Vascular Anastomosing by Gluing - an Experimental Study

Experimental Devices Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis of the Aorta: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To minimize complications associated with the construction of the hand-sewn aortic anastomosis, alternative experimental methods have been pursued. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of experimental anastomotic devices in relation to time and point of rupture of the anastomosis in comparison to the conventional technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases by two independent authors. Our exclusion criteria referred to studies reporting results solely from end-to-side anastomosis, results on vessels other than the aorta, studies that did not involve animal experiments, and non-English publications. The last search date was January 1, 2020.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 22 studies with 34 anastomosis samples and a total of 316 animals. The pooled mean automated anastomosis time was 10.38 min, and the mean point of rupture was 32.7 N. In the subgroup analysis of automated anastomosis time by device category, the anastomotic stenting technique reported significantly lower anastomosis time but also showed significantly lower point of rupture. Comparing the efficacy of experimental devices and the hand-sewn technique, our pooled analysis showed that automated devices significantly decrease the time needed to perform the anastomosis (weighted mean difference -7.24 min). On the other hand, the automated anastomosis is also associated with decreased tensile strength (weighted mean difference -20.68 N).

CONCLUSIONS

Although experimental devices seem to offer a faster anastomosis, they lack endurance when compared with the hand-sewn technique. Further research is needed for the development of an "ideal" anastomotic technique.

Α systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of aortic anastomotic devices

OBJECTIVE

One of the factors contributing to complications related to open repair of the aorta is the construction of a hand-sewn anastomosis. Aortic anastomotic devices (AADs), such as the intraluminal ringed graft (IRG), and the anastomotic stenting technique have been developed to perform a sutureless and less complicated anastomosis. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature reporting clinical use of AADs and aimed to assess, primarily, the effect of each device on 30-day overall and operation-related mortality and aortic cross-clamping time and, secondarily, the rate of successful two-sided application of the IRG device and the operation-related morbidity for each device.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library by two independent authors. Our exclusion criteria included studies incorporating fewer than three patients and studies reporting results solely from animals or in vitro testing, results solely from end-to-side anastomosis, and results solely from endarterectomy procedures. The last search date was February 1, 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies were identified that reported outcomes for the use of three different device types: IRG, anastomotic stenting technique, and surgical staplers. The last two types were classified together as the non-IRG group. The meta-analysis included 27 studies with 50 cohorts incorporating 1260 patients. The median age of the incorporated patients was 61.4 years (range, 51-73 years), and 68.9% were male. The operations were performed for the treatment of acute aortic dissection in 82.3%. The pooled overall 30-day mortality rate varied by device type; IRG devices had a mean rate of all-cause mortality of 9.71%, whereas non-IRG devices were associated with a significantly (I² = 15.78%; P for Cochrane Q test < .19) lower rate of death (1.47%). The pooled mean aortic cross-clamping time was 35.83 minutes. Metaregression showed that the performance of two-sided anastomosis with the IRG device significantly decreased the aortic cross-clamping time. However, a successful two-sided ringed anastomosis was performed in approximately half of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into account that the majority of operations were performed for the treatment of acute aortic dissection, AADs had a relatively low rate of 30-day mortality. Despite the observed heterogeneity in study protocols and the small sample size in the non-IRG group, the non-IRG group presented with the lowest 30-day mortality rate. Specific device-related complications between the different device types need further investigation.

[Techniques of anastomoses issue from vascular surgery and apply to maxillofacial microsurgery]

Vascular surgeons use an anastomosis technique that has proven its efficiency for a long time. This technique consists in an anastomosis with spatulated ended vessels designed with opposite obliquity. This anastomosis is closed by a continuous suture. Authors expose the results of this technique applied to microvascular surgery in facial reconstruction.

BioWeld® Tube and surgical glue for experimental sutureless venous microanastomosis

Background

The medial wall of mammalian veins is generally thin and fragile compared with the thick muscle seen in arteries. This makes venous microanastomoses time consuming and challenging. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of using the BioWeld® Tube in conjunction with a surgical glue (butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) in performing sutureless venous microanastomoses.

Methods

The feasibility and effectiveness of microvascular anastomoses in a rabbit jugular vein model were investigated in six animals, using the BioWeld® Tube in conjunction with butyl-2-cyanoacrylate surgical glue. Patency and tissue repair mechanisms at the anastomotic site were assessed 1 week after the procedure.

Results

All anastomoses remained patent at 1 week. Muscle necrosis occurred only in areas where the tissue was subject to the fold-and-bond procedure.

Conclusion

The study showed the feasibility and short-term effectiveness of the BioWeld® Tube in facilitating venous anastomoses.

Surgical adhesive increases burst pressure and seals leaks in stapled gastrojejunostomy

BACKGROUND

Leakage from a gastrointestinal anastomosis in bariatric surgery is a catastrophic complication and is the second-most preventable cause of death after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Several adjuncts for staple line reinforcement have been investigated to reduce the incidence of this complication. The purpose of our study was to determine whether a commercially available tissue sealant (BioGlue) could reinforce a stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis and whether it could seal an artificially created anastomotic leak.

METHODS

Circular-stapled gastrojejunostomies were performed on freshly explanted porcine stomach and intestine. Experiment 1 consisted of 10 control nonreinforced gastrojejunostomies and 10 gastrojejunostomies reinforced with BioGlue. The staple lines were submerged in saline and exposed to increased pressure using constant-rate infusion of air. The burst pressures were recorded at the point of visible leakage from the anastomosis. In experiment 2, a small defect was created in 10 gastrojejunostomies. The burst pressures were recorded before and after application of BioGlue to the anastomosis. The data were analyzed using the 2-tailed paired t test.

RESULTS

In experiment 1, the burst pressure was significantly increased in the reinforced gastrojejunostomies, from 27.4 ± 8.4 mm Hg to 59.1 ± 19.2 mm Hg (P <.001). In experiment 2, the defective gastrojejunostomies had an average burst pressure of 1.2 ± 0.8 mm Hg. After application of BioGlue, the burst pressure increased to 42.8 ± 15.9 mm Hg (P <.001).

CONCLUSION

These ex vivo findings suggest that the surgical adhesive BioGlue can reinforce both intact and defective stapled gastrojejunal anastomoses. Additional in vivo study is warranted to determine whether BioGlue can prevent or help seal gastrojejunal leaks.

Nerve and Conduction Tissue Injury Caused by Contact with BioGlue

BACKGROUND

BioGlue-a surgical adhesive composed of bovine albumin and glutaraldehyde-is commonly used in cardiovascular operations. The objectives of this study were to determine whether BioGlue injures nerves and cardiac conduction tissues, and whether a water-soluble gel barrier protects against such injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 18 pigs, diaphragmatic excursion during direct phrenic nerve stimulation was measured at baseline and at 3 and 30 min after nerve exposure to albumin (n = 3), glutaraldehyde (n = 3), BioGlue (n = 6), or water-soluble gel followed by BioGlue (n = 6). Additionally, BioGlue was applied to the cavoatrial junction overlying the sinoatrial node (SAN), either alone (n = 12) or after application of gel (n = 6).

RESULTS

Mean diaphragmatic excursions in the BioGlue and glutaraldehyde groups were lower at 3 min and 30 min than in the albumin group (P < 0.05). Mean excursions in the gel group were similar to those of the albumin group (P = 0.9). Five BioGlue pigs (83%) and one gel pig (17%) had diaphragmatic paralysis by 30 min (P < 0.05 and P = 0.3 versus albumin, respectively). Coagulation necrosis extended into the myocardium at the cavoatrial junction in all 12 BioGlue pigs but only two gel pigs (33%, P < 0.01). Two BioGlue pigs (17%), but no gel pigs, had focal SAN degeneration and persistent bradycardia (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

BioGlue causes acute nerve injury and myocardial necrosis that can lead to SAN damage. A water-soluble gel barrier is protective.