation, lipid and glucose homeostasis, and insulin sensitivity. Numerous genetic mutations of PPARγ have been identified and these mutations positively or negatively regulate insulin sensitivity. Among these, a relatively common polymorphism of PPARγ, Pro12Ala of PPARγ2, the isoform expressed only in adipose tissue has been shown to be associated with lower body mass index, enhanced insulin sensitivity, and resistance to the risk of type 2 diabetes in human subjects carrying this mutation. Subsequent studies in different ethnic populations, however, have revealed conflicting results, suggesting a complex interaction between the PPARγ2 Pro12Ala polymorphism and environmental factors such as the ratio of dietary unsaturated fatty acids to saturated fatty acids and/or between the PPARγ2 Pro12Ala polymorphism and genetic factors such as polymorphic mutations in other genes. In addition, this polymorphic mutation in PPARγ2 is associated with other aspects of human diseases, including cancers, polycystic ovary syndrome, Alzheimer disease and aging. This review will highlight findings from recent studies.

Increased insulin clearance in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma2 Pro12Ala

The Pro12Ala polymorphism of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARgamma(2)) is associated with reduced risk for type 2 diabetes. Although increased insulin sensitivity of glucose disposal and lipolysis has been reported, the exact mechanism by which the risk reduction is conferred is not clear. Because the conclusion of greater insulin sensitivity hinged upon lower insulin levels in some studies, it is possible that more efficient insulin clearance is involved. We therefore estimated insulin clearance during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate divided by steady-state insulin concentration, 229 normal glucose tolerant [NGT] subjects), an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (mean C-peptide divided by mean insulin concentrations, 406 NGT, 54 impaired glucose tolerant or mildly diabetic subjects), and a hyperglycemic clamp (120 minutes, 10 mmol/L, C-peptide divided by insulin in the steady-state, 56 NGT subjects). In the carriers of the Ala allele (prevalence approximately 24%), insulin clearance in all 3 protocols was significantly greater ( approximately 10%), than in controls. While the results from the euglycemic clamp reflect both hepatic and peripheral insulin clearance, those from the OGTT and the hyperglycemic clamp reflect mainly hepatic insulin extraction. Free fatty acids (FFA) during the steady state of the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp were significantly lower in carriers of the Ala allele (26 +/- 5 micromol/L) than in controls (46 +/- 3 micromol/L, P =.02). In conclusion, the Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with increased insulin clearance. This could be the result of reduced FFA delivery, which has been shown to improve hepatic insulin removal and sensitivity. Because PPARgamma(2) is mainly expressed in adipose tissue, one of the main regulatory effects of the polymorphism may well be the more efficient suppression of (possibly intra-abdominal) lipolysis.

Haplotype analysis of the PPARgamma Pro12Ala and C1431T variants reveals opposing associations with body weight

BACKGROUND

Variation at the PPARG locus may influence susceptibility to type 2 diabetes and related traits. The Pro12Ala polymorphism may modulate receptor activity and is associated with protection from type 2 diabetes. However, there have been inconsistent reports of its association with obesity. The silent C1431T polymorphism has not been as extensively studied, but the rare T allele has also been inconsistently linked to increases in weight. Both rare alleles are in linkage disequilibrium and the independent associations of these two polymorphisms have not been addressed.

RESULTS

We have genotyped a large population with type 2 diabetes (n = 1107), two populations of non-diabetics from Glasgow (n = 186) and Dundee (n = 254) and also a healthy group undergoing physical training (n = 148) and investigated the association of genotype with body mass index. This analysis has demonstrated that the Ala12 and T1431 alleles are present together in approximately 70% of the carriers. By considering the other 30% of individuals with haplotypes that only carry one of these polymorphisms, we have demonstrated that the Ala12 allele is consistently associated with a lower BMI, whilst the T1431 allele is consistently associated with higher BMI.

CONCLUSION

This study has therefore revealed an opposing interaction of these polymorphisms, which may help to explain previous inconsistencies in the association of PPARG polymorphisms and body weight.

Association of the T-G polymorphism in adiponectin (exon 2) with obesity and insulin sensitivity: interaction with family history of type 2 diabetes

The adipocyte-derived hormone adiponectin seems to protect from insulin resistance, a key factor in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Genome-wide scans have mapped a susceptibility locus for type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome to chromosome 3q27, where the adiponectin gene is located. A common silent T-G exchange in nucleotide 94 (exon 2) of the adiponectin gene has been associated with increased circulating adiponectin levels. Metabolic abnormalities associated with the G allele have not been reported. We therefore assessed whether this polymorphism alters insulin sensitivity and/or measures of obesity using the Tübingen Family Study database (prevalence of the G allele, 28%). In 371 nondiabetic individuals, we found a significantly greater BMI in GG + GT (25.5 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2)) compared with TT (24.1 +/- 0.3 kg/m(2); P = 0.02). Insulin sensitivity (determined by euglycemic clamp, n = 209) was significantly lower in GG + GT (0.089 +/- 0.007 units) compared with TT (0.112 +/- 0.005 units; P = 0.02). This difference disappeared completely on adjustment for BMI. Because our population contains a relatively high proportion of first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes, we stratified by family history (FHD). Much to our surprise, the genotype differences in BMI and insulin sensitivity in the whole population were attributable entirely to differences in the subgroup without FHD, whereas in the subgroup with FHD, the G allele had absolutely no effect. Moreover, individuals without FHD had a significantly lower BMI than individuals with FHD (25.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 26.2 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2); P = 0.01), which was not the case for the GG + GT subgroup without FHD (27.0 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2); NS). This suggests that in individuals without familial predisposition for type 2 diabetes, the adiponectin polymorphism may mildly increase the obesity risk (and secondarily insulin resistance). In contrast, in individuals who are already burdened by other genetic factors, this small effect may be very hard to detect.