Oxygenierung während Ein-Lungen-Ventilation: Ein Vergleich von FiO2 0,5 und CPAP auf der nichtventilierten Lunge vs. FiO2 1,0

Protecting the non-operative lobe/s of the operative lung can reduce the pneumonia incidence after thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomised controlled trial

Lung isolation usually refers to the isolation of the operative from the non-operative lung without isolating the non-operative lobe(s) of the operative lung. We aimed to evaluate whether protecting the non-operative lobe of the operative lung using a double-bronchial blocker (DBB) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) could reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia. Eighty patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 40 each): the DBB with CPAP (Group DBB) and routine bronchial blocker (Group BB) groups. In Group DBB, a 7-Fr BB was placed in the middle bronchus of the right lung for right lung surgery and in the inferior lobar bronchus of the left lung for left lung surgery. Further, a 9-Fr BB was placed in the main bronchus of the operative lung. In Group BB, routine BB placement was performed on the main bronchus on the surgical side. The primary endpoint was the postoperative pneumonia incidence. Compared with Group BB, Group DBB had a significantly lower postoperative pneumonia incidence in the operative (27.5% vs 5%, P = 0.013) and non-operative lung (40% vs 15%) on postoperative day 1. Compared with routine BB use for thoracoscopic lobectomy, using the DBB technique to isolate the operative lobe from the non-operative lobe(s) of the operative lung and providing CPAP to the non-operative lobe(s) through a BB can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the operative and non-operative lungs.

Clinical guide to perioperative management for videothoracoscopy lung resection (Section of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Anesthesia, SEDAR; Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery, SECT; Spanish Society of Physiotherapy)

The introduction of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) techniques has led to a new approach in thoracic surgery. VATS is performed by inserting a thoracoscope through a small incisions in the chest wall, thus maximizing the preservation of muscle and tissue. Because of its low rate of morbidity and mortality, VATS is currently the technique of choice in most thoracic procedures. Lung resection by VATS reduces prolonged air leaks, arrhythmia, pneumonia, postoperative pain and inflammatory markers. This reduction in postoperative complications shortens hospital length of stay, and is particularly beneficial in high-risk patients with low tolerance to thoracotomy. Compared with conventional thoracotomy, the oncological results of VATS surgery are similar or even superior to those of open surgery. This aim of this multidisciplinary position statement produced by the thoracic surgery working group of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT), and the Spanish Association of Physiotherapy (AEF) is to standardize and disseminate a series of perioperative anaesthesia management guidelines for patients undergoing VATS lung resection surgery. Each recommendation is based on an in-depth review of the available literature by the authors. In this document, the care of patients undergoing VATS surgery is organized in sections, starting with the surgical approach, and followed by the three pillars of anaesthesia management: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative anaesthesia.

Effects of one-lung flooding on porcine haemodynamics and gas exchange

Background and aim: We established a porcine model of one-lung flooding (OLF) that can be used for research on the use of ultrasound for lung tumour detection, ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy, and tumour ablation. However, OLF requires one-lung ventilation (OLV) and eliminates the recruitment strategies of the nonventilated lung. During thoracic surgery, OLV alone can be associated with hypoxia, hypercapnia, and right ventricular overload. Here, we examined whether OLF influences haemodynamics and gas exchange indices during and after OLV/OLF compared with OLV/apnoea and two-lung ventilation (TLV) following deflooding. Methods: Fourteen pigs were included in this study: five were allocated to the control group (CO) and nine were assigned to the OLF group (OLF). Assessments of haemodynamics, gas exchange, and lung sonography were performed after baseline measurements, during OLV/apnoea, OLV/OLF, and after deflooding and TLV. The volume of extravascular lung water was also measured. Results: OLF induced no significant deterioration of oxygenation or ventilation during OLF or after deflooding and TLV. Color-coded duplex sonography of the pulmonary artery in the flooded lung demonstrated an oscillating flow that corresponded to intrapulmonary circulatory arrest. After flooding of the nonventilated lung, the partial pressure of O₂ in the arterial blood increased and the shunt fraction decreased significantly compared to OLV/apnoea conditions. After deflooding and TLV, haemodynamics and gas exchange indices showed no differences compared to the CO group and baseline values, respectively. Conclusions: OLF is safe to use during acute animal experimentation. No clinically relevant deterioration of haemodynamics or gas exchange occurred during or after OLF. Due to the circulatory arrest in the flooded lung, the right-to-left shunt volume in the nonventilated lung was minimized. Survival experiments are necessary to further assess the utility of this method.

Can apneic oxygen insufflation become a novel lung protective ventilation strategy? A randomized, controlled, blinded, single center clinical trial

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether a AOI strategy on non-ventilated lung could reduce the regional and systemic proinflammatory cytokine and oxidative stress response associated with esophagectomy, and to evaluate whether AOI can be used as a novel lung protective ventilation strategy. Its impact on oxygenation after OLV, surfactant protein A, B, C (SP-A, B, C), postoperative hospital stay and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) was also evaluated.

Methods

Fifty-four adults (ASA II-III) undergoing esophagectomy with OLV were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: control group (group C) and treated group (group T). Group C was treated with traditional OLV mode,while group T was given AOI of 5 L/min oxygen on the non-ventilated lung immediately at the beginning of OLV. Arterial blood gas was analyzed before and after OLV. A bronchoalveolar lavage(BAL) was performed after OLV on the non-ventilated lung. Proinflammatory cytokine, oxidative stress markers(TNF-α, NF-κB,sICAM-1,IL-6,IL-10,SOD,MDA) and SP-A, B, C were analyzed in serum and BALF as the primary endpoint.The clinical outcome determined by PPCs was assessed as the secondary endpoint.

Results

Patients with AOI had better oxygenation in the recovery period, oxygenation index(OI) (394[367–426] and 478[440–497]mmHg, respectively) of group T at T₂ and T₃ were significantly higher than those (332[206–434] and 437[331–512]mmHg, respectively) of group C. OLV resulted in an increase in the measured inflammatory markers in both groups, however, the increase of inflammatory markers upon OLV in the group C was significantly higher than those of group T. OLV resulted in an increase in the measured SP-A, B, C in serum of both groups. However, the levels of SP-A, B, C of group T were lower than those of group C in serum after OLV, and the results in BALF were the opposite. The BALF levels of SOD(23.88[14.70–33.93]U/ml) of group T were higher than those(15.99[10.33–24.16] U/ml) of group C, while the levels of MDA in both serum and BALF of group T(8.60[4.14–9.85] and 1.88[1.33–3.08]nmol/ml, respectively) were all lower than those of group C (11.10[6.57–13.75] and 1.280[1.01–1.83]nmol/ml) after OLV. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of PPCs.

Conclusion

AOI on non-ventilated lung during OLV can improve the oxygenation function after OLV, relieve the inflammatory and oxidative stress response in the systemic and non-ventilated lung after OLV associated with esophagectomy.

Trial registration

ChiCTR-IOR-17011037. Registered on 31 March 2017.

Efficiency and Efficacy of Two Techniques of Preoxygenation during Modified Rapid Sequence Intubation

Background:

Apneic mass movement of oxygen by applying continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is possible only when the airway is kept patent which helps to reduce the rate of desaturation.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to check the efficiency of preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation by assessing the drop in partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO₂) during apnea with and without keeping an oropharyngeal airway to maintain the patency of airway.

Settings and Design:

This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty patients undergoing robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgeries requiring modified rapid sequence intubation were recruited for the study. In Group A, CPAP was not applied during preoxygenation and oropharyngeal airway was not used, but oxygen was administered at 5 L/min during the apnea. In Group B, CPAP of 5 cmH₂O was maintained during preoxygenation and after induction an oropharyngeal airway was inserted. Patients in both the groups were induced and paralyzed following standardized anesthesia protocol.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Chi-square test, independent t-test, and ANCOVA were used as applicable.

Results:

Group B showed significantly higher mean PaO₂ levels after preoxygenation (525.3 ± 42.5 vs. 500.8 ± 51) and at 90 s of apnea (494.8 ± 42.6 vs. 368.6 ± 98.4) as compared to Group A. The fall in PaO₂ was significantly lower in Group B. The rise in partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide was comparable in both groups.

Conclusion:

Preoxygenation with CPAP of 5 cmH₂O followed by apneic oxygenation with CPAP keeping the airway patent with an oropharyngeal airway results in significantly higher PaO₂ after preoxygenation and slower reduction in PaO₂ during apnea.

Effects of Preoxygenation with Tidal Volume Breathing Followed by Apneic Oxygenation with and without Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Duration of Safe Apnea Time and Arterial Blood Gases

Background:

Application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) helps to recruit collapsed areas of the lung, which improves the oxygen reserve.

Aim of the Study:

To compare the time to desaturate to 90% during apnea following preoxygenation and apneic ventilation with tidal volume breathing for 3 min with and without the application of CPAP.

Settings and Design:

This prospective randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care institution.

Subjects and Methods:

Twenty adult surgical patients were allocated into two groups. Group C patients were preoxygenated with 100% oxygen with CPAP of 20 cm H₂O for 3 min. Group P patients were preoxygenated for 3 min without CPAP. In Group C, apneic oxygenation was initiated following induction and neuromuscular blockade with CPAP of 20 cm H₂O. In Group P, no CPAP was applied. The study was terminated when the patient desaturated to 90%.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Chi-square test and Mann–Whitney test.

Results:

Group C had a significantly longer apnea time as compared to Group P (816.00 ± 30.98 vs. 348.00 ± 122.64 s). Three patients in Group P desaturated to <90% by 3 min and the remaining soon after 6 min. No patient in Group C desaturated till 12 min of apnea. PaO₂ was significantly higher in Group C at 3 and 6 min of apnea. At 3 and 6 min, Group P had significantly lower saturation as compared to Group C.

Conclusion:

Preoxygenation with CPAP significantly delayed desaturation during apnea with significantly higher arterial partial pressure of oxygen as compared to preoxygenation without CPAP.

Effects of Nondependent Lung Ventilation With Continuous Positive-Pressure Ventilation and High-Frequency Positive-Pressure Ventilation on Right-Ventricular Function During 1-Lung Ventilation

Background. The application of volume-controlled high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) to the nondependent lung (NL) may have comparable effects to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the right ventricular (RV) function, oxygenation, and surgical conditions during one lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracotomy. Methods. After local ethics committee approval and informed consent, 75 patients scheduled for elective thoracotomy using OLV were randomly allocated to receive nondependent lung either CPAP 2 (CPAP2; n=25) or 5 (CPAP5; n=25) cm H2O pressure setting of the device or HFPPV using VT 3 mL-1, I: E ratio <0.3 and R.R 60/min (HFPPV; n=25), followed 15 min of OLV. Intraoperative changes in RV ejection fraction (REF), end-diastolic volume (RVEDVI) and stroke work (RVSWI), stroke volume (SVI), oxygen delivery (DO2), and uptake (VO2) indices and shunt fraction (Qs: Qt) were recorded without any surgical manipulation of the lung. Results. The application of NL-HFPPV resulted in improved REF by 33%, SVI and DO2 (P < 0.01) and reduced RVEDVI, RVSWI, PVRI, oxygen uptake, and shunt fraction by 24.8% (P < 0.01) than in the NL-CPAP groups. Conclusion. We concluded that the use of NL-HFPPV is a feasible option and offers improved RV function and oxygenation during OLV for open thoracotomy.

Update on one-lung ventilation: the use of continuous positive airway pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation--clinical application

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence for and the clinical use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for the management of one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. CPAP and PEEP use are important as we are increasingly challenged with patients with less respiratory reserve and greater comorbidity leading to the need for greater clinical management and more interventions during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery to prevent perioperative complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The focus of this article is on the most recent literature with selected classic articles. First, the supportive literature and rationale for application of PEEP, CPAP or both during thoracic surgery are reviewed, relative to the threats of hypoxemia, hyperoxia and mechanical lung injury. The second part of the article focuses on the clinical use of PEEP and CPAP. Algorithms for the application of CPAP and PEEP to patients both at risk and not at risk of acute lung injury are presented.

SUMMARY

CPAP and PEEP are useful not only to treat hypoxia and atelectasis as the consequence of one-lung ventilation, perhaps more importantly, also as part of a protective lung-ventilation strategy to ameliorate mechanical stress and prevent acute lung injury.

Appropriate Ventilatory Settings for Thoracic Surgery: Intraoperative and Postoperative

Mechanical ventilation of patients undergoing thoracic surgery is often challenging. These patients frequently have significant underlying comorbidities, including cardiopulmonary disease, and often must undergo 1-lung ventilation. Perioperative respiratory complications are common and are multifactorial in etiology. Increasing evidence suggests that mechanical ventilation is associated with, and may even cause, lung damage in both sick and healthy patients. Gas exchange to provide acceptable end-organ oxygenation remains a primary goal but so too is minimization of risks for acute lung injury. Every ventilator strategy is associated with potential beneficial and adverse side effects. Understanding the impact of various ventilation strategies allows clinicians to provide optimal care for patients.