[Cup placement in hip replacement surgery -- A comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty -- a multi-center study]

Early postoperative clinical recovery of robotic arm-assisted vs. image-based navigated Total hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study compared the early clinical recovery of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using computer navigation systems (nTHA) and robotic arm-assisted THA (rTHA).

METHODS

Thirty prospective subjects who underwent rTHA were clinically compared to 30 subjects who underwent nTHA. Clinical data (surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, pain severity, number of days to independent walking, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) at discharge), and radiographic parameters (inclination and anteversion angles) were statistically compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Follow-up times were 24.3 ± 6.0 and 27.0 ± 7.0 days in the rTHA and nTHA groups, respectively. The surgical time (135.1 ± 13.9 min vs. 146.2 ± 12.8 min, p = 0.002), number of days to independent walking (7.2 ± 2.0 vs. 11.5 ± 3.0 days, p < 0.001), and postoperative pain using a numeric rating scale on postoperative days 7, 10,, and 14 (1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 2.2 ± 1.2, p = 0.005; 1.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.002; 0.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.1 ± 0.9, p < 0.001; respectively) were significantly reduced in the rTHA group compared to the nTHA group. The rTHA group showed a significantly higher postoperative HHS compared to the nTHA group (85.3 ± .3.2 vs. 81.0 ± 8.5, p = 0.014). No statistically significant difference was observed in radiographic parameters between the groups; however, the incidence of intraoperative target angle changes was significantly lower in the rTHA group than in the nTHA group (0/30 subjects [0%] vs. 11/30 subjects [36.7%], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The surgical time, postoperative pain, and number of days to independent walking were significantly shorter, and the HHS at discharge was significantly higher in the rTHA group than in the nTHA group. Thus, compared to the nTHA group, the rTHA group showed improved early clinical recovery.

Good vs Poor Results After Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis Method Using Implant and Anatomic Parameters With the EOS Imaging System

BACKGROUND

Existing imaging techniques and single-parameter analyses, in nonfunctional positions, fail to detect the differences between patients with good vs poor results after total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The present study developed an analysis method using the EOS full-body, low-dose, biplanar, weightbearing imaging system to compare good vs poor patients after total hip arthroplasty and to report on our preliminary experiences (17 good, 18 poor).

RESULTS

All revision cases were found to have at least 4 high or low implant or anatomic parameters relative to the good group. These included acetabular cup orientation, sagittal pelvic tilt, sacral slope, femoral offset, and neck-shaft angle. Acetabular cup orientation differed significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

With the EOS system, a large cohort can be studied relatively quickly and at low dose, which could lead to patient-specific guidelines.

Anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip replacement: five-year survivorship and learning curve

Opponents associate minimally invasive total hip replacement (THR) with additional risks, potentially resulting in increased implant failure rates. The purpose was to document complications, quality of implant positioning and five-year survivorship of THR using the AMIS approach and to test the hypothesis that eventual high complication and revision rates would be limited to an early series and be avoided by junior surgeons who get trained by a senior surgeon. A consecutive series of 150 primary THR implanted during the introduction of the AMIS technique in the department was retrospectively analysed for complications, implant positioning and implant survival after a minimum of five years. Survivorship curves of implants were compared between different surgeons and time periods. Due to implant revision for any reason the five-year survival rate was 94.6%, 78.9% for the first 20 and 96.8% for the following 130 AMIS procedures (p = 0.001). The hazard ratio for implant failure was 0.979 indicating a risk reduction of 2% every further case. The five-year implant survivorship of those procedures performed by two junior surgeons was 97.7%. We conclude that adoption of AMIS temporarily exposed patients to a higher risk of implant revisions, which normalised after the first 20 cases and that experience from a single surgeon's learning curve could effectively be taught to junior surgeons.

A multiplanar radiography method for assessing cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty

Correct orientation of the acetabular cup considering patient-specific functional pelvic angles is an important factor for improving outcomes and avoiding complications after total hip arthroplasty. This study introduces a new, noninvasive radiographic tool for accurately determining a patient's specific pelvic tilt angle preoperatively, as well as accurately assessing acetabular cup orientation with respect to bony landmarks intraoperatively and postoperatively. The method was validated by imaging a bone replica model of the pelvis with implanted hip components, in comparison to digitized references, and verified with a cadaveric specimen. Pelvic tilt was measured with an accuracy of 0.1 deg and SD of 0.4 deg. Operative cup inclination and anteversion showed accuracies of 0.6 deg and 2.5 deg, with SD of 0.4 deg and 0.6 deg, respectively; these could be improved further by subtracting systematic bias. The method shows accuracy advantages over existing radiographic and fluoroscopic methods and exposes the subjects to a lower radiation dose compared to the similar computed tomography methods. These results suggest that the proposed method is feasible for assessing cup placement with reference to the functional and anatomical references. Furthermore, the ability to reference the same bony landmarks preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively has important research and clinical advantages.

Pelvic tilt is minimally changed by total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

While surgical navigation offers the opportunity to accurately place an acetabular component, questions remain as to the best goal for acetabular component positioning in individual patients. Overall functional orientation of the pelvis after surgery is one of the most important variables for the surgeon to consider when determining the proper goal for acetabular component orientation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We measured the variation in pelvic tilt in 30 patients before THA and the effect of THA on pelvic tilt in the same patients more than a year after THA.

METHODS

Each patient had a CT study for CT-based surgical navigation and standing and supine radiographs before and after surgery. Pelvic tilt was calculated for each of the radiographs using a novel and validated two-dimensional/three-dimensional matching technique.

RESULTS

Mean supine pelvic tilt changed less than 2°, from 4.4° ± 6.4° (range, -7.7° to 20.8°) before THA to 6.3° ± 6.6° (range, -5.7° to 19.6°) after THA. Mean standing pelvic tilt changed less than 1°, from 1.5° ± 7.2° (range, -13.1° to 12.8°) before THA to 2.0° ± 8.3° (range, -12.3° to 16.8°) after THA. Preoperative pelvic tilt correlated with postoperative tilt in both the supine (r(2) = 0.75) and standing (r(2) = 0.87) positions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, pelvic tilt had a small and predictable change after surgery. However, intersubject variability of pelvic tilt was high, suggesting preoperative pelvic tilt should be considered when determining desired acetabular component positioning on a patient-specific basis.

A replication of the study 'Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review'

Objective

To assess the significance of adverse events after spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) by replicating and critically reviewing a paper commonly cited when reviewing adverse events of SMT as reported by Ernst (J Roy Soc Med 100:330–338, 2007).

Method

Replication of a 2007 Ernst paper to compare the details recorded in this paper to the original source material. Specific items that were assessed included the time lapse between treatment and the adverse event, and the recording of other significant risk factors such as diabetes, hyperhomocysteinemia, use of oral contraceptive pill, any history of hypertension, atherosclerosis and migraine.

Results

The review of the 32 papers discussed by Ernst found numerous errors or inconsistencies from the original case reports and case series. These errors included alteration of the age or sex of the patient, and omission or misrepresentation of the long term response of the patient to the adverse event. Other errors included incorrectly assigning spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) as chiropractic treatment when it had been reported in the original paper as delivered by a non-chiropractic provider (e.g. Physician).

The original case reports often omitted to record the time lapse between treatment and the adverse event, and other significant clinical or risk factors. The country of origin of the original paper was also overlooked, which is significant as chiropractic is not legislated in many countries. In 21 of the cases reported by Ernst to be chiropractic treatment, 11 were from countries where chiropractic is not legislated.

Conclusion

The number of errors or omissions in the 2007 Ernst paper, reduce the validity of the study and the reported conclusions. The omissions of potential risk factors and the timeline between the adverse event and SMT could be significant confounding factors. Greater care is also needed to distinguish between chiropractors and other health practitioners when reviewing the application of SMT and related adverse effects.

Improving cup positioning using a mechanical navigation instrument

BACKGROUND

Although surgical navigation reduces the rate of malpositioned acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty (THA), its use has not been widely adopted. As a result of our perceived need for simple and efficient methods of navigation, we developed a mechanical navigation device for acetabular cup orientation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We assessed accuracy of cup orientation (mean error of cup inclination and anteversion) of a novel mechanical navigation device, percentage of outliers, length of operation, and compared the results with a series of CT-based computer-assisted THAs.

METHODS

Cup orientation of 70 THAs performed using the mechanical navigation device was compared with a historical control group of 146 THAs performed using CT-based computer navigation. Postoperative cup orientation was measured using a validated two-dimensional/three-dimensional matching method. An outlier was defined outside a range of ± 10° from the planned inclination and/or anteversion.

RESULTS

Using the mechanical navigation device, we observed a decrease in the errors of inclination (1.3° ± 3.4° [range, -6.6° to 8.2°] versus 3.5° ± 4.2° [-12.7° to 6.9°]), errors of anteversion (1.0° ± 4.1° [-8.8° to 9.5°] versus 3.0° ± 5.8° [-11.8° to 19.6°]), percentages of outliers (0% versus 9.6%), and length of operation (112 ± 22 [78-184] minutes versus 132 ± 18 [90-197] minutes) compared with CT-based navigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CT-based surgical navigation, navigation of acetabular cup orientation using a mechanical device can be performed in less time, lower mean errors, and minimal equipment.

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position

In a prospective and randomised clinical study, we implanted acetabular cups either by means of an image-free computer-navigation system (navigated group, n = 32) or by free-hand technique (freehand group n = 32, two drop-outs). Total hip replacement was conducted in the lateral position and through a minimally invasive anterior approach (MicroHip). The position of the component was determined postoperatively on CT scans of the pelvis using CT-planning software. We found an average inclination of 42.3° (range 32.7-50.6°; SD ± 3.8°) and an average anteversion of 24.5° (range 12.0-33.3°; SD ± 6.0°) in the computer-assisted study group and an average inclination of 37.9° (range 25.6-50.2°; SD ± 6.3°) and an average anteversion of 23.8° (range 5.6-46.9°; SD ± 10.1°) in the freehand group. The higher precision of computer navigation was indicated by the lower standard deviations. For both measurements we found a significant heterogeneity of variances (p < 0.05, Levene's test). The mean difference between the cup inclination/anteversion values displayed by computer navigation and the true cup position (CT control) was 0.37° (SD 3.26) and -5.61° (SD 6.48), respectively. We found a bias (underestimation) with regard to anteversion determined by the imageless computer navigation system. A bias for inclination was not found. Registration of the landmarks of the anterior pelvic plane in lateral position with undraped percutaneous methods leads to an error in cup anteversion, but not to an error in cup inclination. The bias we found is consistent with a correct registration of the anterosuperior iliac spine (ASIS) and with a registration of the symphysis 1 cm above the bone, corresponding to the less compressible overlying soft tissue in this region. There was no significant correlation between the bias and the thickness of soft tissue above the pubic tubercles. We suggest use of a percutaneous registration of ASIS and an invasive registration above the pubic tubercles when computer-assisted navigation is performed in minimally invasive THR in a lateral position.

Accuracy and potential pitfalls of fluoroscopy-guided acetabular cup placement

Using a total of 30 cadaveric hips, the accuracy of a fluoroscopy-based computer navigation system for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) was investigated and an error analysis was carried out. The accuracy of placing the acetabular component within a predefined safe zone using computer guidance was compared to the precision that could be achieved with a freehand approach. Accurate control measurements of the implanted cup were obtained using fiducial-based matching to a pre-operative CT scan with respect to the anterior pelvic plane. A significantly higher number of cups were placed in the safe zone with the help of the navigation system. The variability of cup placement could be reduced for cup abduction but not substantially for cup version. An error analysis of inaccurate landmark reconstruction revealed that the registration of the mid-pubic point with fluoroscopy was a potential source of error. Keeping this pitfall in mind, fluoroscopy-based navigation in THA is a useful tool for registration of the pelvic coordinate system, particularly those points that cannot be reached by direct pointer digitization with the patient in the lateral decubitus position.

Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Many studies have suggested that navigation-based implantation can improve cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compile the best available evidence, and to overcome potential shortcomings because of small sample sizes in individual studies.

METHODS

The search strategy covered the major medical databases from January 1976 through August 2007, as well as various publishers' databases. The internal validity of individual studies was evaluated independently by 3 reviewers. We used random-effects modeling to obtain mean differences in cup angulation and relative risk (RR) of cup positioning outside Lewinnek's safe zone.

RESULTS

Of 363 citations originally identified, 5 trials of moderate methodology enrolling a total of 400 patients were included in the analysis. Mean cup inclination and anteversion were not statistically significantly different between the conventional groups and the navigated groups. Navigation reduced the variability in cup positioning and the risk of placing the acetabular component beyond the safe zone (RR = 0.21, CI: 0.13-0.32).

INTERPRETATION

Based on the current literature, navigation is a reliable tool to optimize cup placement, and to minimize outliers. However, long-term outcomes and cost utility analyses are needed before conclusive statements can be drawn about the value of routine navigation in THA.

Cup positioning in THA: current status and pitfalls. A systematic evaluation of the literature

The correct determination of cup orientation in THA regarding the intraoperative as well as the postoperative assessment due to the pelvic tilt and rotation with inexact incorporation of the pelvis is uncertain. The anterior pelvic plane (APP) seems to be the most reliable reference frame and computer-assisted navigation systems seem to provide the best tool for correct implantation to date. For the intraoperative assessment of the APP, the exact determination of the bony landmarks is mandatory. For the standard plain radiography, standardized positioning of the patient and approximation of pelvic tilt by a lateral view are mandatory. An additional CT must be carried out for certain indications. More emphasis has to be given to the individuality of pelvic tilt and range of motion.

Safety of chiropractic interventions: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review of reported adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the tolerability and safety of chiropractic procedures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite the increasing popularity of chiropractic, there are few properly designed prospective controlled trials, and there is a disproportionate lack of evaluation of its safety profile. The literature reports multiple neurologic complications of spinal manipulation, some of which are clinically relevant and even life threatening.

METHODS

We performed an electronic search in 2 databases: Pubmed and the Cochrane Library for the years 1966 to 2007. All articles that reported adverse reactions associated with chiropractic were included irrespective of type of design. The outcome measures were the type of adverse events associated or attributed to chiropractic interventions and their frequency.

RESULTS

A total of 376 potential relevant articles were identified, 330 of which were discarded after abstract or complete article analysis. The search identified 46 articles that included data concerning adverse events: 1 randomized controlled trial, 2 case-control studies, 7 prospective studies, 12 surveys, 3 retrospective studies, and 115 case reports. Most of the adverse events reported were benign and transitory, however, there are reports of complications that were life threatening, such as arterial dissection, myelopathy, vertebral disc extrusion, and epidural hematoma. The frequency of adverse events varied between 33% and 60.9%, and the frequency of serious adverse events varied between 5 strokes/100,000 manipulations to 1.46 serious adverse events/10,000,000 manipulations and 2.68 deaths/10,000,000 manipulations.

CONCLUSION

There is no robust data concerning the incidence or prevalence of adverse reactions after chiropractic. Further investigations are urgently needed to assess definite conclusions regarding this issue.

Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study

BACKGROUND

The goal of the current prospective randomised radiological study was to determine the accuracy of conventional and computer-assisted femoral component implantation in surface arthroplasty (SRA).

METHODS

We analysed on standard radiographs the femoral component positions after 30 conventional instrumented (Group 1) and 30 navigated (Group 2) SRA femoral components. We evaluated: varus or valgus orientation, horizontal femoral offset and translation of the component.

RESULTS

The tendency to implant the femoral component in mild valgus position (2.8 degrees in Group 1 compared to 2.1 degrees in Group 2), more distally and ventrally in the femoral neck (in Group 1) and with femoral off-set increase (4.8 mm in Group 1 compared to 3.4 mm in Group 2) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The navigation system enables a more accurate insertion of the femoral component.

Cervicothoracic epidural hematoma after chiropractic spinal manipulation therapy. Case report and review of the literature

A spinal epidural hematoma is an extremely rare complication of cervical spine manipulation therapy (CSMT). The authors present the case of an adult woman, otherwise in good health, who developed Brown-Séquard syndrome after CSMT. Decompressive surgery performed within 8 hours after the onset of symptoms allowed for complete recovery of the patient's preoperative neurological deficit. The unique feature of this case was the magnetic resonance image showing increased signal intensity in the paraspinal musculature consistent with a contusion, which probably formed after SMT. The pertinent literature is also reviewed.

Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography

INTRODUCTION

Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs are routinely used to monitor cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Analysis of planar radiographs leads to a certain degree of measurement error for the cup anteversion (AV). With the current study, we wanted to clarify whether planar radiography can be used for accurate evaluation of the THA position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The postoperative orientation of pelvic implants in 42 patients was analyzed according to five documented mathematical algorithms using planar radiographs. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) pelvis scans were available for all patients. A CT-based navigation system was used to determine AV.

RESULTS

The comparison showed that all five formulas presented substantial variations for the AV angle. Of these, Widmer's algorithm presented the smallest difference compared to the CT. Misinterpretation of postoperative planar radiographs is a common problem in THA.

CONCLUSION

Planar radiographs are too imprecise for exact evaluation of the correct cup AV after THA. CT-based analysis may be necessary if exact values are required.

Measuring anatomical acetabular cup orientation with a new X-ray technique

Proper alignment of the acetabular cup component is one of the most important requisites for a successful long-term outcome in total hip replacement. However, measurement and indication of cup orientation in an anatomical pelvic reference system is very difficult. We propose a new C-arm-based X-ray technique for determining the values for inclination and anteversion of the acetabular cup component. The proposed method is validated by computer simulation and sources of error are evaluated. The method predicts an accuracy of better then 5 degrees for determination of anteversion of the cup.

Inappropriate use of the title 'chiropractor' and term 'chiropractic manipulation' in the peer-reviewed biomedical literature

Background

The misuse of the title 'chiropractor' and term 'chiropractic manipulation', in relation to injury associated with cervical spine manipulation, have previously been reported in the peer-reviewed literature.

The objectives of this study were to -

1) Prospectively monitor the peer-reviewed literature for papers reporting an association between chiropractic, or chiropractic manipulation, and injury;

2) Contact lead authors of papers that report such an association in order to determine the basis upon which the title 'chiropractor' and/or term 'chiropractic manipulation' was used;

3) Document the outcome of submission of letters to the editors of journals wherein the title 'chiropractor', and/or term 'chiropractic manipulation', had been misused and resulted in the over-reporting of chiropractic induced injury.

Methods

One electronic database (PubMed) was monitored prospectively, via monthly PubMed searches, during a 12 month period (June 2003 to May 2004). Once relevant papers were located, they were reviewed. If the qualifications and/or profession of the care provider/s were not apparent, an attempt was made to confirm them via direct e-mail communication with the principal researcher of each respective paper. A letter was then sent to the editor of each involved journal.

Results

A total of twenty four different cases, spread across six separate publications, were located via the monthly PubMed searches. All twenty four cases took place in one of two European countries.

The six publications consisted of four case reports, each containing one patient, one case series, involving twenty relevant cases, and a secondary report that pertained to one of the four case reports. In each of the six publications the authors suggest the care provider was a chiropractor and that each patient received chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine prior to developing symptoms suggestive of traumatic injury.

In two of the four case reports contact with the principal researcher revealed that the care provider was not a chiropractor, as defined by the World Federation of Chiropractic. The authors of the other two case reports did not respond to my communications. In the case series, which involved twenty relevant cases, the principal researcher conceded that the term chiropractor had been inappropriately used and that his case series did not relate to chiropractors who had undergone appropriate formal training. The author of the secondary report, a British Medical Journal editor, conceded that he had misused the title chiropractor. Letters to editors were accepted and published by all four journals to which they were sent. To date one of the four journals has published a correction.

Conclusion

The results of this year-long prospective review suggests that the words 'chiropractor' and 'chiropractic manipulation' are often used inappropriately by European biomedical researchers when reporting apparent associations between cervical spine manipulation and symptoms suggestive of traumatic injury. Furthermore, in those cases reported here, the spurious use of terminology seems to have passed through the peer-review process without correction. Additionally, these findings provide further preliminary evidence, beyond that already provided by Terrett, that the inappropriate use of the title 'chiropractor' and term 'chiropractic manipulation' may be a significant source of over-reporting of the link between the care provided by chiropractors and injury. Finally, editors of peer-reviewed journals were amenable to publishing 'letters to editors', and to a lesser extent 'corrections', when authors had inappropriately used the title 'chiropractor' and/or term 'chiropractic manipulation'.

Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays--a comparison of six parameters

OBJECTIVE

To compare six different parameters described in literature for estimation of pelvic tilt on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph and to create a simple nomogram for tilt correction of prosthetic cup version in total hip arthroplasty.

DESIGN

Simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral pelvic radiographs are taken routinely in our institution and were analyzed prospectively. The different parameters (including three distances and three ratios) were measured and compared to the actual pelvic tilt on the lateral radiograph using simple linear regression analysis.

PATIENTS

One hundred and four consecutive patients (41 men, 63 women with a mean age of 31.7 years, SD 9.2 years, range 15.7-59.1 years) were studied.

RESULTS

The strongest correlation between pelvic tilt and one of the six parameters for both men and women was the distance between the upper border of the symphysis and the sacrococcygeal joint. The correlation coefficient was 0.68 for men (P<0.001) and 0.61 for women (P<0.001). Based on this linear correlation, a nomogram was created that enables fast, tilt-corrected cup version measurements in clinical routine use.

CONCLUSION

This simple method for correcting variations in pelvic tilt on plain radiographs can potentially improve the radiologist's ability to diagnose and interpret malformations of the acetabulum (particularly acetabular retroversion and excessive acetabular overcoverage) and post-operative orientation of the prosthetic acetabulum.

Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty

Pelvic tilt and rotation can drastically affect the apparent cup orientation on conventional anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. It was hypothesized that nonstandardized radiographic cup version and abduction can differ significantly from the corresponding anatomic angles if not measured to the anterior pelvic plane, defined by the pubic tubercles and the anterior superior iliac spine. Differences in preoperative and postoperative pelvic orientation and their influence on radiographic measurements of the two angles were analyzed. Conventional radiographs and preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans of 37 total hip arthroplasties were compared. Calculations were made with the preoperative planning station of a computer navigation system. Significantly smaller values of cup version were seen on nonstandardized radiographs, whereas abduction could be measured reliably when referenced to horizontal pelvic landmarks seen on radiographs. The underlying cause for this difference was the variation of pelvic tilt that ranged 27 degrees (range, -7 degrees -20 degrees). Influence of pelvic tilt on the apparent cup orientation can be seen with simple nomograms. The orientation of the anterior pelvic plane before and after surgery did not differ. We think that version measurement on nonstandardized radiographs without anatomic referencing is highly inaccurate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level II-1 (development of diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients--with universally applied reference "gold" standard). See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.