Endosonographic Doppler-guided manometry of esophageal varices: experimental validation and clinical feasibility

Application of ultrasound for the diagnosis of cirrhosis/portal hypertension

With advances in technologic approaches in patients with cirrhosis, including the improvement of management, a simple, one-step approach for advanced fibrotic state of the liver is clinically useful. Although refining the diagnosis of cirrhosis to reflect disease heterogeneity is essential, current diagnostic tests have not kept pace with the progression of this new paradigm. There are unmet needs in primary care centers with respect to patients with cirrhosis. Liver biopsy and measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis are the gold standards for the estimation of hepatic fibrosis, and they have diagnostic and prognostic value. However, both approaches are invasive and cannot be used repeatedly in clinical practice. Ultrasonography (US) is safe, easy to perform, inexpensive, and yields numerical and accurate results. Conventionally, the size of the liver and spleen, bluntness of the liver edge, nodularity of the liver surface, and coarseness of the liver parenchyma have been known as useful parameters for hepatic fibrosis or portal hypertension (PHT) in chronic liver disease. Additionally, some functional US indices including Doppler and CEUS-based examination have been suggested as promising markers for diagnosing cirrhosis and PHT. Identification of the reproducibility and long-term prognostic value through further investigations can demonstrate the clinical usefulness of functional US indices, which are characterized as quantitative parameters for hepatic fibrosis and PHT.

The role of EUS in diagnosis and treatment of liver disorders

Background and aim  Transabdominal ultrasound (US), computed tomographic scanning (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are established diagnostic tools for liver diseases. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is used to perform hepatic interventional procedures including biopsy, biliary drainage procedures, and radiofrequency ablation. Despite their widespread use, these techniques have limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), a tool that has proven useful for evaluating the mediastinum, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, and biliary tract, has an expanding role in the field of hepatology complementing the traditional investigational modalities. This review aimed to assess the current scientific evidence regarding diagnostic and therapeutic applications of EUS for hepatic diseases.

Endoscopic management of bleeding gastric varices--an updated overview

Gastric varices (GVs) are known to bleed massively and often difficult to manage with conventional techniques. This article aims to overview the endoscopic methods for the management of acute gastric variceal bleeding, especially the advantages and limits of GV obliteration with tissue adhesives, by comparison with band ligation and other direct endoscopic techniques of approach. The results of indirect radiological and surgical techniques of GV treatment are shortly discussed. A special attention is payed to the emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound in the therapy of bleeding GV, in the confirmation of its eradication and in follow-up strategies.

Esophageal varix predictive performance of lower esophageal Doppler signals during the swallowing process

The objective of this study was to assess whether the swallowing action can improve the display of lower esophageal Doppler signals (LEDS) during transabdominal ultrasound (TUS). Eighty-four patients with cirrhosis underwent both TUS and endoscopic examination for esophageal varices (EVs). LEDS were assessed under the esophageal resting state and during the swallowing process. Univariate analysis indicated that spleen diameter, spleen vein diameter, portal vein diameter, LEDS and left gastric vein hepatofugal flow were significantly associated with the presence of EVs. No LEDS were detected in patients without EVs at rest or during swallowing. Of the 69 patients with EVs, LEDS could be detected in 21 cases (30.4%) in the esophageal resting state and in 58 cases (84.1%) during the swallowing process. Compared with the esophageal resting state, the swallowing action can significantly improve display of LEDS during TUS (p = 0.000), which may be beneficial for TUS detection of EVs.

Management of gastric variceal bleeding: Role of endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound

Gastric varices (GVs) are notorious to bleed massively and often difficult to manage with conventional techniques. This mini-review addresses endoscopic management principles for gastric variceal bleeding, including limitations of ligation and sclerotherapy and merits of endoscopic variceal obliteration. The article also discusses how emerging use of endoscopic ultrasound provides optimism of better diagnosis, improved classification, innovative management strategies and confirmatory tool for eradication of GVs.

Effects of propranolol or propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate on variceal pressure in schistosomiasis

AIM: To compare the effects of propranolol (PR) to that of PR plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN) on variceal pressure in patients with schistosomiasis.

METHODS: Forty-eight patients with schistosomiasis who had no previous variceal bleeding were treated with PR alone or PR plus ISMN. Seven patients refused variceal pressure manometry (3 receiving PR and 4 receiving PR plus ISMN). One patient withdrew from the trial due to headache after taking ISMN. At the time of termination, twenty patients were randomly assigned to treatment with PR plus ISMN or PR alone. The dose of PR was adjusted until the resting heart rate had been reduced by 25% or was less than 55 bpm. In the PR plus ISMN group, after PR was titrated to the same target, the dose of ISMN was increased up to 20 mg orally twice a day. Variceal pressure was measured using a noninvasive endoscopic balloon technique at the end of the 6-mo treatment period.

RESULTS: In 40 patients (20 in the PR group and 20 in the PR plus ISMN group), variceal pressure was measured before treatment and at the end of the 6-mo treatment period. PR or PR plus ISMN treatment caused a significant reduction in variceal pressure (PR group: from 24.15 ± 6.05 mmHg to 22.68 ± 5.70 mmHg, P = 0.001; PR plus ISMN group: from 25.69 ± 5.26 mmHg to 20.48 ± 5.43 mmHg; P < 0.001). The percentage decrease in variceal pressure was significant after PR plus ISMN compared with that after PR alone (15.93% ± 8.37% vs 6.05% ± 3.67%, P = 0.01). One patient in the PR plus ISMN group and two patients in the PR group had variceal bleeding during follow-up. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the incidence of variceal bleeding. In the PR plus ISMN group, three patients had headache and hypotension. The headache was mild and transient and promptly disappeared after continuation of the relevant drug in two patients. Only one patient withdrew from the trial due to severe and lasting headache after taking ISMN. No side effects occurred in the PR group.

CONCLUSION: PR plus ISMN therapy may be an alternative treatment for patients with schistosomiasis who have a high risk of bleeding.

Measurement of variceal pressure with a computerized endoscopic manometry: validation and effect of propranolol therapy in cirrhotic patients

Background and Purpose

Recently, we invented a computerized endoscopic balloon manometry (CEBM) to measure variceal pressure (VP) in cirrhotic patient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and feasibility of this method, and whether this technique provided further information to pharmacological therapy.

Patients and Methods

VP measurements were performed in 83 cirrhotic patients and compared with HVPG as well as endoscopic bleeding risk parameters. Furthermore, VP was assessed before and during propranolol therapy in 30 patients without previous bleeding.

Results

VP measurements were successful in 96% (83/86) of all patients. Of the 83 patients, the VP correlated closely with the HVPG (P<0.001). The presence of red colour signs and the size of varices were strongly associated with VP. Patients with previous bleeding had higher VP than those who had not yet experienced bleeding. In univariate analysis, the level of VP, the size of varices, and red color signs predicted a higher risk of bleeding. The multiple logistic regression model revealed that VP was the major risk factor for bleeding. In 30 patients receiving propranolol, VP significantly decreased from 21.1±3.5 mmHg before therapy to 18.1±3.3 mmHg after 3 months and to 16.3±4.0 mmHg after 6 months. Comparing the mean decrease in VP with that in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), the decrease in VP was more obvious than HVPG response to propranolol.

Conclusions

This study showed that CEBM is safe and practical to assess VP in cirrhotic patient. It has the potential to be used as a clinical method to assess the risk of variceal bleeding and the effects of pharmacological therapy.

Trial registration

Effect of vasoactive drugs on esophageal variceal hemodynamics in patients with portal hypertension. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry –TRC-08000252.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in hepatology

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is used to evaluate patients with hepatobiliary diseases. The technique is useful for the diagnosis of esogastric varices in selected cases of portal hypertension, and to evaluate the pathogenic role and prognostic value of the collateral circulation in patients with this condition. When coupled with the Doppler technique, EUS can be used to guide injection sclerotherapy and to verify the obliteration of varices (particularly fundal varices) after endoscopic treatment. Hemodynamic changes induced in the collateral circulation by vasoactive drugs can also be measured with Doppler-EUS. Fine-needle aspiration under EUS guidance is useful in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions and perihepatic adenopathy, and in the evaluation of biliary tract diseases. New indications can be developed in the future after adequate experimental validation.

[Recent advances in diagnosis of portal hypertension]

Complications of portal hypertension are major concerns in liver cirrhosis and significant morbidity and mortality mainly because of variceal bleeding, ascites, bacterial infections, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. Various modalities in the diagnosis of portal hypertension are reviewed. The measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is a simple, invasive, reproducible method and regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of portal hypertension. Other tests such as transient elastography, per-endoscopic variceal pressure measurement, endoscopic ultrasonography, and Doppler ultrasonography may be complementary and promising.

Current staging and diagnosis of gastroesophageal varices

Portal hypertension is defined as an increase in hepatic sinusoidal pressure to 6 mm Hg or higher. Cirrhosis is the most common cause of portal hypertension in the western world and results from increased resistance to blood flow at the hepatic sinusoidal level.

Systematic review: endoscopic and imaging-based techniques in the assessment of portal haemodynamics and the risk of variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Invasive measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is regarded as the gold standard for risk stratification and the evaluation of pharmaceutical agents in patients with portal hypertension.

AIM

To review the techniques for endoscopic and imaging-based assessment of portal haemodynamics, with particular emphasis on trials where the results were compared with HVPG or direct portal pressure measurement.

METHODS

Systematic search of the MEDLINE electronic database with keywords: portal hypertension, variceal bleeding, variceal pressure, endoscopic ultrasound, Doppler ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, CT angiography, hepatic venous pressure gradient.

RESULTS

Computed tomography angiography and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have been both employed for the diagnosis of complications of portal hypertension and for the evaluation of the efficacy of endoscopic therapy. Colour Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography has given discrepant results. Endoscopic variceal pressure measurements either alone or combined with simultaneous EUS, correlate well with HVPG and risk of variceal bleeding and have a low interobserver variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic and imaging-based measurements of portal haemodynamics provide an alternate means for the assessment of complications of portal hypertension. Further studies are required to validate their use in risk stratification and the evaluation of drug therapies in patients with portal hypertension.

Color Doppler endoscopic ultrasonography in identifying groups at a high-risk of recurrence of esophageal varices after endoscopic treatment

BACKGROUND

Our preliminary study indicated that either a high hepatofugal flow velocity in the left gastric vein (LGV) or an anterior branch dominant pattern seen under color Doppler EUS (CD-EUS) were possible contributing risk factors for variceal recurrence after endoscopic treatment. However, the sample size was too small, and in this study we aimed to validate the results of the preliminary study.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients treated for moderate or large esophageal varices between 2001 and 2004 at a single university hospital were enrolled in this study. CD-EUS was followed by endoscopic variceal ligation and sclerotherapy.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into either a high-risk group, which exhibited anterior branch dominance and flow velocity of 12 cm/s or more, or a low-risk group, which included all other patients. Half of the patients in the high-risk group exhibited a recurrence within half a year, whereas it took almost 2 years for half of the patients in the other group to exhibit a recurrence (P=0.0044). Using the Cox proportional hazard model with multivariate analysis, only the features of the high-risk group were significant in triggering recurrence of varices (hazard ratio [HR], 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-6.65; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that patients showing anterior branch dominance and rapid hepatofugal flow velocity in the LGV on CD-EUS examination may have a high risk of an early recurrence of esophageal varices.

Perendoscopic variceal pressure measurement

OBJECTIVES

In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the reference method for the assessment of portal hypertension (PHT). Variceal pressure (VP) may be measured at endoscopy, but its relationship to the HVPG remains controversial. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare HVPG and VP values obtained in a cohort of patients with cirrhosis and PHT.

METHODS

Within 8 days (range: 6-10 days), 64 patients in a stable condition with biopsy-proven cirrhosis [alcoholic: 47; other 17; mean age: 56.5 yrs (35-70); mean Child-Pugh's score: 9.4 +/- 1.9; ascites: 37/64; previous variceal bleeding (="bleeders"): 24/64) and oesophageal varices (grade 2: 49; grade 3: 15)] underwent both measurement of the HVPG during transjugular liver biopsy and VP at endoscopy using a "home made" pressure sensitive gauge in the absence of needle puncture of the varix. Alcoholic hepatitis was present in 28 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.

RESULTS

The pressure sensitive gauge was well tolerated. The mean HVPG and VP values were 18.5 +/- 3.4 mmHg and 19 +/- 3.7 mmHg, respectively. A significant difference was observed between "bleeders" (n=24) and non "bleeders" (n=40) in terms of VP values (21.4 +/- 3.3 vs 17.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg, P<0.001), but not for HVPG values (19.4 +/- 4.1 vs 17.9 +/- 2.8 mmHg, P=0.075). A positive correlation was observed between VP and HVPG values (r=0.62, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices, a "home-made" pressure sensitive gauge allowed a non invasive perendoscopic measurement of VP. The positive correlation between VP and HVPG values suggests that measurement of VP may be a reliable estimate of portal pressure in these patients.

Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension. Where are we next?

Endoscopic ultrasonography has recently emerged as an accurate, non-invasive and reproducible alternative means of providing data for patients with portal hypertension. It is well established that endoscopic ultrasonography is more sensitive than endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastric varices. Dilated venous abnormalities outside the gastrooesophageal lumen, which cannot be diagnosed by endoscopy, are readily visible with endoscopic ultrasonography or miniature probes. Endoscopic ultrasonography is also useful to predict the risk of variceal recurrence and thus the risk of rebleeding after endotherapy which cannot be reliably predicted using endoscopy alone. The introduction of echo endoscopes equipped with Doppler facilities has allowed the sonographic visualisation of the vessels and the evaluation of vascular blood flow along with possible morphologic and haemodynamic changes after endoscopic or pharmacological therapy. However, despite its theoretical advantages, relative evidence suggests that in the clinical setting of portal hypertension, endoscopic ultrasonography remains an investigational tool with limited clinical applications.

The role of endoscopy in the treatment of esophageal varices, 2002-2003

Great strides have been made in the endoscopic and radiologic therapy of esophageal varices in the past few years. With the advent of variceal band ligation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, almost every acute variceal bleed can be controlled. In addition, over the past decade great strides have been made in the noninvasive imaging and pressure measurement of esophageal varices. Yet, the mortality rate from variceal bleeding has not changed significantly and the pharmacologic therapy of esophageal varices and the prophylaxis of the initial variceal bleed has lagged behind these other interventional advances. These authors believe that progress in these areas has been slow because the pathophysiology and hemodynamics of esophageal varices are not well understood. It is through progress in the areas of endoluminal ultrasound imaging of esophageal varices and noninvasive pressure measurement that progress has finally been made in the area of the pathophysiology of variceal bleeding. In this update, two novel ideas regarding the pathophysiology of variceal bleeding are described. The first regards increased variceal pressure during peristaltic contraction. The second describes increased variceal pressure with increasing intraabdominal pressure. These new observations suggest a new pathophysiology in the cause of variceal bleeding and imply new methods to prevent and treat variceal bleeding. This update and review of esophageal varices is given in five sections: new developments in the pathophysiology of esophageal variceal bleeding, screening for esophageal varices, prediction of variceal bleeding, treatment of esophageal varices and new modalities to evaluate esophageal varices.