Endosonography probe-guided endoscopic resection of small flat rectal carcinoid tumor using band ligation technique

Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

Submucosal tumors (SMTs) are usually discovered fortuitously during routine endoscopy, including various non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered to be the best imaging procedure to characterize SMTs and to determine the need for further treatment. In this review, the following issues will be addressed: The role of EUS in diagnosis for SMTs, tissue diagnosis for SMTs and the influence of EUS on endoscopic resection techniques for SMTs.

Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

Submucosal tumors (SMTs) are usually discovered fortuitously during routine endoscopy, including various non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered to be the best imaging procedure to characterize SMTs and to determine the need for further treatment. In this review, the following issues will be addressed: The role of EUS in diagnosis for SMTs, tissue diagnosis for SMTs and the influence of EUS on endoscopic resection techniques for SMTs.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumour using the Clutch Cutter

BACKGROUND

To reduce the risk of complications related to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using knives, we developed the Clutch Cutter (CC), which can grasp and incise the target tissue similarly to biopsy techniques using an electrosurgical current. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD using the CC for removal of rectal carcinoid tumours.

METHODS

Between December 2009 and December 2011, we prospectively enrolled seven patients (seven lesions) on 7 different days. Patients were endoscopically diagnosed with rectal subepithelial lesions (upper rectum, n = 3; lower rectum, n = 4) within the level 3 layer and without lymph node involvement, with the diagnosis confirmed by preliminary endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic biopsies. ESD using the CC was performed in all cases, and the therapeutic efficacy, safety and tumour recurrence were assessed.

RESULTS

All lesions were treated easily and safely, and there were no inadvertent incisions. En bloc resection was obtained in all cases, and histologic tumour-free lateral/basal margins were obtained in six of the seven patients. No delayed haemorrhage, perforation or tumour recurrence occurred.

CONCLUSION

ESD using the CC appears to be an easy, safe and technically efficient method for resecting rectal carcinoid tumour.

Long-term prognosis of an endoscopically treated rectal neuroendocrine tumor: 10-year experience in a single institution

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The endoscopic techniques for treating a small rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) are performed in most large centers; however, the endoscopic management of this condition is not well established. This study was designed to determine the long-term prognosis of endoscopically resected NET.

METHODS

We prospectively studied patients with endoscopically treated rectal NET in Seoul St Mary's hospital, between January 2000 and June 2010. The long-term outcomes were analyzed in association with the pathological complete resection and resection procedures.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients (48 men and 29 women; mean age, 52.3 years; range, 23-77 years) were included. The average NET size was 7.0±2.8 mm (range, 3-16 mm). There was no procedure-related complication. En-bloc removal was achieved for all lesions, and the rate of histological complete resection was 75.3% (58/77). Histological complete resection rates were 71.4% (10/14) by conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 74.1% (43/58) by a two-channel EMR, and 100.0% (5/5) by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Among six patients with incomplete histological resection, two underwent additional EMR, two underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and two underwent low anterior section with lymph node dissection. The remaining 13 patients with 'possible' remnant NET underwent regular endoscopic surveillance without additional resection. In the latter group, only one patient had local recurrence, detected on regular colonoscopic surveillance, after 56 months and was treated with additional EMR. All of the patients are alive and 98.7% (76/77) of the patients are free from disease during the follow-up periods.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective modality and may potentially be used for the treatment of NETs smaller than 15 mm in diameter, those confined to the submucosal layer, and those without metastasis. Local treatment was believed to be curative in cases with complete histological resection. In addition, this treatment may have an excellent prognosis in patients with 'possible' remnant NET.

Endoscopic treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors

BACKGROUND

Various methods have been reported for the endoscopic treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. The present study was designed to identify the optimal treatment strategy for an endoscopic resection.

METHODS

Forty rectal carcinoid tumors of 38 patients were treated endoscopically. The indication criteria, complete resection rate, selection of treatment, local recurrence, distant metastases, and complications were analyzed. All tumors were estimated to measure 1 cm or less in diameter, without muscular invasion, atypical features, and lymph node metastases to the pararectal region.

RESULTS

Complete resection of the lesions was obtained in 75.0% (30/40). The complete resection rates were 20.0% (1/5) by conventional polypectomy, 84.6% (22/26) by a two-channel endoscopic mucosal resection, and 77.8% (7/9) by endoscopic submucosal dissection. The 10 cases that did not show a clear submucosal layer after initial endoscopic treatment received additional endoscopic microwave coagulation therapy. There were no local or distant recurrences in the followed-up periods (median, 6.4 years). No difference was observed in the complete resection rate between two-channel endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Small carcinoid tumors measuring less than 1 cm in diameter can therefore be managed endoscopically with no recurrence or spread. The selection of endoscopic treatment should be made after taking such factors as cost-effectiveness, expertise, and experience into careful consideration.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal carcinoid tumor using grasping type scissors forceps

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with a knife is a technically demanding procedure associated with a high complication rate. The shortcomings of this method are the inability to fix the knife to the target lesion, and compression of the lesion. These can lead to major complications such as perforation and bleeding. To reduce the risk of complications related to ESD, we developed a new grasping type scissors forceps (GSF), which can grasp and incise the targeted tissue using electrosurgical current. Colonoscopy on a 55-year-old woman revealed a 10-mm rectal submucosal nodule. The histological diagnosis of the specimen obtained by biopsy was carcinoid tumor. Endoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated a hypoechoic solid tumor limited to the submucosa without lymph node involvement. It was safely and accurately resected without unexpected incision by ESD using a GSF. No delayed hemorrhage or perforation occurred. Histological examination confirmed the carcinoid tumor was completely excised with negative resection margin.

Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device is an effective and safe treatment for carcinoid tumors in the lower rectum

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Various methods for complete endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumors have been reported; however, the number of cases investigated in each study has been limited. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical usefulness of a novel technique named endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) in a large number of rectal carcinoid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1999 and March 2005, a total of 61 patients with 63 rectal carcinoid tumors estimated at 10 mm or less in diameter, without atypical features and resected by ESMR-L were recruited for this analysis. The complete resection rate, complications associated with the procedure, local recurrence, and distant metastases were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were 36 males and 25 females with a mean age of 59 +/- 11 years (24-76 years). Tumor size ranged from 2 to 12 mm in diameter, with an average size of 6.4 +/- 2.4 mm. Fifty-nine lesions (93.6%) were located in the lower rectum (Rb), three in the upper rectum (Ra) and one in the recto-sigmoid colon (Rs). In total, 60 out of 63 lesions (95.2%) were histologically determined to be completely resected. The complete resection rate for lesions located in the Rb was 98.3%, which was significantly higher than that for lesions in Ra and Rs (50%). Minor bleeding associated with the procedure occurred in five lesions (7.9%), but all cases were successfully managed with hemoclips. Histopathologically, all tumors were located in the submucosal layer, and all were classified as classical-type carcinoids without lymphovascular invasion. Neither local recurrence nor distant metastasis was detected during a median follow-up period of 24 months.

CONCLUSION

In a large number of cases, ESMR-L proved to be a useful and safe procedure to resect rectal carcinoid tumors 10 mm or less in diameter, especially for those located in the Rb.

Endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors with a ligation device

BACKGROUND

Local endoscopic mucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors is often associated with margin involvement that requires further intervention. The efficacy of resection of these tumors with endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) was evaluated.

METHODS

Fourteen rectal carcinoid tumors were treated by ESMR-L between 1999 and 2002. ESMR-L was performed with a conventional colonoscope with an attached band-ligator device. For comparison, 14 rectal carcinoid tumors, treated by either endoscopic mucosal resection or polypectomy between 1990 and 1997, were evaluated as historical controls. All tumors were estimated to be 1 cm or less in diameter.

OBSERVATIONS

There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, or tumor size. For 6 (43%) patients in the control group, there was tumor involvement at the margin of the resection specimen, whereas all tumors removed by ESMR-L had histopathologically proven negative margins (p < 0.05). The mean vertical resection margin also was significantly deeper in the ESMR-L group (p < 0.05). There was no complication of any procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

ESMR-L is technically simple, minimally invasive, and safe for treatment of small rectal carcinoid tumors contained within the submucosa. ESMR-L provides a deeper resection margin compared with that obtained with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection or polypectomy.