1
|
Weber RK, Sommer F, Heppt W, Hosemann W, Kühnel T, Beule AG, Laudien M, Hoffmann TK, Hoffmann AS, Baumann I, Deitmer T, Löhler J, Hildenbrand T. [Fundamentals and practice of the application of nasal packing in sinonasal surgery]. HNO 2024; 72:3-15. [PMID: 37845539 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01369-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This paper presents an overview on nasal packing materials which are available in Germany. The current literature is analyzed whether there are robust criteria regarding use nasal packing after sinonasal surgery, whether there are fundamental and proven advantages or disadvantages of products, and what this means in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Selective literature analysis using the PubMed database (key words "nasal packing", "nasal tamponade", "nasal surgery", "sinonasal surgery", or "sinus surgery"), corresponding text books and resulting secondary literature. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Because of systematic methodological shortcomings, the literature does not help in the decision-making about which nasal packing should be used after which kind of sinonasal surgery. In fact, individual approaches for the many different clinical scenarios are recommended. In principle, nasal packing aims in hemostasis, should promote wound healing, and should not result in secondary morbidity. Nasal packing materials should be smooth (non-absorbable materials), inert (absorbable materials), and should not exert excessive pressure. Using non-absorbable packing entails the risk of potentially lethal aspiration and ingestion. For safety reasons inpatient control is recommended as long as this packing is in situ. With other, uncritical packing materials and in patients with special conditions, outpatient control could be justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer K Weber
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
- Sinus Academy, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
- Sektion Nasennebenhöhlen- und Schädelbasischirurgie, Traumatologie, HNO-Klinik, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Moltkestr. 90, 76133, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
| | - Fabian Sommer
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - Werner Heppt
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Deutschland
| | - Werner Hosemann
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Heliosklinikum Stralsund, Stralsund, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Kühnel
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Achim Georg Beule
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für Erkrankungen der oberen Atemwege, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Martin Laudien
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Thomas K Hoffmann
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - Anna Sophie Hoffmann
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
| | - Ingo Baumann
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Deitmer
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e. V., Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Jan Löhler
- Deutscher Berufsverband der HNO-Ärzte e. V., Neumünster, Deutschland
| | - Tanja Hildenbrand
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ivanova PP, Iliev G. Nasal Packing in Septal Surgery: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e36488. [PMID: 37090361 PMCID: PMC10118399 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, alternatives to intranasal packing following septoplasty and rhinoseptoplasty have been widely used and promoted. Here, we aimed to systemically review and compare the different types of nasal packing used in these two surgeries. To assess patient comfort and surgical outcomes, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify and evaluate relevant articles. A detailed and extensive search was performed with the help of the keywords "nasal packing," "septoplasty," "rhinoseptoplasty," "nasal splints," and "intranasal packing." Overall, our review findings indicate that alternative methods (e.g., trans-septal suturing and insertion of intranasal splints) are better options than intranasal packing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polina P Ivanova
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Saint Anna Hospital, Varna, BGR
| | - Georgi Iliev
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Saint Marina, Varna, BGR
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kühnel TS, Hosemann WG, Weber R. [Postoperative treatment following paranasal sinus surgery]. HNO 2021; 69:517-528. [PMID: 33942126 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-021-01057-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative care is a crucial aspect for the success of paranasal sinus interventions. Basic procedures include saline nasal wash, which should be started on the first postoperative day, topical steroids, and antibiotics in cases of infection. Medical treatment involves aspiration of secretion in the inferior meatus during the first week. Removal of scabs in the surgical field should be carried out under endoscopic control beginning at the second week. Intervals are scheduled individually. Occlusion of the nose for the time of epithelium regeneration provides a moist space in the ethmoid, which improves wound healing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas S Kühnel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| | - Werner G Hosemann
- Fachbereich HNO, Helios Hanseklinikum Stralsund, Große Parower Straße 47, 18435, Stralsund, Deutschland
| | - Rainer Weber
- HNO-Klinik, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Moltkestraße 90, 76133, Karlsruhe, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vlastarakos PV, Iacovou E, Fetta M, Tapis M, Nikolopoulos TP. How effective is postoperative packing in FESS patients? A critical analysis of published interventional studies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 273:4061-4071. [PMID: 26708011 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3863-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The present study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of absorbable packing alone, non-absorbable packing alone, and absorbable versus non-absorbable packing in the postoperative care of FESS patients, regarding bleeding control, adhesion formation, wound healing, and overall patient comfort. Systematic literature review in Medline and other database sources until July 2013, and critical analysis of pooled data were conducted. Blinded prospective randomized control trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies were included in study selection. The total number of analyzed studies was 19. Placing packs in the middle meatus after endoscopic procedures does not seem to be harmful for postoperative patient care. Regarding the postoperative bleeding rate, absorbable packing is not superior to no postoperative packing (strength of recommendation A). Comparing absorbable to non-absorbable packing, the former one seems slightly more effective than the latter in the aforementioned domain (strength of recommendation C). Absorbable packing was also found more effective than non-absorbable packing as a means of reducing the postoperative adhesion rate (strength of recommendation B), and more effective in comparison with not placing any packing material at all (strength of recommendation C). Non-absorbable packing also proves more effective than no postoperative packing in preventing the appearance of such adhesions (strength of recommendation A). Absorbable packing is also more comfortable compared to non-absorbable materials (strength of recommendation A), or no postoperative packing in FESS patients (strength of recommendation B). The comparative analysis between the different packing modalities performed in the present study may help surgeons design a more individualized postoperative patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros V Vlastarakos
- ENT Department, MITERA Infirmary, 6 Erythrou Stavrou Street, 15123, Marousi, Athens, Greece. .,, 58 Laskaridou Street, 17676, Kallithea, Athens, Greece.
| | - Emily Iacovou
- ENT Department, General Hospital of Larnaca, Larnaca, Cyprus
| | | | - Marios Tapis
- ENT Department, General Hospital of Larnaca, Larnaca, Cyprus
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery is the standard procedure for surgery of most paranasal sinus diseases. Appropriate frame conditions provided, the respective procedures are safe and successful. These prerequisites encompass appropriate technical equipment, anatomical oriented surgical technique, proper patient selection, and individually adapted extent of surgery. The range of endonasal sinus operations has dramatically increased during the last 20 years and reaches from partial uncinectomy to pansinus surgery with extended surgery of the frontal (Draf type III), maxillary (grade 3-4, medial maxillectomy, prelacrimal approach) and sphenoid sinus. In addition there are operations outside and beyond the paranasal sinuses. The development of surgical technique is still constantly evolving. This article gives a comprehensive review on the most recent state of the art in endoscopic sinus surgery according to the literature with the following aspects: principles and fundamentals, surgical techniques, indications, outcome, postoperative care, nasal packing and stents, technical equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer K. Weber
- Division of Paranasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery, Traumatology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Municipal Hospital of Karlsruhe, Germany
- I-Sinus International Sinus Institute, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Werner Hosemann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gouteva I, Shah-Hosseini K, Meiser P. Clinical efficacy of a spray containing hyaluronic Acid and dexpanthenol after surgery in the nasal cavity (septoplasty, simple ethmoid sinus surgery, and turbinate surgery). J Allergy (Cairo) 2014; 2014:635490. [PMID: 25104962 DOI: 10.1155/2014/635490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 06/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. This prospective, controlled, parallel-group observational study investigated the efficacy of a spray containing hyaluronic acid and dexpanthenol to optimise regular treatment after nasal cavity surgery in 49 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Methods. The control group received standard therapy. Mucosal regeneration was determined using rhinoscopy sum score (RSS). Pre- and postoperative nasal patency was tested using anterior rhinomanometry. The participants were questioned about their symptoms. Results. Regarding all RSS parameters (dryness, dried nasal mucus, fibrin deposition, and obstruction), mucosal regeneration achieved good final results in both groups, tending to a better improvement through the spray application, without statistically significant differences during the whole assessment period, the mean values being 7.04, 5.00, 3.66, and 3.00 (intervention group) and 7.09, 5.14, 4.36, and 3.33 (control group). No statistically significant benefit was identified for nasal breathing, foreign body sensation, and average rhinomanometric volume flow, which improved by 12.31% (control group) and 11.24% (nasal spray group). Conclusion. The investigational product may have additional benefit on postoperative mucosal regeneration compared to standard cleaning procedures alone. However, no statistically significant advantage could be observed in this observational study. Double-blind, controlled studies with larger populations will be necessary to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment modality.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Nasal packs are indispensable in ENT practice. This study reviews current indications, effectiveness and risks of nasal packs and stents. In endoscopic surgery, nasal packs should always have smooth surfaces to minimize mucosal damage, improve wound healing and increase patient comfort. Functional endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery allows the use of modern nasal packs, since pressure is no longer required. So called hemostatic/resorbable materials are a first step in this direction. However, they may lead to adhesions and foreign body reactions in mucosal membranes. Simple occlusion is an effective method for creating a moist milieu for improved wound healing and avoiding dryness. Stenting of the frontal sinus is recommended if surgery fails to produce a wide, physiologically shaped drainage path that is sufficiently covered by intact tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer K Weber
- Sektion Nasennebenhöhlen- und Schädelbasischirurgie, Traumatologie, HNO-Klinik, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Germany
| |
Collapse
|