Combined pancreas and kidney transplantation in a lean type 2 diabetic patient. Effects on insulin secretion and sensitivity

Pancreas Transplantation in Minorities including Patients with a Type 2 Diabetes Phenotype

Background: Prior to year 2000, the majority of pancreas transplants (PTx) were performed as simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKTs) in Caucasian adults with end stage renal failure secondary to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who were middle-aged. In the new millennium, improving outcomes have led to expanded recipient selection that includes patients with a type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) phenotype, which excessively affects minority populations. Methods: Using PubMed® to identify appropriate citations, we performed a literature review of PTx in minorities and in patients with a T2DM phenotype. Results: Mid-term outcomes with SPKT in patients with uremia and circulating C-peptide levels (T2DMphenotype) are comparable to those patients with T1DM although there may exist a selection bias in the former group. Excellent outcomes with SPKT suggests that the pathophysiology of T2DM is heterogeneous with elements consisting of both insulin deficiency and resistance related to beta-cell failure. As a result, increasing endogenous insulin (Cp) production following PTx may lead to freedom checking blood sugars or taking insulin, better metabolic counter-regulation, and improvements in quality of life and life expectancy compared to other available treatment options. Experience with solitary PTx for T2DM or in minorities is limited but largely mirrors the trends reported in SPKT. Conclusions: PTx is a viable treatment option in patients with pancreas endocrine failure who are selected appropriately regardless of diabetes type or recipient race. This review will summarize data that unconventional patient populations with insulin-requiring diabetes may gain value from PTx with an emphasis on contemporary experiences and appropriate selection in minorities in the new millennium.

Do pretransplant C-peptide levels predict outcomes following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation? A matched case-control study

Following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT), survival outcomes are reported as equivalent in patients with detectable pretransplant C-peptide levels (Cp+) and a "type 2″ diabetes mellitus (DM) phenotype compared to type 1 (Cp negative [Cp-]) DM. We retrospectively compared 46 Cp+ patients pretransplant (≥2.0 ng/mL, mean 5.4 ng/mL) to 46 Cp- (level < 0.5 ng/mL) case controls matched for recipient age, gender, race, and transplant date. Early outcomes were comparable. Actual 5-year patient survival (91% versus 94%), kidney graft survival (69% versus 86%, p = .15), and pancreas graft survival (60% versus 86%, p = .03) rates were lower in Cp+ versus Cp- patients, respectively. The Cp+ group had more pancreas graft failures due to insulin resistance (13% Cp+ versus 0% Cp-, p = .026) or rejection (17% Cp+ versus 6.5% Cp-, p = .2). Post-transplant weight gain > 5 kg occurred in 72% of Cp+ versus 26% of Cp- patients (p = .0001). In patients with functioning grafts, mean one-year post-transplant HbA1c levels (5.0 Cp+ versus 5.2% Cp-) were comparable, whereas Cp levels were higher in Cp+ patients (5.0 Cp+ versus 2.6 ng/mL Cp-). In this matched case-control study, outcomes were inferior in Cp+ compared to Cp- patients following SPKT, with post-transplant weight gain, insulin resistance, and rejection as potential mitigating factors.

Effect of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation on blood glucose level for patients with end-stage renal disease with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) remains disproportionately higher than that for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. However, understanding the surgical outcomes for these patients is not well described. Therefore, the results of DM patients with end-stage renal disease and their transplantations were reported.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and June 2019, 63 SPK transplants were performed in our organ transplantation center. χ² and t-test compared the variables between the groups and the record review verified the patient survival. Using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression, we examined the influence of SPK on patient and graft survivals.

RESULTS

Sixty-three SPK transplantation was performed, 18 (29%) were T1DM, and 45 (71%) T2DM. T2DM recipients had older age, duration of diabetes, and pretransplant dialysis time. No differences were found in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, body mass index (BMI), and other variables. Patient survivals for T1DM was 98.2% and 94.8% at 1 and 2 years vs. 100% and 94.1% for T2DM recipients (P=0.87). There was no increased risk between kidney disease, pancreas failure, or death when comparing T2DM and T1DM.

CONCLUSIONS

In our single-center cohort of SPK transplants, we concluded that SPK recipients with T2DM diagnosis were not at increased risk for death, kidney failure, or pancreas failure when compared with recipients with T1DM.

Pancreas transplantation in type II diabetes mellitus

Although the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus was once considered a contraindication to simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, a growing body of evidence has revealed that similar graft and patient survival can be achieved when compared to type 1 diabetes mellitus recipients. A cautious strategy regarding candidate selection may limit appropriate candidates from additional benefits in terms of quality of life and potential amelioration of secondary side effects of the disease process. Although our current understanding of the disease has changed, uniform listing characteristics to better define and study this population have limited available data and must be established.

Pancreas transplantation in C-peptide positive patients: does "type" of diabetes really matter?

BACKGROUND

In the past, type 2 (C-peptide positive) diabetes mellitus (DM) was a contraindication for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes in SPKT recipients according to pretransplantation C-peptide levels ≥ 2.0 ng/mL or < 2.0 ng/mL.

RESULTS

From November 2001 to March 2013, we performed 162 SPKTs including 30 (18.5%) in patients with C-peptide levels ≥ 2.0 ng/mL pretransplantation (C-peptide positive group, range 2.1 to 12.4 ng/mL) and 132 in patients with absent or low C-peptide levels (<2.0 ng/mL, C-peptide "negative"). C-peptide positive patients were older at SPKT, had a later age of onset and shorter duration of pretransplantation DM, and more were African-American (all p < 0.05) compared with C-peptide negative patients. With a mean follow-up of 5.6 years, patient (80% vs 82.6%), kidney graft (63.3% vs 68.9%), and pancreas graft survivals (50% vs 62.1%, all p = NS) rates were comparable in C-peptide positive and negative patients, respectively. At latest follow-up, there were no differences in acute rejection episodes, surgical complications, major infections, readmissions, hemoglobin A1c levels, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate levels between the 2 groups. C-peptide levels were higher (mean 5.0 vs 2.6 ng/mL, p < 0.05) and post-transplant weight gain (≥ 5 kg) was more common (57% vs 33%, p = 0.004) in the C-peptide positive group. Survival outcomes in C-peptide positive (n = 14) vs C-peptide negative (n = 22) African-American patients were similar, as were outcomes in C-peptide positive patients with a body mass index < or ≥ 28 kg/m(2).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher pretransplantion C-peptide levels appear to have a type 2 DM phenotype compared to insulinopenic patients undergoing SPKT. However, survival and functional outcomes were similar, suggesting that pretransplantation C-peptide levels should not be used exclusively to determine candidacy for SPKT.

Pancreas transplantation for type 2 diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will provide evidence that selected patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may benefit from vascularized pancreas transplantation (PTX).

RECENT FINDINGS

Initial experience with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) in patients with T2DM and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) suggested that augmentation of endogenous insulin production by PTX in patients with C-peptide-positive, insulin-requiring diabetes resulted in insulin independence, improved glucose counter-regulation, and enhanced quality of life. A number of single-center retrospective studies have documented equivalent outcomes in patients with either type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or T2DM undergoing predominantly SPKT, although clearly a selection bias exists for patients in the latter category. Selection criteria for SPKT in T2DM include patients less than 55-60 years of age with a BMI less than 30-32 kg/m², insulin-requiring for a minimum of 5 years with a total daily insulin requirement less than 1 u/kg/day, a fasting C-peptide level less than 10 ng/ml, absence of severe vascular disease or tobacco abuse, adequate cardiac function, and presence of 'complicated' diabetes. Data from the International Pancreas Transplant Registry show that up to 7% of SPKT recipients are classified as having T2DM and that outcomes in these patients are comparable to those undergoing SPKT and classified as having T1DM.

SUMMARY

Consequently, characterization of the 'type' of diabetes may be irrelevant and insulin-requiring diabetic patients with ESRD should be evaluated for PTX based exclusively on their predicted ability to tolerate the surgical procedure and requisite immunosuppression as well as comply with a stringent posttransplant follow-up regimen.

Insulin resistance and insulin secretion changes in kidney transplant recipients with normal graft function compared with those with delayed graft function early after transplantation

INTRODUCTION

We compared insulin resistance (IR) and insulin secretion (IS) among kidney transplant recipients with normal versus delayed graft function (DGF) early after transplantation.

METHODS

We selected 55 kidney transplant recipients without a history of clinical diabetes mellitus. The basal values of glucose (G) and insulin (I) were used to calculate indices of IR and IS before, on the third day, as well as at the end of the first, second, and third weeks after transplantation.

RESULTS

Before transplantation IR was more prevalent (62.5%) than impaired IS (20%; P = .012). Three weeks after engraftment, IR was significantly reduced (P < .001), whereas the reduction in the IS was not significant (P = .17). Splitting the results between normal and delayed functioning grafts showed a significant difference in both IR and IS between the 2 groups on the third day after transplantation (P = .018 and .024, respectively). Regression models showed that only cumulative administered cyclosporine dose and plasma creatinine were significantly (or near significantly) associated with IR (P = .04 and .07, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with DGF there was a significantly greater prevalence of IR and IS compared with successfully engrafted patients in the middle of the first week after transplantation. With resumption of normal kidney function among the DGF group, this difference disappeared at the end of the third week after transplantation.

Prevention and management of hyperglycemia after pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreas transplantation is considered the optimal therapy for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. Successful pancreas transplantation achieves euglycemia and allows freedom from insulin therapy. Long-term allograft success may be limited by the development of impaired glucose metabolism. The objectives of the present review are to summarize the possible reasons for endocrine pancreatic dysfunction and to focus on its prevention and management and emphasize the role of immunosuppression.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diabetogenic effects of current immunosuppressive agents have been well established. Regimens without corticosteroids and calcineurin-inhibitor minimization or avoidance have been promoted. Recent studies have revisited the pathogenesis of type I and type II diabetes and demonstrated common pathways, including apoptosis induction, for the exhaustion and destruction of the pancreatic islets.

SUMMARY

The immunosuppressive regimens in pancreatic transplantation should be designed and appropriately modified according to the graft immunological and metabolic conditions. New molecules that are able to preserve islet function and maintain optimal insulin secretion should be considered for pancreas transplant recipients.

Beta cell mass in diabetes: a realistic therapeutic target?

Beta cell deficiency underlies both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and restoration or replacement of beta cell function is therefore the logical long-term solution to therapy. This review sets out to describe the defects in beta cell mass and function in both forms of diabetes, summarises current understanding of the underlying causes of beta cell death, and the methodological limitations of determining beta cell mass in vivo. Finally, the potential effects of current and future treatment regimens on beta cell mass and turnover are considered.

Development of β-Cells in the Native Pancreas After Pancreas Allo-Transplantation in the Spontaneously Diabetic Torii Rat

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated the development of beta-cells in the native pancreas after syngeneic pancreas transplantation (PTx) in a model of type 2 diabetes, namely the Spontaneously Diabetic Torii (SDT; RT1 a) rat. In this study, we evaluated the effect of fully allogeneic PTx (allo-PTx) under immunosuppression on the native pancreases in the recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diabetic 25-week-old SDT rats were divided into two groups: untreated controls and PTx-treated recipients. Dark Agouti (RT1 a) pancreases were then transplanted into the SDT rats. FK506 was administered daily postoperatively. Each group was examined for 15 weeks.

RESULTS

Control SDT rats showed a disappearance of the pancreatic and duodenal homeobox-1 (PDX-1) expression of the pancreases with the development of diabetes. In addition, the islets were gradually replaced by fibrosis, thus resulting in a marked decrease in the beta-cell mass at 40 weeks of age. On the other hand, in PTx recipients, islet-like cell clusters were found in the native pancreases. The beta-cell mass significantly increased in the native pancreases in the recipients at 10 and 15 weeks posttransplantation in comparison to the age-matched controls. Moreover, we observed the re-expression of PDX-1 in the islet-like cell clusters. Interestingly, insulin and glucagon double-positive stained cells in the mesenchyme and insulin single-positive cells in the ductal epithelium were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that the benefits of avoiding glucose toxicity by allo-PTx under immunosuppression could therefore induce the PDX-1 expression in the native pancreases, thus potentially resulting in the development of beta-cells in type 2 diabetic recipients.

Pancreas transplantation using type I and type II spontaneously diabetic rats--our experimental experience

Pancreas transplantation (PTx) is the only therapy that can cure type 1 diabetes mellitus. With the recent advance of surgical procedures and immunosuppression, the outcome of PTx has become better than it used to be before, but some problems still remain. It is rather difficult to induce tolerance and to reverse rejection once it occurred because pancreas graft itself has a strong immunogenicity. Another important issue is regarding the recurrence of autoimmune disease in the pancreatic graft, therefore, some animal models are necessary to delineate and regulate those immune responses specific for PTx. Recently, PTx is also clinically applicable for type 2 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. It has been shown that insulin resistance was improved by PTx in type 2 diabetic recipients. In the current study, we have introduced some useful type 1 and type 2 diabetic models mainly based on our experimental experiences.

Outcomes of pancreas transplants for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to examine how effectively pancreas transplants provide long-term glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). We used guidelines from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to appropriately classify recipients with type 2 DM (vs. type 1 DM).

RESULTS

From 1994 through 2002, a total of 17 patients with type 2 DM underwent a pancreas transplant at our center. Mean recipient age was 52.5 yr. The mean age at diabetes onset was 35.7 yr; mean duration, 16.8 yr. Most recipients had one or more secondary complications related to their diabetes: retinopathy (94%), neuropathy (76%), or nephropathy (65%). At the time of their transplant, three (18%) were on oral hypoglycemic agents alone and 14 (82%) were on insulin therapy. Of the 17 transplants, seven (41%) were a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK); four (24%), pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK); and six (35%), pancreas transplant alone (PTA). One recipient died during the perioperative period because of aspiration. The other 16 recipients became euglycemic post-transplant and had a functional graft at 1 yr post-transplant (patient and graft survival rates, 94%). Now, with a mean follow-up of 4.3 yr post-transplant, the patient survival rate is 71%. The four additional deaths were because of sepsis (n = 2), suicide (n = 1), and unknown cause (n = 1). All four of these recipients were insulin-independent at the time of death, although one was on an oral hypoglycemic agent. Of the 12 recipients currently alive, 11 remain euglycemic without requiring insulin therapy or oral hypoglycemic agents; one began insulin therapy 1.2 yr post-transplant (current daily dose, 60 units).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that pancreas transplants can provide excellent glucose control in recipients with type 2 DM. All 16 (94%) of our recipients whose transplant was technically successful were rendered euglycemic. Long-term results were comparable with those seen in transplant recipients with type 1 DM.

Management of hyperglycaemia after pancreas transplantation: are new immunosuppressants the answer?

Pancreas transplantation is considered the optimal therapy for patients with diabetes mellitus who reach end-stage renal disease. Despite achievement of euglycaemia after this procedure, the progression to impaired pancreatic function and metabolic exhaustion still represents one of the major concerns that increase the risk of graft loss. This paper reviews the possible mechanisms that can induce post-transplant hyperglycaemia, including those related to immunosuppression and those non-related, and the new strategies available for minimising or preventing this complication. Different aetiologies can induce pancreatic dysfunction. Technical complications, acute pancreatitis and delayed graft function, mostly related to impaired insulin secretion, are considered the early causes for abnormal glucose control. In general, acute rejection does not affect the endocrine portion of the pancreas graft because islet destruction occurs later than the inflammation of the exocrine components. Hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance represent the main concern for the progression of blood glucose intolerance. The anastomotic techniques of the exocrine portion of the pancreas and the immunosuppressive regimens are of critical importance for the development of impaired glucose metabolism. Hyperinsulinaemia, as a result of the fact that systemic-enteric or systemic-bladder drainages reducing the hepatic clearance of insulin, has led to the introduction of more physiological techniques using portal drainage of the endocrine secretions. Experimental and clinical data have shown that many of the current immunosuppressants account, to a large degree, for the increased risk of the development of post-transplant hyperglycaemia. The most common maintenance regimen in pancreatic transplantation still consists of triple therapy with a combination of corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors (either ciclosporin [cyclosporine] or tacrolimus), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).The diabetogenic effects of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors have resulted in the need for protocols able to minimise their use. Recent studies have shown the safety and efficacy of steroid-sparing or -free regimens. Sirolimus has shown powerful immunosuppressive potency in absence of nephrotoxicity and diabetogenicity. Multicentre and single-centre reports have demonstrated that both calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal and avoidance were possible when sirolimus was used in a concentration-controlled fashion, with low-dose corticosteroids and MMF. Although the experience with sirolimus in pancreatic transplantation is still limited, the results are promising. Patients affected by diabetic gastroparesis seem to better tolerate a regimen with sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus than one with tacrolimus in combination with MMF.For successful, long-term results of pancreatic transplantation, it is crucial to combine donor selection, technical aspects, modified anastomotic techniques and new therapeutic approaches designed to minimise the metabolic and non-metabolic adverse effects of the immunosuppressive regimens.